RFP 202609125 ED Assessments and Support for Students at A.R. Gould, Long Creek Youth Center_Final.docx
DOCX document 358 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFP - 03F - 202609125
- Issued by
- Maine
About this file
This is a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Maine Department of Corrections for educational assessments and support services at Arthur R. Gould School located within Long Creek Youth Development Center. The Maine Department of Corrections seeks a qualified provider to conduct in-person psychological-educational evaluations for student-residents, with services including comprehensive assessments for autism spectrum disorder, specific learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and emotional disturbance in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504 requirements. The provider must hold certifications in 17 distinct psychometric evaluation instruments ranging from autism diagnostic assessments to academic achievement tests. Questions from interested bidders are due by October 7, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. local time, with proposals due by October 16, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. local time via the Vendor Self Service System. The anticipated contract period begins December 1, 2026, and runs through September 30, 2027, with four optional renewal periods extending through September 30, 2031. The Department reserves the right to make one or multiple awards based on best value to the State.
The cost proposal must be submitted as an hourly rate covering the initial period of performance and will be evaluated using a mathematical formula whereby the lowest bid receives 25 points with higher bids receiving proportionally fewer points. Proposals will be scored on a 100-point scale with 25 points for organizational qualifications and experience, 50 points for proposed services, and 25 points for cost. The provider must comply with extensive security and technical requirements including NIST standards, FERPA, HIPAA, data encryption, background investigations, PREA training, and all State of Maine IT policies and procedures. The provider is responsible for maintaining comprehensive documentation, submitting monthly reports with student demographic information and evaluation outcomes, and ensuring personnel complete required facility orientation and background screening prior to service delivery. Awards are federally funded and contingent upon annual funding availability. The Department anticipates net 30 payment terms upon receipt of accurate invoices containing the State contract number, correct pricing information, and required supporting documentation.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATE OF MAINE
Maine Department of Corrections
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
RFP Coordinator
| NAME: |
| Jessica Gerrish |
| TITLE: |
| Grants & Contracts Manager |
| EMAIL: |
| Jessica.gerrish@maine.gov |
Submitted Questions Due Date
Friday, October 7th, no later than 4:00 p.m., local time
| Proposal Submission Deadline |
| DATE: |
| Friday, October 16th , no later than 4:00 p.m., local time |
| TO: |
| Vendor Self Service System |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
| PUBLIC NOTICE |
| 3 |
| RFP DEFINITIONS/ACRONYMS |
| 4 |
| PART I INTRODUCTION |
| 8 |
A. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
B. GENERAL PROVISIONS
C. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
D. CONTRACT TERM
E. NUMBER OF AWARDS
| PART II SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED |
| 11 |
| PART III KEY RFP EVENTS |
| 14 |
A. VENDOR SELF SERVICE SYSTEM (VSS)
B. QUESTIONS
C. AMENDMENTS
D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
| PART IV PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS |
| 16 |
| PART V PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION |
| 19 |
A. EVALUATION PROCESS – GENERAL INFORMATION
B. SCORING WEIGHTS AND PROCESS
C. NEGOTIATIONS
D. SELECTION AND AWARD
E. APPEAL OF CONTRACT AWARDS
| PART VI CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND CONDITIONS |
| 21 |
A. CONTRACT DOCUMENT
B. STANDARD STATE CONTRACT PROVISIONS
| PART VII RFP APPENDICES AND RELATED DOCUMENTS |
| 23 |
APPENDIX A – PROPOSAL COVER PAGE
APPENDIX B – RESPONSIBLE BIDDER CERTIFICATION
APPENDIX C – QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE FORM
APPENDIX D – SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
APPENDIX E – TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT FORM
APPENDIX F – PROPOSED SERVICES FORM
APPENDIX G – GENERAL/TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
APPENDIX H – COST PROPOSAL FORM
APPENDIX I – ELIGIBILTY REQUIREMENTS
PUBLIC NOTICE
State of Maine Maine Department of Corrections
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
The State of Maine is seeking proposals for the Maine Department of Corrections to provide and support evaluations required by State and Federal requirements as it relates to Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and Section 504 (Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)) at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center.
A copy of the RFP and all related documents can be obtained through Vendor Self Service (VSS): https://mevss.hostams.com/PRDVSS1X1/AltSelfService
Proposals must be submitted to the Office of State Procurement Services, via Vendor Self Service (VSS). Proposal submissions must be received no later than 4:00 p.m., local time, on Friday, October 16th. Proposals will be opened the following business day.
RFP TERMS/ACRONYMS with DEFINITIONS
The following terms and acronyms, as referenced in the RFP, have the meanings indicated below:
| Term/Acronym |
| Definition |
| Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) |
| A sixteen (16) item self-report questionnaire that measures an individual's confidence in their ability to perform various common, everyday activities without losing their balance or becoming unsteady. |
| Arthur R. (AR) Gould School |
| An accredited, public, diploma-granting high school and alternative education program for youth in the care of the Maine Department of Corrections, located within Long Creek Youth Development Center. |
Autism Screening Instrument for Educational Planning
(ASIEP-3)
A comprehensive, individually administered, norm-referenced assessment tool for identifying children with autism and related behaviors, planning educational programs, and monitoring progress.
| Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-10) |
| A brief, ten (10) item self-report questionnaire designed to screen for autistic traits in adults and children (depending on the version), serving as a preliminary step to determine if someone may benefit from a comprehensive autism assessment. |
| Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADIR) |
| A standardized, semi-structured, investigator-based interview used by trained clinicians to assess individuals suspected of having Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) by collecting detailed developmental and behavioral information from parents or caregivers. |
| Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) |
| A standardized, semi-structured assessment designed to evaluate an individual's social and communicative behaviors, as well as repetitive and stereotyped behaviors, to aid in the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). |
| Autism Spectrum Disorder |
| A complex developmental condition involving persistent challenges with social communication, restricted interests and repetitive behavior. |
| Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS 2) |
| A standardized assessment tool used to screen for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children and adolescents aged two (2) to six (6) years. |
| Confidentiality |
| Preserving authorized restrictions on information access and disclosure, including means for protecting confidential or sensitive information. A loss of confidentiality is the unauthorized disclosure of information. |
| Data Classification |
| The process of risk assessment of data. See Appendix E for the Data Classification process (see also “PII Confidentiality Impact Level”). |
| Department |
| Maine Department of Corrections |
| DSM-V |
| Also known as, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), features the most current text updates based on scientific literature with contributions from more than 200 subject matter experts |
| Emotional Disturbance |
| A broad term for a long-term mental health condition, often in children, that significantly and negatively impacts a person's educational performance and social functioning, manifesting as a pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression, an inability to maintain relationships, inappropriate behaviors, or physical symptoms and fears. |
| General Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GADS-2) |
| A brief initial screening tool for generalized anxiety disorder. |
| Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) |
| A law that makes available a free appropriate public education to eligible children with disabilities throughout the nation and ensures special education and related services to those children, supports early intervention services for infants and toddlers and their families, and awards competitive discretionary grants. Refer to: https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/individuals-disabilities/idea. |
| Intellectual Disability |
| A disability that affects the acquisition of knowledge and skills, in particular any of various neurodevelopmental conditions affecting intellectual processes, educational attainment, and the acquisition of skills needed for independent living and social functioning. |
| Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Third Edition (KTEA-3) |
| A comprehensive, individually administered assessment for measuring academic skills in children, adolescents, and young adults. |
| KeyMath3 Diagnostic Assessment (KeyMath-3 DA) |
| An individually administered, norm-referenced test used to evaluate the mathematical abilities of students from preschool through high school (ages four and a half through twenty-one (4.5–21). |
| Long Creek Youth Development Center (LCYDC) |
| Maine’s only secure juvenile facility, serving as both a detention center for pre-adjudicated youth being held for a court appearance and for adjudicated youth who have been committed to a juvenile correctional facility for an indeterminate period up to the age of twenty-one (21). |
| OIT |
| State of Maine, Office of Information Technology |
| Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised (PIATR) |
| A standardized test that measures academic achievement in school-aged children (typically five through eighteen (5-18) years old) across multiple subjects. |
| PII (Personally Identifiable Information) |
| Data that is maintained by an agency that could potentially identify a specific individual and needs to be protected in accordance with state and/or federal law, including (1) any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual‘s identity, such as name, social security number, date and place of birth, mother‘s maiden name, or biometric records; and (2) any other information that is linked or linkable to an individual, such as medical, educational, financial, and employment information. |
| PII Confidentiality Impact Level |
| The PII confidentiality impact level—low, moderate, or high—indicates the potential harm that could result to the subject individuals and/or the organization if PII were inappropriately accessed, used, or disclosed. (NIST SP 800-122). See Appendix E. PII is evaluated to determine its confidentiality impact levels, so that appropriate safeguards can be applied to the PII. |
| Provider |
| Awarded Bidder(s) |
| Psychological-Educational Evaluation(s) |
| A comprehensive, multi-method assessment process designed to gather detailed information about a student's cognitive, academic, behavioral, emotional, and social functioning. Its goal is to identify strengths and challenges that impact learning, development, and daily functioning. These evaluations integrate standardized testing, clinical interviews, behavioral observations, and rating scales to inform diagnosis, educational planning, and intervention strategies. The assessed domains likely include cognitive functioning, academic achievement, social communication, adaptive behavior, emotional and behavioral functioning, and Autism Spectrum Disorder characteristics. |
| Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT) |
| A twenty-five (25) item, parent-report questionnaire used to screen toddlers aged eighteen to twenty-four (18-24) months for early signs of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). |
| RFP |
| Request for Proposals |
| Section 504 (Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)) |
| A federal law designed to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities in programs and activities that receive Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education. Refer to: https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/civil-rights-laws/disability-discrimination/frequently-asked-questions-section-504-free-appropriate-public-education-fape. |
| Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) |
| A brief, parent-completed screening tool used to identify individuals, particularly children, who may need further assessment for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). |
| Special Education |
| As defined in 20-A M.R.S.A. Ch. 301 § 7001. Refer to: https://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/20-a/title20-Asec7001.html. |
| Specific Learning Disability |
| A neurodevelopmental disorder that affects one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or using language, spoken, or written. |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales (SB-5) |
| A widely used and comprehensive IQ test that measures cognitive abilities, including verbal and nonverbal reasoning, knowledge, quantitative skills, and working memory. |
| State |
| State of Maine |
| State Data |
| Any information originating with the State, regardless of form or medium of disclosure (e.g., verbal, observed, hard copy, or electronic) or source of information. It includes any information concerning the State’s information technology infrastructure, systems and software and procedures; and information originating with the State in the course of using and configuring the Services provided under the contract. It includes any sensitive information held by the State that may be protected from disclosure pursuant to a federal or state statutory or regulatory scheme intended to protect that information, or pursuant to an order, resolution or determination of a court or administrative board or other administrative body. |
| Test of Written Language-Fourth Edition (TOWL4) |
| A comprehensive, norm-referenced diagnostic test of written expression for students aged nine (9) years to seventeen (17) years and eleven (11) months. It helps educators and specialists identify students with writing deficits, pinpoint specific strengths and weaknesses, and measure progress in writing programs. |
| Vendor Self Service System (VSS) |
| The Vendor Self Service System (VSS) web portal provides vendors with a single-entry point to register, identify the commodities/services that their company provides, look for business opportunities, and respond to solicitations. |
| Wechsler Scale |
| An IQ test designed to measure intelligence and cognitive ability in adults and older adolescents. |
| Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT5) |
| A brief measure of reading, spelling, and math for ages five (5) through eighty-five plus (85+). |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement |
| A standardized, norm-referenced assessment tool used for screening, diagnosing, and monitoring academic progress in reading, writing, and mathematics for individuals from ages two (2) to over ninety (90). |
State of Maine
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
PART I INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose and Background
The Maine Department of Corrections (Department) is seeking a Provider to provide and support evaluations required by State and Federal requirements as it relates to Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and Section 504 (Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)) at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center as defined in this Request for Proposals (RFP) document. This document provides instructions for submitting proposals, the procedure and criteria by which the awarded Bidder will be selected, and the contractual terms which will govern the relationship between the State of Maine (State) and the awarded Bidder.
B. General Provisions
1. From the time the RFP is issued until award notification is made, all contact with the State regarding the RFP must be made through the RFP Coordinator. No other person/State employee is empowered to make binding statements regarding the RFP. Violation of this provision may lead to disqualification from the bidding process, at the State’s discretion.
2. Issuance of the RFP does not commit the Department to issue an award or to pay expenses incurred by a Bidder in the preparation of a response to the RFP. This includes attendance at personal interviews or other meetings and software or system demonstrations, where applicable.
3. All proposals must adhere to the instructions and format requirements outlined in the RFP and all written supplements and amendments (such as the Summary of Questions and Answers), issued by the Department. Proposals must follow the format and respond to all questions and instructions specified below in the “Proposal Submission Requirements” section of the RFP.
4. Bidders will take careful note that in evaluating a proposal submitted in response to the RFP, the Department will consider materials provided in the proposal, information obtained through interviews/presentations (if any), and internal Departmental information of previous contract history with the Bidder (if any). The Department also reserves the right to consider other reliable references and publicly available information in evaluating a Bidder’s experience and capabilities.
5. The proposal must be signed by a person authorized to legally bind the Bidder and must contain a statement that the proposal and the pricing contained therein will remain valid and binding for a period of 180 days from the date and time of the bid opening.
6. The RFP and the awarded Bidder’s proposal, including all appendices or attachments, will be the basis for the final contract, as determined by the Department.
7. Following announcement of an award decision, all records and documents regarding this RFP, including bid submissions, will be public records, available for public inspection pursuant to 5 M.R.S. §1825 B (6 &15) and the State of Maine Freedom of Access Act (FOAA) (1 M.R.S. § 401 et seq.). State contracts and information related to contracts, including all records, documents, supporting documents, and bid submissions, are public records unless otherwise excepted by statute (Id).
8. Subject to the above and pursuant to applicable law, in the event that a Bidder believes any information that it submits in response to this RFP is confidential, it must mark that information accordingly, and include citation to legal authority in support of the Bidder’s claim of confidentiality. In the event that the Department receives a FOAA request that includes submissions marked as confidential, the Department shall evaluate the information and any legal authority from the Bidder to determine whether the information is an exception to FOAA’s definition of public record. If the Department determines to release information that a Bidder has marked confidential, it shall provide advance notice to the Bidder to allow for them to seek legal relief.
9. The Department, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to recognize and waive minor informalities and irregularities found in proposals received in response to the RFP.
10. ACCESSIBILITY: All IT applications are required to comply with the Digital Accessibility Policy. In addition, all IT applications and content delivered through web browsers are required to comply with the State Web Standards.
11. STATE IT POLICIES: All IT products and services delivered as part of this Agreement shall conform to the State IT policies, standards, and procedures effective at the time this RFP is published.
12. If awarded a contract resulting from this RFP, vendors shall be required to disclose, in writing and in accordance with applicable Maine law, any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Such disclosure must include any financial, professional, or personal relationships that could give rise to a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. Failure to disclose a known conflict or appearance of conflict may result in disqualification, contract termination, or other remedies as provided by law.
13. All applicable laws, whether or not herein contained, are included by this reference. It is the Bidder’s responsibility to determine the applicability and requirements of any such laws and to abide by them.
C. Eligibility Requirements
For eligibility requirements, please see Appendix I for certification list.
D. Contract Term
The Department is seeking cost-efficient proposals to provide services, as defined in this RFP, for the anticipated contract period defined in the table below. The dates below are estimated and may be adjusted, as necessary, in order to comply with all procedural requirements associated with the RFP and the contracting process. The actual contract start date will be established by a completed and approved contract.
Contract Renewal: Following the initial term of the contract, the Department may opt to renew the contract for four (4) renewal periods, as shown in the table below, and subject to continued availability of funding and satisfactory performance.
The term of the anticipated contract, resulting from the RFP, is defined as follows:
| Period |
| Start Date |
| End Date |
| Initial Period of Performance |
| 12/1/2026 |
| 9/30/2027 |
| Renewal Period #1 |
| 10/1/2027 |
| 9/30/2028 |
| Renewal Period #2 |
| 10/1/2028 |
| 9/30/2029 |
| Renewal Period #3 |
| 10/1/2029 |
| 9/30/2030 |
| Renewal Period #4 |
| 10/1/2030 |
| 9/30/2031 |
C. Number of Awards
The Department reserves the right to make one (1) or multiple awards, whichever is in the best interest of the State, as a result of the RFP process. Awards are federally funded and dependent on availability of funding on an annual basis.
PART II SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Assessment Services The Provider will conduct in-person Psychological-Educational Evaluations for student-residents at Arthur R. Gould School and Long Creek Youth Development Center.
2. Qualifications The Provider will hold certification in relevant recognized psychometric evaluations (Appendix I) including, but not limited to:
a. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS);
b. Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADIR);
c. Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ);
d. General Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GADS2);
e. Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC);
f. Autism Screen Instrument for Education Planning (ASIEP3);
g. Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS2);
h. Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (QCHAT);
i. Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ10);
j. Wechsler Scales;
k. Stanford Binet Intelligence Scales (SB-5);
l. Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement;
m. Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Third Edition (KTEA-3);
n. Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT5);
o. Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised (PIATR);
p. KeyMath3 Diagnostic Assessment (KeyMath-3 DA); and
q. Test of Written Language-Fourth Edition (TOWL4).
3. Evaluation Scope The Provider will evaluate students for eligibility and/or diagnosis related to:
a. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
b. Specific Learning Disability (SLD)
c. Intellectual Disability (ID)
d. Emotional Disturbance (ED) consistent with IDEA, Section 504, DSM-V criteria, and applicable State and Federal requirements.
4. Evaluation Methodology The Provider will utilize evidence-based assessment practices and standardized evaluation instruments appropriate for the student's age, disability category, referral concern, and evaluation purpose.
5. Comprehensive Assessment The Provider will conduct evaluations using multiple sources of information, which will include:
a. Record reviews
b. Clinical interviews
c. Behavioral observations
d. Standardized cognitive assessments
e. Academic achievement assessments
f. Social-emotional assessments
g. Adaptive behavior assessments
h. Autism-specific assessments, when appropriate
6. Professional Qualifications All evaluations will be performed by appropriately licensed, certified, or credentialed professionals qualified to administer, score, interpret, and report assessment instruments utilized under this Contract.
7. Evaluation Documentation The Provider will prepare comprehensive written Psychological-Educational Evaluation reports documenting:
a. Assessment methods utilized
b. Assessment results
c. Diagnostic conclusions
d. Educational impact
e. Recommendations
f. Eligibility considerations, when applicable
8. Results Communication The Provider will communicate evaluation findings, conclusions, and recommendations to designated AR Gould School and Department personnel.
9. Family Communication The Provider will provide completed evaluation reports to families in accordance with Department procedures and applicable privacy requirements.
10. Referral Coordination The Provider will coordinate with designated Department staff regarding referrals for:
a. Occupational Therapy evaluations
b. Speech-Language evaluations
c. English Language Learner evaluations
d. Other related evaluations identified during the assessment process
11. Timeliness The Provider will complete evaluations and submit final reports within timelines established by IDEA, Section 504, Department policy, and referral requirements.
12. Case Documentation The Provider will maintain records sufficient to document referrals, evaluation activities, service dates, report completion, and report delivery.
13. Monthly Reporting The Provider will submit monthly reporting information with invoices, including:
a. Student demographic information
b. Dates of service
c. Evaluations performed
d. Evaluator information
e. Evaluation outcomes
f. Evaluation completion status
14. Contractor Training The Provider will ensure all assigned personnel complete required Long Creek Youth Development Center contractor orientation and training prior to independently providing services.
15. Personnel Screening The Provider will ensure all personnel assigned to the Contract successfully complete all required background investigations prior to providing services.
16. PREA Compliance The Provider will comply with all Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) requirements, training requirements, and reporting obligations applicable to contractors working within Department facilities.
17. Staffing Continuity The Provider will maintain sufficient qualified staff resources to perform services throughout the Contract term and will notify the Department of significant staffing changes that will impact service delivery.
18. Compliance Support The Provider will cooperate with Department monitoring, audit, compliance review, and quality assurance activities related to services performed under the Contract.
Technical Assessment of the Proposed System:
The State of Maine requires Providers to demonstrate they have the appropriate security controls in place to protect the State’s sensitive and/or confidential information. Providers are required to explain their compliance with the security requirements listed in the Technical Assessment Form attached in Appendix E.
General/Technical Requirements In addition to the Technical Assessment, Providers are required to explain their compliance with the General and Technical Requirements listed in Appendix G
PART III KEY RFP EVENTS
A. Vendor Self Service System (VSS)
The Office of State Procurement Services Vendor Self Service System website is found at the link below: https://www.maine.gov/dafs/bbm/procurementservices/vendors/vendor-self-service-system A copy of the RFP and all associated documents will be published in VSS.
Only documents published in VSS will be considered binding.
Any interested party may view open solicitations in VSS using the Public Access feature.
Vendors must have an active User ID and password in VSS to submit questions and respond to solicitations, including this RFP.
Vendor registration instructions and User Guide may be found at the link above, which include steps for searching for an existing account/User ID, or registering for a new account/User ID.
Vendors interested in responding to a solicitation are encouraged to obtain a User ID and password for VSS as soon as possible.
Vendors must have an active Vendor Code (VC or VS) to contract with the department.
B. Questions
1. General Instructions: It is the responsibility of all Bidders and other interested parties to examine the entire RFP and to seek clarification, in writing, if they do not understand any information or instructions.
a. Questions must be submitted in VSS as soon as possible but no later than the date and time published in VSS.
b. Questions should be clearly stated and reference the applicable section and/or page number of the RFP.
c. The Department assumes no liability for assuring accurate/complete/on time transmission and receipt.
2. Question & Answer Summary: Responses to all questions will be compiled in writing and published in VSS no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Proposal Submission Deadline. It is the responsibility of all interested parties to go to VSS to obtain a copy of the Question & Answer Summary. Only those answers issued in writing in VSS will be considered binding.
C. Amendments
All amendments released in regard to the RFP will be published in VSS. It is the responsibility of all interested parties to go to VSS to obtain amendments. Only those amendments published in VSS are considered binding.
D. Proposal Submission
1. Proposals Due
a. Proposal submissions must be received no later than the Proposal Submission Deadline (closing date) published in VSS.
b. Any proposal submissions or any additional or revised proposal files received after the Proposal Submission Deadline will be rejected without exception.
2. Delivery Instructions
a. Proposal submissions must be submitted to the Office of State Procurement Services via VSS.
b. Only proposal submissions received via VSS will be considered. The Department assumes no liability for assuring accurate/complete receipt.
c. Submissions containing links to file sharing sites or online file repositories will not be accepted as submissions. Only proposal submissions that have the actual requested files attached will be accepted.
d. Encrypted submissions received which require opening attachments and logging into a proprietary system will not be accepted. Bidders should work with their Information Technology team to ensure that the proposal submission will not be encrypted due to any security settings.
e. File size limits are 15MB per file. Bidders may separate their submissions into multiple files, as necessary, due to file size concerns.
3. Submission Format:
a. Bidders must submit multiple files, with each file named and containing the required information as defined below.
File 1 [Bidder’s Name] – Preliminary Information PDF format preferred, and must include:
· Appendix A (Proposal Cover Page)
· Appendix B (Responsible Bidder Certification)
· Appendix I (Eligibility Requirements)
File 2 [Bidder’s Name] – Organization Qualifications and Experience PDF format preferred, and must include:
· Appendix C (Organization Qualifications and Experience Form)
· Appendix D (Subcontractors Form)
· And all required information and attachments stated in PART IV, Section II.
File 3 [Bidder’s Name] – Proposed Services PDF format preferred, and must include:
· Appendix E (Technical Assessment Form)
· Appendix F (Proposed Services Form)
· Appendix G (General/Technical Requirements
· And all required information and attachments stated in PART IV, Section III.
File 4 [Bidder’s Name] – Cost Proposal Excel format preferred, and must include:
· Appendix H (Cost Proposal Form)
PART IV PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
This section contains instructions for Bidders to use in preparing their proposals. The Department seeks detailed yet succinct responses that demonstrate the Bidder’s qualifications, experience, and ability to perform the requirements specified throughout the RFP.
Bidders’ proposals must follow the outline used below, including the numbering, section, and sub-section headings. Failure to use the outline specified in PART IV, or failure to respond to all questions and instructions throughout the RFP, may result in the proposal being disqualified as non-responsive or receiving a reduced score. The Department, and its evaluation team, has sole discretion to determine whether a variance from the RFP specifications will result either in disqualification or reduction in scoring of a proposal. Rephrasing of the content provided in the RFP will, at best, be considered minimally responsive.
Bidders are not to provide additional attachments beyond those specified in the RFP for the purpose of extending their response. Additional materials not requested will not be considered part of the proposal and will not be evaluated. Bidders must include any forms provided in the submission package or reproduce those forms as closely as possible. All information must be presented in the same order and format as described in the RFP.
Proposal Format and Contents
Section I Preliminary Information (File #1)
1. Proposal Cover Page Bidders must complete Appendix A (Proposal Cover Page). It is critical that the cover page show the specific information requested, including Bidder address(es) and other details listed. The Proposal Cover Page must be dated and signed by a person authorized to enter into contracts on behalf of the Bidder.
2. Responsible Bidder Certification Bidders must complete Appendix B (Responsible Bidder Certification). The Responsible Bidder Certification must be dated and signed by a person authorized to enter into contracts on behalf of the Bidder.
3. Eligibility Requirements Bidders must provide documentation to demonstrate meeting eligibility requirements stated in Appendix I, of the RFP. Please complete Appendix I. This documentation includes:
a. certification in relevant recognized psychometric evaluations including, but not limited to:
i. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS);
ii. Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADIR);
iii. Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ);
iv. General Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GADS2);
v. Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC);
vi. Autism Screen Instrument for Education Planning (ASIEP3);
vii. Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS2);
viii. Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (QCHAT);
ix. Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ10);
x. Wechsler Scales;
xi. StanfordBinet Intelligence Scales (SB-5);
xii. WoodcockJohnson Tests of Achievement;
xiii. Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Third Edition (KTEA-3);
xiv. Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT5);
xv. Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised (PIATR);
xvi. KeyMath3 Diagnostic Assessment (KeyMath-3 DA); and
xvii. Test of Written Language-Fourth Edition (TOWL4).
Section II Organization Qualifications and Experience (File #2)
1. Overview of the Organization Bidders must complete Appendix C (Qualifications and Experience Form) describing their qualifications and skills to provide the requested services in the RFP. Bidders must include three (3) examples of projects which demonstrate their experience and expertise in performing these services, as well as highlighting the Bidder’s stated qualifications and skills.
2. Subcontractors Bidders must complete Appendix D (Subcontractors Form) to provide a list that specifies the name, address, phone number, contact person, and a brief description of organizational capacity and qualifications for any subcontractors to be used. If no subcontractors will be used, indicate as such on the form.
3. Organizational Chart Bidders must provide an organizational chart. The organizational chart must include the project being proposed. Each position must be identified by position title and corresponding to the personnel job descriptions.
4. Litigation Bidders must attach a list of all current litigation in which the Bidder is named and a list of all closed cases that have closed within the past five (5) years in which the Bidder paid the claimant either as part of a settlement or by decree. For each, list the entity bringing suit, the complaint, the accusation, amount, and outcome.
5. Financial Viability Bidders must provide the following information for each of the past three (3) tax years:
a. Balance Sheets
b. Income (Profit/Loss) Statements
6. Licensure/Certification Bidders may provide documentation of any applicable licensure/certification or specific credentials that are related to providing the proposed services of the RFP.
7. Certificate of Insurance Bidders must provide a certificate of insurance on a standard ACORD form (or the equivalent) evidencing the Bidder’s general liability, professional liability and any other relevant liability insurance policies that might be associated with the proposed services.
Section III Proposed Services (File #3)
1. Technical Assessment Bidders must complete Appendix E (Technical Assessment Form) to describe the Bidder’s capability to meet the stated requirements and policies identified in this RFP.
2. Services to be Provided Bidders must complete Appendix F (Proposed Services Form) to discuss the Scope of Services referenced above in Part II of the RFP and what the Bidder will offer, including a description of the methods and resources the Bidder will use and how each task involved will be accomplished. Bidders must also describe how the expectations and/or desired outcomes as a result of these services will be achieved. If subcontractors are involved, Bidders must clearly identify the work each will perform.
3. General/ Technical Requirements Bidders must complete Appendix G (General/Technical Requirements Form) to describe the Bidder’s capability to meet the stated requirements and policies identified in this RFP.
Section IV Cost Proposal (File #4)
1. Cost Proposal Form Bidders must complete Appendix H (Cost Proposal Form).
2. General Instructions
a. The cost proposal must include the costs necessary for the Bidder to fully comply with the contract terms, conditions, and RFP requirements.
b. No costs related to the preparation of the proposal for the RFP, or to the negotiation of the contract with the Department, may be included in the proposal. Only costs to be incurred after the contract effective date that are specifically related to the implementation or operation of contracted services may be included.
PART V PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION
Evaluation of the submitted proposals will be accomplished as follows:
A. Evaluation Process – General Information
1. An evaluation team, composed of qualified reviewers, will judge the merits of the proposals received in accordance with the criteria defined in the RFP.
2. Officials responsible for making decisions on the award selection will ensure that the selection process accords equal opportunity and appropriate consideration to all who are capable of meeting the specifications. The goals of the evaluation process are to ensure fairness and objectivity in review of the proposals and to ensure that the contract is awarded to the Bidder whose proposal provides the best value to the State of Maine.
3. The Department reserves the right to communicate and/or schedule interviews/presentations with Bidders, if needed, to obtain clarification of information contained in the proposals received. The Department may revise the scores assigned in the initial evaluation to reflect those communications and/or interviews/presentations.
4. Changes to proposals, including updating or adding information, will not be permitted during any portion of the evaluation process. Therefore, Bidders must submit proposals that present their rates and other requested information as clearly and completely as possible.
B. Scoring Weights and Process
1. Scoring Weights: Proposal scores will be based on a 100-point scale and will measure the degree to which each proposal meets the following criteria. The proposal materials that will be evaluated under each section below are identified in Part IV of the RFP.
| Section I. |
| Preliminary Information |
| No Points – Eligibility Requirements |
| Section II. |
| Organization Qualifications and Experience |
| 25 points |
| Section III. |
| Proposed Services |
| 50 points |
| Section IV. |
| Cost Proposal |
| 25 points |
| Total |
| 100 |
2. Scoring Process: For proposals that demonstrate meeting the eligibility requirements in Section I, if applicable, the evaluation team will use a consensus approach to evaluate and score Sections II & III above. Members of the evaluation team will not score those sections individually but, instead, will arrive at a consensus as to assignment of points for each of those sections. Section IV, the Cost Proposal, will be scored as described below.
3. Scoring the Cost Proposal: The total cost proposed for conducting all the functions specified in the RFP will be assigned a score according to a mathematical formula. The lowest bid will be awarded 25 points. Proposals with higher bid values will be awarded proportionately fewer points calculated in comparison with the lowest bid.
The scoring formula is:
(Lowest submitted cost proposal / Cost of proposal being scored) x 25 = pro-rated score
No Best and Final Offers: The State of Maine will not seek or accept a best and final offer (BAFO) from any Bidder in this procurement process. All Bidders are expected to provide their best value pricing with the submission of their proposal.
C. Negotiations
1. The Department reserves the right to negotiate with the awarded Bidder(s) to finalize a contract. Such negotiations may not significantly vary the content, nature, or requirements of the proposal or the Department’s Request for Proposal to an extent that may affect the price of goods or services requested.
2. The Department reserves the right to terminate contract negotiations with an awarded Bidder who submits a proposed contract significantly different from the proposal they submitted in response to the advertised RFP.
3. In the event that an acceptable contract cannot be negotiated with the highest ranked Bidder, the Department may withdraw its award and negotiate with the next-highest ranked Bidder, and so on, until an acceptable contract has been finalized. Alternatively, the Department may cancel the RFP, at its sole discretion.
D. Selection and Award
1. The final decision regarding the award of the contract will be made by representatives of the Department subject to approval by the State Procurement Review Committee.
2. Notification of conditional award selection or non-selection will be made in writing by the Department.
3. Issuance of the RFP in no way constitutes a commitment by the State of Maine to award a contract, to pay costs incurred in the preparation of a response to the RFP, or to pay costs incurred in procuring or contracting for services, supplies, physical space, personnel or any other costs incurred by the Bidder.
4. The Department reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or to make multiple awards.
E. Appeal of Contract Awards
Any person aggrieved by the award decision that results from the RFP may appeal the decision to the Director of the Bureau of General Services in the manner prescribed in 5 M.R.S.A. § 1825-E and 18-554 Code of Maine Rules Chapter 120. The appeal must be in writing and filed with the Director of the Bureau of General Services, 9 State House Station, Augusta, Maine, 04333-0009 within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of notification of conditional contract award.
PART VI CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND CONDITIONS
A. Contract Document
1. The awarded Bidder will be required to execute an IT Service Contract (IT-SC) with Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) including appropriate riders as determined by the issuing department. Bidders shall carefully review the IT-SC.
All exceptions will be negotiated between the awarded Bidder(s) and the State. The State will not accept any proposed exceptions as part of this RFP process. The State is not obligated to accept, negotiate, or compromise of any proposed exceptions.
The complete set of standard State of Maine Service Contract documents, along with other forms and contract documents commonly used by the State, may be found on the Office of State Procurement Services’ website at the following link: Office of .
2. Allocation of funds is final upon successful negotiation and execution of the contract, subject to the review and approval of the State Procurement Review Committee. Contracts are not considered fully executed and valid until approved by the State Procurement Review Committee and funds are encumbered. No contract will be approved based on an RFP which has an effective date less than fourteen (14) calendar days after award notification to Bidders. (Referenced in the regulations of the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, Chapter 110, § 3(B)(i).)
This provision means that a contract cannot be effective until at least fourteen (14) calendar days after award notification.
3. The State recognizes that the actual contract effective date depends upon completion of the RFP process, date of formal award notification, length of contract negotiation, and preparation and approval by the State Procurement Review Committee. Any appeals to the Department’s award decision(s) may further postpone the actual contract effective date, depending upon the outcome. The contract effective date listed in the RFP may need to be adjusted, if necessary, to comply with mandated requirements.
4. In providing services and performing under the contract, the awarded Bidder must act as an independent contractor and not as an agent of the State of Maine.
B. Standard State Contract Provisions
1. Contract Administration Following the award, a Contract Administrator from the Department will be appointed to assist with the development and administration of the contract and to act as administrator during the entire contract period. Department staff will be available after the award to consult with the awarded Bidder in the finalization of the contract.
2. Payments and Other Provisions The State anticipates paying the awarded Bidder on the basis of net 30 payment terms, upon the receipt of an accurate and acceptable invoice. An invoice will be considered accurate and acceptable if it contains a reference to the State of Maine contract number, contains correct pricing information relative to the contract, and provides any required supporting documents, as applicable, and any other specific and agreed-upon requirements listed within the contract that results from the RFP.
PART VII LIST OF RFP APPENDICES AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
Appendix A – Proposal Cover Page
Appendix B – Responsible Bidder Certification
Appendix C – Qualifications and Experience Form
Appendix D – Subcontractors Form
Appendix E – Technical Assessment Form
Appendix F – Proposed Services Form
Appendix G – General/Technical Requirements
Appendix H – Cost Proposal Form
Appendix I – Eligibility Requirements Form
APPENDIX A
Maine Department of Corrections
PROPOSAL COVER PAGE
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
Bidder Name:
Chief Executive - Name/Title:
Tel:
E-mail:
Headquarters Street Address:
Headquarters City/State/Zip:
(Provide information requested below if different from above)
Lead Point of Contact for Proposal - Name/Title:
Tel:
E-mail:
Headquarters Street Address:
Headquarters City/State/Zip:
· This proposal and the pricing structure contained herein will remain firm for a period of 180 days from the date and time of the bid opening.
· No personnel currently employed by the Department participated, either directly or indirectly, in any activities relating to the preparation of the Bidder’s proposal.
· No attempt has been made, or will be made, by the Bidder to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a proposal.
· The above-named organization is the legal entity entering into the resulting contract with the Department if they are awarded the contract.
· The undersigned is authorized to enter contractual obligations on behalf of the above-named organization.
To the best of my knowledge, all information provided in the enclosed proposal, both programmatic and financial, is complete and accurate at the time of submission.
Name (Print):
Title:
Authorized Signature:
Date:
APPENDIX B
Maine Department of Corrections
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER CERTIFICATION
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
Bidder Name:
By signing this document, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the aforementioned organization, its principals and any subcontractors named in this proposal:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, and declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from bidding or working on contracts issued by any governmental agency.
b. Have not within three years of submitting the proposal for this contract been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for:
i. Fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a federal, state, or local government transaction or contract.
ii. Violating Federal or State antitrust statutes or committing embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property.
c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification.
d. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this proposal had one or more federal, state, or local government transactions terminated for cause or default.
e. Have not entered into a prior understanding, agreement, or connection with any corporation, firm, or person submitting a response for the same materials, supplies, equipment, or services and this proposal is in all respects fair and without collusion or fraud. The above-mentioned entities understand and agree that collusive bidding is a violation of state and federal law and can result in fines, prison sentences, and civil damage awards.
f. Is not a foreign adversary business entity (https://www.maine.gov/oit/prohibited-technologies).
g. Is not on the list of prohibited companies (https://www.maine.gov/oit/prohibited-technologies) or does not obtain or purchase any information or communications technology or services included on the list of prohibited information and communications technology and services https://www.maine.gov/oit/prohibited-technologies (Title 5 §2030-B).
Name (Print):
Title:
Authorized Signature:
Date:
APPENDIX C
Maine Department of Corrections QUALIFICATIONS and EXPERIENCE FORM
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
Bidder Name:
Present a brief statement of qualifications. Describe the history of the Bidder’s organization, especially regarding skills pertinent to the specific work required by the RFP and any special or unique characteristics of the organization which would make it especially qualified to perform the required work activities. The Bidder may expand this form and use additional pages to provide this information.
Provide a description of projects the Bidder performed which occurred within the past five (5) years and reflect experience and expertise needed in performing the functions described in Part II – Scope of Services to be Provided of the RFP. The Bidder may expand this form and use additional pages to provide this information.
If the Bidder has not provided similar services, note this, and describe experience with projects that highlight the Bidder’s general capabilities.
Project One
Client Name:
Client Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Project Start/End Dates:
Brief Description of Project
Project Two
Client Name:
Client Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Project Start/End Dates:
Brief Description of Project
Project Three
Client Name:
Client Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Project Start/End Dates:
Brief Description of Project
APPENDIX D
Maine Department of Corrections
SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
RFP# 202609125
Educational Assessments and Support for Students at Arthur R. Gould School, Long Creek Youth Development Center
Bidder Name:
Subcontractors If subcontractors are to be used, Bidders must use the tables below to describe the name, address, phone number, contact person, and a brief description of the subcontractors’ organizational capacity and qualifications.
Subcontractor 1
Subcontractor Name:
Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Brief Description of Anticipated Role and Qualifications
Subcontractor 2
Subcontractor Name:
Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Brief Description of Anticipated Role and Qualifications
Subcontractor 3
Subcontractor Name:
Contact Person:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Brief Description of Anticipated Role and Qualifications
APPENDIX E
M…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .