RFP_Phase1_W912DW20R0032_Final.pdf

USAnnyCorpa of Englneera.

Seattle District

RFP No. W912DW20R0032

Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) Command/Control Mission Support Facility

Fairchild AFB, (White Bluff Site), WA

Design-Build Construction Solicitation Phase 1 of 2

This is an Unrestricted Procurement

April 2020

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

1. SOLCTA TION NO.

W912DIV20R0032

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

2. TYPE OF SOLIClrATION

□ SEALED BO (FB)

0 NEGOTIATED (RFP)

IMPORTANT-The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PUROiASE REQUEST NO.

3. DA 1E ISSUBJ

6. FROJECT NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUBJBY COIE W912C::W 8. AOORESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7) COIE USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEAffiE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEAffiE WA 98134-2388

See Item 7 lEL: FAX: 206-764-6817 lEL: FAX:

9. FOR INFORl'M TION Co.LL:

A.NAIi,£ B. lELs=iHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

DEBBE A KNICKffiBOCKffi 206-764-6804

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. lHE GOVffiNVENT REQ� PERFORl\,\b,NCE OF 1HE WORK IESCRBBJ Ill lHESE DOCll\lENTS

JPRA ComrendlControl Mssion Support Facility, White Bluff Site, Fairchild AFB, WA.

This is a Full and Open Competition (Unrestricted) R"ocurement.

(Title, identifying no., elate):

Funds are not currently available for this acquisition. No contract award award will be made until appropriated funds are made available from which payment for contract purposes can be made.

CCL for this project is $12,400,000.00

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _1_0_ calendar days and complete it within 720 calendar days after receiving

D award, 0 notice to proceed. This performance period is � mandatory, D negotiable. (See __________ .)

12A.1HECONTRACTORMJST�ISHANY REQUIRBJPERFORl\,\b,NCEANJPAYM:NTBONJS?

(If "YES,• indicate 1Mthin how many calendar clays after award in Item 12B.)

�YES □ NO

13.

128. Co.LB"JDARDAY S

A.

AOOITIONAL SOLCTA TION REQU�:

Sealed offers in original and 1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in tern 8 by 02:00 PM (hour) local time 11 May 2020 (elate). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee � is, D is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the ( 1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than 90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STAK!ARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

10 APR 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS - PHASE 1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA)

Command/Control Mission Support Facility (CCMSF)

Fairchild AFB, White Bluff Site, WA

DIVISION 00 - PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, CONTRACT FORMS AND CONDITIONS

Sections

00 11 00

00 21 00

00 22 16

00 22 16

00 45 00

00 72 00

00 73 00

SF 1442

Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors

Phase 1 of 2 Phase Design-Build Selection Procedure & Attachments

Phase 2 Design-Build Selection Procedures and Basis of Award

For planning purposes; to be added by amendment

Representations and Certifications

Contract Clauses For planning purposes; subject to change by amendment

Special Contract Requirements For planning purposes; to be added in Phase 2

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - (For planning purposes; to be added in Phase 2) APPENDICES: To be added in Phase 2

RETURN THE FOLLOWING WITH YOUR PHASE ONE (1) PROPOSAL:

• SF 1442

• Phase 1 Technical Proposal - including Proposal Data Sheet and all other submission requirements identified in Section 00 22 16 Phase 1 of2 Phase Design-Build Selection

Procedures

• Corporate Certificate

End of Table of Contents

W912DW20R0032

00 20 00

!!! CAUTION TO OFFERORS !!!

1. TELEPHONES: There are no public telephones at the Seattle District Corps ofEngineers.

2. BUSINESS HOURS: For the Seattle District Corps of Engineers are from 7 :30 A.M. to

4:00P.M.,Monday through Friday.

3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Funds are not currently available for this acquisition. No contract award will be made until appropriated funds are made available from which payment for contract purposes can be made.

BEFORE SIGNING AND SUBMITTING youR OFFER.PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF

THE FOLLOWING. AS FAILURE TO PERFORM ANY ONE OF THESE ACTIONS

MAY CAUSE YOUR OFFER TO BE RE.JECTED

4. AMENDMENTS: Have you acknowledged receipt of ,ALL amendments? Contractors are required to review the solicitation and its amendments on beta.SAM.gov. If in doubt as to the number of amendments issued, please contact the representative listed on the Information

Page.

5. AMENDED SECTIONS: If any of the amendments furnished amended sections, then the amended sections must be used in submitting your offer.

6. MIST AKE IN OFFER: Have you reviewed your offer price for possible errors in calculation or work left out?

7. OFFER ACCEPTANCE PERIOD: The minimum offer acceptance period is specified in block 13D of SF1442, page 00 11 00 -1, Solicitation, Offer and Award. Please ensure that you allow at least the stated number of calendar days for the Government to accept your offer.

8. SYSTEM FOR A WARD MANAGEMENT: Contractors are required, before receipt of contract award, to ensure that their firm is registered in the government web site entitled

System for Award Management (SAM) and that all information required is current and up to date.

Refer to: https//:www.beta.SAM.gov

9. FAR 52,204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postcogsumer Fiber Cogtegt

Paper <May 201 n The Contractor is asked to submit paper documents. such as offers.

letters. or reports that are printed or copied dou hie-sided 0n paper cogtaigipg at least 30 percept postcogsumer fiber. whegeyer practicable. when got using electronic commerce methodstosubmitig{ormatiog ordatatothe Goyergmegt,

10. ATTENTION: Due to heightened security, the method of Hand Delivery has changed. Refer to Section 00 21 00, Paragraph 1.10 for Proposal Submittal information.

SECTION 00 21 00

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

GENERAL INFORMATION

GENERAL DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK

CONTRACT COST CEILING LIMITATION FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

COSTS

GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

1.10 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

1.11 PROPOSAL FORMAT

1.12 JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1.13 SUBCONTRACTING PLAN/ SUBCONTRACTING GOALS REGARDING THE

UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

1.14 SOLICITATION PROVISION

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Seattle District (NWS) intends to procure services for the design and construction of a multi-level Command and Control Mission Support Facility of approximately 2781 square meters located at the Department of Defense’s White Bluff Installation, also known as JPRA West. White Bluff is approximately 9 miles north-east of Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington. Building will require High Performance and Sustainable Building Guiding Principles Compliance (HPSB). HPSB GPC third party certification using either US Green Building Council (USGBC) or Green Building Initiative (GBI). The facility will have concrete masonry veneer exterior and insulated metal roof, and be outfitted with automatic fire sprinklers, mass notification and alarm systems, and infrastructure for intrusion detection for connection to the Installation. All associated infrastructure (including cybersecurity) and pavement necessary for the building, its access, and occupant parking are included as part of this project. This project also includes a new access control features into the White Bluff Site, with control gate and Security Check House of approximately 93 square meters , as well as partial demolition of existing buildings totaling approximately 153 square meters.

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION/SCOPE OF WORK (DRAFT)

Command and Control Mission Support Facility This project involves the design and construction of a new Command and Control Mission Support Facility (C2MSF) for JPRA's Command and Administration, Maintenance Administration/Resources, J-6 Communications, Human Factors, J-7 and unclassified training areas. The facility will house 57 permanent staff that will be relocated from other facilities at White Bluff. Related site improvements include a 14-foot wide one-way looped visitor drop-off/pickup drive aisle with reserved parking for three (3) 9'x20' parallel parking stalls located near the facility's main entry and a 30-foot wide service driveway to the facility's exterior covered storage/staging areas and access to electrical and mechanical rooms. Terminus of service drive to include six (6) 9'x20' parking stalls for Government-owned vehicles. Provide turning radii to allow delivery trucks and emergency vehicles a means to turn-around and exit the site. Other site improvements include new utilities, stormwater drainage, landscaping and enhance pedestrian connections to and from the building, parking areas, and adjacent facilities. The maximum allowable size of the C2MSF is 2,781 gross square meters (29,934 sqft).

Optional- Provide the design and construction of a new/expanded parking area to include a minimum thirty-five

(35) 9'x20' perpendicular stalls for personally owned vehicles (including required quantity of ADA parking stalls), a 26-foot wide two-way drive aisle, landscaping and stormwater drainage. Location of new parking to be northwest of and adjacent to existing parking fronting Building 12. Provide vehicular connections at both ends of the new/expanded parking area to existing parking. Preserve and repurpose existing perimeter parking area lighting.

Gate House/Access Control Point (Optional) A Gate House with a secondary vehicle entry gate and visitor/delivery screening at the main entrance to the White Bluff Site is to be designed and constructed. The Gate House is to be located within the secured perimeter near to, but west of the existing main security gate that is accessed via the site's primary entrance off of W. Newkirk Rd. The Gate House will house pass and ID functions, secondary gate operation, and associated security functions. It will also function as a location for receiving and temporary storage of routine deliveries. The Gate House will also be the location for pickup of outgoing packages from White Bluff. The maximum allowable size of the Gate House is 93 gross square meters (1,000 sqft). Existing site conditions include an asphalt paved entry road with adjacent open lawn areas. Grades gently slope to the west from the primary entry gate.

A new interior access roadway is included in the project as Optional. The new roadway is to direct vehicular access to the Command and Control Mission Support Facility from the site's main entry. The new roadway is to connect to and continue the alignment of the existing roadway between Buildings 1, 2, 3 & 8 within the southern central portion of the site and then continue north towards the proposed C2MSF building. This new roadway is to provide enhanced physical and visual connections to the new facility's front entry and expanded/new parking area (Optional). Design the new interior roadway to provide connections to existing parking areas supporting the functions of the SERE complex and Building 12. The roadway is to be sited within previously cleared and graded areas north of Building#3. Refer to C-100, Overall Site Plan, for approximate alignment of new interior access roadway. The topography of the area increases approximately 15 feet in elevation from south to north and there are existing stormwater conveyance and retention facilities within proximity of the new roadway's alignment. Restore, relocate, and/or reconfigure existing stormwater conveyance and retention facilities to match or exceed existing stormwater flows and storage.

Abatement and Demolition (Optional)

Abatement (Optional),A preliminary hazardous materials survey was completed on Building 1 during the development of this solicitation. Each of the buildings noted for demolition should be assumed to have hazardous material contents to Building 1. Additional survey/testing is required to confirm the presence or lack of hazardous materials if related CLINs are awarded.

There are limitations to the survey conducted due to occupancy, non- invasive testing, and survey scope.

Based on the survey, the following items were noted:

• There were no asbestos-containing materials identified.

• Any door and door frames impacted as part of this project are assumed asbestos-containing and will require inspection by an accredited AHERA building inspector or abatement contractor before disturbance.

• All painted surfaces should be assumed to contain at least trace levels of lead in paint, therefore requiring compliance with WAC 296- 155-176 during any disturbance of painted surfaces.

• The TCLP sample collected was determined to be less than the regulated levels for all RCRA 8 metals analyzed for. Demolition waste from the building can be disposed of as general construction debris.

• The tan and beige paints on the exterior EIFS were determined to contain PCB's. PCB-containing waste in demolition debris cannot be recycled but can be disposed in a subtitle D landfill. Work procedures for proper removal and protection of workers should be provided to contractors in accordance with WAC 296-155 and WAC 296-841.

• Perform destructive testing as needed for mechanical spaces and mechanical/electrical routing.

Demolition (Optional), if awarded, will include the demolition of Buildings 1, 2, and most of Building 3.

Perform demolition in accordance with Fairchild Base Design Standards (BOS) sections 013543 and 028200, and Division 01 of this RFP. Buildings 1 and 2 will be fully demolished along with all utilities connecting to the buildings. Verify all utilities located within, under slabs, and in parking areas prior to demolition activities.

Coordinate any outages with the Government a minimum 48 hours in advance, including outages to isolate systems where utilities cannot be positively identified. The use of historical drawings does not alleviate the contractor from meeting this requirement. Demolition work to include all building features down to and including foundations. Cap all utility lines servicing existing buildings at connections to mains or at other locations approved by JPRA facilities personnel. Remove sidewalks leading to building entrances back to intersections with the main north-south sidewalks. Save and protect from damage existing trees unless removal is necessary due to close proximity to exterior building walls/overhangs, foundations or utilities being demolished. Remove shrubs adjacent to buildings and walkways being demolished. Fill all depressions with select on-site fill material and grade to provide positive drainage.

1.2. CONTRACT COST CEILING LIMITATION FOR DESIGN

AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS

The design and construction costs will be subject to the funds available for this project. The total contract award should not exceed $12,400,000.00 for this contract. Offerors are notified that they are under no obligation to approach this ceiling. However, the Government may not be able to make an award if the dollar amount set for this project is exceeded.

1.3 GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

Due to COVID-19 compliance guidelines and social distancing, Proposals will be received electronically.

However, an Original (hard-bound) proposal must be mailed within 24 hours following electronic submission of the Offeror's proposal. Please note that ALL mail sent to the Seattle District , U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (NWS) , either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box , etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , including but not limited to proposals , revised proposals , bonds , correspondence, etc., may be REJECTED by the US Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located in Building 1202, at 4735 East Marginal Way South , Seattle, WA 98134 if it does not contain a return mailing address.

1.4. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERN ET ACC ESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at:

www.betaSAM.gov under RFP number W912DW20R0032.

It shall be the Contractor' s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments.

The offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

A list of interested vendors (potential offerors and subcontractors) is available on the federal business opportunities web site (registration required) with the solicitation announcement.

http://www.betasam.gov/

1.5. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.5.1. Administrative questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via ProjNet.

Note: All questions and/or comments should reach the above referenced Contracting Office no later than three (3) business days before proposal due date, in order that they may be given consideration or actions taken prior to receipt of offers.

1.5.2. Bidder Inquiry

Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into the system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on the next screen is correct and click continue. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

Project: (474975/GJLK1053425) NWS FAFB ACE GJLK1053425 ADD/ALTER Joint Pers Recovery Agency (JPRA)

The Solicitation Number is: W912DW20R0032

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 8KH2GK-XRKNY9

The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries three (3) business days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals

1.6. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

See Section 00 45 00, FAR 52.219-1 for the small business size standard/NAICS Code.

1.7. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This Request for Proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

1.8. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

The Government intends to hold a pre-proposal conference during Phase 2 (two) at the project site.

1.9. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.10. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

In strict compliance with guidance relating to the current situation with COVID-19 and social distancing, the ONLY authorized transmission method for proposals in response to this solicitation is electronically via SAFE online submission. NO OTHER

TRANSMISSION METHODS (E-MAIL, FACSIMILE, REGULAR MAIL, HAND

CARRIED, ETC.) WILL BE ACCEPTED.

The Offeror’s proposal must be received by the Government by the date/time specified in the solicitation. Offerors shall electronically transmit their proposals using the following link:

https://safe.apps.mil/

Please send proposals using the link above to Contract Specialist Debbie Knickerbocker at debbie.a.knickerbocker@usace.army.mil AND to Contracting Officer Susan Newby at Susan.F.Newby@usace.army.mil.

1.10.1 Instructions for Submitting Electronic Proposals

In an effort to reduce paperwork and cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically through the SAFE site. Submission shall be in Adobe PDF format. Submit no more than five (5) PDF files.

Total file size cannot exceed 8GB. Files may be compressed and/or combined into ZIP files using compression utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission.

1.10.2 Request for Upload Code

Email Contract Specialist Debbie Knickerbocker at debbie.a.knickerbocker@usace.army.mil AND Contracting Officer Susan Newby at Susan.F.Newby@usace.army.mil no later than five (5) working days prior to the proposal due date to receive a request code. Include “W912DW20R0032 SAFE Proposal Drop-Off Request …” in the subject. Include the name and email address of the sender, and the name of the offeror in the body of the email.

The request code will allow a one-time file upload via the SAFE site. Offerors that fail to email for request a code five (5) working days before proposal submission date may not be able to receive a request code in time to upload their submission.

You will receive an email from NoReplyTo@mail.mil with the subject line similar to "[DoD SAFE] W912DW20RTEST Proposal Drop-off Invite". The body of the email will contain a hyperlink, with the drop-off key embedded, for your use in uploading your proposal. The body of the email may also contain additional instructions from the Contracting Specialist in a note beneath the hyperlink. The drop-off key will be valid for 14 calendar days.

1.10.3 Instructions for Upload of Proposal

Follow the hyperlink in the email. This will take you to the DoD SAFE drop off page. The page will be pre-populated with the Name and email you provided, the name and email of the recipient, and the note with additional instructions from the Contracting Specialist.

Add Contract Specialist Debbie Knickerbocker at debbie.a.knickerbocker@usace.army.mil and Contracting Officer Susan Newby at Susan.F.Newby@usace.army.mil as recipients.

The Proposer must enter the e-mail address for both the Contracting Officer and Specialist.

The Proposer can enter an additional e-mail address if desired. After entering the e-mail address, click the ADD button to add the person(s) e-mail to the “Recipients List” of your response. When your proposal is submitted, a notification will be sent to the recipients you added.

NOTE: Do NOT send the SAFE site packages to group e-mail accounts.

Accept the default checkbox settings. Add the files that contain your offer. Files for upload will be listed beneath the “Click to Add Files or Drag Them Here” button. Enter a description for each file. Ensure your proposal is complete and all files are listed; this is a one-time drop-off key. Click on “Drop-off Files” when all files are listed.

When the upload is complete, DoD SAFE will present a screen listing the files uploaded and transmit an email to the recipient(s) to inform them that your proposal has been upload

1.10.3 Receipt of Submissions

The Government will consider proposal submission timely if it is completely uploaded into the SAFE website and the acknowledgement email sent by the date and time proposals are due. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to allow sufficient time for upload. It can take several minutes or even hours in some cases.

The government will not be responsible for submissions delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

See Box 13 of the Standard Form 1442 for the time and date your proposal is due.

Please mail one Original (hard-bound) proposal to the mailing address below, within 24 hours of your electronic proposal submission.

Contract Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District ATTN: Debbie Knickerbocker Mailing Address:

PO Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 Phone: 206-764-6804 Email: Debbie.a.knickerbocker@usace.army.mil

Contracting Officer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District ATTN: Susan Newby Phone: 206-764-6754 Email: Susan.f.newby@usace.army.mil

I.11. PROPOSAL FORMAT

File format. Proposals shall be submitted in PDF format, suitable for reading using Adobe Acrobat in a Windows 10 operating system. PDF files may be combined and compressed using compression utility software such as WinZip or PKZip.

File Organization. Volumes I and II shall be submitted in different files. Each Volume shall be organized as specified below. PDFs shall be indexed and bookmarked to facilitate navigation.

File Names shall clearly state the RFP Number, Volume Number and Offeror Name. If applicable, file names may include the Tab, Example Project Number, and similar relevant information.

Formatting. Pagination shall be in 8 ½” x 11” format, using at least ½” margins and 10 point or larger font size.

The prime or joint venture’s name, address, a signature of the official that can bind the firm and a telephone number shall appear in the lower left corner of the title page of any document/volume to be evaluated.

Volume number, section and date submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number for the amended page, if necessary).

One Original (CD and Bound Volume) will be required for PHASE TWO.

1.12. JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond (in Phase 2) unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a) or HubZone joint venture, the offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

1.13. SUBCONTRACTING PLAN/ SUBCONTRACTING GOALS REGARDING

THE UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

(a) Application. This clause applies to all Offerors submitting proposals.

(b) Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). Attention is directed to the following FAR and DFARS provisions contained in this solicitation:

52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns

52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Alternate II) (applies only to Large Business)

52.219-16, Liquidated Damages- Small Business Subcontracting Plan (applies only to Large Business)

252.226-7001, Utilization of lndian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

(c) Goals. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers considers the following goals reasonable and achievable for the performance of the resultant contract:

Large business Prime Offerors may achieve the small business participations goals through subcontracting to small businesses.

Small business Prime Offerors may achieve small business participation goals through their own performance/participation as a Prime and also through subcontracting to other small Businesses.

The District has provided the following draft Seattle District Small Business goals as a reference to model the offeror's targeted objectives. Once submitted in the proposal, the Plan is a commitment and will be compared to the awardee's post-award Subcontracting Plan submittal (if applicable).

The proposal must identify the extent to which Small Businesses (SBs), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), Woman-Owned SBs (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) SBs, Veteran Owned SBs (VOSBs), and/or Service Disabled Veteran Owned SBs (SDVOSBs) would be utilized in the performance of this contract opportunity (as small business Prime Offerors and/or small business Subcontractors).

Seattle District Goals:

Small Business 30% Small Disadvantaged Business 6% Woman Owned Small Business 3% HUBZone Small Business 3% Veteran Owned Small Business 1% Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business 1%

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 52.204-22 52.204-24

52.207-1 52.214-34

52.215-1

52.222-23

System for Award Management Alternative Line Item Proposal Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

Notice Of Standard Competition Submission Of Offers In The English Language Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure

Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction

OCT 2018

JAN2017

DEC 2019

MAY2006

APR 1991

JAN2017

FEB 1999

52.222-24 52.228-1

Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation FEB 1999 Bid Guarantee SEP 1996

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

W912DW20R0032

52.215-20 REQUIREMENTS FOR COST OR PRICING DATA OR INFORMATION OTHER THAN

CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA (OCT 2010)

( a) Exceptions from certified cost or pricing data. ( 1) In lieu of submitting certified cost or pricing data, offerors may submit a written request for exception by submitting the information described in the following subparagraphs. The Contracting Officer may require additional supporting information, but only to the extent necessary to determine whether an exception should be granted, and whether the price is fair and reasonable.

(i) Identification of the law or regulation establishing the price offered. If the price is controlled under law by periodic rulings, reviews, or similar actions ofa governmental body, attach a copy of the controlling document, unless it was previously submitted to the contracting office.

(ii) Commercial item exception. For a commercial item exception, the offeror shall submit, at a minimum, information on prices at which the same item or similar items have previously been sold in the commercial market that is adequate for evaluating the reasonableness of the price for this acquisition. Such information may include--

(A) For catalog items, a copy of or identification of the catalog and its date, or the appropriate pages for the offered items, or a statement that the catalog is on file in the buying office to which the proposal is being submitted. Provide a copy or describe current discount policies and price lists (published or unpublished), e.g., wholesale, original equipment manufacturer, or reseller. Also explain the basis of each offered price and its relationship to the established catalog price, including how the proposed price relates to the price of recent sales in quantities similar to the proposed quantities;

(B) For market-priced items, the source and date or period of the market quotation or other basis for market price, the base amount, and applicable discounts. In addition, describe the nature of the market;

(C) For items included on an active Federal Supply Service Multiple Award Schedule contract, proof that an exception has been granted for the schedule item.

(2) The offeror grants the Contracting Officer or an authorized representative the right to examine, at any time before award, books, records, documents, or other directly pertinent records to verify any request for an exception under this provision, and the reasonableness of price. For items priced using catalog or market prices, or law or regulation , access does not extend to cost or profit information or other data relevant solely to the offeror's

SECTION 00 22 16 – PHASE ONE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

4.0 TAB A – STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

7.0 PHASE 1 OVERALL RATING

7.1 PHASE 1 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.2 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

7.3 EVALUATION

7.4 DEFINNITIONS

7.5 EVALUATION AND RATING SYSTEM

PHASE ONE – SECTION 00 22 16 PHASE ONE ATTACHMENTS

1 – PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

2 – COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

3 – COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN

CAPABILITY

4 – PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1 This solicitation is for the design and construction of a facility and associated features located at

White Bluff Site, Fairchild AFB, WA. The facility must meet Department of Defense (DOD) criteria, Executive Orders and other applicable laws, regulations and industry standards. In Phase 1 of the 2 phase design-build selection procedure, interested firms or joint venture entities (referred to as “Offerors”) submit certain specified performance capability proposals, demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the design-build construction contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and will short-list up to five (5) of the Phase 1 Offerors to compete for the design-build contract in Phase 2.

1.2 PHASE 2 shall be issued via amendment. In Phase 2, the successful Offerors will submit proposals in accordance with Section 00 22 16. It is the intent of the Government to award off initial offers without discussions unless the Selection Authority (SA) determines that it is necessary, so initial proposals should contain the Offeror’s best terms. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency. Penalty for making false statements in the proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S. Code § 1001.

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal. To qualify for Phase 2, the Offeror must have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines, and the requirements specified in Contract Clause 52.236-25, ”Requirements for Registration of Designers”, must be met. All designs must be under the direct supervision of appropriately licensed professionals for each discipline involved.

2.2 Submit the Phase 1 proposal in a tabbed, three-ring binder. PHASE 1 DOES NOT INVOLVE

PRICING SUBMISSION.

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

Tab A Factor 1 Specialized Experience 1st (Most Important Factor)

Tab B Factor 2 Past Performance 2nd (Slightly less important than Factor 1)

4.0 TAB A - STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.1 Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the completed proposal data sheet (See attachment 1, provided at the end of this Section).

Note: PHASE 2 Evaluation Factors will be provided via amendment.

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The prime contractor and the design firm(s) (or prime contractor if design is to be self-performed) must each demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects, using Construction – Specialized Experience form – (Attachment 2), and Designer – Specialized Experience Form – (Attachment 3) at the end of the section. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to its role on this project. Submit Design Build projects that are 100% constructed and turned over no longer than six (6) years preceding the date that proposals are due. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Design firms may list prime contractors they have worked with for government, private or commercial customers. The offeror shall select the design firm(s) and indicate its selected Designer of Record firm in the proposal. If projects were design-build, identify them as such. Both the prime contractor and the design firm(s) shall submit no more than six (6) projects total with emphasis on Military Construction (MILCON) for the facility type or its equivalent or similar commercial or institutional type:

• Facility Equivalent: Corporate facility/Administrative/Headquarters facility

• MILCON: Congressionally-authorized military construction for DoD requirements

5.1.1. Reference Project Tables: Reference project tables, corresponding to the up to 6 total projects above, should be submitted for up to six (6) project examples, each demonstrating relevant construction and design experience. “Relevant” is defined as projects similar to the project in this solicitation in scope, magnitude, and complexity and that have a logical connection to the requirements of this RFP. Three (3) types of experience areas that are considered especially relevant include: 1) Construction of similarly-sized facility by contract value of $10 million or greater; 2) Construction of facility equivalents; and 3) Military Construction (MILCON). Only relevant projects (see above) within the past six (6) years from the date proposals are due shall be submitted.

5.1.1.1. For Construction Experience: In addition to the requirements in 5.1.1., above, only those projects for which the offeror was the Prime Contractor should be submitted. Offerors should explain how the information provided is relevant to the proposed acquisition, and the projects selected should clearly demonstrate the construction capabilities of the offeror. In addition, the offeror must clearly identify to which, if any, of the three (3) especially relevant experience area(s) each project example pertains (e.g., Project A may qualify and be listed for construction of similarly-sized facility by contract value and military construction, while Project B may qualify and be listed only for construction of similarly sized facility by contract value, etc.).

Required Presentation Format:

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

EXPERIENCE MATRIX

PROJECT TITLE

C O

N S

T R

U C

T

IO

N O

F

S

IM

IL

A

R L

Y -S

IZ

E

D

A

C

IL

IT

IE

S B

Y C

O N

T R

A C

T

V

L U

E

C O

N S

T R

U C

T

IO

N

Q

U

IV

A L

E N

T T

Y E

S

C

IL

IT

IE

M

IL

IT

A

R Y

C O

N S

T R

U C

T

IO

N

(M

C O

N

PROJECT A

PROJECT B

Etc …

Using a format similar to that shown below, provide all of the specific information requested, in the order presented, for the submitted relevant construction experience projects:

1. Project Title & Location (Installation, or State)

2. Project Type (e.g., State, Federal or DOD, Military Installation/MILCON)

3. Dollar Value/Size of Construction Contract

4. Actual Construction Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year)

Scheduled Construction Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year)

5. Role of Construction Firm (e.g., prime or subcontractor) (address type of work performed and percentage of work performed, as applicable)

6. Brief Description of Project (address how the project directly relates to solicited project)

7. Customer Point of Contact (i.e., name, relationship to project, agency/firm affiliation, military installation, state, current phone number, and email address if available

8. Awards or Recognition Received (if applicable)

5.1.1.2. For Design Experience: In addition to the requirements in 5.1.1., above, only those projects for which the Designer was the Designer of Record should be submitted. Offerors should explain how the information provided is relevant to the proposed acquisition, and the projects selected should clearly demonstrate the design capabilities of the offeror. In addition, the offeror must clearly identify to which, if any, of the three (3) especially relevant experience area(s) each project example pertains (e.g., Project A may qualify and be listed for construction of similarly-sized facility by contract value and Military Construction (MILCON), while Project B may qualify and be listed only for construction of similarly sized facility by contract value, etc.).

Required Presentation Format:

DESIGN PROJECT EXPERIENCE

MATRIX

PROJECT TITLE

D E

S

IG

N O

F S

IM

IL

A R

L Y

-S

IZ

C

IL

IT

S

IG

N O

F E

Q U

IV

A

L E

Y P

E S

O F

F A

C

IL

IT

S

IG

N O

F M

IL

IT

A R

Y

C

N S

T R

U C

T

IO

(M

C O

N

PROJECT A

PROJECT B

Etc …

Using a format similar to that shown below, provide all of the specific information requested, in the order presented, for the submitted relevant design experience projects:

1. Project Title & Location (Installation, or State)

2. Project Type (e.g., State, Federal or DOD, Military Installation)

3. Dollar Value/Size of Construction Contract for the Designed Project

4. Actual Design Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year)

Scheduled Design Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year)

5. Role of Design Firm (e.g., Design-Bid-Build or Design-Build; Study; RFP, or 100% design) (address type of work performed and percentage of work performed, as applicable)

6. Brief Description of Project Designed (address how the project directly relates to solicited project)

7. Customer Point of Contact (i.e., name, relationship to project, agency/firm affiliation, city, state, current phone number, and email address if available

8. Awards or Recognition Received (if applicable)

5.1.2. Teaming, LEED, & Design-Build Experience: The offeror should describe any previous teaming experience within the proposed organization, if not described in the project list. Describe team members’ experience on LEED projects and/or projects with Third Party Sustainable certification, if not included on the project list. Offeror may describe design-build experience on other type projects. The above information is limited to projects that are 100% constructed and turned over within the past six (6) years preceding the date proposals are due.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent that proposals demonstrate recent and relevant experience of the prime contractor and designer of record in design, construction, or design-build in accordance with their role on this project. If the design will be accomplished in-house, rather than by subcontract, then the design element of specialized experience will still be evaluated. Experience on the similar projects identified in the project lists will receive more consideration than experience provided in the supplemental narrative. Military Construction (MILCON) project experience will be rated more favorably than project experience not within military installations.

5.2.2. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Construction Contractor (or Architect-Engineer) Appraisal Support System (CCASS/ACASS), including CPARS, reviewing other DOD or Government appraisal systems, or interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.2.3. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive additional credit for Specialized Experience for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

5.2.4. The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, and demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(1) Number, size, type work, complexity, location

(2) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience)

(3) Relevant recent experience constructing: Similarly-sized facility by contract value of $10 million or greater; Construction of equivalent facilities; and Military Construction (MILCON) projects.

5.2.5. The Government may give additional consideration to previous design-build experience, even if the experience is on different type projects. Similarly, the Government may give additional consideration to recent teaming experience among the team members, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. Most consideration will be given to most relevant experience.

5.2.6. Additional consideration may be given if either the constructor or the design firm(s) demonstrate experience in sustainable design.

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

6.1.1. In accordance with FAR 42.1503, past performance will be evaluated using the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) for the prime contractor and its Designer of Record firm. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the DUNS number to the division or unit submitting the offer and divisions providing substantial support to the design-build team. The Government reserves the right to verify the past performance record of other team members besides the prime contractor, and DOR and may evaluate their PPIRS – If no relevant past performance history is available for your DUNS number, you may choose to utilize the attached Customer Satisfaction Survey/ Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 4) which will be used for evaluation. The Government will only evaluate up to six (6) Customer Satisfaction Surveys/ Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) combined for prime contractor, and the design firm(s). Provide completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluations for all projects submitted under Factor 1 if possible. If a CPARS rating is not available for ALL projects submitted under Factor 1, Offerors are strongly urged to submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for those project(s) for which CPARS ratings are not available.

Government databases will be checked and previous customers and/or evaluators may be contacted as references or verification of performance. All performance ratings shall be considered for contracts ongoing or completed within the past six (6) years from the date proposals are due.

6.1.2. All projects submitted on a Customer Satisfaction Survey/Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) must be at 100% complete or completed and turned over within six (6) years preceding the date proposals are due. The PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror, or its team members, to submit to the client for projects the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Customer Satisfaction Surveys/Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) should be submitted with your proposal.

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Debbie.A.Knickerbocker@usace.army.mil, via email prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

6.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1. Past performance assesses the degree of relevance and confidence the Government has in an Offeror’s ability to supply the products and services that meet a user’s needs. This is based on a demonstrated record of performance. The Government may give greater consideration to PPQs for submitted reference projects from Factor 1 (see paragraph 5.1). There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation:

6.2.2. The Government will first assess the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract. The projects will include those submitted under the Specialized Experience Factor (1) as well as from other sources described above. There are four levels of relevancy as shown in Table 2 below:

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6.2.3. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine the degree of success of the D-B team's recent (100% completed and turned over within 6 years within the date proposals are due), relevant experience.