RFP 23-2973 Q & A.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP for 3D Glacial Aquifer Mapping Project
- Solicitation number
- RFP 761 230000002973 2
- Issued by
- Michigan
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for RFP 23-2973 issued by EGLE (Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy) for a 3D modeling project focused on glacial aquifer mapping in Michigan. The project requires bidders to propose partnerships and strategic relationships in 3D modeling of glacial aquifer mapping or general water resource management. Key personnel information must be provided for all individuals expected to work on the project, not just the point of contact. Bidders must submit sample reports from previous projects with similar reporting requirements and provide a brief summary of their reporting capabilities, including software and format specifications. The evaluation study methodology requires that at least 10% of available Wellogic records in each county be randomly distributed throughout the simulation area for comparative analysis, rather than concentrated in specific subregions.
The project has an estimated budget of $80,000. The document addresses clarifications on bidder requirements regarding the scope of partnerships to be described, personnel disclosure, reporting examples and explanations, and the spatial distribution of evaluation study wells. No information regarding response dates, due dates, bidders' meetings, award dates, contract term, pricing structure details, set-asides, incumbents, or funding sources is provided in this Q&A document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP 230000002973 - 3D Glacial Aquifer Mapping Project.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Q# | Document and Section | Page # | Bidder Question | EGLE Response |
| 1 | Vendor Questions Worksheet, Section 2. Company Background Information | Page 12 of 50 | The RFP asks to "Describe partnerships and strategic relationships you think will bring significant value to the State." |
Is this question asking bidders to describe potential partnerships/relationships related to 3D modeling of glacial aquifer mapping, or more general water resource management in Michigan?
| Partnerships and strategic relationships specific to 3D modeling of glacial aquifer mapping are prefereable; however, parterships and strategic relationships in general water resource management in Michgan will also be considered. | |||
| 2 | Vendor Questions Worksheet, Section 2. Company Background Information | Page 12 of 50 | The RFP asks to "Describe partnerships and strategic relationships you think will bring significant value to the State." |
Is this question asking bidders to describe a potential relationship between their business specifically and the State, or more general relationships between institutions and/or various stakeholders?
| See response to Question 1. | |||
| 3 | Schedule A – statement of work contract activities | Page 22 of 50 | The RFP states "In each county, at least 10% of the available Wellogic records shall be reserved for use in the evaluation study." |
Please confirm that the wells selected for evaluation study should be randomly distributed in space (as compared to being selected from one particular subregion in the county).
| Confirmed, wells reserved for comparison should be distributed evenly throughout the simulation area. | |||
| 4 | Schedule A – statement of work contract activities, Section 2.3 Key Personnel | Page 25 and 26 of 50 | This section describes the Key Personnel and process for reassignment. Please confirm that bidders should list all inviduals expected to work on this project, although only one will be the point of contact/correspondence (i.e., the "Contract Representative"). For example, if three (3) engineers are expected to particpate in the work inolved in this project, we should provide the requested information for all 3 engineers, correct? |
| Confirmed, the requested information should be provided for all proposed personnel. | |||
| 5 | Schedule A – statement of work contract activities, Section 3.3 Reporting | Page 30 of 50 | The RFP states "Bidders provide samples of required reports as attachments to this RFP. List file names here." |
| Is this asking the bidder to provide reports from other / previous projects with similar reporting requirements? | Yes, if the bidder has prepared reports similar to the reports described in Section 3.3, Reporting, examples of these reports should be included in the response. | |||
| 6 | Schedule A – statement of work contract activities, Section 3.3 Reporting | Page 30 of 50 | The RFP states "Bidder must explain its reporting capabilities and any reporting that is included in its proposal" |
Please clarify what is being asked here. Should bidders indicate the software and format used to generate reports (e.g., Microsoft Word and PDF report format)? What is meant by "explain...any reporting that is included in its proposal"?
| The bidder can provide a brief summary of the reports submitted. | |||
| 7 | Schedule B - Pricing | Page 34 of 50 | Does this project have an estimated or maximum budget? |
| $80,000 has been budgeted for this project. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .