RFI Questions.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 10 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Information - Concrete 3D Printer
Solicitation number
FA481924QA044
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Information (RFI) from the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command regarding a potential contract opportunity for a Concrete 3D Printer. The RFI contains a series of questions seeking information from potential vendors about overhead maintenance requirements, warranty coverage, preventative maintenance plans, software/firmware updates, service call responsiveness, and applicable NAICS codes. The RFI indicates that any pricing information provided will be used for market research purposes only, and that no quotes, bids, or proposals will be accepted at this time. Vendors are instructed to respond to the questions in the attached Excel document and submit it by email no later than May 20th at 0900 CST.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
COBOD PMA PWS 2024 - CXAE.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

QuestionsAnswers
Would you normally expect overhead maintenance with a requirement similar to this?
If so, what kind of overhead maintenance would you expect?
What type of company would you normally provide these services for?
Are there warranties normally provided for certain parts or only the initial warranty when buying the device as a whole?
Do you have any previous history with similar requirements? Please provide details if possible.
Can you offer a preventative maintenance plan for the COBOD 3D Concrete printer?
Can you provide software/firmware updates to the COBOD 3D concrete printer as they come available?
Can you provide service calls?
Are there any rules, regulations, or guidelines specific to this type of requirement other than those listed in the PWS?
Is 100% compliance a reasonable threshold for preventative maintanence?
Is 100% compliance a reasonable threshold for software/firmware updates?
If either 100% compliance threshold is unreasonable, please explain and give a suggestion.
What would be a reasonable compliance standard for answering within 8 hours for mechanical failures or other urgent matters?
What would be a reasonable compliance standard for answering within 24 hours for regular support?
What NAICS would you normally use for this requirement or what would you suggest?
What brand of parts do you use?
Are there any brands of parts that are not compatable with the parts you use?
Is there any information you would add or would like to see added to the PWS?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .