NESDIS Enterprise Mission Operations (NEMO)

Other Transaction Authority (OTA)

Project Competitive Announcement

Request for Project Proposal (RPP)

RPP No.: 2027-NESDIS-BB-0001

Title:

NESDIS Enterprise Mission Operations (NEMO)

Issued by:

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

Acquisition and Grants Office (AGO) Satellite Information and Acquisition Division (SIAD)

SSMC 2, BLDG 02

1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910

PROPOSAL RESPONSE DATE: October 19, 2026 at 12:00PM ET

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 3

OBJECTIVES 5

HOW CAN YOU PARTICIPATE? 5

PROCESS AND BASIS FOR EVALUATION 6

Phase I: Request for White Papers (RWP) 6 Phase II: Final Down-Select 9

APPENDIX 001: STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 11

APPENDIX 002: PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND DISCLAIMERS 12

APPENDIX 003: PHASE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES 14

Phase I: White Paper Format 14 Phase II: Final Down-Select Format 16

INTRODUCTION

The National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Services (NESDIS) within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), seeks to enter into one or more Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) pursuant to the authority granted under Section 301 of the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 (15 U.S.C. 8531) as amended by the National Integrated Drought Information System Reauthorization Act of 2018, here-to-forward referred to as “the Act”, as amended by Section 503 of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Amendments Act of 2020 (Pub. L. No. 116-259, title V, § 503, 134 Stat. 1153 (2020)).

The purpose of the OTA is to identify and implement new and innovative approaches to satellite mission operations that can lower the cost of observations used to meet NOAA’s mission requirements, while including new, value-added technological advancements. The Government is interested in approaches that enable the transitioning of operational responsibilities for both the current operational fleet (Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS), Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES)-R, and Space Weather Follow On-Lagrange 1 (SWFO-L1), as well as solutions that support the transition and operations of future satellite constellations (Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) and Space Weather Observations (SWO)).

Under Section 301 (d) of the Act, “In order to enhance the effectiveness of data and satellite systems used by NOAA to meet its missions, the Under Secretary may enter into and perform such transaction agreements on such terms as the Under Secretary considers appropriate to carry out basic, applied, and advanced research projects to meet the objectives described in the Act.” The transaction agreements authorized may only be used as follows:

i. For the construction, use, operation, or procurement of new, improved, innovative, or value-adding satellites, instrumentation, ground stations, and data;

ii. To make determinations on how best use existing or planned data, systems, and assets of NOAA; and,

iii. Only when the objectives of NOAA cannot be met using a cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA), grant, procurement contract, or cooperative agreement.

NESDIS, located at NOAA headquarters in Silver Spring, MD, is responsible for collecting and providing the critical satellite Earth observations and other essential environmental information needed for disaster preparedness, all hazards response and recovery, and the protection of the Nation’s critical infrastructure and natural resources. The mission of NESDIS is to provide secure and timely access to global environmental data and information from satellites and other sources to promote and protect the Nation's security, environment, economy, and quality of life. The purpose of this OTA directly aligns with the mission of NESDIS.

This announcement uses a multiple-phase competitive down-select that may result in the award of a single project or multiple projects. Dates listed in this announcement are tentative and subject to change based on actual progress made through each phase of selection. This project is intended to solve the capability gap through a pilot or novel application of commercial technologies.

OBJECTIVES

Problem Statement: NOAA is interested in pursuing innovative, cost-effective approaches to implement a multi-constellation commercial satellite operations service, based on shared contributions from both Government and industry partners.

The Government is interested in establishing one or more Agreements for commercial satellite command and control mission operations services, in support of NOAA’s current and future operational meteorological satellite constellations. For the purposes of these Agreements, current and future geostationary missions (GOES-R and GeoXO) should be considered separately from current polar (JPSS) and current/future space weather (SOLAR-1, SOLAR-A/B) missions. Vendor white papers should address each mission set separately. Vendors may submit one or two white papers. NOAA’s future polar Near Earth Orbit Network (NEON) missions are not within the scope of this effort.

HOW CAN YOU PARTICIPATE?

1. Review the Process and Basis for Evaluation section.

2. Review Appendix 001: Statement of Objectives.

3. Review Appendix 002: Proposal Requirements and Disclaimers.

4. Review Appendix 003: Phase Submission Guidelines.

PROCESS AND BASIS FOR EVALUATION

Phase I: Request for White Papers (RWP)

Due date: OCTOBER 19, 2026 at 12:00PM ET

The purpose of this phase is to discover, learn, and understand more about the proposed solution through the evaluation of White Papers. This phase is intended to explore the capability the proposed solution offers the Government. The Government encourages offerors to focus on the innovative approach the proposed solution brings for consideration by the Government, and other capabilities the proposed solution may offer beyond what the Government requires.

Offerors must submit White Papers by the date and time due in the format provided in this announcement. Submissions not conforming to the designated format or received after the due date and time will not be accepted.

The Government requires Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) pricing during this Phase.

The ROM should include a total price summary of the solution. It is anticipated any award under this agreement will be Firm Fixed Price (FFP).

Offerors shall refer to APPENDIX 003: PHASE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES for White Paper format.

During this phase, the Government may correspond with the offeror to exchange additional information, explanation, material, clarifications, or discussions of the solution.

The Government may issue individual offerors additional instructions and requirements or provide or request supplementary information based on the Government’s desire to further explore the solution for adoption to the Government’s requirements.

The offeror may be required to provide a detailed pricing solution for further evaluation if requested by the Government.

White Papers shall be submitted by the due date and time to brooke.bernold@noaa.gov and anthony.eubanks@noaa.gov for collection and evaluation.

Phase I - Basis for Evaluation:

White Papers shall be evaluated using selections from the following criteria. Solutions may be qualitatively or quantitatively assessed by Government evaluators. Evaluation results are based on evaluator interpretations of information submitted. The Government’s interpretation of offered solutions determines favorability and mailto:brooke.bernold@noaa.gov mailto:anthony.eubanks@noaa.gov acceptability. Solutions will be evaluated using selections from the following criteria:

A. The Government will assess if the proposed solution is capable of meeting objectives identified in Appendix 001.

Favorable: Existing and adaptable commercial or other solution that meets or exceeds all objectives identified in Appendix 001 with limited risk of meeting technical and schedule requirements.

Potential: Existing and adaptable commercial or other solution that meets all objectives identified in Appendix 001; with some risk of meeting technical and schedule requirements.

Unfavorable: Existing and adaptable commercial solution that does not meet all objectives identified in Appendix 001 or has significant risk of meeting technical and schedule requirements.

B. Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Pricing Favorable: Solution ROM pricing is within Government budget constraints and does not have excessive ongoing license or maintenance cost.

Potential: Solution ROM pricing meets Government budget constraints.

Unfavorable: Solution ROM pricing may meet Government budget constraints, but costs are unclear or excessive, or the solution ROM does not meet Government budget constraints.

Phase I - White Paper Down-Selection:

A. Offerors with a White Paper rated “Favorable” in all criteria will be placed into Category 1 – Selected Offerors and receive an invitation for advancement to Phase II. Offerors with White Paper ratings of “Potential” or “Unfavorable” may be placed in this category at Government discretion should the Government desire to further explore the solution.

B. Offerors not favorably evaluated will be placed in Category 2 – Non-Selected Offerors and removed from competition.

C. The Government may provide feedback to Category 1 and Category 2 offerors at its discretion.

Phase II: Final Down-Select

Due Date: To be provided with the invitation to Phase II

Awards under this announcement will be OTAs under the authority granted under Section 301 of the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 (15 U.S.C. 8531) as amended by the National Integrated Drought Information System Reauthorization Act of 2018, here-to-forward referred to as “the Act”, as amended by Section 503 of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Amendments Act of 2020 (Pub. L. No. 116-259, title V, § 503, 134 Stat. 1153 (2020)). Multiple awards may be made from this announcement should it be in the Government’s interest and funds are available.

All potential offerors shall be aware that funding in any or all areas may change with little or no notice, impacting the number of award(s).

The Government reserves the right to select all, part, or none of the offered solutions.

Success Criteria for individual project(s) will be determined in Phase II.

The Government may allow offerors to collaboratively build the Agreement for their specific solutions with the Government team.

Phase II - Basis for Evaluation

A. The offeror(s) selected for invitation to Phase II must be registered in

SAM.gov to be eligible for agreement award.

B. All solutions, as detailed in the completed Agreement, may be qualitatively or quantitatively assessed by Government evaluators. Evaluation results are based on evaluator interpretations of information presented. The Government’s interpretation of offered solutions determines favorability and acceptability.

Offerors will be evaluated using selections from the following criteria for final project agreement award. Evaluation criteria are not in any order of priority.

1) Price

2) Schedule

3) Data Rights/Intellectual Property

4) Applicability of the solution to the Statement of Objectives in

Appendix 001

Favorable: The final negotiated solution is technically acceptable, price is determined to be fair and reasonable, and the proposal http://sam.gov demonstrates technical superiority, innovation, or risk reduction when compared to other submitted solutions.

Unfavorable: The final negotiated solution is not technically acceptable, price is not determined to be fair and reasonable, or the proposal does not demonstrate technical superiority when compared to other submitted solutions.

Phase II Selection:

A. Offerors with an evaluated solution as “Favorable” will be placed into Category

1 – Selected Offerors and receive an awarded Agreement.

B. Offerors receiving an “Unfavorable” rating will be placed in Category 2 – Non-Selected Offerors and removed from competition.

C. The Government may provide feedback to Category 2 offerors at its discretion.

APPENDIX 001: STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

Provided as a separate attachment. See Attachment: Appendix 001: Statement Of Objectives

APPENDIX 002: PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND DISCLAIMERS

A. Competitive procedures will be used for this acquisition to the maximum extent practicable. This announcement serves as a competitive opportunity for interested parties to present solutions for evaluation and potential selection for a project and is considered to satisfy the reasonable effort to obtain competition.

B. The Government will not reimburse interested offerors for costs to prepare and submit any aspect of proposal, pricing information, travel, or any other activity during the competitive selection process.

C. Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or marketing materials are not desired.

D. Use of diagrams or figures to depict the essence of the proposed solution is encouraged.

E. All information in the proposed solution must be unclassified.

F. The delivery period for any project awarded as a result of this announcement shall be negotiated.

G. Proposals from offerors in Category 2 may be considered by the Government for a potential solution up to one (1) year after submission for the same or similar requirements.

H. Offerors shall not submit proposals on behalf of another entity. The offering entity must be eligible for award and provide the solution. Entities requiring a reseller or distributor that is not identified at the time of initial proposal as the primary offeror will be removed from competition. For proposals with teaming or partnership arrangements, the primary offeror shall be clearly identified.

Offerors shall not directly contact the Requiring Activity or other Government activities related to this announcement. Offerors shall direct all communications through NOAA via the following points of contact:

Brooke Bernold brooke.bernold@noaa.gov Anthony Eubanks anthony.eubanks@noaa.gov

ALL QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS WHITE PAPER REQUEST MUST BE

SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN 9 OCTOBER 2026 AT 12:00 EST. NO QUESTIONS

WILL BE CONSIDERED AFTER THIS DATE. ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS WILL

BE PROVIDED AS AN AMENDMENT TO THIS ANNOUNCEMENT.

I. Project Awards. Project award(s) as a result of this announcement will be in the form of Project Agreement (PA) between NOAA and the selected offeror. Flow-down articles may be provided at the offeror’s request. OTA Articles to be included in any mailto:brooke.bernold@noaa.gov mailto:anthony.eubanks@noaa.gov

Project Award document (PA) between NOAA and the selected offeror are not subject to revision, modification, or deletion.

J. Feedback. Participants in OTA selections are not provided debriefs. The

Government may provide feedback at its discretion to selected and non-selected offerors. The Government may provide solution feedback at its discretion to awardees that successfully or unsuccessfully complete projects. Feedback is a Government option and not required.

K. Use of Contractor Support. The Government may utilize the Contractors and/or Consultants listed below to assist in the evaluation of the proposals for this OTA as non-voting subject matter experts. These Contractors/Consultants will have access to any and all information submitted by Offerors, and will be subject to the restrictions contained in the following clauses: CAR 1352.209-71 – Limitation of Future Contracting; CAR 1352.209-72 – Restrictions Against Disclosure; CAR 1352.209-74 – Organizational Conflict of Interest; and FAR Clause 52.203-16 – Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest. The companies/organizations employing the subject Contractors/Consultants are also required to comply with these same confidentiality restrictions. All federal and non-federal personnel participating in the evaluation of this proposal will have executed Non-Disclosure Agreements.

1. Aerospace Corporation

2310 E. El Segundo Blvd, El Segundo, CA 90245

2. Ascendant Engineering, LLC

1455 Coventry Meadows Drive Sykesville, MD 21784

APPENDIX 003: PHASE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

Phase I: White Paper Format

White Papers shall adhere to the following required format:

1. Specifications: White Papers shall conform to the following specifications.

a. Font size shall be no smaller than 12-point with one-inch margins, and one inch header and footer.

b. Length is limited to TEN PAGES MAXIMUM. The Cover Page is not included in the page count.

c. The White Paper shall be submitted in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) and native format (e.g., Microsoft Word, Excel).

2. Cover Page: Offerors shall provide the following background information with their white paper submissions.

•Offeror’s Company Name •Company Address •Company Point(s) of Contact (name, email, phone) •Where is your organization based? (US or Internationally Based) •Business size: Large or Small Business, or not a commercial endeavor •System for Award Management Unique Entity Identifier (SAM UEI) •Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code

3. Executive Summary: A brief description of your organization and core competencies.

4. White Paper Solution: Describe the unique aspects of your solution as it relates to the objectives in Appendix 001.

5. Value Proposition Summary: It is the offeror’s responsibility to demonstrate why it is offering the best solution and what value-add this solution will bring to NOAA. This is the offeror’s chance to convince the Government as to why it should invest in a solution. Offerors are reminded this is not a sales pitch and should focus on demonstrating why the proposed solution will address the objectives. The proposition should be written in clear, concise, common language statements.

ROM pricing must be included in the White Paper.

6. ROM: Provide Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) pricing during this Phase. The ROM should include a total price summary of the solution. It is anticipated any award under this agreement will be Firm Fixed Price (FFP).

7. Offeror Contribution: Describe the Offeror’s proposed contribution to the agreement. Contributions may include cash contributions or in kind contributions.

"Cash Contribution" means the Prime's financial resources expended to perform this Agreement. The cash contribution can be derived from Prime's funds or outside sources or may also come from non federal contract or grant revenues or from profit or fee on a federal procurement contract. A Prime's own source of funds may include funds identified by the prime to be spent in the execution of the Agreement. Cash contributions include the funds a Prime will spend for labor (including benefits and direct overhead), materials, new equipment (prorated if appropriate), and sub to the prime efforts expended on this Agreement.

"In Kind Contribution" means the Prime's nonfinancial resources expended by the Prime, such as wear and tear on in-place capital assets like machinery or the prorated value of space used for the conduct of the activity, and the reasonable fair market value (appropriately prorated) of equipment, materials, and other property used in the conduct of the activity.

Phase II: Final Down-Select Format

Offerors selected for invitation to Phase II shall provide a complete solution, detailed pricing, and other supporting information as required by the Government. Offerors will be issued a Project Agreement template and shall incorporate their solution into a final Project Agreement format. The Government intends to issue the Project Agreement template as a Request for Proposal (RFP); however, may elect to collaboratively develop the Project Agreement with the selected offeror(s).

The offeror shall propose the total price to complete the project agreement, broken out to show the Government-funded price portion and the Company-funded contribution, including the value of non-labor contributions to the completion of the project. The Company shall provide any other data or supporting information as the parties agree is necessary for the determination of a fair and reasonable price. A milestone schedule shall be included which clearly indicates the completion of priced tasks associated with the milestone payment schedule. For firm fixed price agreements, the milestone schedule will serve as a payment schedule for any subsequent award.

a) Full technical response. Describe the solution, capabilities, critical cost, and schedule drivers. Length is limited to THIRTY PAGES MAXIMUM. The Cover Page, Table of Contents, and Acronym Listing are not included in the page count. Include a draft Service Level Agreement (SLA) to address approaches to meeting performance objectives identified in the SOO. (The SLA is excluded from page count limitations).

b) Price and Schedule. Provide price(s), total price, and a sequential milestone payment and delivery schedule with technical milestones outlined.

c) Data and Intellectual Property Rights. Clearly describe all intellectual property and technical data to be delivered and associated rights. Copies of license agreements shall be provided.

d) Government Furnished Property. Clearly describe any required Government furnished property necessary to fulfil the proposed approach.

e) Award Eligibility. Each respondent shall provide its business status and its eligibility to receive an award, registration in SAM.gov.

f) Entity Identification. Company Name, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, System for Award Management Unique Entity Identifier (SAM UEI), address, Point(s) of contact, phone number, email address, and organizational charts shall be included for all significant participants.

g) Document deliverables. Identify documents, to include a legend, which are being submitted as a deliverable. Proprietary documents must be clearly marked.

Phase II: Final Down-Select