RFI_Honeywell Engineering Services.pdf

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

848th Supply Chain Management Group (SCMG)

429th SCMS Honeywell Engineering Services

DESCRIPTION OF EFFORTS

This Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract will supplement Tinker Air Force Base (TAFB) essential engineering capabilities to include, but are not limited to Integrity Program Support (e.g., ASIP, AVIP, MECSIP); Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM);

Maintenance Steering Group (MSG-3); Data Mining/Trend Identification; Structural Engineering Support; Mechanical/Electronic Prototype Design Engineering;

Mechanical/Electronic/Software Reverse Engineering; Non-destructive Inspection (NDI) Support; Supportability Improvement; Software Development and Cyber Security; Technology Insertion; Development and Sustainment of Aircraft Tools; Reliability/Maintainability Engineering; Industrial Engineering; Aerospace Engineering; Electrical Engineering; Human Factors Engineering; Test and Evaluation; Maintenance Engineering Support; Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization; Energy Management; Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E); Fleet Management; and Specialized Studies. The Contractor shall perform studies, analyses, and engineering and document the results in accordance with individual TOs.

The Contractor shall provide engineering support for the NSNs identified on the contract to resolve shortfalls and deficiencies concerning safety, supportability, reliability, availability, and maintainability. Engineering efforts may include but are not limited to: identifying and correcting obsolete parts and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Health Analysis Report (DI-MGMT- 81900), performing engineering analysis, mishap/safety investigations, prototyping, assess and resolve materiel deficiencies, reverse engineering, modeling, simulation, and providing engineering data. Requirements will be detailed and cited in mutually agreed upon separately funded task orders accompanied by applicable documents.

BACKGROUND

A strategic reserve of technical expertise and engineering presence is invaluable to the Air Force’s engineering workforce and the programs they support. Without this assistance to accomplish the tasks, the war fighter’s mission would be gravely impacted. As an outcome of a Command-level reorganization, the majority of the engineering division positions were eliminated or realigned to specific individual offices within AFLCMC and AFSC. Whereas these services were previously available to all stakeholders, they now reside in specific programs and are not generally accessible to other organizations at Hill, Robins and Tinker. In addition, availability of essential engineering skills is limited due to the lack of specialized skills available.

This environment has reinforced the need for a technically competent, rapidly responding supplemental workforce knowledgeable of existing military weapon systems and platforms in close proximity to ALCs. This source must be capable of providing timely, integrated engineering solutions to difficult technical challenges. The operational environment will not accommodate the timeframe necessary for the development of an alternative engineering capability when a problem develops.

It is essential to maintain this engineering capability at the Air Force for continuity, dependability, and follow-on work since a loss of this rapid response capability to respond to warfighter requirements would adversely impact the Air Force mission.

The government will also provide a list of NSN’s for consideration but wants to identify that the list is Not all inclusive and additions may be added by the government as needed.

OBJECTIVES

The goal is to fully support the fundamental and overarching objective of providing technological, supportable products and services to the warfighter. A continuing, structured, and systematic approach for essential engineering support is critical to the Hill, Robins and Tinker AFB mission and will be affected through this RFI. Additionally, the objective of the Essential Engineering Capability Program (EECP) is to provide mission essential engineering support capabilities for all bases mentioned. TOs shall be used to provide technically competent, rapidly responding engineering support for Air Force weapon systems and platforms.

An additional advantage of this effort is to provide unbiased, independent, rapid, non-product affiliated essential engineering and research services. The Contractor will perform tasks identified to insert new supportable technologies, products, or processes to improve weapon system availability and reduce operating costs.

This RFI describes the basic requirements that shall apply to the individual TOs that are placed under the EECP Program. The applicability of these requirements and any other specific requirements shall be set forth in each individual TO.

CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY SURVEY

Part I. Business Information (limit to 2 pages)

Please provide the following business information for your company/institution and for any teaming or joint venture partners:

1. Company/Institution Name:

2. Address:

3. Point of Contact:

4. CAGE Code:

5. Unique Entity ID (UEI):

6. Phone Number:

7. E-mail Address:

8. Web Page URL:

9. List of any Governmentwide multiple award contracts held (i.e. OASIS, Federal

Supply/Professional Services Schedules, HCATS, SEWP, etc.)

10. Size of business pursuant to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

Code: 541614 Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services Size Standard: $16.5 million

Based on the above NAICS Code, state whether your company is:

• Small Business (Yes / No)

• Women-Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

• Small Disadvantaged Business (Yes / No)

• 8(a) Certified (provide end date) (Yes / No)

• HUBZone Certified (Yes / No)

• Veteran Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

• Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

A statement as to whether your company is domestically or foreign owned (if foreign, please indicate the country of ownership).

Part II. Capability Survey Questions (limit to 7 pages)

1. Describe the capabilities of your company/facility and the nature of the services you provide. Include a description of your staff composition and management structure, highlighting education, training and experience with these types of services Please identify any industry and/or DoD recognition and certification received within the past five years

2. Demonstrate your ability and experience for the same or similar services, which your company currently provides (or have provided within the last three years) to the commercial and/or military environment. Include:

a. Contract Number

b. Brief Description of Work Performed

c. Period of Performance

d. Agency/Organization Supported

e. Point of Contact (name and email of Contracting Officer or Program Manager)).

3. What Quality Management System and process improvement practices does your company employ? Please provide a description of your quality program (ISO 9001, AS9100, etc.)

4. Describe your company's capabilities for generating, handling, processing and storing classified material and data. If your business or employees conducted or received security protocols audits or inspections (internal and/or external) within the past five years, please provide the rating/results.

5. Commerciality:

a. Are there established catalog or market prices for these types of services?

b. If you offer these services the U.S. Government and commercial sources, is the same workforce used for both the U.S. Government and commercial sources?

c. Do you offer these types of services to both entities under similar terms and conditions?

i. If not, briefly describe any differences.

6. Is your company interested in possible subcontracting opportunities? If so, please describe in detail what part(s) of this requirement your company is capable or interested in performing.

a. If your company cannot provide these services in their entirety, what solution would you offer to the Government to accomplish the tasks your company cannot perform? (examples: partner/subcontract to another vendor(s); recommend Gov.

remove those parts from the PWS; etc.)

7. Any other information you would like to share with the Government.

Part II. Capability Survey Questions (limit to 7 pages)