RFP for Facilities Assessments - Attachment B.pdf
PDF 187 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Court Facility Assessment Services
- Solicitation number
- RFP-025-2500000288-2
- Issued by
- Breathitt County, Kentucky
About this file
This document is an assessment report from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, detailing a comprehensive evaluation of court facilities across 37 counties. In 2020, the AOC Division of Capital Construction contracted GRW Architects/Engineers to assess court facilities in counties that had never received legislative authorization for a judicial branch capital construction project or received authorization prior to 1996. The assessment scored each county based on multiple criteria including facility age, space adequacy, projected needs, structural soundness, mechanical and electrical systems, security needs, and interior and exterior quality.
The counties were ranked from 1-37 and categorized into three urgency levels: critical need (0%-39.9%), high need (40%-54.9%), and moderate need (55%-69.9%). The ranking is based on Kentucky Revised Statute 26A.160(2)(a), which requires periodic assessments of court facility construction and renovation needs. Counties with the lowest scores, such as Leslie (30.91%) and Owsley (31.97%), are in the critical need category, while counties like Floyd (58.73%) and Daviess (58.85%) fall into the moderate need category. The document serves as a strategic planning tool for prioritizing judicial branch capital construction projects across the Commonwealth.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
0 2 / 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 P a g e | 1
The AOC conducts periodic assessments of court facilities across the Commonwealth in accordance with KRS 26A.160. In 2020, the AOC Division of Capital Construction contracted GRW Architects/Engineers to assess facilities in the 37 counties that have never received legislative authorization for a judicial branch capital construction project or received authorization prior to 1996. Each county was given a score based on facility age, space adequacy, projected needs, structural soundness, mechanical and electrical systems, security needs, and interior and exterior quality. The counties were then ranked 1-37 in order of greatest need for a judicial branch capital construction project based on the assessment score of their court facilities. The ranked counties are categorized by urgency. The categories shown are critical need, high need, and moderate need. As additional facilities are assessed, counties will be added to the list in accordance with their assessment score.
* Already authorized
KRS 26A.160(2)(a) requires the AOC to "assess the need for court facilities construction or renovation throughout the Commonwealth.
The assessment shall consider the age, space adequacy, projected needs, structural soundness, mechanical and electrical systems, security needs, and interior and exterior quality of existing court facilities."
Rank County Score 15 Montgomery 40.05% 16 Knox* 40.05% 17 Ballard 40.05 18 Union 41.27% 19 Trimble 42.20% 20 Martin 42.35% 21 Ohio 42.86 22 Carroll 43.33% 23 Powell 43.61% 24 Lincoln 43.92% 25 Hickman 44.72% 26 McLean 44.81% 27 Anderson 45.08% 28 Rockcastle 45.31% 29 Boyle 45.50% 30 Letcher 45.97% 31 Menifee 46.45% 32 Woodford 47.35% 33 Webster 48.94% 34 McCracken 49.19% 35 McCreary 50.00%
MODERATE:
55%-69.9%
Rank County Score* 36 Floyd 58.73% 37 Daviess 58.85%
Rank County Score 1 Leslie* 30.91% 2 Owsley* 31.97% 3 Spencer 34.13% 4 Caldwell* 34.14% 5 Fulton 34.66% 6 Estill 34.68% 7 Lee 35.45% 8 Elliott 37.16% 9 Edmonson 37.98% 10 Clark* 38.17% 11 Larue 38.17% 12 Greenup* 38.25% 13 Graves* 39.42% 14 Meade 39.62%
CRITICAL:
0%-39.9%
HIGH:
40%-54.9%
Attachment B
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .