RFP 2425 SWM_Cart Tagging.docx
DOCX document 1005 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Recycle Right: Cart Tagging Initiative
- Solicitation number
- RFP 2425 SWM
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology for consulting services to develop and execute a cart tagging initiative across multiple communities in Washington State. The primary objectives are to reduce contamination in the curbside recycling stream, measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the cart tagging initiative, and incorporate equity and environmental justice considerations into the project design.
The RFP outlines a six-task scope of work that includes planning and project design, volunteer solicitation, scheduling, performing the cart tagging, analyzing and reporting the findings, and overall project management. The total budget for this procurement is $500,000 and the period of performance is from the contract award date through June 30, 2025, with the option to extend for up to one additional two-year period. Ecology is seeking highly qualified and experienced contractors to submit proposals that demonstrate a well-thought-out work plan, use of qualified personnel, and a robust data collection and reporting methodology. The RFP also encourages the use of small, minority, women, and veteran-owned businesses as subcontractors.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
State of Washington, Department of Ecology Solicitation Number RFP XXXX, Recycling Rate Study and Community Input Process
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
| Solicitation Number |
| Solicitation Title |
| Proposal Due Date and Time |
| RFP 2425 SWM |
| Recycle Right: Cart Tagging Initiative |
| August 6, 2024 by 5:00 pm |
Lacey, WA time
RFP Procurement Coordinator: Daniel Weston Phone: (360) 791-4849 Email: daniel.weston@ecy.wa.gov Instructions to Bidders:
· Any questions concerning this solicitation are to be directed to the above Procurement Coordinator.
· Check WEBS for any amendments.
· Bid must be received on or before the Proposal Due Date and Time by Ecology to be considered responsive.
How to respond on this bidding opportunity:
· Review RFP section 2.8 for Submission of Proposal instructions.
· Only emailed bids are accepted in response to this RFP. Attach your bid submissions to your email.
· Bid must contain an official signature of a duly authorized officer or agent of the Bidder’s company empowered with the right to bind the Bidder. Remember to sign your Bid.
· For electronic submissions by email, attach a scanned PDF of the signature page to your Bid, electronic digital signatures are accepted.
· Email subject line is to note the Solicitation Number and Solicitation Title.
Bids must be received on or before the due date & time at this location:
· Bidders are responsible for the timely delivery of their bid to the email address shown below:
· Please submit responses via email directly to the Procurement Coordinator identified above, by email to: daniel.weston@ecy.wa.gov
Table of Contents
| 1. | INTRODUCTION | 4 |
| 1.1 | Announcements and Special Information | 4 |
| 1.2 | Objectives | 4 |
| 1.3 | Background | 5 |
| 1.4 | Period of Performance | 6 |
| 1.5 | Funding | 6 |
| 1.6 | No Costs or Charges | 6 |
| 1.7 | Acquisition Authority | 6 |
| 1.8 | Authority to Bind | 6 |
| 1.9 | Contract Formation | 7 |
| 1.10 | Incorporation of Documents into a Contract | 7 |
| 1.11 | Contract Type | 7 |
| 1.12 | Definitions | 7 |
| 2. | ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS | 9 |
| 2.1 | Procurement Coordinator | 9 |
| 2.2 | Estimated Procurement Schedule | 10 |
| 2.3 | Pre-Bid Conference | 11 |
| 2.4 | WEBS Registration | 12 |
| 2.5 | Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) | 12 |
| 2.6 | Bidder Questions and Answers | 12 |
| 2.7 | RFP Amendments | 13 |
| 2.8 | Submission of Proposal | 13 |
| 2.9 | Proposal Presentation and Organization | 14 |
| 2.10 | Cost of Response Preparation | 14 |
| 2.11 | Response Property of Ecology | 14 |
| 2.12 | Proprietary or Confidential Information | 14 |
| 2.13 | Errors in Response | 15 |
| 2.14 | Waive Minor Administrative Irregularities | 15 |
| 2.15 | Responsiveness | 15 |
| 2.16 | Exclusive Use | 16 |
| 2.17 | Nondiscrimination | 16 |
| 2.18 | Small Businesses and Diverse Businesses | 16 |
| 2.19 | Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprises (MWBE) | 16 |
| 2.20 | Wage Laws and Workers’ Rights Certifications | 17 |
| 2.21 | Non-Endorsement and Publicity | 17 |
| 2.22 | No Best and Final Offer | 17 |
| 2.23 | No Obligation to Contract/Buy | 18 |
| 2.24 | Rejection of Proposals | 18 |
| 2.25 | Right to Cancel | 18 |
| 2.26 | Award Intent | 18 |
| 2.27 | Insurance Coverage | 18 |
| 3. | EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD PROCESS | 19 |
| 3.1 | Basis for Evaluation | 19 |
| 3.2 | Evaluation Process | 19 |
| 3.3 | Clarification of Proposal | 20 |
| 3.4 | Evaluation Scoring Points | 20 |
| 3.5 | Scoring Process | 21 |
| 3.6 | Substantially Equivalent Scores | 22 |
| 3.7 | Bidder Interview | 22 |
| 3.8 | Selection of Apparent Successful Bidder | 22 |
| 3.9 | Notification of Apparent Successful Bidder | 22 |
| 3.10 | Contract Negotiations with Apparent Successful Bidder | 23 |
| 3.11 | Debriefing of Unsuccessful Bidders | 23 |
| 3.12 | Complaint and Protest Requirements | 23 |
| 4. | VENDOR REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMITTALS | 24 |
| 4.1 | (M) Minimum Bidder Qualifications | 24 |
| 4.2 | (MS) Approach and Work Plan | 24 |
| 4.3 | (MS) Summary of Proposed Staff | 25 |
| 4.4 | (M) Staffing Requirements | 25 |
| 4.5 | (MS) Similar Work Experiences | 26 |
| 4.6 | (MS) Work Experiences in WA State | 26 |
| 4.7 | (MS) Past Customer References | 26 |
| 4.8 | (M) Subcontractors Use | 27 |
| 4.9 | (M) Informational Background | 27 |
| 4.10 | (MS) Price Proposal | 29 |
| APPENDIX A Certifications and Assurances | 32 | |
| APPENDIX B MWBE Participation Form | 34 | |
| APPENDIX C Wage Laws Certification | 35 | |
| APPENDIX D Workers’ Rights Certification | 36 | |
| APPENDIX E Nondiscrimination Certification | 37 | |
| APPENDIX F Scope of Work | 38 | |
| APPENDIX G Sample Service Contract | 42 | |
| APPENDIX H Complaint and Protest Procedures | 43 | |
| APPENDIX I Small Business and Veteran Business Certification Form | 46 | |
| APPENDIX J Diverse Business Inclusion Plan – Subcontractors Form | 47 | |
| APPENDIX K Diverse Business Inclusion Plan – Subcontractors | 48 | |
| APPENDIX L Response Checklist | 53 |
INTRODUCTION
Announcements and Special Information Bidders are required to read, understand, and accept all information contained within this entire solicitation package. By responding to this solicitation, the Bidder acknowledges having read and understood the entire solicitation, and accepts all the information contained herein.
In support of the State’s economic and environmental goals, we encourage you to consider the following elements in responding to our solicitations. These are not a factor of award (unless otherwise specified in this document):
· Using environmentally preferable products and services that exceed EPA guidelines.
· Supporting a diverse supplier pool, including small, veteran, minority, and women-owned firms.
· Supplying products made or grown in Washington.
Objectives The Department of Ecology (Ecology) is soliciting bids for consulting services to develop and execute a cart tagging initiative for the purpose of reducing contamination in the recycling stream. Ecology seeks proposals from experienced contractors with a solid track record of planning and executing cart tagging projects. For full details, refer to Appendix F, Scope of Work.
The ultimate goals of the project are to:
· Perform cart tagging in multiple communities across Washington State.
· Reduce contamination in the curbside recycling stream.
· Measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the cart tagging initiative.
· Include equity and environmental justice considerations in the project design.
Project Expectations:
· Ecology expects proposals from highly qualified and experienced practitioners that actively provide this specialized consulting service.
· Ecology expects proposals to contain a well thought out work plan response with clear explanation of deliverables and breakdown of approach/tasks on how the bidder will meet the above objectives.
· Ecology expects the bidder to commit a team of qualified professionals to the account who have experience developing and executing on-the-ground recycling outreach .
· Ecology expects the bidder to produce both a written and presentation deliverable with specific recommendations that pertain to areas outlined in Appendix F: Scope of Work.
· As part the contract, Ecology expects the Bidder to work with Ecology Project Manager to make the process, communications, and coordination as efficient as possible.
Background About Washington State Department of Ecology:
The Department of Ecology (http://www.ecy.wa.gov/) employs about 1,700 people located in six major offices and a number of smaller offices throughout the State. Ecology’s headquarters is in Lacey. The mission of the agency is to protect, preserve, and enhance Washington’s environment, and promote the wise management of air, land, and water for the benefit of current and future generations. The agency is organized into ten environmental programs plus one administrative program with six divisions. The agency provides services in the areas of environmental permitting; technical assistance; inspections and enforcement; contracts, grants, and loans; environmental monitoring and analysis; policy and rule development; and education and outreach.
In 2019, to encourage Washington residents to improve residential recycling practices and reduce contamination in the commingled curbside stream, Ecology worked with contractors to launch a statewide “Recycle Right” campaign. The campaign included stakeholder input to identify the most impactful sources of contamination and audience testing to determine the messaging that would best resonate with residents. The initial campaign focused on the concept of keeping recyclables empty, clean, and dry, and the subsequent campaign in 2023 emphasized not bagging recyclables. The campaigns consisted primarily of online, television, radio, and billboard advertisements and received 59 million impressions. While these campaigns were considered successful in regards to their reach, impressions do not always translate into changes in behavior. It has been difficult to measure the impact of these campaigns, and it remains unclear how effective they were at reducing contamination in the recycling stream.
Research and case studies from communities in Washington State (Olympia, Spokane) and around the country have demonstrated that cart tagging and lid lift initiatives can reduce recycling contamination and even increase the amount that residents recycle. Ecology wants to move the Recycle Right campaign forward with new tactics, while preserving the existing brand. By transitioning the Recycle Right campaign from a public awareness campaign to direct feedback, Ecology hopes to effect meaningful, measurable improvements in the recycling behaviors of Washington residents.
Period of Performance The period of performance of any Contract resulting from this RFP is from date of award to June 30, 2025, unless at Ecology’s sole discretion the contract is terminated sooner, or extended for additional periods. Amendments extending the period of performance, if any, shall be exercised at the sole discretion of Ecology and are subject to written mutual agreement.
Ecology reserves the right to extend the contract for up to one (2) year period, if additional funding is obtained by Ecology.
The total contract term may not exceed three (3) years unless an emergency exists and/or special circumstances require a partial term extension.
The actual Project Schedule and period of performance may vary depending on the Apparent Successful Bidder’s response and Contract negotiations.
Funding Funding will be provided by Ecology’s Solid Waste Management Program. The maximum budget for this procurement is $500,000, this is inclusive of all cost, including materials, travel, and sales tax, if applicable. Any bid response in excess of the budget will be considered non-responsive. In the event additional funds are required due to an approved change order, or should additional funding be obtained by Ecology; the parties may negotiate an amended Statement of Work. Any such Statement of Work is contingent upon the availability of funding.
No Costs or Charges No costs or charges under the proposed Contract may be incurred before the Contract is fully executed.
Acquisition Authority Ecology issues this RFP acting under the delegated authority of the Department of Enterprise Services, in accordance to Revised Code of Washington RCW 39.26, which establishes the Department of Enterprise Services and regulates the manner in which state agencies may acquire goods and services.
Authority to Bind The Director of the Department of Ecology, or the Director’s designee, is the only individual who may legally commit Ecology to the expenditures of funds for a Contract resulting from this RFP. No cost chargeable to the proposed Contract may be incurred before receipt of either a fully executed Contract or specific written authorization from the Director.
Contract Formation A Proposal submitted in response to this Solicitation is an offer to contract with Ecology. A Proposal becomes a contract only when legally awarded and accepted in writing by Ecology.
Incorporation of Documents into a Contract This Solicitation document, any subsequent Amendments, and the Bidder’s Response will be incorporated into the resulting Contract.
Contract Type Ecology anticipates awarding a service contract to develop and execute a statewide cart tagging initiative.
To be responsive to this RFP, Bidder must indicate a willingness to enter into a Contract substantially the same as the Sample Service Contract, Appendix G, by signing the Certifications and Assurances, located in Appendix A, and returning it with your bid. Bidder’s submission of a Response to this solicitation constitutes acceptance of these contract requirements, unless otherwise noted in Bidder’s submittal.
The Bidder may submit exceptions to this solicitation as allowed in Appendix A - Certifications and Assurances. Under no circumstances is a Bidder to submit its own standard contract terms and conditions as a response to this solicitation. The terms and conditions of any other contract shall have no force or effect. Instead, Bidder is to review and identify the language in Appendix G, Sample Service Contract and its attached General Terms and Conditions that the Bidder finds problematic, state the issue, and propose the specific language or contract modification that the Bidder is requesting changed, and then attach such to Appendix A, Certification and Assurances, as a proposal submittal.
Ecology expects the Contract signed with the Apparent Successful Bidder to be substantially the same as the Sample Service Contract, Appendix G. Any specific areas of dispute with the Sample Service Contract must be identified in the Bidder’s Response. Ecology will review any requested exceptions and accept or reject them at its sole discretion, and may, at the sole discretion of Ecology be grounds for disqualification from further consideration in the award of a Contract.
The foregoing should not be interpreted to prohibit either party from proposing additional contract terms and conditions during negotiation of the final Contract.
Definitions For a complete list of definitions review those definitions in Chapter 39.26 RCW, all terms contained herein will be read consistently with those definitions.
In addition to the definitions identified in the Appendix G, Sample Service Contract, and its attached Appendix C, General Terms and Conditions, the following definitions apply for the purposes of this RFP include:
“ASB” means Apparent Successful Bidder (Proposer).
"Accessible” means the expectation that people with disabilities have access to and use of information and data and be provided access to the same services and content that is available to persons without disabilities unless providing direct access is not possible due to technical or legal limitations “Bid” means a written offer in response to a solicitation from the Department of Ecology to perform a Contract to provide labor, materials, supplies, services, and/or equipment.
“Bidder” means an individual or entity who submitted a bid in response to a solicitation from the Department of Ecology.
“Contractor” means individual or entity who’s Proposal has been accepted by Ecology and is awarded a fully executed, written contract.
“DES” means state of Washington Department of Enterprise Services.
“Ecology” means state of Washington Department of Ecology.
“Proposal” means a written offer in response to a solicitation from the Department of Ecology to perform a Contract to provide labor, materials, supplies, services, and/or equipment.
“Proposer” means the individual or entity who submitted a proposal in response to a solicitation from the Department of Ecology.
“Response” means bid or proposal.
“RFP” means Request for Proposal.
“Services” means labor, work, analysis, or similar activities provided by a Contractor relating to the solicitation to accomplish a specific scope of work.
“SOW” means Statement of Work, a written agreement between Department of Ecology and the Contractor for services to be accomplished under the terms and conditions of the resulting Contract from a Request for Proposal.
“WEBS” means Washington’s Electronic Business Solution, the state vendor registration and Bidder notification system maintained by the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services located at: Doing Business with the State | Department of Enterprise Services (wa.gov).
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Procurement Coordinator The Procurement Coordinator is the sole point of contact in Ecology for this RFP. Communications directed to parties other than the Procurement Coordinator may result in disqualification of the Bidder. All oral communications will be considered unofficial and non-binding on Ecology. Bidders should rely only on written statements issued by the Procurement Coordinator.
The Procurement Coordinator may be reached as follows:
| Name: | Dan Weston |
| Telephone Number: | (360) 791-4849 |
| E-Mail Address: | daniel.weston@ecy.wa.gov |
Estimated Procurement Schedule The dates and times listed below represent the estimated procurement schedule. Ecology reserves the right to change the schedule as needed. Notification of changes to the procurement schedule prior to Bid Due Date and Time will be sent electronically to all properly registered users in the Department of Enterprise Services’ WEBS who have downloaded this solicitation from WEBS. Changes to the procurement schedule after Bid Due Date and Time may not be communicated.
All times are local time in Lacey, WA.
DATES & TIMES
EVENT
| June 24, 2024 |
| RFP Issued through WEBS |
| July 1, 2024 |
| Vendor Questions and Comments Due for Pre-bid Conference |
| July 8, 2024 |
| Pre-Bid Proposal Conference (optional attendance) |
| July 16, 2024 |
| Final Vendor Questions and Comments Due |
| July 23, 2024 |
| State’s Final Written Answers to Questions, issue amendment to RFP |
(Vendors should check WEBS for any amendments)
August 6, 2024 By 4:00 pm Proposal Due Date and Time Local time in Lacey, WA
Below dates are anticipated and are subject to change.
| August 7 - 21, 2024 |
| Evaluation Period |
| August 22 - 26, 2024 |
| Bidder Interviews |
| August 27, 2024 |
| Apparent Successful Bidder Announcement |
| August 28 - 30, 2024 |
| Hold debriefing conferences (if requested) |
| August 27 - 30, 2024 |
| Contract Negotiation & Agreement |
| September 3, 2024 |
| Estimated Contract Effective Start Date |
Pre-Bid Conference An optional pre-bid conference to address Solicitation requirements will be held at time and location indicated below. While attendance is not mandatory, Vendors are encouraged to attend and actively participate.
VIRTUAL PRE-BID CONFERENCE
Monday, July 8, 2024 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Microsoft Teams meeting Join the meeting Meeting ID: 221 966 291 87 Passcode: r9d44D
Dial in by phone +1 564-999-2000 United States, Olympia Phone conference ID: 550 541 354#
Find a local number
Purpose of this Pre-bid Conference is to review the bid requirements, bidding process and field any questions. Bidders are expected to raise any questions, exceptions, or additions they have concerning the bid documents and process at the Pre-Bid Conference.
If interpretations, specifications, or other changes to the Solicitation are required as a result of the conference, the Procurement Coordinator will make amendments to the Solicitation and provide those amendments by posting them on Washington’s Electronic Business Solution (WEBS).
Assistance for disabled, blind, or hearing-impaired persons who wish to attend the Pre-Bid Conference is available with prior arrangement with Ecology. Contact the Procurement Coordinator identified on the cover page of this Solicitation for assistance.
WEBS Registration Ecology will use Washington's Electronic Business Solution (WEBS) exclusively for the issuance of this RFP and all RFP updates (i.e., addenda, amendments, answers to submitted questions, etc.). Vendors are responsible for checking WEBS for any changes to the RFP.
Bidders are solely responsible for:
1. Properly registering with the Department of Enterprise Services’ WEBS at Doing Business with the State | Department of Enterprise Services (wa.gov).
2. Maintaining an accurate Vendor profile in WEBS..
3. Maintaining an accurate Vendor profile in WEBS.
4. Downloading the solicitation consisting of the RFP with all attachments and exhibits related to the solicitation for which you are interested in bidding; downloading all current and subsequent amendments to the solicitation.
To ensure receipt of all solicitation documents, the RFP for this solicitation must be downloaded from WEBS. Notification of amendments to the solicitation will only be provided to those Vendors who have registered with WEBS and have downloaded the RFP from WEBS. Failure to do so may result in a potential Bidder having incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise inadequate information, or a Bidder submitting an incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise inadequate Proposal.
Bidders and potential bidders accept full responsibility and liability for failing to receive any amendments resulting from their failure to register with WEBS and download the RFP from WEBS, and hold the state of Washington harmless from all claims of injury or loss resulting from such failure. Contact the WEBS Customer Service for any questions regarding the WEBS registration process at (360) 902-7400.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Ecology complies with the ADA and related federal and state laws and regulations. To request ADA reasonable accommodations for public access and mobility for attending meetings, printed materials in a format for the hearing or visually impaired, or ADA parking please contact the Procurement Coordinator. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711 and those with speech disability may call TTY at 877-833-6341. Vendors may contact the Procurement Coordinator to receive this solicitation in Braille or on tape.
Bidder Questions and Answers Bidders are responsible for communicating to the RFP Procurement Coordinator any issues, exceptions, additions, or omissions concerning the solicitation. Specific questions or comments concerning the RFP must be submitted to the RFP Procurement Coordinator via email by the date and time set forth in the Estimated Procurement Schedule identified herein.
The solicitation designates a particular time period for vendor questions and comments in order to help in the procurement process. Early submission of questions and comments is encouraged. For questions received after the Question/Answer Period, in the interest of maintaining the procurement process, Ecology reserves the right at its sole discretion whether to provide an answer.
An answer to any Vendor question given orally or via email is considered as tentative, unofficial, and non-binding on Ecology. For any changes to the RFP as a result of Vendor questions or comments will be issued via a written amendment by the RFP Procurement Coordinator and provided to Vendors through WEBS, this will assure accurate and consistent responses to all Vendors.
RFP Amendments Prior to submittal due date and time, Ecology reserves the right to change portions of this solicitation. Any changes or corrections will be by one (1) or more written amendment(s), dated, attached to or incorporated in and made a part of this solicitation document. All changes must be authorized and issued in writing by the Procurement Coordinator. If there is any conflict between amendments, or between an amendment and the RFP, whichever document was issued last in time shall be controlling.
Only Bidders who have properly registered and downloaded the original solicitation directly via WEBS system will receive notification of amendments and other correspondence pertinent to the procurement. Ecology shall use WEBS for all updates (i.e., addenda, amendments, answers to questions, etc.). Vendors are responsible for checking WEBS for any changes to the RFP.
In the event it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP, addenda will be placed on the Department of Enterprise Service’s WEBS website Bid Opportunities | Department of Enterprise Services (wa.gov).
Submission of Proposal Due date and time: All bid submittals must be received by the Procurement Coordinator no later than the due bid date and time specified in the Estimated Procurement Schedule at the specific location identified on cover page of this solicitation.
Bidders are responsible for the timely submission of their bids. Bids not received by the date and time specified, or at location other than that specified, will not be accepted and shall be disqualified from further consideration.
For emails, the "receive date/time" posted by the Ecology’s email system will be used as the official time stamp for the time of receipt for the response. Bidders should allow sufficient time to ensure timely receipt of the email. Ecology assumes no responsibility for delays and or errors caused by bidder’s e-mail, Ecology’s email, network events, or any other party.
Bidders assume full responsibility for timely, correct, and complete receipt of all submissions to the Procurement Coordinator. It is the Bidder’s responsibility to contact the Procurement Coordinator to verify that the items submitted are received in complete and usable form.
Bid Submittal: Submit an electronic copy of the bid submittal to the Procurement Coordinator identified on the cover page. Electronic copy must be in either Microsoft or Adobe product formats.
Bids must be legible and properly signed by an authorized representative of the Bidder. Electronic digital signatures are accepted. The Bidder may submit a scanned PDF with original signatures for the bid documents that require the signature of an authorized Bidder representative. Unsigned Bids will be rejected on opening unless satisfactory evidence was submitted clearly establishing the Bidder’s desire and intent to be bound by their Bid, such as a signed cover letter. Incomplete or illegible Bids may be rejected as nonresponsive.
Identification and Delivery: To facilitate proper delivery and processing, bids sent by email are to include in the subject line the RFP number and title.
Proposal Presentation and Organization Bidders are encouraged to label and organize their Proposal Response in the format outlined in Appendix L, Response Checklist for ease of evaluation.
Standard brochures are not to be included in the Proposal submittals. There should not be any unnecessary attachments, enclosures, or exhibits. Any electronic submittals shall be in Microsoft Office or Adobe .pdf formats. Charts and spreadsheets may be larger than normal letter size 8.5in x 11in paper.
Cost of Response Preparation Ecology will not reimburse Bidders for any costs associated with preparing or presenting a Response to this RFP.
Response Property of Ecology All materials submitted in response to this solicitation become the property of Ecology, unless received after the deadline in which case the Response will be returned back to the sender. Ecology has the right to use any of the ideas presented in any material offered that is not proprietary to the Bidder, selection or rejection of a Response does not affect this right.
Proprietary or Confidential Information In accordance with RCW 39.26.030, all records submitted to the Department of Ecology relating to state procurement are exempt from public disclosure prior to the announcement of the apparent successful bidder. Upon receipt of a bid and until such announcement is issued, Department of Ecology will withhold bidder submissions and deny disclosure in the event a request for public inspection or copying is made pursuant to Chapter 42.56 RCW.
However, once the apparent successful bidder announcement is issued, Department of Ecology will withhold information marked confidential or proprietary only to the extent Ecology believes information is exempt under applicable laws. When a third party requests a bidder’s information, Ecology may or may not notify the affected bidder prior to releasing. In the event of such notification, the bidder must obtain a court order enjoining disclosure or Department of Ecology will release the information on the date specified.
Errors in Response Bidder is liable for all errors or omissions contained in their Proposal Response. Bidders will not be allowed to alter Response documents after the deadline for Proposal submission. Ecology is not liable for any errors in Responses. Ecology reserves the right to contact a Bidder for clarification of Response contents.
In those cases where it is unclear to what extent a requirement or price has been addressed, the Procurement Coordinator may contact a Bidder to clarify specific points in the submitted Response. However, under no circumstances will the responding Bidder be allowed to make changes to the proposed items after the deadline for Proposal submissions.
Waive Minor Administrative Irregularities Ecology reserves the right to consider the actual level of Bidder’s compliance with the requirements specified in this solicitation and to waive informalities in a Proposal. Informality is an immaterial variation from the exact requirements of the competitive solicitation, having no effect or merely a minor or negligible effect on quality, quantity, or delivery of the supplies or performance of the services being procured, and the correction or waiver of which would not affect the relative standing of, or be otherwise prejudicial to Bidders.
Ecology reserves the right, at its sole option, to make corrections to a Bidders’ Responses when an obvious arithmetical error has been made in the price quotation for Proposal evaluation purposes. Bidders will not be allowed to make changes to their quoted price after the Response submission deadline.
Responsiveness All Proposals will be reviewed by the RFP Procurement Coordinator to determine compliance with bid administrative requirements and instructions specified in this RFP. Bidders are specifically notified that failure to comply with any part of the RFP may result in rejection of the Proposal as non-responsive. Any Proposal that is rejected as non-responsive will not be evaluated for award.
Bidders who do not meet minimum qualifications (refer to Section 4.1) will be rejected as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration.
Exclusive Use This RFP is being issued for Ecology’s exclusive use for the purpose set forth in this RFP. The results of this RFP may not be used to satisfy the competitive requirements of any other agency that may choose to purchase similar Products/Services directly from the Apparent Successful Bidder.
Nondiscrimination Nondiscrimination Requirement. During the term of this Contract, Bidder, including any subcontractor, shall not discriminate on the bases enumerated at RCW 49.60.530(3).
Nondiscrimination Certification. Pursuant to legislative enactment, Bidder shall certify it has not willfully violated Washington’s nondiscrimination law, RCW 49.60.530(3), 9 RCW. Refer to RCW 39.26.160 (2) (f) for requirements. Bidder is to submit a completed certification for Nondiscrimination Certification form in Appendix E – Nondiscrimination Certification with their response. Bidder is to review requirements for nondiscrimination in the General Terms and Conditions, Appendix, G, Sample Service Contract.
Small Businesses and Diverse Businesses ECOLOGY, in accordance with Washington law, encourages small and diverse businesses to compete for and participate in state procurements as contractors and as subcontractors to awarded bidders. Review, e.g., RCW 39.19 (OMWBE certified businesses); RCW 43.60A.200 (WDVA Certified Veteran-Owned Businesses); and RCW 39.26.005 (Washington Small Businesses).
Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprises (MWBE) In accordance with the legislative findings and policies set forth in RCW 39.19, the state of Washington encourages participation in all of its Contracts by Minority and Women Owned Business Enterprise (MWBE) firms either self-identified or certified by the Office of Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises (OMWBE). While the state does not give preferential treatment, it does seek equitable representation from the minority and women’s business community.
Participation may be either on a direct basis in response to this Solicitation or as a Subcontractor to a Contractor. However, unless required by federal statutes, regulations, grants, or Contract terms referenced in the original Solicitation, no preference will be included in the evaluation of Bids and Proposals, no minimum level of MWBE participation shall be required as condition for receiving an award, and Bids and Proposals will not be evaluated, rejected or considered non-responsive on that basis.
Any affirmative action requirements set forth in federal regulations or statutes included or referenced in the original Solicitation will apply. Bidders may contact Office of Minority and Women’s Business Enterprises (OMWBE) to obtain information on certified firms for potential sub-contracting arrangements. Nothing in this section is intended to prevent or discourage Bidders from inviting others from participation from non MWBE firms as well as MWBE firms. For questions regarding the above, contact OMWBE toll free at 866-208-1064.
Bidders who are MWBE or intend to use MWBE Subcontractors are encouraged to identify the participating firm(s) on Appendix B.
Wage Laws and Workers’ Rights Certifications Pursuant to legislative enactment in 2017, Bidder shall certify it has not willfully violated Washington’s wage laws, Title 49 RCW. Review RCW 39.26.160 (2) (f) for requirements.
Bidder is to submit the completed certification for Wage Laws Certification form in Appendix C – Wage Laws Certification with their response.
Pursuant to the Washington State Governor’s Executive Order 18-03, the Washington State Department of Ecology is seeking to contract with qualified entities and business owners who certify that their employees are not, as a condition of employment, subject to mandatory individual arbitration clauses and class or collective action waivers.
Bidder is to submit the completed certification for Workers’ Rights Certification form in Appendix D – Workers’ Rights Certification with their response.
Non-Endorsement and Publicity Neither Ecology nor the end users are endorsing the Bidder’s Products or Services, nor suggesting that they are the best or only solution to their needs. Bidder agrees to make no reference to Ecology, any end user or the state of Washington in any literature, promotional material, brochures, sales presentation or the like, regardless of method of distribution, without the prior review and express written consent of Ecology.
No Best and Final Offer Ecology reserves the right to make an award without further discussion of the Proposal submitted. Therefore, the Proposal should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms that the Bidder can propose. There will be no best and final offer option, unless at the sole discretion of Ecology it is determined to be in the best interest of the state.
No Obligation to Contract/Buy Ecology reserves the right to refrain from contracting with any and all Bidders. Neither the release of this solicitation document nor the execution of a resulting Contract obligates Ecology to make any purchases.
Rejection of Proposals Ecology reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any and all Proposals received, without penalty, and not to issue a contract as a result of this RFP.
Right to Cancel Ecology reserves the right to cancel or reissue all or part of this Solicitation at any time as allowed by law without obligation or liability.
Award Intent Only one (1) successful Bidder will be identified via this procurement. Ecology intends to award only one (1) Contract.
Insurance Coverage The Successful Bidder is required to obtain insurance to protect the State should there be any claims, suits, actions, costs, or damages or expenses arising from any negligent or intentional act or omission of the Contractor or its Subcontractor(s), or their agents, while performing work under the terms of any Contract resulting from this solicitation. Review Appendix G, Sample Service Contract, for a description of the insurance requirements.
EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD PROCESS
Basis for Evaluation Contract award shall be made to the lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder based on the evaluation and award criteria established herein and subject to consideration of all factors identified in RCW 39.26 and preferences in state law.
Ecology reserves the right subject to the provisions of RCW 39.26.160 to: (1) Waive any informality; (2) Reject any or all Bids, or portions thereof; (3) Accept any portion of the items bid unless the Bidder stipulates all or nothing in their Bid; (4) Cancel a solicitation and re-solicit Bids; (5) Negotiate with the highest scoring Responsive and Responsible Bidder to determine if that Bid can be improved for the Purchaser; (6) Award on an all or none consolidated basis taking into consideration “lifecycle costs”; and, (7) Award in aggregate when in the best interest of the state.
Ecology seeks to acquire the goods/services that best meet the State’s needs and offers best value in the interest of the state.
Responses will be evaluated on the basis of the information provided in the Bidder’s Proposal. Bidders are not to assume that the evaluators know anything about the Bidder or its proposed solution. Therefore, it is important that the responses be clear and complete so that the evaluators can adequately understand all aspects of the Proposal. Failure of a Bidder to provide such may result in the Bidder receiving a low evaluation score or being deemed non-responsive.
Due to the complex nature of this RFP, the Evaluation Team, during the course of their evaluation, may consult with other technical experts within Ecology to ensure that they understand the Bidder’s response to those requirements in order to assign appropriate scoring. Such technical experts are not part of the Evaluation Team and will not assign scores.
Evaluation Process The evaluation process is designed to award the Contract to the Bidder with the best combination of attributes as demonstrated in the Bidder’s Proposal. Scores are based on the evaluation of the Bidder’s responses to the requirements in this RFP.
Step 1: Responsiveness Evaluation Proposals will be reviewed initially by the Procurement Coordinator to determine on a pass/fail basis compliance with administrative requirements of this RFP. Responses meeting the administrative requirements will then be reviewed on a pass/fail basis to determine if the Response meets the Mandatory requirements (M) outlined in Sections 4 – Vendor Requirements and Submittals, and the Bidder meets the Minimum Bidder Qualifications. Only Proposals that satisfactorily pass the Responsiveness Review will be further evaluated. Ecology reserves the right to determine at its sole discretion whether Bidder’s Response to a Mandatory requirement is sufficient to pass.
If the Bidder does not pass the Responsiveness Evaluation they will be deemed non-responsive and will not be further evaluated.
Step 2: Evaluation of Written Proposals Ecology will use the Evaluation Criteria to evaluate and score Bidder’s responses to the scored requirements (MS) in Section 4 - Vendor Requirement and Submittals. The evaluation of Bids shall be accomplished by an evaluation team, to be designated by Ecology, which will determine the scoring of the Bids.
Step 3: Bidder Interviews with the top candidates Ecology may select top scoring Bidder(s) from Step 2 to be invited to participate in a Bidder Interview. Ecology reserves the right to select and award to a bidder without conducting interviews. If a Bidder does not pass the Bidder Interview evaluation, they may be deemed non-responsive and will not be further evaluated.
Step 4: Reference Evaluation For the top scoring Bidder(s) advanced from Step 2 or Step 3, the Evaluation Team will contact references and evaluate Bidder’s references for pass/fail. References will be used to assist in the evaluation of timeliness, performance, industry knowledge, and customer service.
Ecology reserves the right to contact references supplied by the Bidder and to contact others who may have pertinent information regarding the Bidder’s prior experience and ability to perform the services contemplated in this procurement, and use such in the evaluation process. Ecology reserves the right to select and award to a bidder without conducting reference evaluations. If a Bidder does not pass the Reference Evaluation, they may be deemed non-responsive and will not be further evaluated.
Step 5: Final Score Tabulation Upon completion of Steps 1-4, the RFP Procurement Coordinator will sum scores to figure the final score for each Bidder and consider other evaluation information to determine the Apparent Successful Bidder.
Clarification of Proposal The RFP Coordinator may contact the Bidder for clarification of any portion of the Bidder’s Proposal.
Evaluation Scoring Points The evaluation scores assign a relative importance for each scored topic. Scores for Level 1 and Level 2 will be added together resulting in the total points awarded.
*PROCUREMENT EVALUATION FOR EXECUTIVE ORDER 18-03 (FIRMS WITHOUT MANDATORY INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION FOR EMPLOYEES). Pursuant to RCW 39.26.160(3) (best value criteria) and consistent with Executive Order 18-03 – Supporting Workers’ Rights to Effectively Address Workplace Violations. Ecology will evaluate bids for best value and provide a bid preference identified herein to any bidder who certifies, pursuant to the certification attached as Appendix D, Workers’ Rights Certification for Executive Order 18-03, that their firm does NOT require its employees, as a condition of employment, to sign or agree to mandatory individual arbitration clauses or class or collective action waiver.
The following points will be assigned for evaluation purposes:
| EVALUATION LEVEL 1 |
| Scoring Points Available |
| Approach and Work Plan |
| 30 |
| Summary of Proposed Staff |
| 10 |
| Similar Work Experiences |
| 20 |
| Work Experiences with WA State |
| 5 |
| Cost (Price Sheet) |
| 25 |
| *Workers’ Rights Certification Preference |
| 5 |
| Small and Diverse Business Preference |
| 5 |
| Total Level 1 Points |
| 100 points |
EVALUATION LEVEL 2
| Bidder Interviews (optional) |
| Pass/Fail |
| Past Customer References |
| Pass/Fail |
| Total Level 2 Points |
| Pass or Fail |
| TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS |
| 100 points |
Scoring Process Evaluations of the written response to this RFP will be as follows:
“(M)” or “Mandatory” shall mean the Bidder must comply with the requirement and the Response will be evaluated on a pass or fail basis. For Mandatory requirements (M), the Response must indicate whether or not the Bidder or its proposed Products/Services meet the requirement and provide all information requested. A statement, “(Bidder’s Name) has read, understands, and fully complies with this requirement” is acceptable, along with any additional information requested.
“(MS)” or “Mandatory Scored” shall mean the Bidder must comply with the requirement and the Response will be scored. For Mandatory Scored (MS) items, the Response must indicate whether or not the Bidder or its proposed Products/Services meet the requirement, and describe how the proposed Bidder’s Products/Services will accomplish each requirement.
Failure to follow these above instructions may result in disqualification.
Substantially Equivalent Scores When evaluation of the proposals produces numerical ratings that are substantially equivalent, i.e., final scores separated by two percent (2%) or less of the final score, Ecology reserves the right to award the Contract to the Bidder whose Proposal is deemed to be in Ecology’s best interest.
Bidder Interview Ecology, at its sole discretion, may elect to select the top Bidder(s) from the written evaluations for an oral presentation. Ecology will contact the top Bidder(s) to schedule a date, time, and location for a Bidder Interview. Ecology reserves the right to select and award to a Bidder without conducting an interview based on Bidder’s score.
The Bidder presentation will include review and confirmation of the Bidder’s Proposal, and may include service and product description and demonstration, demonstration of Bidder’s capabilities, etc. to aid in the evaluation of the Bidder. Representations made by the Bidder during the oral presentation will be considered binding. If an interview is requested, Ecology will prepare a list of technical questions for the Bidder to answer in a sixty to ninety (60-90) minute time period. The answers to the questions will be Pass/Fail to aid in the evaluation of the bid.
If possible, the Bidder’s proposed Project Manager and key staff who will be providing the services should participate. The score (Pass/Fail) from the Bidder presentation will be used to determine the Apparent Successful Bidder.
Selection of Apparent Successful Bidder Apparent Successful Bidder selection begins after all evaluation steps are completed as outlined in Section 3 – Evaluation and Contract Award Process.
Based on the evaluation process, Bidder(s) with the highest total score and best meet the State’s needs and offers the best value in the interest of Ecology will be declared the ASB.
Notification of Apparent Successful Bidder All Bidders responding to this solicitation will be notified when Ecology has determined the ASB. The date of announcement of the ASB will be the date of the notification from Ecology. The Procurement Coordinator will notify Bidders via email from DES/WEBS.
Designation as an ASB does not imply that Ecology will issue an award to your firm. It merely suggests that at this moment in time Ecology believes your bid to be responsive. This designation allows Ecology to perform a further responsiveness and responsibility analysis and ask for additional documentation. Ecology is also at liberty to re-review and determine whether the bid is truly responsive as initially believed. The Bidder must not construe this as a notification of award, impending award, an attempt to negotiate, etc. If you act or fail to act in reliance of this notification, you do so at your own risk and expense.
Contract Negotiations with Apparent Successful Bidder After the notification of the ASB, Ecology may enter into contract negotiations with the ASB, which may include discussion regarding the terms of the Contract. Contract negotiations may result in incorporation of some or the Bidder’s entire Bid. The Bidder should be prepared to accept this RFP for incorporation into a contract resulting from this RFP. It is also understood that the Bid will become part of the contract and the official file.
Should contract negotiations fail to be completed within one (1) month after initiation, Ecology may immediately cease contract negotiations and declare the Bidder with the next highest score as the new Apparent Successful Bidder and enter into contract negotiations with that Bidder.
The ASB will be expected to execute the Contract within ten (10) Business Days of its receipt of the final Contract. If the selected Bidder fails to sign the Contract within the allotted ten (10) days timeframe, Ecology may elect to cancel the award, and award the Contract to the next ranked Bidder, or cancel or reissue this solicitation (Refer to Subsection 2.25 - Right to Cancel).
Debriefing of Unsuccessful Bidders Only Bidders who submit a Response may request an optional debriefing conference to discuss the evaluation of their Response. Upon request, a debriefing conference will be scheduled with an unsuccessful Bidder. The Procurement Coordinator must receive the request for a debriefing conference within three (3) business days after the announcement of Apparent Successful Bidder is sent to the responding Bidders. The debriefing conference is held within three (3) business days of the request, unless Ecology chooses a more convenient time. Debriefing conferences may be conducted in person or on the telephone, and will be scheduled for no more than one hour.
Discussion at the debriefing conference will be limited to the following:
· Evaluation and scoring of the Bidder’s proposal.
· Critique of the Bidder’s proposal.
· Review of the Bidder’s final score and ranking in comparison with other Bidders’ final scores without identifying the other Bidders.
Complaint and Protest Requirements For Complaints and Protests, review Appendix H - Complaints and Protests Procedures, regarding the grounds for, filing, and resolution of complaints and protests.
VENDOR REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMITTALS
(M) Minimum Bidder Qualifications Bidder is to provide a statement of compliance with the following minimum requirements:
a) Bidder must be licensed to conduct business in Washington State or commit to becoming licensed in Washington State within thirty (30) calendar days of being selected as the Apparent Successful Bidder.
b) Bidder must have been in business for a minimum of three (3) years providing those service identified herein.
c) Bidder must not be suspended or debarred from government contracts.
(MS) Approach and Work Plan Bidder is to describe their approach and work plan for how the Bidder will meet the objectives and expectations outlined in RFP, Section 1.2, Objectives, and Appendix F, Scope of Work. Bidder is to include at minimum: (keep response to 15 pages or less)
a) Provide a complete description of your proposed approach and work plan for the project.
b) Describe your experience and approach to cart tagging and how you will measure its impact. Include examples or samples from past similar projects demonstrating your approach, if available.
c) Provide estimated level of effort breakdown between the objectives pertaining to the project, as outlined in RFP Section 1.2 and Appendix F, Scope of Work. Provide overall task breakdown with estimated timeline/hours for each task. Describe deliverables produced at each step.
d) Bidder may present any alternate, creative approaches, and ideas that meet the requirements of the tasks in Appendix F, Scope of Work. The Bidder may also provide supporting documentation that would be pertinent to this RFP.
e) Provide your proposed schedule to meet the project schedule. Bidder must discuss the feasibility of meeting this timeline and any contingencies, including any shutdown plans for winter months. Ecology would prefer to conduct the majority of the cart tagging in the summer and falls months of 2024 and spring months of 2025.
f) Describe your internal policies and procedures for ensuring all field staff have required PPE and safety training and follow all the required safety guidelines when working on public roads near traffic.
g) Provide your approach to…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .