RFB 2025-003 Demolition and Removal of 8895 Club Drive.pdf

REQUEST FOR BIDS

Demolition and Removal of

8595 Club Drive

RFB 2025-003

Issue Date: September 29,2025

Due Date: October 30, 2025

The City of Douglasville is requesting competitive sealed bids for a Demolition and removal of a 4500 Square foot building located at 8595 Club Drive, Douglasville, GA 30134. Bid submission deadline is October 30, 2025, at 4:00 PM EDT.

A. Scope of Work

1. Demolition and removal of 8595 Club Drive building

2. Contractor responsible for removal and disposal of all materials including transport of materials and all related permits in accordance with local, state, and federal law.

3. All utilities have been disconnected by the City.

4. Hazardous Materials Survey: Exhibit A

B. Format for Submission of Bid Proposal

Bid Proposals shall include the following elements:

1. Firm name, address, and telephone number

2. Primary contact person(s) and telephone number(s)

3. Year firm was established.

4. Provide at least 3 client references and contact information.

5. Cost of proposal

6. Organizational Chart which identifies individuals’ names and responsibility

7. Proposed timeline for project.

8. Brief statement of Qualifications

9. Contractors and Subcontractors affidavits of compliance with the Georgia Security and Immigration Act. (E-Verify) (on form supplied in RFB)

C. Evaluation of Bid Proposals

1. Demonstrate understanding of the project scope (25 points)

2. Qualifications and demonstration of previous experience with hazardous materials building demolitions and standards to complete the project (30 points)

3. Project schedule and timeline (20 points)

4. Cost (10 points)

5. References related to hazardous materials building demolition (15 points)

D. General Conditions

Upon submission of a bid proposal, the proposer representative certifies on behalf of his or her company or organization that:

1. This proposal is genuine and not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, an undisclosed person, firm, or corporation.

2. This proposal is not submitted in conformity with any agreement or rules of any group, association, organization, or corporation.

The proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to submit a false or sham proposal.

E. Bonding Requirements If the awarded contract’s total cost, including the original lump sum bid amount plus any anticipated change orders, exceeds $100,000, the following bonds will be required:

• Performance Bond: One hundred percent (100%) of the contract price.

• Payment Bond: One hundred percent (100%) of the contract price.

These bonds must be issued by a surety company licensed to do business in the State of Georgia and acceptable to the City. Failure to provide the required bonds prior to execution of the contract will render the bid non-responsive.

1. The proposer has not solicited or induced any person, firm, or corporation to refrain from Proposer.

2. The proposer has not sought by collusion to obtain for itself any advantages over any other proposer or over the City of Douglasville.

RFB TIMELINE

RFB ESTIMATED

TIMELINE

City issues public advertisement of RFB 09/29/25

Deadline for written questions/requests for clarification

10/09/25 4:00 PM EDT

Publish responses to questions 10/16/25

Deadline for submission of Bid Proposals 10/30/25 4:00 PM EDT

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

All requests for information and clarifications regarding this project shall reference the above invitation name and be submitted via Bidnet Direct (https://www.bidnetdirect.com) no later than 10/09/25 at 4:00 PM. Questions and answers will be issued in the form of an addendum to all interested and will be available on Bidnet Direct (https://www.bidnetdirect.com).

Please contact Alyssa Gordon, Senior Accounting Specialist at gordona@douglasvillega.gov if further assistance is needed. All firms are responsible for checking Bidnet Direct https://www.bidnetdirect.com, on a regular basis for updates, clarifications, and announcements. The City of Douglasville reserves the right to http://www.bidnetdirect.com/ https://www.bidnetdirect.com/ mailto:gordona@douglasvillega.gov https://www.bidnetdirect.com/ communicate via electronic mail with the primary contact listed in the proposer’s response to the RFB.

SUBMITTAL DATE AND INFORMATION

Please submit an electronic copy of the complete package in one PDF file via Bidnet Direct: (https://www.bidnetdirect.com).

The electronic submittal must include a reference to Demolition of 8895 Club Drive RFB 2025-003. The entire submittal should be submitted as one PDF file. Please do not submit individual documents or sections separately. Submission must be received no later than 10/30/25 at 4:00 PM .

It is the sole responsibility of the proposer to ensure delivery by specific deadlines. No submittals will be accepted after the date and time stipulated above. A list of firms submitting responsive proposals will be available on Bidnet Direct (https://www.bidnetdirect.com) after the stated submission deadline.

All expenses for preparing and submitting responses are the sole cost of the party submitting the response. The City is not obligated to any party to reimburse such expenses. All submittals upon receipt become the property of the City. Labeling information provided in submittals “proprietary” or “confidential” or any other designation of restricted use will not protect the information from public view. Subject to the provisions of the Georgia Open Records Act, the details of the proposal documents will remain confidential until final award.

COMMUNICATION

From the issue date of this (RFB) solicitation until a successful proposer is selected and announced, proposers are forbidden to communicate about this solicitation or this project for any reason with any members of the City of Douglasville administration and government, except for submission of questions as instructed in the RFB, or during the pre− proposal conference (if applicable), or as provided by any existing work agreement(s).

For violation of this provision, the Owner reserves the right to reject the proposal of the offending proposer. If assistance is needed after the question submittal deadline, please contact Alyssa Gordon – Senior Accounting Specialist at gordona@douglasvillega.gov.

All bids must comply with all applicable general and special instructions. The City of Douglasville reserves the right to reject any bid that is non-responsive or incomplete or to reject all bids. All bids must be for completion of the entire project — any work intended to be subcontracted must be noted on the Bid Sheet. Bids must include the following to be considered.:

• Completed E-Verify

• Contractors and Subcontractors Affidavit

• Contractor's Oath

All bidders shall comply with all statutory requirements for ethical bidding and with the Georgia Security Immigration Compliance Act.

Please note that there will not be a pre-bid meeting. All bids shall be quantity bids utilizing the City's bid form entitled Bid Sheet for pricing.

BIDDER hereby submits this Bid as set forth above:

Bidder:

(typed or printed name of organization)

By:

(individual’s signature)

Name:

(typed or printed)

Title:

(typed or printed)

Date:

(typed or printed)

If Bidder is a corporation, a partnership, or a joint venture, attach evidence of authority to sign.

Attest:

(individual’s signature)

Name:

(typed or printed)

Title:

(typed or printed)

Date:

(typed or printed)

Address for giving notices:

Bidder’s Contact:

Name:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

Address:

Bidder’s Contractor License Number:

BIDDERS’ DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

All bidders should be aware that the Project is a public project, and the City is a public agency.

Pursuant to the laws, rules and Executive Orders of the State of Georgia, the City of Douglasville shall make every effort to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest or any impropriety in both the selection process for this project and the negotiation and performance of any resulting contract. As part of any submittal you intend to make for this project, you must include a Disclosure Statement with your submittal which answers the following specific questions:

1. Describe any business transactions occurring within the prior two years between your firm and the City of Douglasville. <Insert Response Here>

2. Describe any gift, hospitality, or benefit of any sort that your firm has provided to the City of Douglasville, within the prior one-year period.

<Insert Response Here>

3. A conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest is defined as any action, decision, or recommendation by a person acting in a capacity as a public official, the effect of which is or could be to the private monetary or financial benefit or detriment of the person, the person’s relative, or any business with which the person or a relative of the person is associated. The potential conflict of interest is viewed from the perspective of a reasonable person who has knowledge of the relevant facts. Based upon this definition, describe any conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest that your firm has with the City of Douglasville. <Insert Response Here>

This Disclosure Statement should be dated and signed by an authorized signer for the bidder and submitted with the Bidder’s submittal.

Name of Firm

Authorized Signature Date

Printed Name and Title of Authorized Agent

Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance.

Compliance with the requirements of O.C.G.A. 13-10-91 and Georgia Department of Labor Rule 300-10-1- .02 are conditions of this contract. Contractor certifies that it has the following number of employees (check one appropriate box):

500 or more employees, or

100 or more employees, or fewer than 100 employees, as identified in O.C.G.A. 13-10-91. In the event the Contractor employs or contracts with any subcontractor(s) in connection with this contract, the Contractor will secure from the subcontractor(s) such subcontractor(s’) indication of the employee-number category applicable to the subcontractor. The contractor’s compliance with the requirements of O.C.G.A. 13-10-91 and Rule 300-10-1-.02 is attested by the execution of the contractor affidavit as shown in Rule 300-10-1-.07, or a substantially similar contractor affidavit, which document is attached to this Contract, and is a part of this Contract.

In the event the Contractor employs or contracts with any subcontractor(s) in connection with this contract, the Contractor will secure from such subcontractor(s) attestation of the subcontractor’s compliance with O.C.G.A. 13-10-91 and Rule 300-10-1-.02 by the subcontractor’s execution of the subcontractor affidavit shown in Rule 300-10-1-.08 or a substantially similar subcontractor affidavit, and maintain records of such attestation for inspection by the City at any time. Such subcontractor affidavit shall become a part of any contractor/subcontractor agreement.

CONTRACTOR AFFIDAVIT AND AGREEMENT REGARDING GEORGIA SECURITY

AND IMMIGRATION COMPLIANCE.

By executing this affidavit, the undersigned contractor verifies its compliance with O.C.G.A. 13-10-91, stating affirmatively that the individual, firm, or corporation which is contracting with the City of Douglasville has registered with and is participating in a federal work authorization program* [any of the electronic verification of work authorization programs operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security or any equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), P.L. 99-603], in accordance with the applicability provisions and deadlines established in O.C.G.A. 13-10-91.

The undersigned further agrees that, should it employ or contract with any subcontractor(s) in connection with the physical performance of services pursuant to this contract with the City of Douglasville, contractor will secure from such subcontractor(s) similar verification of compliance with O.C.G.A. 13-10-91 on the Subcontractor Affidavit provided in Rule 300-10-01-.08 or a substantially similar form. Contractor further agrees to maintain records of such compliance and provide a copy of each such verification to the City of Douglasville at the time the subcontractor(s) is retained to perform such service.

Company ID Number: EEV/Basic Pilot Program* Authorization Date

Name of Contractor Name of Project

Name of Public Employer

Signature by Authorized Officer or Agent Date

Printed Name of Authorized Officer/Agent of Contractor

Title of Authorized Officer/Agent of Contractor

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS

THE DAY OF , 20

Notary Public My Commission Expires:

* As of the effective date of O.C.G.A. 13-10-91, the applicable federal work authorization program is the “EEV / Basic Pilot Program” operated by the U. S. Citizenship and Immigration

SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIDAVIT FOR GEORGIA SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION

COMPLIANCE.

By executing this affidavit, the undersigned subcontractor verifies its compliance with O.C.G.A. 13-10-91, stating affirmatively that the individual, firm or corporation which is engaged in the physical performance of services under a contract with (name of contractor)| on behalf of the City of Douglasville has registered with and is participating in a federal work authorization program* [any of the electronic verification of work authorization programs operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security or any equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hired employees, pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), P.L. 99-603], in accordance with the applicability provisions and deadlines established in O.C.G.A. 13-10-91.

Company ID Number: EEV/Basic Pilot Program* Authorization Date

Name of Subcontractor Name of Project

Name of Public Employer

Signature by Authorized Officer or Agent Date

Printed Name of Authorized Officer/Agent of Subcontractor

Title of Authorized Officer/Agent of Subcontractor

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS

THE DAY OF , 20

Notary Public

* As of the effective date of O.C.G.A. 13-10-91, the applicable federal work authorization program is the “EEV / Basic Pilot Program” operated by the U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Bureau of the U.S.

Department of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Social Security Administration (SSA).

CERTIFICATION FORM

I, , being duly sworn, state that I am (title) of (firm) and hereby duly certify that I have read and understand the information presented in the attached bid and any enclosure and exhibits thereto.

I further certify that to the best of my knowledge the information given in response to the request for bids is full, complete and truthful.

I further certify that the bidder and any principal employee of the bidder have not, in the immediately preceding five years, been convicted of any crime of moral turpitude or any felony offense, nor has had their professional license suspended, revoked or been subjected to disciplinary proceedings.

I further certify that the bidder has not, in the immediately preceding five years, been suspended or debarred from contracting with any federal, state or local government agency, and further, that the bidder is not now under consideration for suspension or debarment from any such agency.

I further certify that the bidder has not in the immediately preceding five years been defaulted in any federal, state or local government agency contract, and further, that the bidder is not now under any notice of intent to default on any such contract.

I acknowledge, agree and authorize, and certify that the bidder acknowledges, agrees and authorizes, that the City of Douglasville may, by means that the City of Douglasville deems appropriate, determine the accuracy and truth of the information provided by the bidder and that the City of Douglasville or their agents may contact any individual or entity named in the RFB for the purpose of verifying the information supplied therein.

I acknowledge and agree that all the information contained in the RFB is submitted for the express purpose of inducing the City to award a contract.

A materially false statement or omission made in conjunction with this bid is sufficient cause for suspension or debarment from further contracts, or denial of rescission of any contract entered into based upon this bid thereby precluding the firm from doing business with, or performing work for, the State of Georgia. In addition, such false statement or omission may subject the person and entity making the bid to criminal prosecution under the laws of the State of Georgia of the United States, including but not limited to O.C.G.A. §16-10-20, 18 U.S.C. §§1001 or 1341.

Signature

SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME

This (day) of (month), 20 (year)

NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE

NOTARY SEAL

List of Similar Projects:

1. Project Name:

Project Location:

Project Owner:

Owner Contact (Name and Phone):

Project Contract Amount:

Description of Project:

2. Project Name:

3. Project Name:

625 Holcomb Bridge Road, Norcross, GA 30071 • 770-209-0029 • unitedconsulting.com

REPORT

For Mr. Marcus Thompson City of Douglasville

Hazardous Material Survey Douglas County Coroner’s Office 8585 Club Drive Douglasville, Georgia

Douglass County Coroner’s Office 8585 Club Drive, Douglasville Georgia

CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

July 30, 2025

Mr. Marcus Thompson City Of Douglasville 6695 Church Street Douglasville, GA 30134

Via Email: thompsonm@douqlasvillega.gov

RE: Report of Hazardous Material Survey Douglas County Coroner's Office 8595 Club Drive Douglasville, GA. 30314

CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

Dear Mr. Thompson:

United Consulting has completed the Hazardous Materials Survey at the above referenced site located in Douglasville, Douglas County, Georgia, hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property. The testing activities were performed in substantial conformance with industry standards. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with this project and look forward to assisting you with future projects. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely, UNITED CONSULTING

Timothy J. Beck, P.G. Scott D. Smelter Executive Vice President Principal

MC/bk mailto:thompsonm@douqlasvillega.gov

8585 Club Drive, Douglasville Georgia

CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES

3.0 INACCESSIBLE AREAS/LIMITING CONDITIONS

4.0 ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE COLLECTION

4.1 Overview

4.2 Sample Location Selection

4.3 Procedure

4.4 Bulk Sample Analysis

4.5 Bulk Sample Results

4.6 Asbestos Assessment Results

5.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

5.1 Overview

5.2 Sample Location Selection

5.3 Procedures

5.4 Sample Analysis

5.5 Paint Testing Results

5.5.1 Lead-Based Paint Evaluation

6.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

6.1 General

6.1.1 Fluorescent Light Tubes

6.1.2 Light Ballasts

6.1.3 Mercury Switches

6.1.4 Air Conditioning/Refrigeration Units

6.1.5 Back-up Batteries

8.1.6 Other Hazardous Materials

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

8.0 LIMITATIONS

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Sample Location Plan

APPENDICES

Appendix A Table 1 – Asbestos Sample Results Table 2 – Lead Paint Results Appendix B Photographic Documentation Appendix C Certifications Appendix D Laboratory Results Appendix E Asbestos Notification Requirements for Demolition, Renovation, or Abatement Projects

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

United Consulting conducted a Hazardous Materials Survey on the Proposed Police Precinct property located in Douglasville, Douglas County, Georgia, hereafter referred to as the Subject Property. The Subject Property is currently developed with a county office building. A summary of our findings is as follows:

1. United Consulting collected 67 bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing materials from the

Subject Property. Five (5) of the samples, black floor mastic, black roof mastic, and exterior grey door and window caulks were identified to be asbestos containing.

2. United Consulting performed a lead-based paint survey of the Project Site building to visually identify suspect lead-based paint films on interior and exterior building components. Measurements of lead in painted surfaces at the Project Site were obtained utilizing an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) device.

The painted surfaces identified at the Project Site were generally in poor to fair condition at the time of United Consulting’s survey activities. The painted surfaces analyzed were not found to contain lead-based paint.

3. United Consulting conducted a survey of the Project Site for hazardous materials. The survey identified several items which could contain regulated and/or hazardous materials including fluorescent light tubes, light ballasts, HVAC system, a backup generator with associated fuel tank, containers of used oil and anti-freeze, acrylic paint, smoke detectors, and backup batteries. These items are discussed in the body of the report.

4. The building owner or demolition/renovation contractor must forward a proper Ten-Day Notification to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (EPD) prior to the start of any building renovation/demolition activities.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

United Consulting was retained by the City of Douglasville to perform a Hazardous Materials Survey on the Douglas County Coroner's Office located at 8585 Club Drive in Douglasville Douglas County, Georgia. The purpose of this survey was to collect and test representative samples of common building materials for the presence of asbestos fibers and painted surfaces for the presence of lead-based paint.

United Consulting understands that the client intends to demolish the structure.

Physical sample collection occurred on July 11, 2025. United Consulting representative Mr. Matthew D Cowart, Environmental Specialist, also inventoried obvious materials observed across the Subject Property, which may pose hazards to human health and/or the environment during demolition activities.

Photographs of the Subject Property structure are included in Appendix B.

The asbestos bulk sample collection activities were performed by United Consulting representative, Mr.

Cowart. Mr. Cowart is an accredited Asbestos Inspectors in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), Inspector Certificate Number 20537. His certification and that of the laboratory used for this investigation are reproduced in Appendix C.

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES

The Subject Property is developed with a county office structure. The exterior of the structure was finished with a brick and stone façade. The main roofing system was observed to be a membrane roof system. A smaller secondary roof section over the backup generator was observed to be a low sloped roof with asphalt shingles. The structure was observed to sit on a slab-on-grade foundation system.

The interior of the structure was in good to fair condition at the time of our site visit. The interior walls were finished with drywall system materials. The ceilings included a drop ceiling system with various ceiling tiles. Flooring systems throughout the structure were finished with a mixture of carpeting floor tile, vinyl, and raised floor systems.

The small backup generator extension was observed to be a simple wood framed structure with an asphalt shingle roof system.

3.0 INACCESSIBLE AREAS/LIMITING CONDITIONS

The Subject Property was not occupied during the sampling event. For this reason, United Consulting employed destructive sampling techniques to obtain representative samples for demolition.

Inaccessible areas were not encountered during this assessment.

4.0 ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE COLLECTION

4.1 Overview

Bulk sampling was performed in substantial conformance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA's), "Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings" (EPA 560/5-85-024, 1985). Bulk sampling was performed at the Subject Property, on July 11, 2025, by Mr.

Matthew Cowart. Mr. Cowart is an accredited Asbestos Inspector in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), Inspector Certificate Number 20537. A copy of Mr. Cowart’s certification is included in Appendix C.

4.2 Sample Location Selection

Sample locations were randomly chosen in the field, based on the identification of suspect asbestos-containing material (SACM). A distributed sampling plan based on a randomized sampling scheme was not used for this sampling program. Samples were collected from areas deemed safe and accessible.

4.3 Procedure

Samples were collected by wetting the material to be sampled, by extracting a representative section of the suspect material and by placing the material in a sample container. Each sample was assigned a unique sample number and delivered to an independent laboratory (Eurofins Environmental Testing Southeast-Atlanta, LLC.) for analysis. Chain of Custody was documented and retained on-file. The laboratory results are attached in Appendix D. The locations of the bulk samples collected during this survey are shown on Figure 1.

4.4 Bulk Sample Analysis

The bulk samples were tested for detectable concentrations of asbestos (greater than one percent asbestos) utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining techniques. The testing method used was the “Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples” (EPA 600/M4-82020, as amended). Materials containing one percent or more asbestos are considered asbestos containing materials (ACM) and are regulated. Current EPA regulations require that the building owner assume that materials containing a trace amount of asbestos be assumed to be regulated asbestos-containing material unless further testing in the form of Point Counting is performed on the materials. Bulk sample testing by the above analytical methods were performed by Eurofins Environmental Testing Southeast-Atlanta, LLC., a successful participant in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).

4.5 Bulk Sample Results

United Consulting collected 67 bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (SACM) from the Subject Property. Sampled items included drywall system materials, ceiling tiles, cove base glues, sink sound proofing, HVAC mastics, caulks, floor systems, and roof systems. The survey results discussed below have been compiled by material location and material type (e.g., ceiling tile, drywall, etc.).

Photocopies of the Laboratory Results are included in Appendix D.

Sample locations are listed in the tables below. A summary of the bulk sample results is presented in Table 1. Five (5) of the samples, black floor mastic, black roof mastic, and exterior grey door and window caulks were identified to contain regulated concentrations of asbestos fibers.

4.6 Asbestos Assessment Results

Asbestos containing building materials were identified at the Subject Property in black floor mastics, black roof mastic, and exterior grey door and window caulks.

The National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires the removal of ACM prior to activities, which would disturb them. United Consulting recommends that the asbestos-containing materials be removed, prior to demolition/renovation by a qualified asbestos abatement contractor, using State of Georgia accredited personnel, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local regulations governing the removal of asbestos-containing material.

A Ten-Day Notification should be forwarded to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), by the building owner or demolition/renovation contractor prior to the start of any building demolition activities.

A Georgia licensed Asbestos Removal Contractor should be employed to remove asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and appropriately contain, transport, and dispose of asbestos containing waste materials. Friable material (such as pipe insulation) should be appropriately addressed in a timely manner, whether any demolition or renovation is planned. ACM that is not friable (e.g., floor tile and mastic) should be addressed before any demolition or renovation work begins.

5.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SURVEY

5.1 Overview

Lead is a highly toxic metal that affects virtually every system of the body. LBP is defined as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm²) (or 5,000 micrograms per gram (ug/g) or 0.5% by weight) or more of lead. The purpose of the Lead-Based Paint testing was to visually identify suspect lead-based paint films at the Project Site, and to test the paint films for detectable concentrations of lead. Measurements of lead in painted surfaces identified at the Project Site were analyzed utilizing a Viken Pb200i X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) device. The XRF is capable of detecting lead in both surface and underlying layers of paint. Utilization of the XRF eliminates destructive paint chip sampling. United Consulting performed the survey in substantial conformance to industry standards. Sampling was performed at the Project Site on July 11, 2025, by Mr. Matt Cowart.

5.2 Sample Location Selection

Sample locations were randomly chosen in the field, based on location, type, and color for potential demolition purposes.

5.3 Procedures

United Consulting utilized the XRF to assess representative paint films identified throughout the Subject Property. The device was checked using a supplied standard on multiple occasions throughout testing.

The certification of the individual conducting this lead-based paint survey can be found in Appendix B.

The test face of the XRF is placed against the material of concern and triggered. The triggering releases a very short exposure of radiation and the response to the exposure is measured. This allows the concentration of lead within the top ¼-inch of the material to be measured. The XRF has automatic data logging capability. Locations were recorded separately during the survey.

5.4 Sample Analysis

United Consulting analyzed paint films from within the interior and exterior of the structure. The results printed from the XRF are included in Appendix C. On the results sheet, the results read based on the lead content of the painted surface analyzed with the XRF. XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to the stated threshold of the instrument (1.0 mg/cm2), and negative if they are less than the threshold.

8585 Club Drive, Douglasville Georgia

CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

5.5 Paint Testing Results

5.5.1 Lead-Based Paint Evaluation

Based on the XRF results, paint containing lead greater than the HUD action level was not identified at the Subject Property. Based on the results of this survey, United Consulting does not believe additional sampling is necessary at this time.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations require that workers be protected from exposure to lead at any concentration via proper engineering controls and appropriate levels of personal protective equipment as per Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926.62 (29 CFR 1926.62).

Solid waste which leaches hazardous concentrations of lead greater than 5.0 parts per million (ppm) by TCLP, must be properly disposed of in an appropriately permitted hazardous waste landfill. Samples should be obtained and submitted for TCLP analysis for any confirmed lead based painted material which is to be brought to a landfill for disposal. The building owner or renovation contractor must forward a proper Ten-Day Notification to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (EPD) prior to the start of any building renovation/demolition activities.

8585 Club Drive, Douglasville Georgia

CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

6.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY

6.1 General

A visual reconnaissance of the Subject Property was conducted in order to identify potentially hazardous or regulated materials. The visual reconnaissance identified fluorescent light tubes, light ballasts, refrigerants, acrylic paint, used oil, anti-freeze, and backup batteries.

6.1.2 Fluorescent Light Tubes

During this survey 235 four-foot fluorescent light tubes were observed throughout the structure.

Additionally, 12 eight-foot fluorescent light tubes were also observed. Fluorescent light tubes likely contain mercury vapor and heavy metals coatings, which are recognized human health hazards. These bulbs should be removed and care should be taken to prevent breakage of these bulbs during demolition/renovation activities. The bulbs should be disposed of properly.6.1.2 Light Ballasts

United Consulting spot checked light units throughout the property for the presence of PCB containing ballasts. All fluorescent light ballasts observed during the inventory were labeled as non-PCB containing and therefore are not considered hazardous materials. If during demolition/renovation activities light ballast with PCB’s are encountered, they need to be handled as hazardous materials by the demolition/renovation contractor.

6.1.3 Mercury Switches

Mercury is a recognized human health hazard and should be handled cautiously. Mercury switches are commonly utilized in commercial thermostats and heating and ventilation systems. Care should be taken not to break the mercury containing vessel. Mercury can be absorbed directly into the skin on contact and by inhalation. Further, a mercury spill requires special handling and should not be attempted by untrained personnel. No mercury switches were observed at the site at the locations checked. If during demolition/renovation activities mercury containing items are encountered, they need to be handled as hazardous materials by the demolition/renovation contractor.

6.1.4 Air Conditioning/Refrigeration Units

Air conditioning and refrigeration units may contain regulated gases. Uncontrolled release of these gases into the environment is against the law. During our assessment refrigerants were observed at the site at two HVAC units and five condenser units. During demolition/renovation activities if these locations are to be disturbed, they need to be handled as hazardous materials by the demolition/renovation contractor.

It is assumed that appliances belonging to the current occupants will be removed prior to vacancy.

6.1.5 Back-up Batteries

Emergency lights typically contain backup batteries which contain either lithium or lead based battery systems.

In addition to emergency lighting, backup power systems for computer servers, telephone, and alarm systems typically utilize battery powered backup systems. During our assessment back-up batteries were observed in ten smoke detectors, nine exit signs, four emergency lights, four fire alarm flashers, and one backup power system for computer servers. These products should be properly disposed of prior to demolition should they remain in the building.

6.1.6 Other Hazardous Materials

During the site visit, United Consulting observed at least two fire extinguishers within the structure which would need to be properly disposed of prior to demolition should they remain within the building.

The site contained a pole mounted electrical transformer with unknown PCB content. It is assumed that this transformer is the property of the local utility who should be notified to remove prior to demolition activities.

A backup generator with associated fuel tank was identified in an exterior addition to the structure. Prior to the demolition of the structure, the backup generator must be safely decommissioned and removed to prevent potential hazards associated with fuel, oil, and other residual materials. This includes disconnecting all electrical and fuel lines, draining any remaining fuel or lubricants and ensuring that all associated components, such as fuel tanks and batteries, are properly handled and disposed of. Removal should be conducted by qualified personnel to mitigate the risk of fire, explosion, or environmental contamination.

In addition, three 1-gallon containers of used oil were observed along with a 1-gallon container of possible antifreeze which did not appear to be labeled and a gallon of acrylic paint. These products should be properly disposed of prior to demolition should they remain in the building.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this survey, asbestos containing materials were identified in black floor mastic in the bathrooms, black roofing mastics, and grey exterior window and door caulks. The building owner or demolition contractor must forward a proper Ten-Day Notification to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (EPD) prior to the start of any building renovation/demolition activities.

In the event that suspect ACM are encountered at the time of demolition not assessed during this survey, United Consulting should be contacted, and proper samples of the suspect materials should be collected and submitted for testing, prior to continuing demolition activities which could disturb these materials and potentially result in an asbestos fiber release.

Lead based paint was not observed at the Subject Property. Based on the results of our visual Hazardous Materials Survey, several potentially hazardous materials including fluorescent light tubes, backup batteries, used oil, potential antifreeze, acrylic paint, a backup generator with associated fuel tank, and refrigerants associated with the HVAC systems were observed at the Project Site. These should be carefully removed from the premises prior to demolition/renovation activities.

8.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions presented in this report are based on the laboratory results and visual condition of the materials identified on-site. Asbestos and lead concentrations will vary between sample locations. Our assessment of the materials at the Subject Property is a professional opinion arrived at through the method and procedures accepted by and standard to the industry. No other warranty or guarantee is expressed or implied.

The conclusions presented in the Hazardous Materials Inventory are based on observations made on the days of the inventory.

Representative areas of the Subject Property were sampled. Preparation of abatement design bid documents or scopes of work for abatement, may require additional sampling and definition of the extent of the materials. United Consulting shall not be held responsible for errors, miscalculations, assumptions, misinterpretations or other problems or liabilities arising from, or associated with, firms or individuals bidding on asbestos abatement work that rely solely, or in part, on this document.

This Hazardous Materials Survey has been prepared on behalf of Mr. Marcus Thompson and the City of Douglasville.

UNITED CONSULTING

Prepared: MC Title: Site Location Map

FIG.1

Checked: TB Project: Douglas County Coroner's Office

Date: 7/30/25 Project No. CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

Scale: See above Client: City Of Douglasville

Subject Property

Prepared: MC Title: Sample Location Plan

FIG.2

Checked: TB Project: Douglas County Coroner's Office

Date: 7/30/25 Project No. CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

Scale: Not to scale Client: City Of Douglasville

APPENDIX A

Tables

Table 1: Summary of Asbestos Test Results

Sample No. Component Location Asbestos (%) Friability/Condition

A-1 Drywall Offices ND Friable Good

A-2 Joint compound Offices ND Friable Good

A-3 Cove base tan Offices ND Non-friable Good

A-4 2x2 white ceiling tile Offices ND Friable Good

A-5 Drywall Offices ND Friable Good

A-6 2x2 white ceiling tile Offices ND Friable Good

A-7 Joint compound Offices ND Friable Good

A-8 Cove base tan Offices ND Non-friable Good

A-9 Drywall Lobby ND Friable Good

A-10 Joint compound Lobby ND Friable Good

A-11 Cove base grey Lobby ND Friable Good

A-12 2x2 ceiling tile Lobby ND Friable Good

A-13 Joint compound Offices ND Friable Good

A-14 Drywall Conf. Room ND Friable Good

A-15 Tape & Joint Compound Conf. Room ND Friable Good

A-16 12"x12" floor tile (Brown /w white)

Office RR 1 ND Non-friable Good

A-17 Sink Caulk White Office RR 1 ND Non-friable Good

A-18 Cove base tan Office RR 1 ND Non-friable Good

A-19 2x2 Ceiling Tile White Office RR 1 ND Friable Good

A-20 2x2 Ceiling Tile White Office RR 2 ND Friable Good

A-21 Layer A

12"x12" floor tile (Brown /w white)

Office RR 2 ND Non-friable Good

A-21 Layer B Adhesive Office RR 2 ND Non-friable

Good

A-21 Layer C Black Mastic Office RR 2 3% CH Non-friable

Good

A-22 Sink Caulk White Office RR 2 ND Non-friable Good

A-23 Joint compound Back Hall ND Friable Good

A-24 2x2 ceiling tile (Insulated)

Back Hall ND Friable Good

A-25 Cove base black Back Hall ND Non-friable Good

A-26 Drywall & Joint Compound Utility Room ND Friable Good

A-27 Drywall & Joint Compound Utility Room ND Friable Good

A-28 Drywall Mud Room ND Friable Good

A-29 Joint Compound Mud Room ND Friable Good

A-30 Cove base tan Mud Room ND Non-friable Good

A-31 Drywall Back Hall ND Friable Good

A-32 2x2 Ceiling Tile (Solid White)

Server Room ND Friable Good

A-33 2x2 Ceiling Tile (Solid White)

Server Room ND Friable Good

A-34 12"x12" Floor Tile (White w/ tan)

Kitchen ND Friable Good

A-35 Joint Compound Kitchen ND Friable Good

A-36 Cove base black Kitchen ND Friable Good

A-37 2x2 Ceiling Tile (Solid White)

Pantry ND Friable Good

A-38 2x2 Ceiling Tile (Solid White)

Kitchen ND Friable Good

A-39 Sink Soundproofing Black Kitchen ND Friable Good

A-40 Countertop Caulk White Kitchen ND Non-friable Good

A-41 12"x12" Floor Tile (Light blue)

Water closet ND Non-friable Good

A-42 12"x12" Floor Tile (Light blue)

Water closet ND Non-friable Good

A-43 Drywall Water closet ND Friable

A-44 2x2 Ceiling Tile White (Textured)

Dispatch ND Friable Good

A-45 2x2 Ceiling Tile White (Textured)

Dispatch ND Friable Good

A-46 Drywall Dispatch ND Friable Good

A-47 Tape & Joint Compound Dispatch ND Friable Good

A-48 Drywall Dispatch ND Friable Good

A-49 Tape & Joint Compound Dispatch ND Friable Good

A-50 12"x12" Floor Tile (Light blue)

Dispatch ND Non-friable Good

A-51 Cove Base Black Dispatch RR 2 ND Non-friable Good

A-52 Drywall Dispatch RR 2 ND Friable Good

A-53 Drywall Radio Room ND Friable Good

A-54 Joint Compound Radio Room ND Friable Good

A-55 2x2 Ceiling Tile (Solid White)

Dispatch RR 1 ND Friable Good

A-56 HVAC Mastic White Storage ND Non-friable Good

A-57 HVAC Mastic White Storage ND Non-friable Good

A-58 Roof Shingle W/ Felt Roof ND Non-friable Good

A-59 Roof Shingle W/ Felt Roof ND Non-friable Good

A-60 Layer A Roof Membrane Roof ND Non-friable

Good

A-60 Layer B Penetration Mastic Black Roof 10% CH Non-friable

Good A-61

Layer A Roof Membrane Roof ND Non-friable Good

A-61 Layer B Penetration Mastic Black Roof 10% CH Non-friable

Good

A-62 Penetration Caulk Grey Roof ND Non-friable Good

A-63 Penetration Caulk Grey Roof ND Non-friable

A-64 Window Caulk Grey Exterior 3% CH Non-friable Good

A-65 Window Caulk White Exterior ND Non-friable Good

A-66 Window Caulk White Exterior ND Non-friable Good

A-67 Door Caulk Grey Exterior 3% CH Non-friable Good

BRL= Not detected at the Reporting Limit Bold = above HUD target concentration

Lead Paint Table 2: Summary of Lead Paint Test Results

Sample No. Room

Component Material Condition Result

1 Calibration 1 2 Calibration 0.9 3 Calibration 1 4 Eastern Exterior Jamb Metal Good 0 5 Eastern Exterior Frame Wood Good 0 6 Eastern Exterior Door Metal Good 0 7 Eastern Exterior Jamb Metal Good 0 8 Eastern Exterior Frame Wood Good 0 9 Office Hall Wall N Drywall Good 0

10 Office 1 Frame Wood Good 0 11 Office 1 Wall E Drywall Good 0 12 Office 2 Door Wood Good 0 13 Office 2 Jamb Wood Good 0 14 Lobby Handrail Wood Good 0 15 Office 4 Wall W Drywall Good 0 16 Office 4 Door Wood Good 0 17 Office 4 Frame Wood Good 0 18 Lobby Frame Wood Good 0 19 Lobby Wall S Drywall Good 0 20 Conference Room Wall W Drywall Good 0 21 Office RR 1 Wall W Drywall Good 0 22 Office RR1 Door Wood Good 0 23 Office RR 2 Wall E Drywall Good 0 24 South Hall Wall S Drywall Good 0 25 South Hall Jamb Metal Good 0 26 Mud room Jamb Metal Good 0.1 27 Mud room Door Metal Good 0 28 Mechanical room Door Metal Good 0 29 West Exterior Frame Wood Good 0 30 Generator addition Door Metal Good 0 31 Generator addition Siding Metal Good 0 32 Server room Wall E Wood Good 0 33 Server room Jamb Metal Good 0 34 Water closet Wall E Drywall Good 0 35 Water closet Jamb Metal Good 0

Sample No. Room

Component Material Condition Result

36 Kitchen hall Shelf Wood Good 0 37 Pantry Wall N Drywall Good 0.1 38 Pantry Wall S Drywall Good 0.1 39 Pantry Door Metal Good 0 40 Kitchen Wall E Drywall Good 0.1 41 Kitchen Wall S Drywall Good 0.1 42 Dispatch RR1 Jamb Metal Good 0 43 Dispatch RR1 Wall W Drywall Good 0 44 Dispatch RR2 Wall W Drywall Good 0 45 Dispatch RR2 Jamb Metal Good 0 46 Radio room Wall E Drywall Good 0 47 Radio room Wall S Drywall Good 0.1 48 Radio room Door Metal Good 0 49 Dispatch closet Frame Wood Good 0 50 Dispatch closet Wall W Drywall Good 0 51 Dispatch handrail Handrail Wood Good 0 52 South Exterior Storage Door Metal Good 0 53 South Exterior Storage Jamb Metal Good 0.3 54 South Interior Storage Door Metal Good 0 55 South Exterior Storage Wall S Brick Good 0.1 56 North Exterior Soffit N Wood Good 0 57 North Exterior Roof Siding Metal Good 0 58 Calibration 0.9 59 Calibration 0.6 60 Calibration 0.8

APPENDIX B

Photographic Documentation

Photo: Exterior view of structure. Photo: View of north offices.

Photo: View of office 1. Photo: View of lobby.

Property: Douglas County Coroner’s Office

Site Photographs

Location: 8595 Club Drive, Douglasville, GA

Client: City of Douglasville

Project Number: CIDVI-25-GA-09612-01

Photo: View of office restroom. Photo: View of mechanical room.

Photo: View of backup generator. (Gallon of used oil in bottom left) Photo: View of water heater in water closet.

Photographs

Location: 8595 Club Drive, Douglasville, GA

Photo: View of kitchen. Photo: View of dispatch.

Photo: View of raised floor system. Photo: View of radio room.

Photographs

Location: 8595 Club Drive, Douglasville, GA

Photo: View of HVAC condenser units. Photo: View of HVAC system in storage room.

Photo: View of backup batteries in server room. Photo: View of server room.

Photographs

Location: 8595 Club Drive, Douglasville, GA

APPENDIX C

Certifications

APPENDIX D

Laboratory Results and Chain of Custody

CLIENT PROJECT:

LAB CODE:

July 21, 2025

Matthew Cowart United Consulting Group Inc.

625 Holcomb Bridge Rd Norcross, GA 30071

Douglas County Coroner's Office 673524-1

Dear Matthew, Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for PLM Bulk samples received at our laboratory on July 14, 2025. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using polarizing light microscopy (PLM) per the EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials and EPA 40 CFR Appendix E to Subpart E of Part 763: Interim Method of the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples.

Sample results containing >1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the EPA 600 Method is <1% by calibrated visual estimate.

Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations.

Kind Regards, Dana Till, QA Manager

NVLAP 102082-0

3080 Presidential Drive • Atlanta, GA 30340 • (770) 457-8177

ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORT

By: Polarized Light Microscopy

Prepared for

United Consulting Group Inc.

CLIENT PROJECT: Douglas County Coroner's Office

LAB CODE: 673524-1

TEST METHOD:

EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 40 CFR Appendix E to Subpart E of Part 763

REPORT DATE: 07/21/25

3080 Presidential Drive • Atlanta, GA 30340 • (770) 457-8177

Project: Douglas County Coroner's Office

Method:

Asbestos Report Summary By: Polarized Light Microscopy

673524-1Lab Code:

EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 40 CFR Appendix E to Subpart E of Part 763

Client IDClient IDClient IDClient ID Lab IDLab IDLab IDLab ID LayerLayerLayerLayer Sample DescriptionSample DescriptionSample DescriptionSample Description Asbestos %Asbestos %Asbestos %Asbestos %

A-1 3544382 Layer A Gray tape w/ beige paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Brown/gray drywall None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-2 3544383 White joint compound w/ beige paint

None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-3 3544384 Layer A Tan cove base None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Yellow adhesive None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer C White joint compound w/ beige paint

None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer D Brown tape None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-4 3544385 Gray ceiling tile w/ white paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-5 3544386 Layer A Gray tape w/ beige paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Brown/gray drywall None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-6 3544387 Beige ceiling tile w/ white paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-7 3544388 White joint compound w/ beige paint

None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-8 3544389 Layer A Tan cove base None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Yellow adhesive None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer C Gray tape w/ beige paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-9 3544390 Layer A Gray tape w/ beige paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Brown/gray drywall None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-10 3544391 White joint compound w/ beige paint

None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-11 3544392 Layer A Tan cove base None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Beige adhesive None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-12 3544393 Gray ceiling tile w/ white paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-13 3544394 White joint compound w/ gray paint

None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

A-14 3544395 Layer A Gray tape w/ beige paint None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Layer B Brown/gray drywall None DetectedNone DetectedNone DetectedNone Detected

Project: Douglas County Coroner's Office

Method:

Asbestos Report Summary By: Polarized Light Microscopy

673524-1Lab Code:

EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 40 CFR…