RFP Engineering Design Services - Closure Plan Revision 12.01.25.pdf

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Consulting and Engineering Design Services for Closure Plan Revision and

Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to- Energy Facility

South Meadows

Hartford, Connecticut

Issued December 1, 2025

Key Dates:

December 9, 2025 - Submission of Letter of Interest

December 10, 2025 – Mandatory Pre Proposal Project Site Tour December 23, 2025 – Questions from Proposers Due

January 21, 2026 - Proposals Due

CRDA RFP #26-011

A PUBLIC SOLICITATION ISSUED BY THE

CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CRDA is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Minority/Women's

Business Enterprises are encouraged to apply.

Request for Proposal Consulting and Engineering Design Services December 1, 2025

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction II. Project Description III. Scope of Services IV. General Information V. Submittal Requirements VI. Selection Criteria VII. General Requirements And Conditions

Exhibit 1A Engineering Team Questionnaire Part 1 Exhibit 1B Engineering Team Questionnaire Part 2 Exhibit 2 Required Certifications & Affidavits Exhibit 3 Compensation Exhibit 4 Professional Registrations Exhibit 5 RFP General Conditions and Requirements Certification Exhibit 6 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Addenda Exhibit 7 Form of Contract Exceptions

Attachment 1 State Forms Attachment 2 Form of Contract Attachment 3 Documents Attached for Reference

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 3

I. INTRODUCTION

Request for Proposal Consulting & Engineering Design Services PROJECT: Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA

Waste to Energy Facility

CRDA# 26-011

South Meadows, Hartford, CT 06120

PROPOSAL DUE DATE: January 21, 2026

TIME: 1:00 PM

The Capital Region Development Authority (“CRDA”) is undertaking closure of the Former MIRA Waste to Energy Facility, a State-permitted solid waste management facility. CRDA intends to enter into a contract with a qualified Engineering Consulting Firm to provide engineering services for this project.

Background CRDA is a quasi-public agency of the State of Connecticut working to encourage the redevelopment and economic expansion of the Hartford region, including oversight of housing construction and other economic development projects. CRDA owns and/or manages various sports and entertainment venues and parking facilities. Effective June 30, 2025, Public Act 25-168 made CRDA the successor to the MIRA Dissolution Authority (“MDA”) with regards to MDA’s South Meadows Site, located at 300 Maxim Road and 100 Reserve Road in Hartford (the “South Meadows Site” or “Site”).

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The South Meadows Site covers approximately 80 acres, and includes the shuttered MIRA Resource Recovery Facility (“RRF”), a permitted solid waste management facility composed of two distinct operational facilities - the Waste Processing Facility (“WPF”) and the Power Block Facility (“PBF”). Municipal solid waste was formerly received and processed at the WPF, and the resultant refuse-derived fuel was combusted in three boilers at the PBF to produce steam for electricity generation. The general Site layout, including the solid waste permit area, is provided as Figure 2.

On May 5, 2022, MIRA notified the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (“CT-DEEP”) of its intention to close the RRF on or about August 1st of that year and submitted a Closure Plan to CT-DEEP pursuant to RCSA Section 22a-209-13(b). The RRF ultimately ceased operation on July 19, 2022.

The May 2022 Closure Plan focused on the removal and proper off-site disposal of any waste and waste residues remaining at the RRF after its shutdown, the cleaning of all waste processing equipment and building surfaces to a visually clean standard and securing the site and all buildings to prevent unauthorized entry. The only building demolition that was contemplated by MIRA as part of the closure process was demolition of the ash storage and load-out building; MIRA

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 4 intended to leave all other on-site buildings and facility equipment in-place, pending future decisions regarding site redevelopment.

In an effort to offer the most flexibility and opportunity for redevelopment of the 80-acre South Meadows Site, CRDA intends to proceed with the Closure Plan work, followed by demolition of all RRF-related equipment and buildings at the Site. The Closure Plan will therefore have to be revised to incorporate the anticipated building demolition into the closure process, as well as to address previous CT-DEEP and Greater Hartford Flood Commission (“GHFC”) comments, and incorporate information presented in the South Meadows Redevelopment Considerations Study.

Documents Attached for Reference (Attachment 3)

1) May 2022 Closure Plan for CSWS Resource Recovery Facility, prepared by TRC Environmental Corporation

2) Greater Hartford Flood Commission (“GHFC”) August 5, 2022 Letter to CT-DEEP RE: MIRA Closure Plan Dated May 2022

3) CT-DEEP October 14, 2022 Request for Additional Information for Closure Plan for CSWS Resource Recovery Facility

4) Materials Innovation and Recycling Authority January 5, 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Closure Plan

5) CT-DEEP January 17, 2024 2nd Request for Additional Information for Closure Plan for CSWS Resource Recovery Facility

6) MIRA Dissolution Authority February 16, 2024 Response to 2nd Request for Additional Information Regarding Closure Plan

7) CT-DEEP May 16, 2024 Letter Regarding the Closure Plan

8) March 10, 2025 South Meadows Redevelopment Considerations Study, prepared by Weston &

Sampson

9) Environmental Land Use Restriction (“ELUR”) recorded April 20, 2018, including six (6) survey sheets dated March 28, 2018.

10) ELUR recorded March 13, 2025, including three (3) survey sheets dated May 31, 2024.

III. SCOPE OF SERVICES

The purpose of this RFP is to identify and engage a qualified consultant to perform the following work scope:

1) Review referenced documents;

2) Revise the RRF Closure Plan to include:

a. removal of any remaining wastes and waste residues from the RRF,

b. removal of all solid waste management equipment from the RRF for proper off-site recycling/disposal, Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 5

c. pre-demolition abatement of hazardous building materials,

d. demolition of all RRF buildings associated with permitted solid waste management activities,

e. other pertinent revisions and information to address previous CT-DEEP and GHFC comments contained in the referenced documents,

f. identification of site soils that, based on the site-specific ELURs, will require investigation and/or remediation following building demolition,

g. revised closure schedule to incorporate the revised closure approach,

h. revised closure and demolition cost estimates to incorporate the revised closure approach;

3) Provide support necessary for CRDA to receive CT-DEEP approval to implement the revised

Closure Plan;

4) Prepare engineering plans and technical specifications in support of CRDA’s public solicitation of qualified contractors to perform the closure work;

5) Provide support to CRDA during the public bidding process to engage a qualified contractor to perform the closure work, including evaluation of bids/proposals received from respondents

6) Provide Construction Quality Assurance Services during the construction phase of the project including but not limited to: i) construction administration services (review/approval of submittals, responding to RFIs, processing change orders, review/approval of requests for payment, review of as-built drawings, contract closeout activities, etc.) and ii) full time inspection services to oversee the closure work.

Note: Consultant shall be aware that the work scope detailed herein may not include all work tasks required to complete the project. Consultant will be expected to address all necessary tasks required to facilitate the completion of the project within the estimated costs provided by Consultant in Exhibit 3.

Allowances

a. Meeting Allowances:

• Propose an Allowance for three (3) two-hour meetings with regulators and/or other stakeholders during the initial Closure Plan revisions and submission phase of the project.

• Propose an Allowance for three (3) two-hour meetings during the final design phase and bidding phase of the project, one of which shall be the construction pre-proposal site meeting.

b. Reimbursable Expense Allowance: Propose an Allowance for the following reimbursable expenses:

• printing reimbursable expense.

• mileage reimbursable expense (including any travel time charges).

• laboratory analytical reimbursement expense for analysis of waste characterization samples in accordance with current SW-846 methods – list each applicable method number and unit cost per sample.

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 6

IV. General Information

A. Submission Key Dates RFP Issue Date Mon 12/1/2025 Letter of Interest Tues 12/9/2025 Site Tour Wed 12/10/2025 10:00 AM Last Day for Questions Tues 12/23/2025 1:00 PM Last Day for RFP Addenda Wed 1/7/2026 Proposals Due Wed 1/21/2026 1:00 PM Short List Presentations Wed 2/4/2026 Expected Notice of Award Fri 2/20/2026

B. CRDA Contact Information

The official contact person for the purposes of this RFP is:

Mr. Christopher R. Shepard, P.E.

Capital Region Development Authority 100 Columbus Boulevard, Suite 500 Hartford, Connecticut 06103

(860) 930-5475 E-mail: cshepard@crdact.net

All communications with CRDA regarding this RFP must be directed to Mr. Shepard. All communications with any other employee of CRDA is strictly prohibited, except as permitted by this RFP. Any violation of this prohibition by a proposer or its representatives may result in disqualification or other sanctions.

C. Letter of Interest

Interested firms are encouraged, but not required, to submit a letter of interest to Mr. Shepard by Tuesday, December 9, 2025 acknowledging receipt of the RFP and informing CRDA of its intent to respond. Such letters should include the name, address, telephone and e-mail address of the individual who can address inquiries related to this RFP and the firm’s proposal and receive clarifications or addenda from CRDA.

D. Pre-Proposal Project Site Tour

CRDA will host a mandatory pre-proposal site tour on Wednesday, December 10, 2025 at 10:00AM. Visitors should arrive at the site entrance located at 300 Maxim Road, Hartford CT.

Tour participants shall wear long pants, closed-toed shoes (work boots or safety shoes recommended), a hard hat, safety glasses, and a high-visibility vest.

mailto:cshepard@crdact.net

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 7

E. Questions and Addenda

All questions regarding this RFP and submission requirements must be directed, in writing, to Mr.

Shepard by 1:00 PM on Tuesday, December 23, 2025. Written responses to all questions will be posted by Wednesday, January 7, 2026 on the CRDA website at https://crdact.net/rfps/.

Any addenda to this RFP will be posted on this website and proposers are advised to periodically check the site.

F. Proposal Deadline

Proposals submitted in response to this RFP must be submitted to the address below by 1:00 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, January 21, 2026.

Mr. Christopher R. Shepard, P.E.

Capital Region Development Authority 100 Columbus Boulevard, Suite 500 Hartford, CT 06103-2819

G. Short Lists; Presentation

CRDA may decide on the basis of the proposals to “short-list” one or more proposers and invite them to make individual presentations. For planning purposes, such presentations, if requested, would be expected to take place at CRDA’s office located on the 5th floor of the Connecticut Convention Center, 100 Columbus Boulevard, Suite 500 on Wednesday, February 4, 2026.

H. Draft Contract

See Attachment 2

V. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

The proposer shall complete and submit one (1) original and two (2) hard copies of its proposal and required attachments, together with one (1) copy in PDF electronic format on a USB flash drive. All submissions must follow the required format and address all requirements listed in the prescribed order using the numbering system below. Failure to follow the required format may result in disqualification of a submission.

All submissions must be signed by the proposer. Unsigned submissions will be rejected.

Submissions transmitted by facsimile will not be accepted or reviewed.

https://crdact.net/rfps/

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 8

Part 1 – Cover Letter

The cover letter shall be signed by a person authorized to legally bind the proposer and must include the following items:

• The identity of the proposing or lead firm and any partners, consultants or subcontractors included as part of the response, and a description of its legal form and domicile.

• The names of the individuals involved in the preparation of the RFP response and of any individuals employed or compensated to develop or advocate or solicit for the proposal along with their relationship to the proposing firm. Identify any such individuals who are subject to the provisions of the Connecticut Code of Ethics for Lobbyists.

• A statement confirming that the proposer has sole and complete responsibility for performing the services as proposed.

Part 2 – Table of Contents

Proposers must include a Table of Contents that lists sections and subsections with page numbers that follow the organization and sequence for this submission as required.

Part 3 – Organizational Profile

In addition to the information requested below, the proposer is required to complete Exhibits 1A and 1B and include them in this section (Part 3).

1. Qualifications. Describe how your experience or special knowledge, skills or abilities meet CRDA’s needs as outlined in this RFP.

2. Summary of Relevant Experience. Provide a listing of comparable projects, including but not limited to those sponsored by State and municipal governments, for which the proposer and/or its proposed team currently provide these consulting services or have provided such services within the last three (3) years. Additionally, provide detailed information on the type and scope of the projects and scope of services provided. Include name, title, address, telephone, facsimile number and email address of the client contact or contract administrator.

3. Organization Chart. Data describing the proposer’s and/or individual team members’ current organization date of incorporation, ownership, corporate office, number of years in business, size of business, services offered, operating philosophy and financial performance. Provide a diagram showing the hierarchical structure of functions and positions within the organization.

4. Financial Condition. If the proposer is a firm or corporation, include the three (3) most recent annual financial statements prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant, and reviewed or audited in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (USA). If the proposer has been in business for less than three (3) years, such proposer must include any financial statements prepared by a Certified Public Accountant and reviewed or

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 9 audited in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (USA) for the entire existence of such firm or corporation. Submit one (1) sealed confidential envelope separate from the main proposal package.

5. Firm/team’s affirmative action policy.

Part 4 – Partners

If the Proposal is submitted jointly by two (2) or more entities that will share responsibility for contract performance in any way, provide the same information required under Parts 3 and 5 for each such entity

Part 5 – Understanding of CRDA’s Goals

This section should describe your firm’s understanding of CRDA’s goals for the engineering design services for the project entitled Consulting and Engineering Design Services for Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste to Energy Facility and how your firm will assist in achieving them.

Part 6 – Additional Data (optional)

Provide any additional information which the proposer wishes to bring to the attention of CRDA that is relevant to this RFP.

Part 7 – Required Certifications and Affidavits

Completed certifications and affidavits listed in Exhibit 2

Part 8 – Compensation

Completed Exhibit 3

Part 9 – Professional Registration

Completed Exhibit 4

Part 10 – RFP General Conditions Requirements Certification

Completed Exhibit 5

Part 11 – Acknowledgement of Receipt of Addenda

Completed Exhibit 6

Part 12 – Form of Contract Exceptions

Completed Exhibit 7

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 10

VI. SELECTION CRITERIA

The following criteria shall be among those utilized in the selection process. They are presented as a guide for the proposer in understanding CRDA’s requirements and expectations for this project and are not necessarily exclusive or presented in order of importance.

A. Firm/team’s qualifications and experience

B. Professional qualifications of key personnel assigned to project

C. Proposed work plan and schedule

D. Price and/or other financial terms of proposal

E. References

F. Firm/team’s demonstrated commitment to affirmative action

VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS

1. If you elect to respond to this RFP, submission of your proposal constitutes your acceptance of the following understandings:

a. Proposals must be signed by an authorized officer of the proposer. Proposals must also provide name, title, email address and telephone number for (i) individuals with authority to negotiate and contractually bind the entity, and (ii) those who may be contacted for the purpose of clarifying or supporting the information provided in the proposal.

b. This RFP is not an offer or commitment, and neither this RFP, the RFP process nor any subsequent negotiations shall give rise to any commitment or obligation on the part of CRDA or confer any rights on any proposer unless and until a binding written agreement is executed by CRDA and the proposer.

c. CRDA reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to (i) to reject any or all proposals received in response to this RFP for any reason and at any time; (ii) to waive any irregularities or deficiencies in any proposal; (iii) to discuss a proposal or enter into negotiations with any proposer without notice to other proposers; (iv) to suspend or discontinue any such discussions or negotiations at any time; (v) to extend, reopen, modify, cancel and/or reissue this RFP; (vi) to enter into discussions or negotiations with parties not responding to the RFP without first rejecting all proposals received in response to this RFP;

(vii) to discuss, negotiate and enter into agreements with more than one proposer or any other party with respect to different responsibilities; and (viii) to use the proposals as a basis for negotiation and to negotiate with one or more proposers on terms other than set forth in this RFP or in any proposal.

d. Proposals should be submitted on the most favorable terms from a technical, qualifications and price standpoint. CRDA will select for negotiation the proposal(s) that best meet its

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 11 needs. While cost will be a factor to be considered, CRDA is not required and reserves the right not to accept the lowest priced proposal.

e. CRDA will not be responsible for any expenses incurred by any proposer in conjunction with the preparation or presentation of any proposal with respect to this RFP or proposer’s participation in the RFP process, all of which shall be at the proposer’s sole cost and risk.

f. CRDA is a “public agency” for purposes of the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). Accordingly, upon receipt at the office of CRDA, your proposal will be considered a public record or file subject to disclosure under the FOIA. The FOIA includes an exemption for responses to a request for proposals in a contract award process until the contract is executed or negotiations for the award of such contract have ended, whichever occurs earlier. CRDA has determined that it is in the public interest to maintain the temporary confidentiality of proposals pursuant to this FOIA exemption.

The FOIA also includes exemptions for “trade secrets” and “commercial or financial information given in confidence, not required by statute.” This exemption allows, but does not require, CRDA to withhold information that qualifies under these exemptions, which exceptions remain available so long as the information continues to be treated by the submitting party as confidential and is not readily available to the public from other sources. Only the particular information falling within one of these exemptions can be withheld by CRDA if made the subject of a public records request under FOIA. Therefore, a proposer must specifically identify those particular sentences, paragraphs, pages, sections or exhibits that it claims to be exempt, together with a convincing explanation and rationale sufficient to support the claim of confidentiality for purposes of Section 1-210(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes in terms of the prospective harm to the competitive position of the submitting party if such information were to be released. In the absence of such identification and explanation, any claim that particular information is exempt from FOIA disclosure will be deemed to have been waived. If a public records access request is made, CRDA is required to, and reserves the right to, determine (i) whether information included in a proposal qualifies under these exemptions, and (ii) whether to withhold the information.

Proposers should be aware that (x) CRDA has no obligation to initiate, prosecute or defend any legal proceeding or to seek to secure any protective order or other relief to prevent disclosure of any information pursuant to an FOIA request, (y) the proposer will have the burden of establishing the availability of any FOIA exemption in any such legal proceeding, and (z) in no event shall CRDA or any of its officers, directors or employees have any liability for disclosure of documents or information in the possession of CRDA which CRDA, or such officer, director or employee, in good faith, believes to be required pursuant to the FOIA or other requirements of law.

In the event of a public records request for a proposal, CRDA may provide a copy of the proposal with all or part of the information redacted for which an exemption has been claimed on the basis of confidentiality. For this purpose, CRDA may request, and each proposer by submission of a proposal agrees promptly to provide to CRDA, a version of

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 12 such proposal from which all information has been redacted for which an FOIA exemption based on confidentiality has been made.

g. Except as otherwise expressly provided in an agreement with CRDA, each proposal and any work product developed under a contract awarded as a result of this RFP shall be the sole property of CRDA.

This RFP, the RFP process, and any contract awarded pursuant to this RFP are subject to all other applicable legal requirements.

2. If you elect to respond to this RFP, you will be deemed to have certified the accuracy and completeness of the following representations and warranties:

a. Neither proposer nor any of its principals (i) has been convicted of bribery or attempting to bribe a public official of the State of Connecticut; (ii) has been found to have violated the State Code of Ethics for Public Officials or Lobbyists (the “Code of Ethics”); (iii) has been suspended or disqualified from bidding on contracts with the State of Connecticut or any department, agency or quasi-public agency of the State of Connecticut; (iv) has knowingly committed any violation of the Code of Ethics or of any other procurement requirement in connection with this RFP; or (v) is in default under any contract with any department, agency or quasi-public agency of the State of Connecticut.

b. Neither proposer nor any of its principals has received or paid, or agreed to receive or pay, any finders’ fee (Section 3-13j through 3-13l of the Connecticut General Statutes) or other compensation or benefit from or to any third party in connection with this solicitation, procurement or award of a contract with CRDA pursuant to this RFP.

c. Neither proposer nor any of its principals has provided anything of value to any officer, employee or board member of the CRDA, or any state public official or employee who may be involved with the RFP, for which full payment has not been made.

d. (i) The proposal is not made in connection with any competing proposer submitting a separate response to this RFP and is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud;

(ii) the proposer did not participate in the RFP development process and had no knowledge of the specific contents of the RFP prior to its issuance; (iii) no officer, employee or board member of CRDA participated directly or indirectly in the proposer’s proposal preparation;

and (iv) the information contained in the proposal is true, accurate and complete and includes all information necessary to insure that the statements therein are not misleading.

3. A proposal will not be considered complete unless the proposer also submits the following:

Part 1 Cover Letter Part 2 Table of Contents Part 3 Organizational Profile (Including Exhibits 1A and 1B) Part 4 Partners

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 13

Part 5 Understanding of CRDA’s goals for the engineering design services for the Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste to Energy Facility

Part 6 Additional Data (Optional) Part 7 Required Forms and Affidavits listed in Exhibit 2.

Part 8 Compensation (Exhibit 3) Part 9 Professional Registration (Exhibit 4).

Part 10 RFP General Conditions Requirements Certification (Exhibit 5) Part 11 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Addenda (Exhibit 6) Part 12 Form of Contract Exceptions (Exhibit 7)

Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, this RFP and the RFP process is solely for the benefit of CRDA. This RFP is not an offer susceptible to acceptance, but merely a request for proposals. CRDA shall have no liability or obligation of any kind as a result of this RFP or the RFP process, including as a result of any discussions or negotiations with a proposer, unless and until a binding agreement is entered into with a proposer.

In making its selection of a successful proposer, the CRDA may consider any and all factors and considerations which the CRDA, in its sole discretion deems relevant, the relative importance of which shall be in the sole discretion of CRDA.

Exhibit 1A Quality Based Selection Engineering Team Questionnaire Part 1

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 14

CRDA Project Number: 26-011

Project Title:

Consulting and Engineering Design Services for Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste to Energy Facility

Firm Name:

Firm Address:

Instructions: The Engineering Team Questionnaire contains questions that are not project-specific but are intended to provide the CRDA with information about the qualifications of the entire Team.

The Questionnaire must be answered as completely and concisely as possible.

No more than one (1) “Team” Questionnaire can be submitted. If necessary, use an attachment to answer any question and reference the question number.

1. Describe the nature of the entire Engineering Team. Response shall include the following:

1.1 Will your firm be providing sole services or be part of a team?

1.2 Name the principal who will be representing the entire team.

2.0 What past experiences does this firm have in working with public agencies?

3.0 Has your firm ever been involved in litigation with a governmental agency over a project you worked on or were not chosen for? If yes, explain.

4.0 Briefly describe your firm’s current workload and the status of each project. Submit a completed Project

Information Form (last page of this questionnaire) with this “Team” Questionnaire for each project.

5.0 List any recognition awards your firm has received.

Exhibit 1A

Engineering Team Questionnaire Part 1

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 15

6.0 Describe innovative approaches in design that your firm has used relating to speed of completion, quality of construction, security, and/or cost containment and how it may apply to projects of similar size and scope to this contract.

7.0 Which services will you perform in-house, and which services will you sub-contract?

8.0 Will your firm and your subcontractors provide the owner with access to requested information regarding financial transactions, methods of operation and all other records, reports or information about this project? If no, which items will you exclude?

9.0 Explain why the CRDA should select your team to provide services for this Project.

10.0 Submit any other relevant information that will assist the reviewers in evaluating the team’s qualifications to perform the work.

Exhibit 1B

Engineering Team Questionnaire Part 2

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 16

CRDA Project Number: 26-011

CRDA Project Title: Consulting and Engineering Design Services for Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste to Energy Facility

Firm Name:

Firm Address:

Instructions: The Engineering Team Questionnaire contains questions that are not project-specific but are intended to provide the CRDA with information about the qualifications of the entire Team.

The Questionnaire must be answered as completely and concisely as possible.

No more than one (1) “Team” Questionnaire can be submitted. If necessary, use an attachment to answer any question and reference the question number.

1.0 Provide information about the firm’s size and financial capability to perform the project in a timely manner.

2.0 Who will be the Lead Engineer? Provide this person’s experience in designing projects of similar size and scope to this contract.

3.0 Provide the following information about the other registered professionals employed by your organization who will be assigned to work on this project. The proposer may use attached resumes in response to parts 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 of this question.

3.1 Educational background

3.2 Current registrations

3.3 Professional experience, previous firms, and previous projects

3.4 Responsibilities on this project

4.0 Provide a responsibility chart with written descriptions showing how the design professionals will interact with the Owner to deliver design services. Submit an Attachment with this Questionnaire for the responsibility chart for your firm.

5.0 How does your firm document quality assurance and quality control in the design process and in the issuance of bidding documents?

6.0 Please provide, in order of relevance, projects of similar size and scope as required for this contract, which were designed by your firm. Use the Project Information Form (last page of this questionnaire) we have provided. Use a separate form for each project.

Exhibit 1B

Engineering Team Questionnaire Part 2

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 17

Project Information and Reference Form Required Attachment

Use one Attachment for each project as required by the “Team” Questionnaire. List Completed Projects that best represent your firm’s ability to perform the Scope of Services Identified in Section III of this RFP.

Submitting Firm’s Name A-E “Team” Question Number

Project Name:

Project Description:

(Identify similarities to this RFP’s Scope of Services)

Total Design Cost:

Total Construction Cost:

Start/Completion Date:

Lead Engineer’s Name:

Project References:

Owner Contact Info:

Name:

Title:

Entity Name:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

End “Team” Questionnaire

Insert Additional Pages as Needed

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 18

Exhibit 2 Required Certifications & Affidavits (Attachment 1)

The following forms must be completed and submitted as part of the RFP Submission:

1. OPM Ethics Form 1 – Gift and Campaign Contribution Certification

2. Guide to the Code of Ethics for Current or Potential State Contractors

3. State Elections Enforcement Commission Form 10

4. Internal Revenue Service Form W-9

5. CRDA Disclosure Form A

6. State of CT Certificate of Compliance

7. Disclosure statement concerning any current business relationships (within the last three years) that pose a conflict of interest as defined by Connecticut General Statutes Section 1-85 & 1-86

8. State of CT Nondiscrimination Certification form D

9. OPM Ethics Form 5 – Consulting Agreement Affidavit

10. CHRO Contract Compliance Regulations & Report

11. State of CT Terms & Conditions

12. General Conditions Certification (Exhibit 5 of RFP)

13. Acknowledgement of Receipt of RFP Addenda (Exhibit 6 of RFP)

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 19

Name of Proposer: ______________________

Exhibit 3

Compensation and Project Schedule

The undersigned, having familiarized ourselves/myself with the project and this Request for Proposals, hereby propose to complete the Work identified in this RFP for the following Contract Prices:

Proposals shall include a T&M price to complete the work described herein. Tasks 1 and 2 shall be priced on a Time and Materials basis, subject to Not-to-Exceed limits. Task 3 shall be priced on a Time and Materials basis. Proposers shall include a breakdown of the price for Tasks 1 and 2, including estimated hours, billing rates, and all required materials or subcontracted expenses.

1) Revise Closure Plan and provide support necessary to obtain Closure Plan approval from CT-DEEP

2) Prepare engineering plans and specifications, and support CRDA’s public solicitation and selection of qualified contractor(s) to perform the closure work and associated demolition.

3) Construction Quality Assurance Services (provide hourly rates for one full time construction inspector and one project manager).

4) Allowances

Task 1- All work required to revise the Closure Plan and obtain approval from CT-DEEP to implement the Closure Plan (Time & Materials Not-To-Exceed)

(Dollars) ($ ######) NTE

Task 2- All work required to prepare construction level plans and specifications for a project to properly meet CT-DEEP requirements for closure of the former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility.

Item shall include support during public bidding process to engage qualified contractor(s) to perform the closure and demolition work. (Time & Materials Not-to-Exceed)

Total of Tasks 1 - 2

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 20

Task 3 – Hourly rates for one full time construction inspector and one project manager (T&M)

Construction Inspector ___________________________ Hourly Rate

Project Manager ___________________________ Hourly Rate

Allowances

Meeting Allowance (Not-to-Exceed Total, Invoiced Hourly)

For additional on-site meetings (2 hours with Project Manager) ____________________ each meeting

Reimbursable Expense Allowance, Printing (Invoiced per Printed Page)

Reimbursable Expense Allowance, Travel (Mileage and Travel Time)

Reimbursable Expense Allowance, Waste Characterization/Environmental Testing (Not-to-Exceed Total, Attach Unit Costs for All Applicable Laboratory Methods)

Attach a detailed breakdown in tabular form of cost assumptions for Tasks 1-2 and Allowances. At a minimum, include personnel assigned to each task, estimated number of hours for each person assigned to each task, and the hourly rates of personnel assigned to each task.

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 21

Proposers shall include an estimated schedule to complete the following tasks after receiving the notice to proceed:

1) Review of documents and site inspection

2) Submit draft revised Closure Plan to CRDA

3) Finalize and submit revised Closure Plan to CT-DEEP after receipt of CRDA comments

4) Preparation of construction level plans and specifications after Closure Plan approval is issued by CT-DEEP.

5) Support during public bidding process to engage qualified contractor(s) to perform the closure work.

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 22

Name of Proposer: _________________

Exhibit 4

Professional Registrations

ATTACH HERE: Provide written evidence that The Proposer, at the time when Proposal is submitted, possesses valid license(s) and professional registrations in the State of Connecticut.

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 23

Name of Proposer: __________________________

Exhibit 5

RFP General Conditions and Requirements Certification

The undersigned hereby affirms the Proposer shall adhere to the RFP Conditions as contained in the RFP for Consulting and Engineering Design Services for Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility including Attachment 1, State of CT Standard Terms and Conditions.

Submitted:

Date: _________________________

(Signature of Official)

(Print Name and Title of Official)

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 24

Name of Proposer_________________________

Exhibit 6

Acknowledgement of Receipt of Addenda Certification

ADDENDA ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the following addenda:

ADDENDA NUMBER DATE OF ADDENDA

Submitted:

Date: _________________________

(Signature of Official)

(Print Name and Title of Official)

Closure Plan Revision and Implementation at the Former MIRA Waste-to-Energy Facility – RFP Page # 25

Name of Proposer: ____________________________

Exhibit 7

Form of Contract Exceptions

Proposers should identify below any exceptions to the Form of Contract or any issues/comments they have with the Form of Contract in Attachment 2.