RFP Responsibility Inquiry AttG.pdf

PDF 195 KB Posted

Attached to
Engaging Impacted Communities in Listening Sessions for the Built Environment Program
Solicitation number
S-34000-00003398
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Attachment G - Responsibility Inquiry related to RFP S-34000-00003398 for the Engaging Impacted Communities in Listening Sessions for the Built Environment Program in the state of Oregon. The RFP is issued by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to select a contractor to collaborate with agency staff, design and facilitate Listening Sessions, lead outreach strategy for engaging Impacted Communities, and assist in developing a proposed work plan. The contract opportunity involves the jurisdictions of Multnomah County and the City of Portland.

The Responsibility Inquiry form requires the offeror to provide information on their financial, material, equipment, facility, and personnel resources and expertise, their past contract performance, any criminal or civil charges, terminated contracts or lawsuits, outstanding judgments or financial distress, and required licenses and certifications. The offeror must also have an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate if employing 50 or more full-time workers and the contract price exceeds $500,000.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

INT RFP S-34000-00003398 – Listening Sessions for the Built Environment Program Att G

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT G - RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY

Agency will determine responsibility of an Offeror prior to award and execution of a Contract. In addition to this form, Agency may notify Offeror of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in an Agency finding of non-responsibility and rejection.

1. Does Offeror have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of Offeror to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES / NO .

2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature has Offeror completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Offeror′s control, Offeror stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party? Number: ____

How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number: ____ If any, please explain.

Response:

3. Within the last three years has Offeror (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Offeror’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:

• obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract,

• violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Offers, or

• embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property? YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.

Response:

4. Within the last three years, has Offeror had:

• any contracts terminated for default by any government agency, or

• any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES / NO .

If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 2 of 3

Response:

5. Does Offeror have any outstanding or pending judgments against it? YES / NO .

Is Offeror experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing? YES / NO .

Does Offeror have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period? YES / NO

If "YES” on the first question or second question, or “NO” on the third question, please provide additional details.

Response:

6. Within the last three years, has Offeror filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it? YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.

Response:

7. Does Offeror have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is Offeror legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon? YES /NO .

If "NO," please explain.

Response:

8. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if Offeror employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract price is estimated to exceed $500,000. [This requirement does not apply to architectural, engineering, photogrammetric mapping, transportation planning or land surveying and related services contracts.] Does a current authorized representative of Offeror possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services? YES / NO / N/A

. [If the certificate was provided with the Bid or Offer submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Offer” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.]

Response:

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of Offeror certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 3 of 3

Offeror Name: RFP: RFP S-34000-00003398

Project Name: Engaging Impacted Communities in Listening Sessions for the Built Environment Program

Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Title

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .