RFP 25_103 Sidewalk Prioritization Rating _ A.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- PAVEMENT ANALYSIS
- Solicitation number
- PE-66085-NONST-2025-000000041
- Issued by
- Fulton County, Georgia
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by a city government for a Sidewalk Prioritization Rating project. The city is seeking a vendor to create a sidewalk centerline layer and a handicap ramp layer, including various attributes for each asset such as location, condition, material, width, and linear footage of repair needed. The sidewalks will be prioritized for repair based on location (arterial roads, schools/parks, residential areas, and other roads) and condition (good, fair, poor, very poor). The selected vendor will fill in the required attributes for each sidewalk segment and handicap ramp, while the city will provide a map for the city zone. The scope also includes creating custom fields such as linear feet of work area, city zone, condition, and location.
The document provides details on the sidewalk segmentation, scoring criteria, exhibit maps, and city expectations for the GIS data layers. It does not include pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, or other contractual details. The selected vendor is not required to fill in the condition, inspection date, or inspector name for the handicap ramp assets.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP 25_103 Information and Contract T_C.pdf | ||
| RFP 25_103 Scope of Work_Submittal Info.pdf | ||
| E_Verify Affidavit_Contractor.pdf | ||
| Road Classification Map.pdf | ||
| Disclosure_Debarment Required Form.pdf | ||
| RFP 25_103 Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SIDEWALK PRIORITIZATION/RATING
Sidewalk Segmentation:
Segments will be broken at natural break points (intersections, driveways). If the distance between break points is greater than 200’, then it will be broken into multiple segments. Ideally, we would like to have segments around 100’ long in these scenarios. This will make things easier for our crews to locate the issues needing repair over having a 500’ segment. In neighborhoods with normal/small lots, the segments will still stop at natural break points even if it is a short distance.
Scoring:
The City would like to prioritize sidewalk repairs based on two categories, Location and Condition. These two categories will both be assessed when making decisions of what type of repair is needed, who will be making the repairs, and how quickly they need to be completed. These were formulated based on research and our specific needs.
Location:
• A: On arterial roadways and within the downtown district (nonresidential) This is the highest location priority and will mostly be completed by contractors. Arterial roadways typically have higher speed limits with greater risk to pedestrian/worker safety.
The downtown area has a high concentration of pedestrian generators located within it.
• B: Within a quarter mile radius of schools, parks, greenway access and government buildings (nonresidential) These repairs will mostly be completed by Public Works personnel. These are locations that are most likely to have pedestrians walking to and from them.
• C: Residential areas (neighborhoods)
Sidewalk Prioritization
Location
A
On Arterial roadways and within the downtown district (nonresidential)
B
Within a quarter mile radius of schools, parks, greenway access and government buildings (nonresidential)
C
Residential areas (neighborhoods)
D
All other roads
Condition
Good
No vertical displacement.
Cracking or spalling under 25% of segment.
Fair
Vertical displacement less than 1".
Major cracking or spalling between 26%-50% of segment.
Poor
Vertical displacement between 1"-2".
Major cracking or spalling between 51%-75% of segment.
Very Poor
Vertical displacement over 2".
Major cracking or spalling over 76% of segment.
These repairs will mostly be completed by Public Works personnel. Neighborhoods generally have high foot traffic but have much lower speed limits making them less dangerous to pedestrian/workers.
• D: All other roads These repairs will mostly be completed by Public Works personnel. Any segment that does not fall into location A, B or C will go into location D.
Condition:
• Good: No vertical displacement. Cracking or spalling under 25% of segment.
- No work order is required for the segment.
• Fair: Vertical displacement less than 1”. Major cracking or spalling between 26%-50% of the segment.
- No work order is required for the segment.
• Poor: Vertical displacement between 1”-2”. Major cracking or spalling between 51%-75% of segment.
- One work order will be made for the segment noting the total linear footage of sidewalk needing repair.
• Very Poor: Vertical displacement of 2”. Major cracking or spalling over 76% of segment
- One work order will be made for the segment noting the total linear footage of sidewalk needing repair.
The condition of a segment will be based on its worst issue. For example, if there is one vertical displacement of 2.5” in a segment that is 120’ long but the rest of it is fine, the condition of the whole segment will still be Very Poor. The linear footage indicated within the work order will show that it is an isolated issue.
We would like for these conditions to be represented by a unique color on the GIS map the Contractor will be creating.
Exhibit A: Nonresidential streets
Exhibit B: Large lot residential
Exhibit C: Normal/small lot residential
Exhibit C: Location Map
City Expectations:
• Selected vendor will create the sidewalk centerline layer.
• Each segment will be an entity or asset.
• Each entity/asset will have the following attributes:
1. Unique ID or Feature ID (assigned by the vendor) using West to East and South to North numbering and street name, similar to roadway segments.
2. Name of adjacent road
3. Material (pull down menu with choices)
- Concrete
- Asphalt
- Brick/Paver
- Gravel
- Mulch
- Pervious
- Other
4. Width (in feet)
5. Inspection date
6. Inspector name
7. Location (with pull down choices)
A - Arterial or downtown B - Quarter mile radius C - Residential D – Other
8. Condition (with pull down choices)
- Good
- Fair
- Poor
- Very Poor
9. City zone (with pull down choices 1-5) *City can provide a map for this.
• The vendor will fill in attributes for each asset.
• Data will be based on entire segment, not on each crack or displacement.
• The Layer will include the following custom fields to be filled out by the selected vendor
1 – Width 2 – Linear feet of work area (if cracking occurs over 50’ then 50’ is entered even if segment is 100’) 3 – City Zone 1-5 4 – Condition: Good, Fair, Poor, Very Poor 5 - Location: A-D
ADA Handicap Ramps:
• The firm should create a handicap ramp layer.
• Each ramp should be an asset point.
• Each asset should have the following attributes:
1. Unique ID or feature ID (selected firm to create)
2. Name of adjacent road (Selected firm to fill in)
3. Material (Pull down menu with choices)
- Concrete
- Asphalt
- Brick/paver
- other
4. Inspection date
5. Inspector name
6. Location (with pull down choices) A - Arterial or downtown B - Quarter mile radius C - Residential D – Other
7. Condition (with pull down choices)
- Good
- Fair
- Poor
- Very Poor
8. City Zone (with pull down choices 1-5).
9. Detectible warning surface (with pull down choices)
- yes -No
10. Ramp type (with pull down choices) -A
- A Skewed
- B
- C
- D
- D Skewed
11. Percentages and Dimensions -Cross Slope Percentage
- Ramp Percentage
- Ramp Length
- Landing Size
12. ADA Compliant (with pull down choices)
- Yes
- No
• Selected firm is not to fill in condition, inspection date or inspector name.
• Please use the table attached below for reference.
Unique ID 1388
Road Name Old Milton Parkway
Surface PCC Drop Down for options
Location Tier A,B,C,D Drop Down for options
Detectible Warning Surface Yes or No Drop Down for options
Ramp Type A, A Skewed, B, C, D, D Skewed Drop Down for options
ADA Compliant Yes or No Drop Down for options
Cross Slope Percentage
Ramp Percentage
Ramp Length
Landing Size
Lat. 34.07315
Long. -84.305619
Notes
Desired Attributes
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .