RFA-DK-26-313-Full-Announcement.html
HTML file 128 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- RFA-DK-26-313
About this file
This is a Request for Application (RFA) for a non-competitive, single-source cooperative agreement to fund continuation of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) in Common Metabolic Diseases (CMD) Knowledge Portal. The funding opportunity is issued by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) under the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and falls under federal grant program 93.847 (Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research). Only the Broad Institute, Inc., the current awardee institution, is eligible to apply. The RFA invites a renewal application from the existing AMP CMD Knowledge Portal awardee under the previous RFA-DK-19-505. NIDDK intends to commit $15 million in total costs over 5 years to fund one award, with a maximum direct cost budget of $2 million per year and a maximum project period of 5 years. The application must be submitted electronically by March 10, 2026, at 5:00 PM local time, with scientific merit review occurring in March 2026, advisory council review in July 2026, and an earliest start date of October 2026. The funding supports the administrative structure, technical infrastructure, and scientific capabilities needed to maintain and expand the AMP CMD Knowledge Portal as a curated repository and analytical platform that aggregates publicly available genomic, epigenomic, and omics data related to common metabolic diseases and their complications, with the portal serving as a primary resource for the scientific community to identify candidate genes, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets.
The application requires compliance with all NIH grant policies, registration in System for Award Management (SAM), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov prior to submission. Applicants must follow research application instructions in the How to Apply Application Guide, submit a Data Management and Sharing Plan, and provide a Resource Sharing Plan. The award is a cooperative agreement, indicating substantial NIH programmatic involvement, and applications will be peer-reviewed using five scored review criteria: Importance of Research (Significance and Innovation), Rigor and Feasibility, and Expertise and Resources, plus additional review considerations for protections of human subjects, vertebrate animals, biohazards, and budget justification. Foreign subawards and subcontracts are not permitted under this NOFO as of the May 1, 2025 policy change. The Broad Institute must designate Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) with appropriate expertise and must establish a Steering Committee to oversee project implementation, coordinate activities, and ensure data quality and accessibility in compliance with NIH's Data Management and Sharing Policy. All data, protocols, resources, and methods developed under this award must be shared rapidly and timely with the research community and deposited in a publicly accessible repository.
RFA-DK-26-313-Full-Announcement.html
Text of this file
Department of Health and Human Services
Part 1. Overview Information
Participating Organization(s)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Components of Participating Organizations
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Funding Opportunity Title
Single Source for Continuation of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) in Common Metabolic Diseases (CMD) Knowledge Portal (U01 Research Project (Cooperative Agreement) Clinical Trial not allowed)
Activity Code
U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreements
Announcement Type
Reissue of
RFA-DK-19-505
Related Notices
Check for any recent Notices of NIH Policy Changes that may impact application requirements.
Funding Opportunity Number (FON)
RFA-DK-26-313
Companion Funding Opportunity
None
Number of Applications
Only one application per institution is allowed, as defined in Part 2, Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
Assistance Listing Number(s)
93.847
Funding Opportunity Purpose
This non-competitive Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) is intended to fund a single award to the current awardee institution of the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal (AMP CMD KP), the Broad Institute, Inc. The AMP CMD program is a collaborative partnership between the NIH, pharmaceutical companies, and nonprofit organizations to develop new models for identifying and validating promising biological targets to serve as biomarkers and/or for drug discovery (www.nih.gov/research-training/accelerating-medicines-partnership-amp/type-2-diabetes). This is a one-time NOFO to provide funds to the AMP CMD KP to continue the development and maintenance of the web portal and underlying, curated knowledge base; which serves as the flagship resource encompassing the myriad types of data and information that provide an understanding of the biological heterogeneity in patients with CMDs and their related complications. In its next five-year period, the AMP CMD KP will be expected to continue its expansion of its datasets and traits, import additional data types, deploy additional analytical and visualization tools, and increase its utility to a more diverse user base, and to develop a framework for independent sustainability. The application will be peer-reviewed and if it is not a meritorious application, it will not be funded.
This is a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for a Single Source that will invite an application from the eligible organization to apply. Please see Section III. Eligibility for additional information. In accordance with NIH standard peer-review processes, the application will be peer-reviewed, and only meritorious applications will be considered for funding.
Funding Opportunity Goal(s)
To promote extramural basic and clinical biomedical research that improves the understanding of the mechanisms underlying disease and leads to improved preventions, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetes, digestive, and kidney diseases. Programmatic areas within the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases include diabetes, digestive, endocrine, hematologic, liver, metabolic, nephrologic, nutrition, obesity, and urologic diseases.
Key Dates
Posted Date
February 06, 2026
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
February 06, 2026
| Application Due Dates |
| Review and Award Cycles |
| New |
| Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) |
| AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed |
| Scientific Merit Review |
| Advisory Council Review |
| Earliest Start Date |
Not Applicable
March 06, 2026
Not Applicable
| July 2026 | |
| October 2026 |
December 2026
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Not Applicable
Expiration Date
March 10, 2026
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
| There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity. | |
| Use the NIH ASSIST system to prepare, submit and track your application online. | |
| Use an institutional system-to-system (S2S) solution to prepare and submit your application to Grants.gov and eRA Commons to track your application. Check with your institutional officials regarding availability. | |
| Use Grants.gov Workspace to prepare and submit your application and eRA Commons to track your application. |
Table of Contents
Part 1. Overview Information Key Dates Part 2. Full Text of Announcement Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III. Eligibility Information Section IV. Application and Submission Information Section V. Application Review Information Section VI. Award Administration Information Section VII. Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information
Part 2. Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description
Background Common Metabolic Diseases (CMDs), including obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, metabolic liver disease, and chronic kidney disease, are related diseases that collectively comprise a major public health burden in the United States. These diseases can each cause significant debilitation on their own, but frequently present together, resulting in significant complications compounding their impact. Although the rise in prevalence is understood to be largely driven by environmental factors including diet and lifestyle, it is now appreciated that complex genetic determinants contribute to an inherent susceptibility to each of the CMDs. For example, common and rare variants identified by genome-wide association studies and genome sequencing have yielded greater than 600 loci that have significant associations with type 2 diabetes (T2D). For the purposes of this NOFO, the terms disease and trait are used broadly, to encompass diseases, risk of diseases, protective effects against diseases, complications, molecular phenotypes, organismal phenotypes, clinical phenotypes or outcomes, responses to therapeutic drugs, and other outcomes relevant to human health and disease.
Translation of many of these disease-associated risk loci to causal variants and their downstream effector transcripts (coding or non-coding) has been complicated by the fact that the risk loci often lie in non-coding regions of the genome, far from the effector transcript they regulate. Through work accomplished by the AMP CMD Consortium, and the AMP T2D Consortium that preceded it, an unprecedented amount of human genomic and epigenomic data around CMDs have been collated and analyzed. At the same time, there remains significant amounts of genomic information around CMDs and their related traits and complications that can be added to the AMP CMD KP as well as additional -omics and other data types that can be incorporated or integrated into its existing foundation.
To address these gaps, the NIDDK is soliciting an application to this NOFO to address the overarching goals of 1) accelerating the pace of understanding of the genetic architecture of CMDs and their related traits and complications, 2) providing tools for KP users to identify candidate genes with predicted causal relationship to CMDs and their complications, and 3) making this information broadly available to the scientific community to foster fundamental and clinical research, ultimately resulting in the identification of potential biomarkers for disease and the discovery of potential therapeutic targets.
Accelerating Medicines Partnership The NIH, pharmaceutical companies and nonprofit organizations have together created the Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) to develop new models for identifying and validating promising biological targets for new diagnostics and drug development. A major goal is to generate pre-competitive, disease-specific data that will be publicly accessible to the broad biomedical community for further research (https://www.nih.gov/research-training/accelerating-medicines-partnership-amp/type-2-diabetes).
A critical program goal of the AMP initiative is to advance research in specific disease areas by creating a community resource of data, analyses, and other research resources which are publicly available and accessible to the broad biomedical community. In order to maximize scientific exchange and accelerate research in that field, it is expected that all information, data, protocols, resources, and methods developed by AMP investigators will be shared in a rapid and timely way with other investigators in the consortium and with the research community at-large. Given the amount and complexity of the data, success will require rapid and broad access across the biomedical community to allow for further analyses and collaborative research efforts.
The AMP initiative has worked to ensure that all data generated (including processed/analyzed data) is deposited in a rapid and timely way into a repository that is accessible for use by the broad biomedical community, and that these data will remain available to all qualified investigators, consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and policies and unencumbered by any intellectual property claims. While the NIH encourages patenting of technology suitable for subsequent private investment that may lead to the development of products that address public needs, the NIH discourages premature claims on pre-competitive information that may impede research. It should be recognized that the research supported under the AMP initiative is intended to be precompetitive and will neither make use of proprietary pre-existing intellectual property nor is expected itself to produce patentable findings. Similarly, other research resources developed under the AMP initiative are expected to be made available to the research community.
Goal and Objectives of the AMP CMD Knowledge Portal This non-competitive Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) intends to continue the Accelerating Medicines Partnership in Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal (AMP CMD KP), funding a single award to the Broad Institute, Inc. The application will be peer-reviewed and if it is not a meritorious application, it will not be funded. This opportunity will support the administrative structure and technical and scientific infrastructure needed to support AMP CMD KP activities and data and tools. The overall goal for the AMP CMD KP is to create the flagship resource that encompasses the myriad types of data and information that provide an understanding of the biological heterogeneity in patients with CMDs and their complications. This will be accomplished by maintaining and continuing to develop the web portal and supporting infrastructure to aggregate, collate, and analyze multiple data types on risk variants and causal effector transcripts for CMDs and their complications.
By providing access to these resources to the community, the AMP T2D KP will accomplish its goal of conducting and facilitating research leading to disease knowledge, therapeutic targets, and biomarkers. To maximize scientific exchange and accelerate research in that field, it is expected that all information, data, protocols, resources, and methods deposited to the AMP CMD KP will be shared in a timely way with the research community at large. It will also provide for the expertise and infrastructure needed for data and sample management, including standardized acquisition, harmonization, annotation, quality control, dissemination, and timely public accessibility.
Overview The AMP CMD KP will accomplish its goals by building on existing extensive CMD genomics information as a foundation upon which to add and integrate additional -omics data types, phenotype data, and functional genetics studies to define the genetic architecture of CMDs and identify key disease-driving molecular networks, especially those shared among the metabolic diseases. Key nodes within these networks are expected to serve as candidate biomarkers or points for therapeutic modulation. The AMP CMD KP itself will not generate new data, but rather will serve as a curated repository, analytical platform, and portal for publicly available data. The research, results, and resources of the AMP CMD KP will accelerate the pace of metabolic disease research to ultimately improve the care of patients by providing the data and evidence for:
| Identifying conditions and factors central to robust characterization of patients in disease- and treatment-relevant sub-types; |
| Understanding metabolic disease risk, initiation, progression, and complications development; |
| Associating efficacy and safety of existing therapies with patient sub-types; |
| Discovering biomarkers for metabolic diseases and their complications; |
| Improving clinical decision-making at the individual patient level; |
| Identifying key modulation nodes in disease-driving molecular networks to enhance novel biomarker therapeutic discovery. |
Data and Knowledge Base, The Data and Knowledge Base of the AMP CMD KP will serve as the primary database, integrator, and analytical platform for publicly available -omics data, including functional and biological data, relevant to the CMDs. It may also serve this function for certain publicly available data types generated by other, highly-relevant NIDDK-funded or other research endeavors. It is expected that the AMP CMD Data and Knowledge Base should possess the following characteristics:
| Provide a common, curated catalog of CMD- and complications-relevant traits for mapping of data; |
| Incorporate genomic and genetic data around CMDs and their complications and use this as a foundation upon which to incorporate additional data types (e.g., omics, EHR profiles); |
| Provide users with the ability to perform analyses on its data via tools in the publicly-Accessible Knowledge Portal and via access to underlying datasets; |
| Provide download access to as many underlying data sets as possible to registered users that agree to an end user agreement. |
Publicly-accessible Knowledge Portal The publicly-accessible Knowledge Portal serves as the primary presentation layer (front end) for display of aggregated data and knowledge. The front end should possess the following characteristics:
| Be usable by a variety of user types (e.g., clinicians, researchers, patients); |
| Allow users to perform analyses and visualizations of the underlying data in the Data and Knowledge Base; |
| Interface with other knowledge portals to provide access to additional data types not directly supported by the AMP CMD KP. |
This is a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for a Single Source that will invite an application from the eligible organization to apply. Please see Section III. Eligibility for additional information. In accordance with NIH standard peer-review processes, the application will be peer-reviewed, and only meritorious applications will be considered for funding.
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Section II. Award Information
Funding Instrument
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
Application Types Allowed
Renewal - Renewal application from awardee RFA-DK-19-505
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Clinical Trial?
Not Allowed: Only accepting applications that do not propose clinical trials.
Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards
NIDDK intends to commit 15 Million total costs over 5 years to fund 1 award.
Award Budget
Application budgets are not limited but need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project and not not to exceed 2 million in direct costs per year.
Award Project Period
The maximum project period is 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Organizations
Only the following applicant is eligible to apply for this single source funding: The Broad Institute, Inc. Please refer to Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Information for more details.
Foreign Organizations/International Collaborations
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. This new requirement was effective, May 1, 2025.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Required Registrations
Applicant Organizations
Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.
System for Award Management (SAM) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code.
NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code – Foreign organizations must obtain an NCAGE code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM.
Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) - A UEI is issued as part of the SAM.gov registration process. The same UEI must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.
eRA Commons - Once the unique organization identifier is established, organizations can register with eRA Commons in tandem with completing their Grants.gov registrations; all registrations must be in place by time of submission. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application.
Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration.
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s))
All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. If the PD/PI is also the organizational Signing Official, they must have two distinct eRA Commons accounts, one for each role. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply-Application Guide.
This NOFO is limited to the current AMP CMD KP awardee institution supported under RFA-DK-19-505. Only the PI/PDs associated with the award issued under RFA-DK-19-505 to the Broad Institute, Inc is eligible to apply for this single source funding. Please refer to Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Information for more details.
2. Cost Sharing This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
3. Additional Information on Eligibility Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.
A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.
An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).
Applicant organization may submit one application. Only a single award will be issued to the Broad Institute, Inc under this single source funding opportunity. Please refer to Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Information for more details.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application.
This means that the NIH will not accept: A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application. A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application. An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Requesting an Application Package The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Page Limitations All page limitations described in the How to Apply- Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
Instructions for Application Submission
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply- Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
SF424(R&R) Cover All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Other Project Information
SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile
R&R or Modular Budget
R&R Subaward Budget
PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement
PHS 398 Research Plan All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
All applicants planning research (funded or conducted in whole or in part by NIH) that results in the generation of scientific data are required to comply with the instructions for the Data Management and Sharing Plan. All applications, regardless of the amount of direct costs requested for any one year, must address a Data Management and Sharing Plan.
| Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. | |
| No publications or other material, with the exception of blank questionnaires or blank surveys, may be included in the Appendix. |
PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply- Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered “Yes” to the question “Are Human Subjects Involved?” on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
Delayed Onset Study Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
PHS Assignment Request Form
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
4. Submission Dates and Times Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH’s electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply-Application Guide.
5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372) This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
6. Funding Restrictions All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
7. Other Submission Requirements and Information
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Mandatory Disclosure
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Any instructions provided here are in addition to the instructions in the policy.
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Overall Impact
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following scored review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.
Scored Review Criteria
Reviewers will consider Factors 1, 2 and 3 in the determination of scientific merit, and in providing an overall impact score. In addition, Factors 1 and 2 will each receive a separate factor score.
Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)
| Significance | |
| Evaluate the importance of the proposed research in the context of current scientific challenges and opportunities, either for advancing knowledge within the field, or more broadly. Assess whether the application addresses an important gap in knowledge in the field, would solve a critical problem, or create a valuable conceptual or technical advance. | |
| Evaluate the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study. |
Innovation
| Evaluate the extent to which innovation influences the importance of undertaking the proposed research. Note that while technical or conceptual innovation can influence the importance of the proposed research, a project that is not applying novel concepts or approaches may be of critical importance for the field. |
| Evaluate whether the proposed work applies novel concepts, methods or technologies or uses existing concepts, methods, technologies in novel ways, to enhance the overall impact of the project. |
Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)
| Approach | |
| Evaluate the scientific quality of the proposed work. Evaluate the likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and assess whether the proposed studies can be done well and within the timeframes proposed (feasibility). |
Rigor:
| Evaluate the potential to produce unbiased, reproducible, robust data. | |
| Evaluate the rigor of experimental design and whether appropriate controls are in place. | |
| Evaluate whether the sample size is sufficient and well-justified. | |
| Assess the quality of the plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results. | |
| Evaluate whether the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex or age, in the design, analysis, and reporting. | |
| For applications involving human subjects or vertebrate animals, also evaluate: | the rigor of the intervention or study manipulation (if applicable to the study design). |
| whether outcome variables are justified. | |
| whether the results will be generalizable or, in the case of a rare disease/special group, relevant to the particular subgroup. | |
| whether the study population appropriately models the target population. |
For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, assess the adequacy of inclusion plans as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Considerations of appropriateness may include disease/condition/behavior incidence, prevalence, or population burden, population representation, and/or current state of the science.
Feasibility:
| Evaluate whether the proposed approach is sound and achievable, including plans to address problems or new challenges that emerge in the work. For proposed studies in which feasibility may be less certain, evaluate whether the uncertainty is balanced by the potential for major advances. |
| For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, evaluate the adequacy and feasibility of the plan to recruit and retain a study population that appropriately models the target population. Additionally, evaluate the likelihood of successfully achieving the proposed enrollment based on age, race, ethnicity, and sex. |
| For clinical trial applications, evaluate whether the study timeline and milestones are feasible. |
Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment)
Investigator(s) Evaluate whether the investigator(s) have demonstrated background, training, and expertise, as appropriate for their career stage, to conduct the proposed work. For Multiple Principal Investigator (MPI) applications, assess the quality of the leadership plan to facilitate coordination and collaboration.
Environment Evaluate whether the institutional resources are appropriate to ensure the successful execution of the proposed work.
Additional Review Criteria
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, but will not give criterion scores for these items, and should consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Protections for Human Subjects
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects; 2) adequacy of protection against risks; 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others; 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained; and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption; 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics; and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
Vertebrate Animals
When the proposed research includes Vertebrate Animals, evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals according to the following criteria: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; (3) interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and (4) justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Biohazards
When the proposed research includes Biohazards, evaluate whether specific materials or procedures that will be used are significantly hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and whether adequate protection is proposed.
Resubmissions
As applicable, evaluate the full application as now presented.
Renewals
As applicable, evaluate the progress made in the last funding period.
Revisions
As applicable, evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project.
Additional Review Considerations
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, evaluate the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Budget and Period of Support
Evaluate whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s), convened by CSR, in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Appeals of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
| Applications will be assigned to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Advisory Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions: | |
| Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review. | |
| Availability of funds. | |
| Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities. |
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicant’s federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicant’s integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 “Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants.” This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipient’s business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
| The rules listed at 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. |
| All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the terms and conditions in the Notice of Award (NoA). The NoA includes the requirements of this NOFO. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Recipients, and Activities. |
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
By applying for or accepting federal funds from HHS, recipients certify compliance with all federal antidiscrimination laws and these requirements and that complying with those laws is a material condition of receiving federal funding streams. Recipients are responsible for ensuring subrecipients, contractors, and partners also comply.
Applicants and recipients are strongly encouraged to refer to the NIH Director’s Statement of Priorities, entitled “Advancing NIH’s Mission Through a Unified Strategy.”
Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable federal regulations. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.340, by accepting an NIH award, the recipient agrees that continued funding for the award is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds, recipient satisfactory performance, compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the award, and may also otherwise be terminated, to the extent authorized by law, if the agency determines that the award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities, in line with 2 CFR 200.340(a)(4).
Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Act of 2015, Div. N, § 405, Pub. Law 114-113, 6 USC § 1533(d), the HHS Secretary has established a common set of voluntary, consensus-based, and industry-led guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes.
Successful recipients under this NOFO agree that:
When recipients, subrecipients, or third-party entities have:
| ongoing and consistent access to HHS owned or operated information or operational technology systems; and |
| receive, maintain, transmit, store, access, exchange, process, or utilize personal identifiable information (PII) or personal health information (PHI) obtained from the awarding HHS agency for the purposes of executing the award. |
Recipients shall develop plans and procedures, modeled after the NIST Cybersecurity framework, to protect HHS systems and data. Please refer to NIH Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting for additional information.
Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AWARDS
RESEARCH PROJECT APPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS, CLINICAL STUDIES, PREVENTION AND CONTROL INTERVENTIONS, AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES The following special terms of award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) administrative guidelines, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) grant administration regulations at 2 CFR 200, and other HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration policies.
The administrative and funding instrument used for this program will be the cooperative agreement, an "assistance" mechanism (rather than an "acquisition" mechanism), in which substantial NIH programmatic involvement with the recipients is anticipated during the performance of the activities. Under the cooperative agreement, the NIH purpose is to support and stimulate the recipients' activities by involvement in and otherwise working jointly with the award recipients in a partnership role; it is not to assume direction, prime responsibility, or a dominant role in the activities. Consistent with this concept, the dominant role and prime responsibility resides with the recipients for the project as a whole, although specific tasks and activities may be shared among the recipients and the NIH as defined below.
The Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) will have the primary responsibility for:
1. Developing the research design and study protocol, including definition of objectives and approaches, sample size and power calculations, and establishing procedures for participant recruitment and follow-up, data collection, quality control, interim data and safety monitoring, final data analysis and interpretation, and publication of results.
2. Establishing a Steering Committee to implement, coordinate and manage the project(s). Recipient(s) will name investigators to serve as members on a Steering Committee and other subcommittees, as appropriate, meeting periodically. Recipients will be required to accept and implement the common protocol(s) and procedures approved by the Steering Committee.
3. Designating Protocol Chairs. The Program Directors/Principal Investigators (for studies involving multiple protocols) shall designate a single Protocol Chairperson (if the Program Director/Principal Investigator does not assume this role) for each protocol to be carried out by the study group.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .