RFA-AI-27-014-Full-Announcement.html
HTML file 132 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- RFA-AI-27-014
About this file
This is a Request for Applications (RFA) announcing a cooperative agreement funding opportunity for the development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) and technologies against radiological, nuclear, or chemical threats. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) administers the program on behalf of the National Institutes of Health, with participation from the National Eye Institute (NEI), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). The funding opportunity number is RFA-AI-27-014, with a posted date of September 1, 2026, and an open date of October 9, 2026. Applications are due October 8, 2027, October 9, 2028, and October 08, 2029, with earliest start dates of November 9, 2026, November 9, 2027, and November 9, 2028, respectively. NIAID intends to commit $12 million in FY 2027 to fund 18–20 awards across Research Areas 1, 2, and 4, with $3 million for one application in Research Area 3. Award budgets are capped at $350,000 per year in direct costs, except for Research Area 3 (Nonhuman Primate Radiation Survivor Cohort) awards, which may reach $2 million. The maximum project period is five years. Clinical trials are not allowed.
The RFA solicits applications across four research areas: (1) Radiation MCMs, models, and natural history; (2) Biodosimetry; (3) Nonhuman Primate Radiation Survivor Cohort; and (4) Chemical Countermeasures targeting government-designated Chemicals of Concern (including anticoagulants, blood agents, cholinergic agents, convulsants, hemolytic agents, pulmonary irritants, ultra-potent synthetic opioids, and vesicants). Eligible applicants include higher education institutions, nonprofits, for-profit organizations, state and local governments, tribal governments, and faith-based organizations; foreign organizations and foreign subawards/subcontracts are not permitted. Key requirements include preliminary data supporting intended use, well-defined experimental methods suitable for mass-casualty settings, annual benchmarks for assessing progress, and a data management and sharing plan. Applications must address post-exposure MCM administration (minimum 24 hours post-irradiation for radiation MCMs, or post-exposure for chemical countermeasures). Applicants must register in the System for Award Management (SAM), obtain a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), and establish eRA Commons and Grants.gov accounts. Applications are submitted electronically via ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace, or institutional system-to-system solutions. Scientific review is conducted by an appropriate Scientific Review Group, followed by secondary review by the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council. The funding instrument is a cooperative agreement, indicating substantial NIH programmatic involvement, including participation in monthly and annual meetings and guidance on remediation if benchmarks are not met.
RFA-AI-27-014-Full-Announcement.html
Text of this file
Department of Health and Human Services
Part 1. Overview Information
Participating Organization(s)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Components of Participating Organizations
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES (NIAID)
National Eye Institute (NEI)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Funding Opportunity Title
Development of Candidate Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) and Technologies Against Radiological/Nuclear or Chemical Threats (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)
Activity Code
U01 Research Project – Cooperative Agreements
Announcement Type
New
Related Notices
Check for any recent Notices of NIH Policy Changes that may impact application requirements.
Funding Opportunity Number (FON)
RFA-AI-27-014
Companion Funding Opportunity
None
Number of Applications
See Part 2, Section III. 3. Additional Information on Eligibility.
Assistance Listing Number(s)
93.855, 93.867, 93.846, 93.279, 93.853, 93.837, 93.838, 93.839, 93.840, 93.233
Funding Opportunity Purpose
The purpose of this notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) is to support research that advances understanding of the natural history of radiation or chemical exposures; develops relevant injury models; identifies and validates diagnostic tools, biomarkers, or triage technologies; and supports the development of effective medical countermeasures (MCMs) to mitigate or treat acute and/or delayed injuries resulting from radiological/nuclear or chemical public health emergencies.
Funding Opportunity Goal(s)
To assist public and private nonprofit institutions and individuals to establish, expand and improve biomedical research and research training in infectious diseases and related areas; to conduct developmental research, to produce and test research materials. To assist public, private and commercial institutions to conduct developmental research, to produce and test research materials, to provide research services as required by the agency for programs in infectious diseases, and controlling disease caused by infectious or parasitic agents, allergic and immunologic diseases and related areas. Projects range from studies of microbial physiology and antigenic structure to collaborative trials of experimental drugs and vaccines, mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics as well as research dealing with epidemiological observations in hospitalized patients or community populations and progress in allergic and immunologic diseases. Because of this dual focus, the program encompasses both basic research and clinical research.
Key Dates
Posted Date
September 01, 2026
Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
October 09, 2026
| Application Due Dates |
| Review and Award Cycles |
| New |
| Renewal / Resubmission / Revision (as allowed) |
| AIDS - New/Renewal/Resubmission/Revision, as allowed |
| Scientific Merit Review |
| Advisory Council Review |
| Earliest Start Date |
November 09, 2026
November 09, 2026
Not Applicable
| March 2027 | |
| May 2027 |
July 2027
October 08, 2027
October 08, 2027
Not Applicable
| March 2028 | |
| May 2028 |
July 2028
October 09, 2028
October 09, 2028
Not Applicable
| March 2029 | |
| May 2029 |
July 2029
All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Due Dates for E.O. 12372
Not Applicable
Expiration Date
October 10, 2028
Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this NOFO or in a Notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts).
Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the NOFO) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.
Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
| There are several options available to submit your application through Grants.gov to NIH and Department of Health and Human Services partners. You must use one of these submission options to access the application forms for this opportunity. | |
| Use the NIH ASSIST system to prepare, submit and track your application online. | |
| Use an institutional system-to-system (S2S) solution to prepare and submit your application to Grants.gov and eRA Commons to track your application. Check with your institutional officials regarding availability. | |
| Use Grants.gov Workspace to prepare and submit your application and eRA Commons to track your application. |
Table of Contents
Part 1. Overview Information Key Dates Part 2. Full Text of Announcement Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III. Eligibility Information Section IV. Application and Submission Information Section V. Application Review Information Section VI. Award Administration Information Section VII. Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information
Part 2. Full Text of Announcement
Section I. Notice of Funding Opportunity Description
Research Objectives and Scope This notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) aims to support research and development – from early-stage discovery through advanced product development – aimed at diagnosing, mitigating, and treating radiation- or chemical-induced injuries, or internal radionuclide contamination during and after mass-casualty public health emergencies. The goal of this initiative is to enable academic and industry partners to develop triage tools and safe, effective medical countermeasures (MCMs) to protect United States (U.S.) citizens and save lives during radiological, nuclear, or chemical incidents.
Each application must address only one Research Area listed below:
| Research Area 1: Radiation MCMs, models, and natural history |
| Research Area 2: Biodosimetry |
| Research Area 3: Nonhuman Primate (NHP) Radiation Survivor Cohort (NHP-RSC) |
| Research Area 4: Chemical Countermeasures |
All Research Areas aim to support animal models and new approach methodologies (NAMs) such as improved in-silico predictive models and in vitro platforms (e.g., microphysiological systems) to complement and/or reduce the use of animal models to assess radiation or chemical injury natural history, biomarkers, and MCM safety and efficacy.
Research Area 1 - Radiation MCMs, models, and natural history This Research Area seeks MCM development and aims to support, but is not limited to, the following topic examples:
Research and development on MCMs given after radiation exposure with administration of the first dose beginning at a minimum of 24 hours or later post-irradiation (48 hours or later for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia-targeted hematopoietic-ARS products), for treatment of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and/or delayed effects of exposure, including: Products to enhance survival and/or reduce major morbidities in irradiated models or NAMs predictive of human responses, or for decorporation agents, to reduce body burden of internalized radionuclides.
| Product development to support U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) interactions and facilitate licensure and potential inclusion in the Strategic National Stockpile. |
| Development of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) methods for identification of novel targets and/or lead molecules for radiation injuries, interpretation of complex data sets, and/or data mining to identify biomarkers altered by irradiation and/or MCM treatment. |
Research Area 2 – Biodosimetry This Research Area aims to support the development of biodosimetry approaches/devices for triage and/or predictive biodosimetry of early and late injuries to facilitate determination of radiation exposure status (yes/no field deployable triage applications), as well as to guide medical care. This Research Area aims to support, but is not limited to, the following topics:
| Evaluation of radiation injury biomarker signatures predictive of early and/or delayed injury with signature biokinetics analysis within 30 minutes to days, weeks, or months of radiation exposure. |
| Development of point-of-care (e.g., field triage) or definitive care (e.g., medical center based) biodosimetry signature/device to measure intensity of radiation injuries. |
| Influence of confounders on the kinetics of the biomarker(s) should be considered (e.g., type of radiation, percent of body exposure, use of FDA approved products). |
Research Area 3 - Nonhuman primate radiation survivor cohort (NHP-RSC) This Research Area aims to support the following:
| Support of an existing NHP-RSC of 200 or more male and female irradiated (1-14 Gy, total- or partial-body exposed) and non-irradiated control animals: rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) or cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). |
| Collecting, cataloging, archiving, and sharing biological and data resources, as well as computational resources to conduct in-depth analyses of health data. |
Research Area 4 - Chemical Countermeasures (CC) This Research Area supports discovery and early development of CC against U.S. Government-designated Chemicals of Concern (CoCs). CoCs are grouped into toxidromes based on their primary mechanisms of toxicity, enabling the development of threat agnostic MCMs. The examples below highlight CoCs of interest to the Government.
CoC toxidromes (with examples of associated CoCs) include:
| Anticoagulants: brodifacoum, bromadiolone |
| Blood Agents: hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulfide |
| Cholinergic: parathion, phorate, aldicarb |
| Convulsants: picrotoxin, TETS, strychnine |
| Hemolytic/Metabolic Agents: arsenic trioxide, thallium sulfate, arsine |
| Pulmonary Irritant/Corrosive Agents: chlorine, phosgene, ammonia |
| Ultra-Potent Synthetic Opioids: fentanyl, carfentanil, nitazenes |
| Vesicants: nitrogen mustard, phosgene oxime |
Research topics include:
| Validating targets and pathways; characterizing preliminary candidates; optimizing hits to leads; and demonstrating post-exposure activity in models that predict human response in mass-casualty settings. | |
| Developing therapeutics (including repurposed drugs) to: | Mitigate acute, life-threatening effects in mass-casualty settings. |
| Prevent long-term or delayed harmful health effects following acute exposure (i.e., improve quality of life). |
Non-Responsive Criteria for All Applications Applications that meet any of the criteria below will be considered non-responsive and will not be reviewed:
| Research proposing pretreatment approaches, i.e., compound(s) that must be administered prior to radiation/chemical exposure to be protective/efficacious (prophylaxis) |
| Proposed HIV/AIDS research |
| Epidemiological studies |
| Applications proposing research in more than one research area within a single application |
Additional Research Area Specific Non-Responsive Criteria Research Areas 1-3: Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Applications with studies that –
| Propose administration of a candidate MCM at times earlier than 24 hours after radiation exposure (or earlier than 48 hours for MCMs targeting neutropenia or thrombocytopenia resulting from radiation exposure). |
| Characterize and develop biomarkers of carcinogenesis. |
| Utilize non-biologically based dosimetric methods and/or environmental testing/sampling devices (e.g., thermo-luminescent detectors, fortuitous dosimeters, and radiation portals). |
Research Area 4: Chemical Countermeasures Applications with studies that –
| Propose research that does not create or validate candidate MCMs efficacy against CoCs. |
| Address chronic, long-term environment or occupational CoC exposures. |
| Propose therapeutics that are not feasible for mass-casualty use, including those requiring treatment within 15–30 minutes of exposure, except for therapeutics targeting ultra-potent synthetic opioids. |
| Develop environmental decontamination methods or diagnostic, triage, or analytical technologies. |
| Advance product development activities for CoC MCMs, including GLP IND-enabling studies, pivotal animal efficacy studies, or cGMP manufacturing. |
See Section VIII. Other Information for award authorities and regulations.
Section II. Award Information
Funding Instrument
Cooperative Agreement: A financial assistance mechanism used when there will be substantial Federal scientific or programmatic involvement. Substantial involvement means that, after award, NIH scientific or program staff will assist, guide, coordinate, or participate in project activities. See Section VI.2 for additional information about the substantial involvement for this NOFO.
Application Types Allowed
New
Resubmission
The OER Glossary and the How to Apply Application Guide provide details on these application types. Only those application types listed here are allowed for this NOFO.
Clinical Trial?
Not Allowed: This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
Need help determining whether you are doing a clinical trial?
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards
NIAID intends to commit a total of $12M in FY 2027 to fund 18-20 awards in Research Areas 1, 2, and 4. There will be a total of $3M in FY2027 to fund one application in Research Area 3. The number of FY 2028 and 2029 awards is contingent upon NIH appropriations and the submission of a sufficient number of meritorious applications.
Award Budget
Application budgets are not anticipated to exceed $350,000 in direct costs per year with the exception of application budgets for Research Area 3, which are not expected to exceed $2M in direct costs.
All budgets should reflect the actual needs of the proposed project.
Award Project Period
The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum project period is 5 years.
NIH grants policies as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made from this NOFO.
Section III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Eligible Organizations
| Higher Education Institutions - Includes all types | |
| Public/State Controlled Institutions of Higher Education | |
| Private Institutions of Higher Education |
Nonprofits Other Than Institutions of Higher Education
| Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education) |
| Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) IRS Status (Other than Institutions of Higher Education) |
For-Profit Organizations
| Small Businesses |
| For-Profit Organizations (Other than Small Businesses) |
Local Governments
| State Governments |
| County Governments |
| City or Township Governments |
| Special District Governments |
| Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Federally Recognized) |
| Indian/Native American Tribal Governments (Other than Federally Recognized). |
Federal Governments
Eligible Agencies of the Federal Government
U.S. Territory or Possession
Other
Independent School Districts
Public Housing Authorities/Indian Housing Authorities
Native American Tribal Organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
Faith-based or Community-based Organizations
Regional Organizations
Foreign Organizations/International Collaborations
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) Entities (Foreign Organizations) are not eligible to apply.
Non-domestic (non-U.S.) components of U.S. Organizations are not eligible to apply.
Foreign components, as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement, are allowed.
NIH will no longer issue awards (i.e., new, renewal, or non-competing continuation) to domestic or foreign entities that involve foreign subawards/subcontracts. All NIH-funded research involving foreign subawards/subcontracts must be submitted in response to a NOFO that is specifically designated for funded international collaborations. See NIH Grants Policy Statement 16.8 Collaborative International Research Awards.
Applications involving foreign subawards/subcontracts submitted in response to this NOFO will be deemed noncompliant and will not be considered for funding. This policy applies to all monetary international collaborations resulting in foreign subawards/subcontracts, however, it does not preclude unfunded international collaborations or foreign components, funding for foreign consultants, or procurement of unique equipment or supplies from foreign vendors.
Required Registrations
Applicant Organizations Applicant organizations must complete and maintain the following registrations as described in the How to Apply- Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award. All registrations must be completed prior to the application being submitted. Registration can take 6 weeks or more, so applicants should begin the registration process as soon as possible. Failure to complete registrations in advance of a due date is not a valid reason for a late submission, please reference the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications for additional information.
System for Award Management (SAM) – Applicants must complete and maintain an active registration, which requires renewal at least annually. The renewal process may require as much time as the initial registration. SAM registration includes the assignment of a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code for domestic organizations which have not already been assigned a CAGE Code. Foreign organizations must obtain a NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (in lieu of a CAGE code) in order to register in SAM. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)- A UEI is issued as part of the SAM.gov registration process. The same UEI must be used for all registrations, as well as on the grant application.
| eRA Commons - Once the unique organization identifier is established, organizations can register with eRA Commons in tandem with completing their Grants.gov registrations; all registrations must be in place by time of submission. eRA Commons requires organizations to identify at least one Signing Official (SO) and at least one Program Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) account in order to submit an application. |
| Grants.gov – Applicants must have an active SAM registration in order to complete the Grants.gov registration. |
Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD(s)/PI(s)) All PD(s)/PI(s) must have an eRA Commons account. PD(s)/PI(s) should work with their organizational officials to either create a new account or to affiliate their existing account with the applicant organization in eRA Commons. Obtaining an eRA Commons account can take up to 2 weeks.
All PD(s)/PI(s) must be registered with ORCID. The personal profile associated with the PD(s)/PI(s) eRA Commons account must be linked to a valid ORCID ID. For more information on linking an ORCID ID to an eRA Commons personal profile see the ORCID topic in our eRA Commons online help.
Eligible Individuals (Program Director/Principal Investigator)
Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) is invited to work with their organization to develop an application for support.
For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, visit the Multiple Program Director/Principal Investigator Policy and submission details in the Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded) Component of the How to Apply-Application Guide.
2. Cost Sharing This NOFO does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 1.2 Definition of Terms.
3. Additional Information on Eligibility Number of Applications
Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct.
The NIH will not accept duplicate or highly overlapping applications under review at the same time, per NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.7.4 Submission of Resubmission Application. This means that the NIH will not accept:
A new (A0) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of an overlapping new (A0) or resubmission (A1) application.
A resubmission (A1) application that is submitted before issuance of the summary statement from the review of the previous new (A0) application.
An application that has substantial overlap with another application pending appeal of initial peer review (see NIH Grants Policy Statement 2.3.9.4 Similar, Essentially Identical, or Identical Applications).
Section IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Requesting an Application Package The application forms package specific to this opportunity must be accessed through ASSIST, Grants.gov Workspace or an institutional system-to-system solution. Links to apply using ASSIST or Grants.gov Workspace are available in Part 1 of this NOFO. See your administrative office for instructions if you plan to use an institutional system-to-system solution.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the Research (R) Instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide except where instructed in this notice of funding opportunity to do otherwise (in this NOFO, in a policy notice, or other notice from NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.
Page Limitations All page limitations described in the How to Apply- Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.
Instructions for Application Submission
The following section supplements the instructions found in the How to Apply- Application Guide and should be used for preparing an application to this NOFO.
SF424(R&R) Cover All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Project/Performance Site Locations All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
SF424(R&R) Other Project Information All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Facilities & Other Resources: For applications addressing Research Area 3 - NHP-RSC, describe the following:
Availability of laboratory space and the ability to support the following NHP studies and testing:
| Pathology and necropsy (to include histology and immunohistochemistry) and sample imaging |
| Physiological testing (e.g. cardiac and respiratory, endocrine and metabolic; microbiome, immune surveillance and other aspects of immune function/vaccine response, neurologic and behavioral assessments, etc.) |
| Standard analyses such as serum chemistries, blood counts, as well as molecular and cellular analyses and radiographic exams (e.g. x-rays, CTs, MRIs) and other imaging studies to evaluate animal health status. |
Provision of safe and reliable NHP transport to and from the site for accrual and evaluations in compliance with U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal Welfare Act (AWA) transportation regulations.
Describe Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC) accredited NHP facilities with adequate housing and caging, including indoor and outdoor access.
Since the proposed work involves the use of NHPs, which are USDA-regulated species, each organization will have to register with the USDA and agree to comply with the AWA and annual inspections. If currently licensed or registered, please provide the license or registration number for each facility.
SF424(R&R) Senior/Key Person Profile All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Within the Biographical Sketch Common Form of Key personnel proposing research related to radiation and nuclear countermeasures, describe expertise within the areas of radiation biology, dosimetry/health physics, statistics, drug/device development, biostatistics, and veterinary medicine (if animal studies are proposed) including AAALAC accredited veterinary experience handling irradiated NHPs if proposing radiation related research involving NHPs.
R&R or Modular Budget All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions for applications to Research Areas 1-3:
For Research Areas 1-3: Within the budget section, include funds to support travel for the PD(s)/PI(s), and if necessary, the minimum number of additional relevant staff, to participate in a once yearly, 1-day program progress meeting with NIAID, to be held in the Rockville, MD area.
For Research Area 3 - NHP-RSC applications, include the following: A detailed budget not to exceed $2M in direct costs in the first year of the award. Applicants should also assume that up to 25 animals may be added to the cohort each year from other government-funded studies. These animals will be designated by NIAID staff, in conjunction with the PD(s)/PI(s).
R&R Subaward Budget
PHS 398 Cover Page Supplement
PHS 398 Research Plan All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
Specific Aims: State which Research Area (1, 2, 3, or 4) the application addresses. List in priority order the broad, long-range objectives and goals of the proposed project. Concisely describe the work to be completed.
Research Strategy: Use this section to summarize the research strategy, including significance, innovation and approach and explain the rationale for selecting the methods to accomplish the specific aims.
All applications regardless of Research Area should address the following:
| Describe well-defined, rigorous experimental methods that support the proposed indication, with a clear concept of use in mass-casualty or emergency settings. Provide a clear justification for biomarker(s) selection, model and endpoint selection, controls, timing, route of administration or sample selection if applicable. |
| Provide a clear and feasible development plan, with associated timeline(s), that outlines key activities. |
Benchmarks: Applicants should include a table of benchmarks reflecting the high-risk, progressive nature of product development research. Benchmarks should include:
Quantitative benchmarks for assessing year-one progress, and clearly defined out-year interim objectives.
Prior to award of each budget period, benchmarks may be renegotiated. Failure to meet benchmarks may affect non-competing continuation awards.
Applications that do not include annual benchmarks for assessing successful progress will be considered non-compliant and will not be reviewed.
For applications focused on MCMs (radiological, nuclear or chemical), describe the following:
| Based on robust preliminary data, describe the therapeutic candidate, including full chemical structure when applicable. Explain how the proposed MCM will advance a well-characterized candidate to reduce mortality and morbidity in mass casualty events, and, when relevant, how it improves upon current standard of care. These efforts incorporate a clearly defined concept of use, continuum of care (e.g., field to hospital), and route of administration to ensure the innovation is practical and deployable. |
| Describe the novelty of the proposed therapeutic candidate or approach, clearly identify what is innovative about the target, pathway, mechanism, assays, or models. If proposing drug repurposing, provide a strong scientific rationale for the new indication. If the candidate builds upon or improves an earlier, unmarketed drug, clearly describe its advantages and summarize relevant preclinical and clinical findings that support continued development of the proposed candidate. |
| Describe how the project will demonstrate that the candidate MCM, including repurposed therapeutics, is biologically active, synthetically feasible, has defined specificity, potency, target selectivity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, safety, and clinically relevant post-exposure in vivo efficacy. |
Applications that do not include preliminary data supporting intended use/target pathology will be considered non-compliant and will not be reviewed.
Research Area 1 – Radiation MCMs, models, and natural history:
Describe how the application focuses on basic or translational research aimed at the development of an MCM at timepoints 24 hours (or 48 hours for thrombocytopenia or neutropenia H-ARS targeted products) or later post-irradiation.
Research Area 2 – Biodosimetry:
Provide preliminary data for the intended end-use (triage, dose determination, and/or predictive biodosimetry). Describe the research gap the application addresses. For example, distinguish between concerned citizens (unexposed) and exposed populations, determining the radiation dose of an exposed individual, or determining the acute and/or delayed radiation injury outcomes to major organs/physiological systems.
Applications that do not include preliminary data supporting intended use/target pathology will be considered non-compliant and will not be reviewed.
Research Area 3 – NHP-RSC:
Describe what samples will be archived from the animals, and what data will be preserved. Applicants should assume that any diagnostics that they proposed to carry out, and/or standard medical management and treatment(s) provided to the animals in the cohort should be consistent with treatment(s) provided to humans with similar symptoms.
Research Area 4 – Chemical Countermeasures:
Describe how the application focuses on translational research to develop a mass-casualty appropriate delayed treatment CoC MCM.
Resource Sharing Plan: Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans as provided in the How to Apply - Application Guide.
Other Plan(s):
All instructions in the How to Apply - Application Guide must be followed, with the following additional instructions:
A Data Management and Sharing Plan (DMS Plan) is required for any NIH-funded or conducted research that will generate scientific data. Applicants must submit the DMS Plan at the time of application using the NIH DMS Plan Format Page. The DMS Plan must address the elements in the structured format. Where the DMS Plan Format Page requires a "Yes or No" response, no additional narrative is allowed.
| Appendix: Only limited Appendix materials are allowed. Follow all instructions for the Appendix as described in the How to Apply - Application Guide. | |
| No publications or other material, with the exception of blank questionnaires or blank surveys, may be included in the Appendix. |
PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information When involving human subjects research, clinical research, and/or NIH-defined clinical trials (and when applicable, clinical trials research experience) follow all instructions for the PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form in the How to Apply- Application Guide, with the following additional instructions:
If you answered "Yes" to the question "Are Human Subjects Involved?" on the R&R Other Project Information form, you must include at least one human subjects study record using the Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information form or Delayed Onset Study record.
Study Record: PHS Human Subjects and Clinical Trials Information
Delayed Onset Study Note: Delayed onset does NOT apply to a study that can be described but will not start immediately (i.e., delayed start). All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
PHS Assignment Request Form All instructions in the How to Apply- Application Guide must be followed.
3. Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM) See Part 2. Section III.1 for information regarding the requirement for obtaining a unique entity identifier and for completing and maintaining active registrations in System for Award Management (SAM), NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) Code (if applicable), eRA Commons, and Grants.gov
4. Submission Dates and Times Part I. contains information about Key Dates and times. Applicants are encouraged to submit applications before the due date to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. When a submission date falls on a weekend or Federal holiday, the application deadline is automatically extended to the next business day.
Organizations must submit applications to Grants.gov (the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies). Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons, NIH's electronic system for grants administration. NIH and Grants.gov systems check the application against many of the application instructions upon submission. Errors must be corrected and a changed/corrected application must be submitted to Grants.gov on or before the application due date and time. If a Changed/Corrected application is submitted after the deadline, the application will be considered late. Applications that miss the due date and time are subjected to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.3.9.2 Electronically Submitted Applications.
Applicants are responsible for viewing their application before the due date in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission.
Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the How to Apply-Application Guide.
5. Intergovernmental Review (E.O. 12372) This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental review.
6. Funding Restrictions All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement.
Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 7.9.1 Selected Items of Cost.
7. Other Submission Requirements and Information
Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the How to Apply – Application Guide. Paper applications will not be accepted.
Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III. Eligibility Information contains information about registration.
For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission process, visit How to Apply – Application Guide. If you encounter a system issue beyond your control that threatens your ability to complete the submission process on-time, you must follow the Dealing with System Issues guidance. For assistance with application submission, contact the Application Submission Contacts in Section VII.
Important reminders:
All PD(s)/PI(s) must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile form. Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. See Section III of this NOFO for information on registration requirements.
The applicant organization must ensure that the unique entity identifier provided on the application is the same identifier used in the organization's profile in the eRA Commons and for the System for Award Management. Additional information may be found in the How to Apply – Application Guide.
See more tips for avoiding common errors.
Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness and compliance with application instructions by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations, NIH. Applications that are incomplete, non-compliant and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed.
Mandatory Disclosure
Recipients or subrecipients must submit any information related to violations of federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the federal award. See Mandatory Disclosures, 2 CFR 200.113 and NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4.1.35.
Send written disclosures to the NIH Chief Grants Management Officer listed on the Notice of Award for the IC that funded the award and to the HHS Office of Inspector Grant Self Disclosure Program at grantdisclosures@oig.hhs.gov.
Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in the policy
Section V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. Applications submitted to the NIH in support of the NIH mission are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.
Overall Impact
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following scored review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have a major scientific impact.
Scored Review Criteria
Reviewers will consider Factors 1, 2 and 3 in the determination of scientific merit, and in providing an overall impact score. In addition, Factors 1 and 2 will each receive a separate factor score.
Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)
| Significance | |
| Evaluate the importance of the proposed research in the context of current scientific challenges and opportunities, either for advancing knowledge within the field, or more broadly. Assess whether the application addresses an important gap in knowledge in the field, would solve a critical problem, or create a valuable conceptual or technical advance. | |
| Evaluate the rationale for undertaking the study, the rigor of the scientific background for the work (e.g., prior literature and/or preliminary data) and whether the scientific background justifies the proposed study. |
Innovation
| Evaluate the extent to which innovation influences the importance of undertaking the proposed research. Note that while technical or conceptual innovation can influence the importance of the proposed research, a project that is not applying novel concepts or approaches may be of critical importance for the field. |
| Evaluate whether the proposed work applies novel concepts, methods or technologies or uses existing concepts, methods, technologies in novel ways, to enhance the overall impact of the project. |
Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)
| Approach | |
| Evaluate the scientific quality of the proposed work. Evaluate the likelihood that compelling, reproducible findings will result (rigor) and assess whether the proposed studies can be done well and within the timeframes proposed (feasibility). |
Rigor:
| Evaluate the potential to produce unbiased, reproducible, robust data. | |
| Evaluate the rigor of experimental design and whether appropriate controls are in place. | |
| Evaluate whether the sample size is sufficient and well-justified. | |
| Assess the quality of the plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results. | |
| Evaluate whether the investigators presented adequate plans to address relevant biological variables, such as sex or age, in the design, analysis, and reporting. | |
| For applications involving human subjects or vertebrate animals, also evaluate: | the rigor of the intervention or study manipulation (if applicable to the study design). |
| whether outcome variables are justified. | |
| whether the results will be generalizable or, in the case of a rare disease/special group, relevant to the particular subgroup. | |
| whether the study population appropriately models the target population. |
For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, assess the adequacy of inclusion plans as appropriate for the scientific goals of the research. Considerations of appropriateness may include disease/condition/behavior incidence, prevalence, or population burden, population representation, and/or current state of the science.
Feasibility:
| Evaluate whether the proposed approach is sound and achievable, including plans to address problems or new challenges that emerge in the work. For proposed studies in which feasibility may be less certain, evaluate whether the uncertainty is balanced by the potential for major advances. |
| For applications involving human subjects, including clinical trials, evaluate the adequacy and feasibility of the plan to recruit and retain a study population that appropriately models the target population. Additionally, evaluate the likelihood of successfully achieving the proposed enrollment based on age, race, ethnicity, and sex. |
| For clinical trial applications, evaluate whether the study timeline and milestones are feasible. |
| Specific to this NOFO: | |
| Evaluate the relevance of the proposed benchmarks for feasibility of meeting any proposed product development activities. |
Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment)
Investigator(s) Evaluate whether the investigator(s) have demonstrated background, training, and expertise, as appropriate for their career stage, to conduct the proposed work. For Multiple Principal Investigator (MPI) applications, assess the quality of the leadership plan to facilitate coordination and collaboration.
Environment Evaluate whether the institutional resources are appropriate to ensure the successful execution of the proposed work.
Additional Review Criteria
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, but will not give criterion scores for these items, and should consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Protections for Human Subjects
For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects; 2) adequacy of protection against risks; 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others; 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained; and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.
For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption; 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics; and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to the Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects.
This NOFO only accepts applications that do not propose clinical trials. Note: Applications may propose activities involving human subjects that are not deemed clinical trials.
Vertebrate Animals
When the proposed research includes Vertebrate Animals, evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals according to the following criteria: (1) description of proposed procedures involving animals, including species, strains, ages, sex, and total number to be used; (2) justifications for the use of animals versus alternative models and for the appropriateness of the species proposed; (3) interventions to minimize discomfort, distress, pain and injury; and (4) justification for euthanasia method if NOT consistent with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please refer to the Worksheet for Review of the Vertebrate Animals Section.
Biohazards
When the proposed research includes Biohazards, evaluate whether specific materials or procedures that will be used are significantly hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and whether adequate protection is proposed.
Resubmissions
As applicable, evaluate the full application as now presented.
Renewals
As applicable, evaluate the progress made in the last funding period.
Revisions
As applicable, evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project.
Additional Review Considerations
As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact score.
Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources
For projects involving key biological and/or chemical resources, evaluate the brief plans proposed for identifying and ensuring the validity of those resources.
Budget and Period of Support
Evaluate whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s), convened by CSR, in accordance with NIH peer review policies and practices, using the stated review criteria. Assignment to a Scientific Review Group will be shown in the eRA Commons.
As part of the scientific peer review, all applications will receive a written critique.
Applications may undergo a selection process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review) will be discussed and assigned an overall impact score.
Requests for reconsideration of initial peer review will not be accepted for applications submitted in response to this NOFO.
| Applications will be assigned on the basis of established PHS referral guidelines to the appropriate NIH Institute or Center. Applications will compete for available funds with all other recommended applications submitted in response to this NOFO. Following initial peer review, recommended applications will receive a second level of review by the National Advisory Allergy and Infectious Diseases Council. The following will be considered in making funding decisions: | |
| Scientific and technical merit of the proposed project as determined by scientific peer review. | |
| Availability of funds. | |
| Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities. |
If the application is under consideration for funding, NIH will request "just-in-time" information from the applicant as described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.5.1. Just-in-Time Procedures. This request is not a Notice of Award nor should it be construed to be an indicator of possible funding.
Prior to making an award, NIH reviews an applicant's federal award history in SAM.gov to ensure sound business practices. An applicant can review and comment on any information in the Responsibility/Qualification records available in SAM.gov. NIH will consider any comments by the applicant in the Responsibility/Qualification records in SAM.gov to ascertain the applicant's integrity, business ethics, and performance record of managing Federal awards per 2 CFR Part 200.206 "Federal awarding agency review of risk posed by applicants." This provision will apply to all NIH grants and cooperative agreements except fellowships.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates After the peer review of the application is completed, the PD/PI will be able to access his or her Summary Statement (written critique) via the eRA Commons. Refer to Part 1 for dates for peer review, advisory council review, and earliest start date.
Information regarding the disposition of applications is available in the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 2.4.4 Disposition of Applications.
Section VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices A Notice of Award (NoA) is the official authorizing document notifying the applicant that an award has been made and that funds may be requested from the designated HHS payment system or office. The NoA is signed by the Grants Management Officer and emailed to the recipient's business official.
In accepting the award, the recipient agrees that any activities under the award are subject to all provisions currently in effect or implemented during the period of the award, other Department regulations and policies in effect at the time of the award, and applicable statutory provisions.
Recipients must comply with any funding restrictions described in Section IV.6. Funding Restrictions. Any pre-award costs incurred before receipt of the NoA are at the applicant's own risk. For more information on the Notice of Award, please refer to the NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 5. The Notice of Award and NIH Grants & Funding website, see Award Process.
Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee Approval: Recipient institutions must ensure that protocols are reviewed by their IRB or IEC. To help ensure the safety of participants enrolled in NIH-funded studies, the recipient must provide NIH copies of documents related to all major changes in the status of ongoing protocols.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements The following Federal wide and HHS-specific policy requirements apply to awards funded through NIH:
| The rules listed at 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. |
| All NIH grant and cooperative agreement awards include the NIH Grants Policy Statement as part of the terms and conditions in the Notice of Award (NoA). The NoA includes the requirements of this NOFO. For these terms of award, see the NIH Grants Policy Statement Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart A: General and Part II: Terms and Conditions of NIH Grant Awards, Subpart B: Terms and Conditions for Specific Types of Grants, Recipients, and Activities. |
All federal statutes and regulations relevant to federal financial assistance, including those highlighted in NIH Grants Policy Statement Section 4 Public Policy Requirements, Objectives and Other Appropriation Mandates.
By applying…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PKG00294097.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .