RFP Attachment 1 - PPQ.doc
DOC document 63 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1625-OFO-25-NAT-0019
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a Department of Labor (DOL) Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Data Collection Operations contract, solicitation number 1605C5-25-R-00002. The PPQ is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous customers, evaluating contractor performance across four key areas: quality of goods/services, contract performance, timeliness of performance, and personnel management.
The questionnaire provides a structured method for past clients to rate contractor performance using adjectival ratings ranging from Outstanding to Unsatisfactory, with sections for specific comments, identification of contractor strengths and weaknesses, and a recommendation on whether the contractor should be awarded future contracts. The document is part of a competitive procurement process for the Current Employment Statistics (CES) program, which seeks non-personal services for data collection activities, with potential contract types including firm-fixed-price and labor-hour line items.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AMNT 0004 - Executed Atlanta CBA 22-25.pdf | ||
| AMNT 0004 - RFP Attachment 4 - RFP Question and Answer.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AMNT 0004 - DOL RFP 1605C5-25-R-00002 0004.pdf | ||
| AMNT 0003 - DOL RFQ 1605C5-25-R-00002 0003.pdf | ||
| AMNT 0003 - RFP Attachment 3 - Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AMNT 0003 - Wage Determinations for CES DCCs.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AMNT 0003 - RFP Attachment 4 - RFP Question and Answer.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_1605C5-25-R-00002_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| DOL RFQ 1605C5-25-R-00002 0001.pdf | ||
| DOL RFQ 1605C5-25-R-00002 FINAL.pdf | ||
| RFP Attachment 5 - QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Attachment 6 - SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN TEMPLATE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP Attachment 4 - RFP Question and Answer.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP Attachment 3 - Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP Attachment 2 - BLS Confidentiality and Security.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1605C5-25-R-00002 Attachment 1
ATTACHMENT 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REF: RFP # 1605C5-25-R-00002 – Current Employment Statistics (CES) Data Collection Operations
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form plans to submit a proposal to the Department of Labor (DOL) in response to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Data Collection activities. Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important.
Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to the DOL Contracting Office via email to Jasmine Lee (Lee.Jasmine.4@dol.gov), Rachael Vargas (Vargas.Rachael.N@dol.gov), and Shayla Battle Battle.Shayla.E@dol.gov) by the time specified in Section L.1 of the RFP.
PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. VENDOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS
2. CUSTOMER AGENCY
3. CONTRACT NUMBER:
2a. EVALUATOR
4. CONTRACT VALUE: $______________________
NAME:
5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE: ________________
TITLE:
6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: ___________
PHONE NO:
7. CONTRACT TYPE (Circle All That Apply): FP
CPFF
CPAF OTHER
8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Circle One Response): DIFFICULT ROUTINE
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
PART TWO: VENDOR PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the vendor’s performance. Each section has a set of questions with five possible adjectival ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents your experience with this vendor and indicate your assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. These sections are:
A. QUALITY OF SERVICE
B. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
D. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT / SUBCONTRACTORS
Also, it is very important (and beneficial to our evaluation) if you submit examples and/or comments as to why they were rated as such in the sections herein.
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| Outstanding |
| Contractor’s performance significantly exceeded most or all contract requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| Acceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Neutral |
| In the case of a vendor without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the vendor may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problems(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| A |
| QUALITY OF GOODS/SERVICES |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Rate the overall quality of the services received. |
| 2 |
| Company’s handling of issues or problems. |
COMMENTS:
| B |
| CONTRACT PERFORMANCE |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts? |
| 2 |
| How effective has the contractor been in understanding and responding to additional user requirements? |
| C |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Were the services provided according to contract requirements? |
| 2 |
| Were schedules/timelines adhered to? Were all task completed/provided on-time? |
| 3 |
| Was the contractor responsive to technical direction? |
| D |
| PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT / SUBCONTRACTORS |
| O |
| A |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| 1 |
| Rate the overall quality of the personnel management. |
| 2 |
| Company’s handling of issues or problems. |
PART THREE: VENDOR PERFORMANCE RATING
1.
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
YES
If so, by Default
Convenience ____
NO
If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).
2.
What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3.
What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4.
Would you award another contract to this contractor?
YES
No
WHY?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR
DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .