RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 J.6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 162 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation for Hack DHS: Crowdsourced Vulnerability Assessment Services (CVAS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70RTAC22R00000010
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a solicitation seeking crowdsourced vulnerability assessment services. The Department of Homeland Security is soliciting proposals from vendors to conduct security testing of DHS public-facing websites and applications through a vetted community of security researchers. The past performance questionnaire requests references to rate offerors on criteria including quality, timeliness, management, and customer satisfaction for prior similar contracts. References are asked to provide ratings on a scale of one to five and additional comments. The solicitation number is 70RTAC22R00000010 and responses are due by the Phase 2 proposal deadline specified in the RFP.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP 70RTAC22R00000010 - Attachment J.6 Past Performance Questionnaire

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Please have your referenced client complete this survey and submit directly to Sohl Han, at

Sohl.Han@hq.dhs.gov and LaKeisha Johnson, at LaKeisha.Johnson@hq.dhs.gov by the Phase 2 proposal deadline.

This survey pertains to Offeror

(Contractor Name)

Your Name

Your Company/Agency

Your Title/ Your Role in this

Contract

Your Email Address

Your Telephone Number

Your Role in this Contract

Reference

Survey Period of Performance

General Description of Services

Required under the Contract

Signature of Person Completing

Survey mailto:Sohl.Han@hq.dhs.gov mailto:LaKeisha.Johnson@hq.dhs.gov

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Assign each area a rating of either 5

(Exceptional), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Satisfactory), 2 (Marginal), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.

Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Overall quality of product/service:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support:

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Reliability:

2. Responsive to technical direction:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Response time to end-users:

MANAGEMENT:

1. Effective management, including subcontracts:

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Notification of problems:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Flexibility:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

7. Ability to transition resources and personnel:

COST CONTROL (not applicable to fixed-price contract type):

1. Current, accurate and complete billings:

2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Cost efficiencies:

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Management Personnel

Yes No

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel

Yes No

c. Overall technical solutions to provide a comprehensive managed service.

Yes No

d. Would you hire this vendor for the future requirement?

Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Rating Guidelines

Rating Definition

5-Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4-Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3-Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

2-Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

1-Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

This survey pertains to Offeror Contractor Name:
Your Name:
Your CompanyAgency:
Your Title Your Role in this Contract:
Your Email Address:
Your Telephone Number:
Your Role in this Contract Reference:
Survey Period of Performance:
General Description of Services Required under the Contract:
Signature of Person Completing Survey:
1 Compliance with contract requirements: Off
2 Accuracy of reports: Off
3 Level of knowledge experience and training of personnel: Off
4 Capability of personnel to perform required services: Off
5 Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services: Off
6 Overall quality of productservice: Off
7 Effectiveness of maintaining continuity of mission support: Off
1_8: Off
2_8: Off
3_8: Off
4_8: Off
5_8: Off
2 Responsive to technical direction: Off
3 Meets contract delivery schedules andor task deadlines: Off
4 Response time to endusers: Off
NA: Off
NA_2: Off
NA_3: Off
NA_4: Off
NA_5: Off
NA_6: Off
NA_7: Off
NA_8: Off
NA_9: Off
NA_10: Off
NA_11: Off
1 Effective management including subcontracts: Off
1_12: Off
2_12: Off
3_12: Off
2 Reasonablecooperative behavior: Off
3 Responsive to contract requirements: Off
1_14: Off
4 Notification of problems: Off
1_17: Off
3_14: Off
3_15: Off
3_16: Off
3_17: Off
7 Ability to transition resources and personnel: Off
5_12: Off
5_13: Off
5_14: Off
5_15: Off
5_16: Off
5_17: Off
5_18: Off
NA_12: Off
NA_13: Off
NA_14: Off
NA_15: Off
NA_16: Off
NA_17: Off
NA_18: Off
1 Current accurate and complete billings: Off
2 Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals: Off
1_21: Off
2_21: Off
3_21: Off
4_21: Off
5_21: Off
NA_21: Off
Contractor Management Personnel: Off
Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel: Off
Overall technical solutions to provide a comprehensive managed service: Off
Would you hire this vendor for the future requirement: Off
undefined:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .