Request for Qualifications and Proposal_Hazardous Materials Assessment.pdf

Request For Qualifications &

Request for Proposal:

Hazardous Materials

Assessment

Glenwood Resource Center Campus Site

Issued: November 6, 2025

Response Due: November 20, 2025, at 3:00 PM CT

Hazardous Materials Assessment Request for Qualifications and Request for Proposal

November 2025 | i

Contents

1 Project Overview

2 Request for Qualifications and Selection Schedule

3 Scope of Work

3.1 Package 1: Hazardous Materials Assessment for Demolition

Task 100: Project Management and Quality Control

Task 200: Buildings Recommended for Demolition

Task 300: Tunnel System

3.2 Package 2: Hazardous Materials Assessment for Preservation

Task 400: Project Management and Quality Control

Task 500: Asbestos Survey

Task 600: Lead Assessment

Task 700: Hazardous Building Materials Inventory

Task 800: Reporting

4 Instructions to Respondents

4.1 Submission Content and Format for Qualifications and Proposal Approach

4.2 Submission Content and Format for Sealed Cost Proposal

4.3 Response Submittal

5 Evaluation and Award

5.1 Evaluation Criteria for Qualifications

5.2 Evaluation Criteria for Cost Proposal

5.3 Final Score Tabulation

5.4 Award………

Inserts

Insert 1. Proposed Redevelopment and Survey Area

Tables

Table 1. Key Dates

Attachments

Figure 1. GRC Campus Building Features and Planning Recommendations

Figures 2.1 through 2.6. Asbestos Sampling Areas

Figure 3. GRC Campus Tunnel System

Table 2. Building Data and Planning Recommendations

November 2025 | 1

1 Project Overview

HDR, on behalf of the Glenwood Redevelopment Corporation (GRC), is seeking a qualified firm to provide hazardous materials assessment services at the Glenwood Resource Center Campus Site.

GRC is committed to redeveloping this 245-acre site located within the City of Glenwood, Iowa. The redevelopment would include the demolition and/or renovation of existing features to develop walkable urbanism elements (pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use development patterns) along with open space design. The hazardous materials assessment work is required to help with early preparation work to make the site “shovel ready” for redevelopment. Additional information on the proposed redevelopment plan can be found on the Glenwood Redevelopment Corporation website.1

Insert 1. Proposed Redevelopment and Survey Area

Three main parties are involved in the redevelopment plan for the Glenwood Resource Center

Campus Site. Each will take on a different set of responsibilities throughout the redevelopment process:

• GRC: Owner, final decision regarding all project activities

1 https://glenwoodredevelopment.com/

November 2025 | 2

• HDR: Project architect, project engineer, overall project consultant, administrative advisor to

GRC, manager of selected sub-consultant service activities

• Arch Icon | Master Developer: Project visionary, project lead, manager of selected subcontractor construction activities

The purpose of this request for qualifications is to have firms interested in providing hazardous materials assessment services provide their qualifications, specifically address the scope of work and provide a well-considered approach and separate, sealed cost proposal for these services.

An optional site visit will be scheduled by the GRC to allow interested applicants an opportunity to view the site to assist in their proposal. No formal presentation will be given. The site will be open to interested applicants on Thursday, November 13, 2025, between 10:00 AM CT and 3:00 PM CT.

Respondents are required to comply with each requirement listed herein. Respondents must be registered with the State of Iowa to conduct business within the state.

2 Request for Qualifications and Selection

Schedule

Table 1. Key Dates

Activity Date

Request for Qualifications and Request for Proposal

(RFQ/RFP) Posted

November 6, 2025

Campus Open for Site Visit November 13, 2025

Submission Deadline November 20, 2025, at 3:00 PM CT

Anticipated Evaluation Period November 21–26, 2025

Notification of Award December 2, 2025

Anticipated Negotiations December 2-9, 2025

Anticipated Notice to Proceed Upon Execution of Agreement

3 Scope of Work

To prepare the Glenwood Resource Center Campus Site for redevelopment, hazardous materials testing is required in and around the existing buildings and tunnels to facilitate continued early demolition and design efforts. Figure 1 provides an aerial overlay of the project area. Testing is to include asbestos surveys, lead-based paint (limited) assessments, and hazardous building materials inventories. This work will identify the presence, location, and quantity of hazardous materials, and the testing results will be communicated to contractors, vendors, and employees working on site to meet the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) communication of hazard requirements, as outlined in 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.1101. Additional details for each testing category are included below.

This scope of work will be authorized under packages, with the base scope, herein referred to as

Package 1, including all areas intended for demolition, with the option to add additional scope for buildings identified for preservation and renovation, herein referred to as Package 2.

November 2025 | 3

The hazardous materials firm shall complete all assessments and provide reports for Package 1 within 90 days of notice to proceed. A schedule for Package 2 will be determined in coordination with GRC, HDR, and Arch Icon to meet the needs of the overall redevelopment efforts.

Note: The assumptions included in this RFP are provided for purposes of establishing a corresponding project fee. The actual conditions encountered at the site may differ.

3.1 Package 1: Hazardous Materials Assessment for Demolition

Task 100: Project Management and Quality Control

TASK 110: PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Perform contract administration and coordination efforts, establishing one project manager as the primary point of contact. Project Manager will develop and manage a project schedule for all tasks detailed herein, ensure project deadlines are met, correspond with the client in a timely and effective manner, participate in project team meetings and provide comprehensive updates, prepare and submit progress reports, and oversee the development and delivery of all reports to ensure deliverables meet the expectations of project schedule and budget.

TASK 120: QUALITY CONTROL

Prepare a quality plan and a site-specific safety plan for the scope of work, as well as a scope of work review.

Task 200: Buildings Recommended for Demolition

TASK 210: ASBESTOS SURVEY

Task 211 – Visual Assessment and Sampling Plan

The selected firm shall conduct a visual assessment of the interior and exterior of approximately 70 buildings to identify suspected asbestos containing materials (suspect ACM). To aid in the execution and documentation of the visual assessment and subsequent sampling of suspect ACM, the site has been subdivided into six (6) groups of planned demolitions, as shown in the attachments provided.

Upon completion of the visual assessment, the selected firm shall produce and submit a proposed sampling plan for GRC, HDR, and Arch Icon review prior to conducting the suspect ACM sampling.

The sampling plan will outline the number of samples to be taken, schedule and prioritize the execution of sampling, and right-size efforts to complete the sampling based on site-specific information.

Taks 212 – Asbestos Sampling

Suspect ACM samples shall be collected in accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in 40

CFR Part 763 Subpart E 763.86 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act). Asbestos testing shall be conducted by asbestos technicians licensed by the State of Iowa and in accordance with all federal, State, and local regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, 40 CFR Part 61 (National

Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants [NESHAP]), as it pertains to asbestos.

The selected contractor should minimize damage to buildings, structures, and building materials while collecting samples. Laboratory analysis of collected samples shall be performed by polarized

November 2025 | 4 light microscopy (PLM) using United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method

600/R-93/116 (Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials). The analysis must be conducted at a laboratory accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program (NVLAP). The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, will be determined by microscopic visual estimation.

For estimating purposes, interested firms should assume that the asbestos survey would require collecting up to 4,700 samples for buildings planned to be demolished. Estimates should also account for other direct expenses needed to perform the field assessments such as temporary lighting, equipment rentals, and other incidentals. Temporary patching of roof damage as result of sampling will be done by a qualified contractor and should not be factored into the cost proposal.

TASK 220: HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS INVENTORY

The selected contractor shall conduct an inventory of hazardous and/or potentially regulated building materials (HBM) in approximately 70 buildings and structures identified for demolition. The

HBM inventory should include, but not be limited to, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) materials;

universal waste (fluorescent light tubes, mercury-containing switches, batteries, electronics); tritium

(radioactive) emergency egress fixtures or lights; mold; hydraulic oils; lubricants; and regulated refrigerants. Items that are not discernible or cannot be safely accessed shall be assumed to contain their respective contaminant of concern.

TASK 230: REPORTING

Findings of both the suspect ACM and the HBM assessments for the buildings should be documented into a series of six (6) reports, based on the geographical grouping of buildings (see

Figures 2.1 through 2.6 attached). Each report will present the results of the assessment for each building in the assigned group and describe each of the assessments, including but not limited to methods and procedures for visual assessments, material sampling methods, and analytical results.

The reports should include the following:

• Project Information

• Summary of Field Activities

• Photo Log and Sample Locations on Building Diagrams (as available)

• Approximate Quantities of HBM’s

• Findings and Recommendations

• Analytical Reports

• Staff and Company Certifications

Task 300: Tunnel System

TASK 310: ASBESTOS SURVEY

Task 311 – Visual Assessment

An “Asbestos Reassessment Survey (Volume 2 of 2)” was completed in 2006. Based on this report, all but a 235-foot portion of the tunnel located beneath Lacey Hall (Building 710), was confirmed to have been previously abated of suspect ACM.

November 2025 | 5

As part of this task, the selected firm shall conduct a visual assessment of the interior of the tunnel systems to confirm previous abatement of the tunnel system with no further suspect ACM materials were installed since 2006, with the exception of the noted segment under Lacey Hall.

Upon completion of the visual assessment, produce and submit a proposed sampling plan for the

235-foot portion of tunnel, as well as confirmation on the abatement status of the remaining tunnel system, for review prior to conducting further suspect ACM sampling.

Task 312 – Asbestos Sampling

Suspect ACM samples shall be collected in accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in 40

CFR Part 763 Subpart E 763. Asbestos testing shall be conducted by asbestos technicians licensed by the State of Iowa and in accordance with all federal, State, and local regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, 40 CFR Part 61, as it pertains to asbestos.

Laboratory analysis of collected samples shall be performed by PLM using USEPA Method 600/R-

93/116 (Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials). The analysis must be conducted at a laboratory accredited by the NVLAP. The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, will be determined by microscopic visual estimation.

This scope of work assumes that the previously abated sections of the tunnel system would be confirmed to be inactive, abated, and without ACM. Should the confirmation assessment identify visual signs of suspect ACM, additional sampling and lab analysis would be added to the contract by amendment.

For estimating purposes, assume that the asbestos survey of the remaining section of tunnel not previously abated would require collecting seven (7) samples. Cost proposals should also account for other direct expenses needed to perform the field assessments such as temporary lighting, equipment rentals, and other incidentals.

TASK 320: HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS INVENTORY

The selected contractor shall conduct a visual assessment and inventory indicating hazardous and/or potentially regulated HBM in the tunnel systems identified for assessment. The HBM inventory should include, but not be limited to, PCB materials; universal waste (fluorescent light tubes, mercury-containing switches, batteries, electronics); tritium (radioactive) emergency egress fixtures or lights; mold; hydraulic oils; lubricants; and regulated refrigerants. Items that are not discernible or cannot be safely accessed shall be assumed to contain their respective contaminant of concern.

TASK 330: REPORTING

Findings of the assessments for the tunnel system should be documented into one (1) report, which will describe each of the assessments, including but not limited to methods and procedures for visual assessments, material sampling methods, and analytical results. The report should include the following:

• Project Information

• Summary of Field Activities

• Photo Log and Sample Locations on Building Diagrams (as available)

November 2025 | 6

• Approximate Quantities of HBM’s

• Findings and Recommendations

• Analytical Reports

• Staff and Company Certifications

Note: Lead assessment will not be required of structures that are to be demolished. The volume of lead compared to the volume of the structure should not create a disposal issue. Therefore, it was decided not to collect lead assessment samples.

3.2 Package 2: Hazardous Materials Assessment for Preservation

Task 400: Project Management and Quality Control

TASK 410: PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Perform contract administration and coordination efforts, establishing one project manager as the primary point of contact. Project Manager will develop and manage a project schedule for all tasks detailed herein, ensure project deadlines are met, correspond with the client in a timely and effective manner, participate in project team meetings and provide comprehensive updates, prepare and submit progress reports, and oversee the development and delivery of all reports to ensure deliverables meet the expectations of project schedule and budget.

TASK 420: QUALITY CONTROL

Prepare a quality plan and a site-specific safety plan for the scope of work, as well as a scope of work review.

Task 500: Asbestos Survey

The selected contractor shall conduct a visual assessment of the interior and exterior of up to 16 buildings and structures to identify suspect ACM. Suspect ACM samples shall be collected in accordance with the sampling protocols outlined in 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E 763.86 (Asbestos

Hazard Emergency Response Act). Asbestos testing shall be conducted by asbestos technicians licensed by the State of Iowa and in accordance with all federal, State, and local regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, 40 CFR Part 61 (NESHAP), as it pertains to asbestos.

The selected contractor should minimize damage to buildings, structures, and building materials while collecting samples. Laboratory analysis of collected samples shall be performed by PLM using

USEPA Method 600/R-93/116 (Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building

Materials). The analysis must be conducted at a laboratory accredited by the NVLAP. The percentage of asbestos, where applicable, will be determined by microscopic visual estimation.

For estimating purposes, interested firms should assume that the asbestos survey would require collecting up to 2,700 samples for buildings recommended for preservation to be renovated.

Estimates should also account for other direct expenses needed to perform the field assessments such as temporary lighting, equipment rentals, and other incidentals.

Task 600: Lead Assessment

The selected contractor shall conduct a lead paint/coating (LP) assessment of representative interior and exterior components of up to 16 buildings planned for renovations. Staff must have the proper

November 2025 | 7 training to recognize LP. The LP assessment shall be conducted to meet the informational requirements for compliance with OSHA’s construction standard for lead (29 CFR 1926.62), which defines lead-containing paint as paint containing any detectable lead. The testing program is not intended to meet the requirements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

(HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, HUD 24

CFR 35, Lead-Safe Housing Rule, USEPA’s regulations under 40 CFR 745, Renovation, Repair, and

Painting, or the USEPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act for waste determination.

The selected contractor shall collect paint/coating chip samples to test coatings of representative building components that may be impacted by the proposed redevelopment work. The selected contractor should minimize damage to buildings, structures, and building materials while collecting samples.

For estimating purposes, assume that the LP survey would require collecting 250 samples.

Task 700: Hazardous Building Materials Inventory

The selected contractor shall conduct a visual assessment and inventory indicating hazardous and/or potentially regulated HBM in up to 16 buildings and structures identified for assessment. The

HBM inventory should include, but not be limited to, PCB materials; universal waste (fluorescent light tubes, mercury-containing switches, batteries, electronics); tritium (radioactive) emergency egress fixtures or lights; mold; hydraulic oils; lubricants; and regulated refrigerants. Items that are not discernible or cannot be safely accessed shall be assumed to contain their respective contaminant of concern.

Task 800: Reporting

Prepare one report that describes each of the three assessments including but not limited to methods and procedures for visual assessments, material sampling methods and analytical results.

Provide comparison of analytical results to appropriate regulatory levels.

Findings of the three assessments for the buildings recommended for preservation should be documented into one (1) report, which will describe each of the assessments, including but not limited to methods and procedures for visual assessments, material sampling methods, and analytical results. The hazardous materials firm shall complete all assessments and provide reports for Package 2 within an agreed timeline in coordination with GRC, HDR and Arch Icon.

The report should include the following:

• Project Information

• Summary of Field Activities

• Photo Log and Sample Locations on Building Diagrams (as available)

• Approximate Quantities of HBM’s

• Findings and Recommendations

• Analytical Reports

• Staff and Company Certifications

November 2025 | 8

4 Instructions to Respondents

4.1 Submission Content and Format for Qualifications and Approach Respondents must submit the following information:

Firm Experience: Descriptions of three (3) projects of similar scope and scale completed within the last five (5) years. The description shall include, at a minimum, the following details:

o Description of the services provided, and work completed.

o Client name, address, email address, and telephone number for each project o Information regarding whether the project was completed on time and within budget.

o One to two paragraphs describing the firm’s asbestos, LP, and HBM experience, including prior work at or near the project site or comparable sites.

Firm Qualifications: Descriptions of the qualifications of the Project Manager and other key personnel to be assigned to the project. The description shall include, at a minimum, the following details:

o Relevant qualifications for key personnel proposed to work on the project.

o Percentage of availability for key personnel identified to work on the project.

o Proof of all relevant and required professional registrations and licenses, including, but not limited to, asbestos certification, technician licenses, and laboratory accreditation.

Responses for the Qualifications portion of the submittal are limited to five (5) pages (8.5 x 11).

Pagination count includes cover letter, proposal narrative, and all associated attachments.

Pagination count does not include signed certifications.

4.2 Submission Content and Format for Sealed Cost Proposal

Respondents must submit the following information separate from the qualifications:

• Cost Breakdown: A “Cost Proposal Template” has been provided to all interested applicants.

This workbook must be used by all firms to provide a detailed and comprehensive budget proposal that clearly identifies all costs associated with the proposed scope of work in

Section 3 above. The workbook is designed to simplify the cost estimating process and to create a standard approach for all interested applicants for this RFQ/RFP. The budget should be transparent and provide sufficient detail for evaluating:

o Personnel costs by average hourly rate per job title and estimated hours for completion.

o List costs associated with specialized equipment, software, and technology required for the project.

o Include estimated costs for travel and lodging for all necessary personnel.

o Clearly state the total proposed cost for Package 1 and Package 2, as well as the overall project.

The project cost for services should be a “not-to-exceed cost for professional services.” Services will be invoiced and compensated as time and materials based on rates provided in the cost proposal.

Note: Proposal shall include total cost for the requested services above, including itemized subtotals. Scope tasks and related costs not in support of, identified in, or that go beyond the

November 2025 | 9 identified pricing assumptions of the tasks in Section 3 above should be detailed and subtotaled separately from the requested cost elements. These additional costs will not be considered in awarding of points but can inform the GRC and HDR of potential additional costs that could potentially be assumed.

4.3 Response Submittal

Responses shall be emailed to project@glenwoodredevelopment.com no later than 3:00 PM Central

Time on Tuesday, November 18, 2025. File size is limited to 10 MB.

For questions concerning this RFQ/RFP, please contact: project@glenwoodredevelopment.com.

Respondents shall not contact any other employee or officer of GRC, HDR or Arch Icon concerning any aspect of this RFQ/RFP, except the individual(s) listed above. Violation of the provision may be grounds for rejecting a response.

5 Evaluation and Award

5.1 Evaluation Criteria for Qualifications

The following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate each response:

1. Firm Experience (25 points)

• Proven ability to successfully deliver projects of similar scope and complexity.

• Previous work performed at or near the proposed project location.

2. Firm Qualifications (25 points)

• Capacity to provide all required personnel to complete the project.

• Demonstrated technical expertise and access to necessary equipment.

3. Firm’s Project Delivery Approach (15 points)

• Defined and effective approach to project management, implementation methodology, and quality control.

• Documented record of completing projects on time and within budget.

• Ability of proposed team to meet project deadlines as outlined in the Scope of Work.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria for Cost Proposal

The following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate each response:

mailto:project@glenwoodredevelopment.com mailto:project@glenwoodredevelopment.com

November 2025 | 10

SCORING CRITERIA – COST PROPOSAL

MAXIMUM POINTS

POSSIBLE

The Cost Proposal will be evaluated based on the Applicant’s Cost Proposal for the services provided.

The lowest proposed cost will receive a total of 35 points. All other Cost

Proposals will be normalized according to the following calculation:

Total Score = Lowest Proposed Cost from all Responsive Applicants x 35 Proposed Cost from Individual Applicant

5.3 Final Score Tabulation

Submittals will be evaluated to determine which firms have the experience and qualifications that are most suited for this project. The evaluation will be conducted by a committee based upon the

Evaluation Criteria outlined previously. The committee members will meet to discuss the submittals and their individual evaluations. The committee will then come to a consensus evaluation and rank each submittal. The highest ranked submittal will be designated as the most qualified respondent.

The initial evaluation will be based on qualifications and approach only. No cost proposals shall be unsealed during the qualifications-based evaluation.

Following the qualifications-based evaluation process, all firms that are determined to be qualified to complete the work will be advanced to the scoring and evaluation process based on the sealed cost proposals, using the evaluation criteria outlined previously.

The cost proposal scores will be combined with the evaluation scores from the RFQ for a combined overall score. The maximum Final Score for any application is 100 points.

The review committee will finalize all award recommendations and submit them to the GRC for consideration. GRC has final decision-making authority to make a final selection for award.

5.4 Award

Following the evaluation process and selection from the GRC board, contract negotiations will commence with the selected firm. Negotiations will include final agreement on scope of work, fee, and contract terms and conditions.

GRC and HDR reserve the right to award the agreement to the next available respondent in the event the successful respondent fails to enter into an agreement, or the agreement with said respondent is terminated within forty-five (45) days of the effective date.

All respondents will be notified of intent to award or decision to award the Agreement.

The selected firm will enter into a subconsultant agreement with HDR to perform the contracted services.

Nuckolls St S H a z e l

S t

Townsend St

R ailr oad Ave

Ke g C re ek

S V in e

S t

Green St

S C h e s tn u t

S t

S L in n

S t

Nuckolls St

C e n tr a l

S t

Io w a St

Lacey S t

Auto Value

Hotel Arthur

Accurate Insurance

C hi ca go B ur l in gt on

Q ui nc y R R

Main St

O rc h a rd

Dr L a c e y S tR a il ro a d

A v e

C a m p

R d

US Highway 34

US Highway 34

Ives Ave th

S t

Indian H ills D r

Main St

In d e p e n d e n c e S t

US Highway 34

US Highway 34

Ives Ave

Ingrum Ave

US Highway 34GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 1

GRC CAMPUS BUILDING FEATURES AND PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS

0 0.1MilesO

LEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

Main St th

S t

In d ia n

H il ls D r

Indian Hills Dr

Indian H ills D r

In d ian Hi lls Dr

Indian H ills D r

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 2.1

ASBESTOS SAMPLING AREA #1

0 0.02MilesO

LEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

K eg

C re ek

S V in e

S t Green St

Main St

Io w a St

Lak e

D r

L a cey S t

L a c e y S t C a m p R d

Ives Ave

Main St

In d e p e n d e nce S t th

S t

In dia n H il ls

D r

M a in S t

In dian Hi ll Dr

M a in S t

Indian Hills Dr

In dian Hills

D r

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 2.2

ASBESTOS SAMPLING AREA #2

0 0.02Miles

OLEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

K eg

C re ek

Glenwood Lake

Coolidge St

S V in e

S t

Tyson St

Green St

Main St

Io w a St

Lak e

D r

L a cey S t

L a c e y S t C a m p R d

Ives Ave

Main St

In d e p e n d e nce S t th

S t

US Highway 34

M a in S t

Independence St Independence St

M a in S t

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 2.3

ASBESTOS SAMPLING AREA #3

0 0.02Miles

OLEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

K eg

C re ek

Glenwood Lake

Coolidge St

S V in e

S t

Tyson St

Green St

Main St

Io w a St

Lak e

D r

L a cey S t

L a c e y S t C a m p R d

Ives Ave

Main St

In d e p e n d e nce S t th

S t

US Highway 34

FB9

FB11

FB1

S3

S2

Pump House

S4

FB3

FB8

L a c e y S t

C a m p

R d

Buckner Dr

L a c e y S t

C a m p

R d

Inde p e n d e n c e S t

Buckner Dr

In d e p e n d e n c e S t

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 2.4

ASBESTOS SAMPLING AREA #4 - COVENANT AFFECTED AREA

0 0.01MilesO

LEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

K eg

C re ek

S V in e

S t Green St

Main St

Io w a St

Lak e

D r

L a cey S t

L a c e y S t C a m p R d

Ives Ave

Main St

In d e p e n d e nce S t th

S t

Garages

Water Tower

Ch ic ag o, Bu r l i ng to n Qu in cy

RR

Io w a St

C hi ca go , B ur l in gt on

Q ui nc y R R

C en tra l

S t

Io wa

St

Main St

Iow a

S t

C entral St

Lacey St

L a c e y S t

Main St

In d e p e n d e n c e S t

Main St

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 2.5

ASBESTOS SAMPLING AREA #5

0 0.02MilesO

LEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

K eg

C re ek

S V in e

S t Green St

Main St

Io w a St

Lak e

D r

L a cey S t

L a c e y S t C a m p R d

Ives Ave

Main St

In d e p e n d e nce S t th

S t

Tank

O rc h ard

D r

Orchard Dr

L a c e y S t

L a c e y S t

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 2.6

ASBESTOS SAMPLING AREA #6 - LACEY HALL

0 0.01MilesO

LEGEND

Railroad

Survey Boundary Area

Covenant Affected Area

Glen Haven - To Remain As Is

Preseve for Residential Use

Preserve for Commerical/Community Use

Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Buildings Recommended for Demolition

K eg

C re ek

S V in e

S t Green St

Main St

Io w a St

Lak e

D r

L a cey S t

L a c e y S t C a m p R d

Ives Ave

Main St

In d e p e n d e nce S t th

S t

720 718

C hicago, B ur l ington Q uincy

R R

Iow a

St

Central St

O rc ha rd

D r

Io wa St

Centr al S t

L a c e y S t

Lacey St

M a in S t Lacey St

Camp Rd

Lacey St

Camp Rd

Independence St

M a in S t

B u c k n e r D r

CE

K

BB

W

G

Y

AA

J

Z

Q

V

H

X

T

O

L

A

M N

T

I

U

D

R

B

CC

GLENWOOD RESOURCE CENTER CAMPUS SITE

FIGURE 3

GRC CAMPUS TUNNEL SYSTEM

0 0.03MilesO

LEGEND

Tunnel System

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

Lacey Hall

A 233

AA 69

B 284

BB 30

C 30

CC 371

D 324

E 30

G 50

H 206

I 250

J 71

K 33

L 119

M 188

N 230

O 134

Q 90

R 333

T 395

T 395

U 260

V 102

W 30

X 78

Y 35

Z 166

Name Length (Linear Feet) Name Length (Linear Feet)

Glenwood Redevelopment Corporation Table 2. Building Data and Planning Recommendations Glendwood Resource Center Campus Site Key: Recommended for Demolition Preserve for Residential Use Preserve for Commercial/Community Use Preserve for Branding Opportunity

Plan Asbestos Sampling Survey

Area Name Address Current Use Square Footage Age Number of Floors

Demo 1 462 462 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 463 463 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 464 464 Indian HIlls Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 465 465 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 466 466 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 467 467 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 468 468 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 469 469 Indian Hills Drive Medical Infirmary 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 470 470 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 472 472 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 473 473 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 1 474 474 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,000 1980 1

Demo 2 240 240 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

Demo 2 242 242 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

Demo 2 244 244 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

Demo 2 246 246 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,100 1979 1

Demo 2 248 248 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

Demo 2 250 250 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

Demo 2 252 252 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 5,934 1977 1

Demo 2 253 253 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,591 1977 1

Demo 2 254 254 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,231 1977 1

Demo 2 355 355 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 5,946 1977 1

Demo 2 357 357 Indian Hills Drive Hospice - Rental 7,000 1976 2

Demo 2 358 358 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1978 1

Demo 2 359 359 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing - Alegent Health 7,000 1976 2

Demo 2 360 360 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,591 1977 1

Demo 2 361 361 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing - Alegent-PMIC 7,000 1976 2

Demo 3 317 317 Main Street Storage 14,784 1925 3

Demo 3 319 319 Main Street Residence #9 1,408 1925 2

Demo 3 322 322 Main Street Residence Duplex #6 700 1941 1

Demo 3 323 323 Main Street Residence #12 1,880 1923 2

Demo 3 324 324 Main Street Residence Duplex #5 600 1941 1

Demo 3 719 719 Main Street Residene #8 1,800 1926 1

Demo 3 FB1 99 Powell Road Maintenance Shed 8,544 1980 1

Demo 3 FB11 Shed 1,440 2000 1

Demo 3 FB3 Machine Shed 5,080 1940 1

Demo 3 FB9 Machine Storage 2,360 1981 2360

Demo 3 Pump House Pump House ca. 1980 1

Demo 3 S2 Storage 3,000 ca. 1990 1

Demo 3 S3 Equipment Storage ca. 2000 1

Demo 3 S4 39 Powell Road Storage 5,080 1940 1

Glen Haven Buildings to Remain As Is

Glenwood Redevelopment Corporation Table 2. Building Data and Planning Recommendations Glendwood Resource Center Campus Site

Plan Asbestos Sampling Survey

Area Name Address Current Use Square Footage Age Number of Floors

Demo 4 110 110 Main Street Multi-Use Administration / Dining Canteen 14,346 1922 3

Demo 4 118 118 Buckner Drive Transportation Garage 13,921 1983 1

Demo 4 119 119 Buckner Drive Upholstery Shop / Storage 30,798 1918 2

Demo 4 707 707 Lacey Street Residential Duplex #4 2,457 1947 3

Demo 4 709 709 Lacey Street Residence-Duplex #3 2,457 1947 3

Demo 4 711 711 Lacey Street Residence-Duplex #2 2,457 1947 3

Demo 4 713 713 Lacey Street Residence-Duplex #1 2,457 1947 3

Demo 4 715 715 Lacey Street Greenhouse 6,984 1964 1

Demo 4 801 801 Lacey Street Green Thumb Multi-Use Storage 3,235 Unknown 1

Demo 4 803 803 Lacey Street Paint Shop 2,341 1966 1

Demo 5 101 101 Lacey Street Storage 17,432 1966 3

Demo 5 105 105 Central Street Laundry 10,523 1911 2

Demo 5 106 106 Central Street Staff Training Room/Barber Shop (Rented) 11,953 1955 2

Demo 5 121 121 Main Street Storage Warehouse 23,283 1930/1950 3

Demo 5 212 212 Independence Street Mills County Public Health 19,952 1904 4

Demo 5 213 213 Independence Street GSHS-Treatment Pogram Services - Administration 19,952 1904 4

Demo 5 214 214 Independence Street Clothing Center - Administrative 18,304 1932 4

Demo 5 703 703 Main Street Utility-Power Plant 23,591 1906/1934 1

Demo 5 722 722 Independence Street Recycling Warehouse -

Demo 6 704 704 Orchard Drive Residence #11 - Superintendent 3,018 1954 1

Demo 6 708 708 Lacey Street Medical Clinic 34,000 1963 3

Demo 6 710 710 Lacey Street Lacey Hall, Area IV - Storage/Educational-Administrative 70,560 1940 5

Demo 6 712 712 Lacey Court Complex Medical-Mental Health Treatment Clinic (On With Life) 19,844 1979 2

Demo 6 714 714 Lacey Court Multi-Use Therapy 13,232 1975 2

Demo 6 716 716 Lacey Court Multi-Use Therapy 13,232 1975 2

Demo 6 718 718 Lacey Court Multi-Use Therapy 13,232 1979 2

Demo 6 720 720 Lacey Court Hydro-Therapy 4,000 1963 1

Res 102 102 Central Street Recreational-Activity Center 84,208 1914 5

Res 104 104 Lacey Street GRC Administration 31,428 1964 2

Res 111 111 Lacey Street Meyer Building - Recycling Vocational Admin 47,744 1955 3

Res 115 115 Lacey Street GSHS Area 3 - Administration 40,328 1900 4

Res 120 120 Main Street Area II Engineering - Environmental Services 75,875 1906 4

Res 702 702 Orchard Drive Residence #7 1,020 1923 2

Comm 108 108 Central Street Chapel / Recreational-Activity Center 4,550 1969 2

Comm 116 116 Main Street Fire Station / Garage-Storage 3,180 93 Years 2

Comm FB5 40 Powell Road Storage Shed 3,660 1934 1

Comm FB6 37 Powell Road Storage Sheds 2,013 1934 1

Comm FB7 Storage Shed 2,400 1934 1

Comm FB8 44 Powell Road Barn 7,826 1933 2

Comm S1 Home Storage ca. 2010 1

Opp Tank

Opp Water Tower

GH 103 103 Central Street Administration and Preschool (Rented) 42,180 1924 3

Glenwood Redevelopment Corporation Table 2. Building Data and Planning Recommendations Glendwood Resource Center Campus Site

Plan Asbestos Sampling Survey

Area Name Address Current Use Square Footage Age Number of Floors

GH 128 128 Indian Hills Drive Residential Multi-Client Housing 6,591 1979 1

GH 130 130 Indian Hills Drive Residential Multi-Client Housing 6,591 1979 1

GH 132 132 Indian Hills Drive Residential Multi-Client Housing 6,231 1979 1

GH 133 133 Indian Hills Drive Glen Haven Nursing Home 6,231 1977 1

GH 134 134 Indian Hills Drive Residential Multi-Client Housing 6,231 1979 1

GH 136 136 Indian Hills Drive Residential Multi-Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

GH 138 138 Indian Hills Drive Residential Multi-Client Housing 6,055 1979 1

GH 239 239 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,591 1977 1

GH 241 241 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,055 1977 1

GH 247 247 Indian Hills Drive Residential-Multi Client Housing 6,231 1977 1