Request-for-Proposal.docx

DOCX document 103 KB Posted

Attached to
Financial Advisor
Solicitation number
BSC-2024-002
Issued by
Burleigh County, Bismarck City, North Dakota

About this file

This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by Bismarck State College (BSC), a state institution in North Dakota. BSC is seeking proposals from consulting firms to serve as the college's financial advisor, providing bond sale services and other financial consulting services. The selected firm will work with BSC for the duration of the potential bond sale. The RFP outlines the scope of work, including making financing recommendations, reviewing debt structure, preparing official statements, coordinating bond printing and delivery, and providing other capital financing services. Offerors must demonstrate their experience, qualifications, and ability to meet the requirements, as well as provide a detailed fee structure. Proposals are due by February 9, 2024, and BSC intends to award a contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous based on the stated evaluation criteria.

The RFP indicates that BSC will not permit the selected financial consultant's firm to purchase bonds in a negotiated sale, but will allow the firm to bid in a competitive sale. Pricing information must be submitted separately from the technical proposal. The RFP also outlines North Dakota's contractual requirements, noting that no material changes to the state's standard terms and conditions will be permitted without prior written approval.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Evaluation+Worksheet.docx DOCX document
Notice+of+intent+to+Award.docx DOCX document
Questions+and+Answers.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Bismarck State College 1500 Edwards Avenue PO Box 5587 Bismarck, ND 58506-5587

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

RFP Title: Financial Advisor RFP Number: BSC-2024-002 Issued: January 19, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION ONE – INSTRUCTIONS3
1.1PURPOSE OF RFP3
1.2PROCUREMENT OFFICER CONTACT INFORMATION3
1.3DEFINITIONS3
1.4RFP SCHEDULE3
1.5ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS WITH A DISABILITY3
1.6SECRETARY OF STATE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS3
1.7BIDDERS LIST REGISTRATION3
1.8STATE PROCUREMENT WEBSITE (SPO ONLINE)3
1.9AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP3
1.10DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIONS3
1.11OFFEROR RESPONSIBLE FOR COSTS3
1.12TAXES3
1.13PROPOSAL RECEIPT DEADLINE – LATE PROPOSALS REJECTED3
1.14PROPOSAL OPENING3
1.15AMENDMENT AND WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS3
1.16NEWS RELEASES3
1.17CONFLICT OF INTEREST3
1.18ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE PROHIBITED3
1.19COLLUSION PROHIBITED3
1.20PROTEST AND APPEAL3
1.21SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY NON-STATE PERSONNEL3
1.22SUPPLIER REGISTRATION (PAYEE)3
SECTION TWO – BACKGROUND4
2.1BACKGROUND INFORMATION4
SECTION THREE – SCOPE OF WORK4
3.1SCOPE OF WORK4
3.2APPLICABLE DIRECTIVES4
3.3REQUIREMENTS4
SECTION FOUR – PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS6
4.1PROPOSAL PREPARATION6
4.2PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS6
SECTION FIVE – AWARD AND PROPOSAL EVALUATION7
5.1AWARD7
5.2RESPONSIVENESS7
5.3RESPONSIBILITY – SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION8
5.4EVALUATION CRITERIA8
5.5COST PROPOSAL EVALUATION8
5.6CLARIFICATIONS OF PROPOSALS – DISCUSSIONS8
5.7RIGHT OF REJECTION8
5.8BEST AND FINAL OFFERS9
5.9TIE PROPOSALS9
5.10NEGOTIATIONS9
5.11NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD9
5.12CONTRACT APPROVAL10
5.13EVALUATION DEBRIEFING10
SECTION SIX – CONTRACT INFORMATION11
6.1NORTH DAKOTA CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS – BACKGROUND11
6.2STATE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS – OFFEROR’S PROPOSED CHANGES11
A.Contract Changes – Unanticipated Amendments11
6.3CONTRACTUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS – NO MATERIAL CHANGES11
6.4SCOPE OF WORK13
6.5CONTRACT TERM13
6.6RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS13

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 – Technical Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

SECTION ONE – INSTRUCTIONS

1.1 PURPOSE OF RFP

The State of North Dakota, acting through its BISMARCK STATE COLLEGE, (the STATE) is soliciting proposals for the purpose of retaining a consulting firm to act as the BSC financial advisor in providing bond sale services and other financial consulting services. BSC intends to continue the relationship with the selected firm for the duration of the potential bond sale.

1.2 PROCUREMENT OFFICER CONTACT INFORMATION

The Procurement Officer is the point of contact for this RFP. Offerors shall direct all communications regarding this RFP to the Procurement Officer. Do not add the Procurement Officer to any marketing distribution lists.

PROCUREMENT OFFICER: Karla Erhardt EMAIL: karla.erhardt@bismarckstate.edu

PHONE: 701-224-2427

TTY Users call: 7-1-1

A person or firm interested in submitting a proposal should ensure all communications related to the procurement are only with the designated point of contact. This section does not restrict communication with state officials or any member of the legislative assembly unless the state official or member of the legislative assembly is involved directly with the procurement for which the person is interested or has submitted a bid or proposal (N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-01.1).

Engaging in unauthorized communication or seeking to obtain information about an open solicitation with any state employee or official other than the responsible Procurement Officer or designee is sufficient grounds for suspension or debarment. (N.D.A.C. § 4-12-05-04(7))

1.3 DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this RFP, the acronyms and defined terms are as follows:

Acronym or Term
Name or Definitions
Contractor
Entity that has an approved contract with the State of North Dakota
CT
Central Time Zone
OMB
Office of Management and Budget
RFP
Request for Proposal
Solicitation Closing
Deadline for receipt of proposals listed in the RFP Schedule
SPO
Office of Management and Budget, State Procurement Office
SPO Online
State Procurement Office Online system
BSC
Bismarck State College

1.4 RFP SCHEDULE

EVENT
DATE and TIME
RFP issued
1/19/2024
Deadline for submission of Questions and Objections
1/31/2024 by 3:00 pm, CT
Solicitation Amendment with responses to Questions issued approximately (if required)
02/01/2024
Deadline for receipt of proposals (Solicitation Closing)
02/09/2024 by 4:00 PM, CT

1.5 ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS WITH A DISABILITY

Contact the Procurement Officer, as soon as possible, if an individual with a disability needs assistance with the RFP, including any events in the RFP schedule, so reasonable accommodations can be made.

1.6 SECRETARY OF STATE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS

The North Dakota Secretary of State has registration requirements for individuals and businesses transacting business in North Dakota. If the successful Offeror is determined to have a registration requirement with the North Dakota Secretary of State, they must be registered before the contract award and registration must remain active for the duration of the contract period (N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-09.1)

· See the OMB Guidelines to Vendor Registry for more information.

Visit the Secretary of State's Vendor Registration webpage for information on registration requirements and fees. Visit FirstStop, the Secretary of State's business and licensing software, for online form options.

· Check the Business Records database to see if a business is registered.

· Contact Secretary of State's office by email or call 701-328-2900 (choose menu item 2, then option 1).

· If you need to register, fees apply.

· Vendors may need to obtain businesses licenses. See the list of licenses required of businesses in the State of North Dakota. The link includes information on who to contact, application fees, renewal dates, and the legal reference.

1.7 BIDDERS LIST REGISTRATION

Individuals or business entities desiring to be notified of bidding opportunities may apply to be placed on the Bidders List. (N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-09) Bidders Lists are used to notify vendors when solicitations are issued on the State Procurement Office Online system (SPO Online). Placement on the Bidders List does not guarantee a vendor will receive notice of every solicitation (N.D.A.C. § 4-12-05-01). There are no fees to register as a bidder. The online application form requests contact information for the receipt of solicitation notices. The Bidders List application and SPO Online system use commodity codes to identify categories of goods, services, and information technology.

The commodity codes used for this solicitation are: 946-all, 958-all.

Visit the OMB website for instructions and the online Bidders List Application:

Bidders List Registration Website

For assistance with Bidders List Registration, contact State Procurement Help Desk at 701-328-1728 or infospo@nd.gov.

1.8 STATE PROCUREMENT WEBSITE (SPO ONLINE)

This RFP and any related amendments and notices will be posted on the North Dakota OMB website using SPO Online. Offerors are responsible for checking this website to obtain all information and documents related to this RFP: https://apps.nd.gov/csd/spo/services/bidder/main.htm Select “Recent Solicitations”. Recent Solicitations are listed by close date.

Notices related to this RFP will be sent to the Bidders List for the needed commodity or service and other known potential Offerors.

Offerors not having completed the Bidders List registration may request to receive notices related to this RFP by contacting the Procurement Officer in writing with the following information: RFP title, business name, contact person, mailing address, telephone number, and email address.

1.9 AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP

If an amendment to this RFP is issued, it will be provided to all Offerors on the Bidders List for the solicitation and to those prospective Offerors who have contacted the Procurement Officer to receive notices related to the RFP. An Offeror shall include in their proposal any required acknowledgements of amendments to the RFP.

1.10 DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIONS

Offerors should carefully review the RFP including all Attachments. Offerors may ask questions to obtain clarification and request additional information, or object to material in the RFP. Questions and objections must be submitted to the Procurement Officer in writing by the deadline identified in the RFP Schedule. If no deadline is specified, questions or objections must be received at least seven days prior to the Solicitation Closing deadline. The Procurement Officer may elect to respond to questions received after the deadline.

Questions and objections should include a reference to the applicable RFP section or subsection. Email is the preferred method of submission with the RFP number and title cited in the email subject line.

Responses to questions will be distributed as a solicitation amendment unless the question can be answered by referring the Offeror to a specific section of the RFP.

1.11 OFFEROR RESPONSIBLE FOR COSTS

Offeror is responsible for all costs associated with the preparation, submittal, and evaluation of any proposal including any travel and per diem associated with demonstrations and presentations.

1.12 TAXES

The STATE is not responsible for and will not pay itemized local, state, or federal taxes. Purchases of tangible personal property made by a state government agency is exempt from sales tax. The state sales tax exemption number is E-2001, and certificates will be furnished upon request by the purchasing agency. The contractor must provide a valid Vendor Tax Identification Number as a provision of the contract.

The purchasing agency will determine if services provided under this contract are Form 1099 reportable. The purchasing agency may require the contractor to submit an IRS Form W-9.

The state tax exemption number should not be used by contractors in the performance of a contract.

A contractor or service provider performing any contract, including service contracts, for the United States Government, State of North Dakota, counties, cities, school districts, park board or any other political subdivisions within North Dakota is not exempt from payment of sales or use tax on materials, tangible personal property, and supplies used or consumed in carrying out contracts. In these cases, the contractor is required to file returns and pay sales and use tax just as required for contracts with private parties. Contact the North Dakota Tax Department at 701-328-1246 or visit their website at https://www.nd.gov/tax/tax-resources/ for more information.

A contractor performing any contract, including a service contract, within North Dakota is also subject to the corporation income tax, individual income tax, and withholding tax reporting requirements, whether the contract is performed by a corporation, partnership, or other business entity, or as an employee of the contractor. In the case of employees performing the services in the state, the contractor is required to withhold state income tax from the employees’ compensation and remit to the state as required by law. Contact the North Dakota Tax Department at 701-328-1248 or visit their website for more information.

1.13 PROPOSAL RECEIPT DEADLINE – LATE PROPOSALS REJECTED

An Offeror is solely responsible for ensuring their proposal is received by the STATE prior to the Solicitation Closing deadline identified in the RFP schedule regardless of the method of submission. A solicitation amendment will be issued if this deadline is changed. An Offeror may contact the Procurement Officer to inquire whether their proposal has been received. Proposals delivered late will be rejected pursuant to N.D.A.C. § 4-12-08-13.

1.14 PROPOSAL OPENING

A public opening will not be held.

This is a formal sealed Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Proposals will be secured and held unopened until the Solicitation Closing deadline. Per N.D.A.C § 4-12-08-04, the openings may be made public at the discretion of the purchasing agency. If a public opening is held, only the names of Offerors that submitted proposals can be revealed at the opening, and each proposal will be opened in a manner to avoid disclosure of the contents to the competing Offerors.

1.15 AMENDMENT AND WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS

Offeror may amend, supplement, or withdraw proposal prior to the Solicitation closing deadline. No changes will be accepted after the Solicitation closing deadline. After the Solicitation closing deadline, Offeror may make a written request to withdraw their proposal and shall provide evidence that a substantial mistake has been made, at which point the STATE may permit withdrawal.

1.16 NEWS RELEASES

Offerors shall not make any news releases related to this RFP without prior approval of the STATE.

1.17 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Under state laws and rules, a state employee or official shall not participate directly or indirectly in a procurement when the state employee or official knows of a conflict of interest. Potential conflicts of interest include state employees or their immediate family members employed by the firm, seeking employment with the firm, or with a financial interest in the firm. Potential conflicts of interest will be addressed in accordance with N.D.A.C. § 4-12-04-04. (N.D.C.C. § 12.1-13-03)

Persons employed by the State of North Dakota, or within one year thereafter, may be prohibited from acquiring a pecuniary interest in a public contract or transaction. Offerors should review N.D.C.C. § 12.1-13-02 to ensure compliance and avoid such conflict(s) of interest.

1.18 ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE PROHIBITED

Offerors must not give or offer to give anything to a state employee or official that might influence or appear to influence procurement decisions. Suspected attempts to influence will be handled in accordance with N.D.A.C. § 4-12-04-05.

1.19 COLLUSION PROHIBITED

Offerors must prepare proposals independently, without collusion. Suspected collusion will be handled in accordance with N.D.A.C § 4-12-04-06.

1.20 PROTEST AND APPEAL

An interested party may protest a solicitation pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-12 and N.D.A.C. § 4-12-14-01. When a solicitation contains a deadline for submission of questions and objections, protests of the solicitation will not be allowed if these faults have not been brought to the attention of the Procurement Officer before the specified deadline. If no deadline for questions is specified, protests based upon defects in the solicitation must be made at least seven calendar days before the deadline for receipt of proposals.

An Offeror that has submitted a response to a solicitation and is aggrieved may protest an award or notice of intent to award pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-12 and N.D.A.C. § 4-12-14-02. The protest must be submitted in writing to the Procurement Officer during the protest period, which is seven calendar days beginning the day after the notice of intent to award is issued.

The protestor may appeal the decision of the Procurement Officer to the Director of OMB or designee in writing within seven calendar days after receiving notice of the decision pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-12 and N.D.A.C. § 4-12-14-03.

1.21 SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY NON-STATE PERSONNEL

When a purchasing agency has specifications prepared by someone other than a state employee or official on behalf of the STATE, that person or business entity must be excluded from submitting bids or proposals in accordance with N.D.A.C. § 4-12-06-06.

1.22 SUPPLIER REGISTRATION (PAYEE)

The successful Offeror will be required to complete Supplier Registration, if not already registered as a Supplier. Any individual or business who will be receiving payment from a state agency or higher education institution must complete a registration process to collect important financial and taxpayer information. Payments are generally made by check or automatic clearing house (ACH), and taxpayer information must be collected in compliance with IRS requirements. The State and North Dakota University System (NDUS) have separate financial systems and vendor registration processes.

SECTION TWO – BACKGROUND

2.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Bismarck State College (BSC) is requesting proposals for the purpose of retaining a consulting firm to act as the BSC financial advisor in providing bond sale services and other financial consulting services. BSC intends to continue the relationship with the selected firm for the duration of the potential bond sale.

SECTION THREE – SCOPE OF WORK

3.1 SCOPE OF WORK

Services to be provided:

Services shall include, but not be limited to:

· Recommendations of financing options including size, timing, maturity schedules, and marketing.

· Reviewing debt structure for compliance with local, state, and federal regulations.

· Preparation of the official statement in compliance with disclosure guidelines, as appropriate, and the printing and distribution of same.

· Recommendation of competitive or negotiated sales and participation in the negotiation of price and terms for negotiated sales.

· Coordination of the printing and delivery of bonds, and interaction with Bond Counsel and rating agencies.

· Recommendation of acceptance or rejection of bids; and

· Other services related to capital financing are normally provided by a financial consultant but not mentioned above.

· BSC will not permit the financial consultant’s firm to purchase bonds in a negotiated sale. BSC will permit the financial consultant’s firm to bid in a competitive sale.

3.2 APPLICABLE DIRECTIVES

The contractor is responsible for identifying and complying with all state and federal requirements that apply to the contract.

3.3 REQUIREMENTS

In response to this Request for Proposal the following items need to be addressed:

1. Experience of the firm including the experience of the local (regional) office. BSC is interested in specific issues the firm has been involved in within the state of North Dakota.

2. Description of any innovations the firm has developed or worked on for tax-exempt or taxable security issues or other capital financing initiatives, briefly outlining the problem, the solution, and the results.

3. Describe the structure of the firm including size and branches. If the firm is a component of an organization, provide the name and relationship to the parent organization.

4. Provide background information for the staff that would be assigned to BSC. Include position in the firm, years and types of experience, and educational background.

5. Provide a fee structure, including hourly rates for assigned staff and a statement of policy on expenses. BSC requires detailed billings including the name of the consultant, hours worked, hourly rate, extension of hours, and expenses by person.

6. Attach a list of at least three (3) references including names and contact information. Describe the services provided to each reference.

7. The written proposal of services should include the name, phone number, and e-mail of the primary contact person. The proposal, although not a contract, is to be signed by an authorized official of your firm.

8. Written disclosure of any potential conflict of interest.

9. A statement on how the firm will provide the services outlined in this request. Describe the firm’s ability to provide timely access and service to BSC.

SECTION FOUR – PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.1 PROPOSAL PREPARATION

The STATE discourages overly lengthy and costly proposals. An Offeror must prepare their proposal using the prescribed proposal format and provide all the requested information; this will enable the proposal to be evaluated fairly and completely. If an Offeror submits more than one proposal, each proposal must be prepared in accordance with these instructions.

Each proposal will include a Technical Proposal and a Cost Proposal prepared in accordance with these instructions. The Technical Proposal and the Cost Proposal must be submitted as separate documents, clearly labeled with the name of the Offeror, and marked “Technical Proposal” and “Cost Proposal.” Costs must not be revealed in the Technical Proposal. Options may be discussed in the technical proposal, but all cost information must be in the Cost Proposal only. DO NOT submit documents that are embedded into proposal documents or that contain links to documents on an external website.

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

UPLOAD RESPONSE THROUGH THE STATE PROCUREMENT ONLINE SYSTEM (SPO ONLINE):

Offeror must electronically submit proposals through the State Procurement Office Online system (SPO Online) by the Solicitation Closing deadline.

DO NOT WAIT UNTIL THE “LAST MINUTE” TO SUBMIT A RESPONSE. We recommend uploading your response 24 hours prior to the Solicitation Closing deadline.

Offeror must begin the electronic submission process well in advance of the Solicitation Closing deadline to allow for transmission and resolution of any technical difficulties. Be advised that the STATE is not responsible for an Offeror’s failure to timely submit a proposal due to any technical difficulties. If you experience any technical difficulties, contact the Procurement Officer or the State Procurement Office at infospo@nd.gov or 701-328-2740.

If documents are in the process of being uploaded when the Solicitation Closing deadline occurs, the upload process will stop. The attempted submission will not be uploaded successfully and is ineligible for consideration. The STATE takes no responsibility for electronic submissions that are captured, blocked, filtered, quarantined, or otherwise prevented from uploading by any anti-virus or other security software.

1. This solicitation is posted on SPO Online at: https://apps.nd.gov/csd/spo/services/bidder/main.htm

2. Select “Recent Solicitations” and find the solicitation. Solicitations are listed by close date.

3. Use “Upload Response” to upload a maximum of five (5) clearly labeled documents before the Solicitation Closing deadline provided in the RFP Schedule.

4. Offeror must upload their Technical Proposal and Cost Proposal in separate files.

5. The maximum file size allowed is 50 MB per file.

6. There is a 50 character file name limitation for the document being uploaded.

7. There is 75 character limit in the TITLE field within SPO Online.

8. All SPO Online field entries must be alphanumeric. Dashes and underscores are allowed; however, the system DOES NOT accept other special characters such as apostrophe, & symbol, quotation marks, etc.

9. DO NOT submit documents that are embedded (zip files), movies, wmp, encrypted, or mp3 files.

10. Offeror will receive an email confirmation from infospo@nd.gov that the upload response was received including the “File Description” for the uploaded files. Review this email to ensure all files were successfully uploaded. If Offeror DOES NOT receive an email confirmation, the upload was NOT successful, and the files will need to be uploaded again. If Offeror does not receive an email confirmation after the reattempt, contact the Procurement Officer or the State Procurement Office at infospo@nd.gov or 701-328-2740.

Visit https://www.omb.nd.gov/sites/www/files/documents/doing-business-with-the-state/procurement/spo-electronic-response-external-job-aid.pdf for the SPO Electronic Response Job Aid which describes how to submit an electronic response.

SECTION 5 – CONTRACT PROVISIONS

North Dakota procurement statutes, rules, and policies allow some negotiation of the terms and conditions. No changes to the terms and conditions will be permitted without prior written approval from the STATE.

SECTION 6 – OPEN RECORDS AND CONFIDENTIALITY

All proposals and other material submitted become the property of the STATE and may be returned only at the STATE’s discretion. The State of North Dakota has broad open records laws. Proposals received are exempt from open record requirements until an award is made, in accordance with N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-10(2). After award, proposals are subject to the North Dakota open records laws. Proposals or portions of proposals may be confidential only if specifically stated in law.

Offerors are instructed not to mark their entire proposal as “confidential”.

Offeror must provide one of the following in their proposal:

· Provide a statement indicating that their proposal does not contain any confidential information, OR

· Make a written request to hold confidential any trade secrets and other proprietary data contained in their proposal. Offeror must clearly identify the material considered confidential and explain why the material is confidential. See the North Dakota Office of the Attorney General website for additional information at https://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t44c04.pdf and https://attorneygeneral.nd.gov/open-records-meetings

SECTION FIVE – AWARD AND PROPOSAL EVALUATION

5.1 AWARD

The STATE intends to award a contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is determined to be responsive to the requirements of the solicitation and is determined to be the most advantageous in consideration of the RFP evaluation criteria.

5.2 RESPONSIVENESS

All proposals will be evaluated to determine if they are responsive to the requirements of the solicitation. The STATE reserves the right to waive minor informalities in accordance with N.D.A.C. chapter 4-12-10. Minor informalities are insignificant omissions or nonjudgmental mistakes that are matters of form rather than substance, evident from RFP document, with a negligible effect on price, quantity, quality, delivery, or contractual conditions that can be waived or corrected without prejudice to other Offerors. Responsive proposals will be evaluated by the Procurement Officer or evaluation committee using the evaluation criteria stated within the RFP.

5.3 RESPONSIBILITY – SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION

The STATE reserves the right to contact references, other customers, including state and local government agencies, regarding past experience with the Offeror. Prior experience of the state agency or institution with any prospective Offeror may also be taken into consideration during evaluation.

The STATE may, at any time, make a supplementary investigation as to the responsibility of any Offeror in accordance with N.D.A.C. § 4-12-11-04. This investigation may include, but is not limited to, financial responsibility, capacity to produce, sources of supply, performance record, or other matters related to the Offeror’s probable ability to deliver if a contract is awarded to the Offeror. If it is determined that an Offeror appears not to be sufficiently responsible, the proposal will be rejected.

5.4 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Proposals will be evaluated using a 100 point scale. The evaluation committee will award points based on the questions in the Technical Proposal Evaluation Worksheet – Attachment Insert number 1. The Technical Proposal evaluation score and Cost Proposal evaluation score will be added together to determine the total evaluation score. After the initial evaluation, the evaluation committee may determine which proposals are reasonably susceptible for award and continue the evaluation process with only those Offerors. Offerors whose proposals are not selected for further evaluation may request a debrief from the Procurement Officer after an award notice is issued. The final evaluation score will consider information received by the STATE, including but not limited to, discussions with Offerors, demonstrations, presentations, site visits, reference checks, and best and final offers.

Preference Laws: Any applicable preference laws will be applied. For more information, refer to the Guidelines to Preference Laws.

5.5 COST PROPOSAL EVALUATION

The STATE will calculate evaluation points awarded to Cost Proposals. Any prompt payment discount terms proposed by the Offeror will not be considered in evaluating cost.

The reciprocal preference law, N.D.C.C. § 44-08-01, was repealed effective August 1, 2023.

The cost amount used for evaluation may be affected by the application of other costs required to implement the proposed solution to determine the total cost of the solution (i.e. cost for ITD to host a STATE hosted solution).

The lowest Cost Proposal will receive the maximum number of points allocated to cost. Cost proposals will be evaluated using the following formula.

5.6 CLARIFICATIONS OF PROPOSALS – DISCUSSIONS

To determine if a proposal is reasonably susceptible for award, communications by the Procurement Officer or evaluation committee are permitted with an Offeror to clarify uncertainties or eliminate confusion concerning the contents of a proposal and determine responsiveness to the RFP requirements. Discussions will be limited to the specific section of the RFP or proposal indicated by the STATE. Discussions are generally conducted by telephone or internet-based conference.

In conducting discussions, there may be no disclosure of any information derived from proposals submitted by competing Offerors. Clarifications may not result in material or substantive change to the proposals. Evaluation scores may be adjusted based in consideration of information obtained through discussions.

5.7 RIGHT OF REJECTION

The STATE reserves the right to reject any proposals, in whole or in part. Proposals received from suspended or debarred bidders will be rejected. Proposals determined to be nonresponsive to the requirements of the RFP will be rejected. The STATE reserves the right to reject the proposal of an Offeror determined to be not responsible. The STATE reserves the right to refrain from making an award if determined to be in its best interest.

5.8 BEST AND FINAL OFFERS

The STATE is not obligated to request best and final offers; therefore, Offerors should submit their best terms (technical and cost) in response to this RFP.

If the STATE determines there is a need for additional information, substantial clarification or changes to the RFP or proposals, the STATE may request for best and final offers from Offerors that have submitted proposals determined to be reasonably susceptible for award. The best and final offer request will describe the additional information, clarification, or change being requested.

A date and time will be established for receipt of revised proposals. If an Offeror does not submit a best and final offer, the STATE shall consider its original proposal its best and final offer. Best and final offers will be evaluated using the evaluation criteria stated in the RFP. The STATE may request more than one best and final offer.

5.9 TIE PROPOSALS

In the event that two or more proposals contain identical pricing or receive identical evaluation scores, N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-05.1 requires preference must be given to a resident North Dakota bidder, seller, vendor, offeror, or contractor as defined in N.D.C.C. § 44-08-02. In the event the tie is not resolved by application of this law, N.D.A.C. § 4-12-11-05 will be applied.

5.10 NEGOTIATIONS

Contract negotiations will be conducted in accordance with N.D.A.C. § 4-12-12. The STATE may enter negotiations with one or more Offeror whose proposals received the highest scores and are reasonably susceptible for award. During negotiations, the STATE and Offeror may agree to alter or otherwise change the terms and conditions and price of the proposed contract. Negotiation, if held, will be within the scope of the RFP and limited to those items that would not have an effect on the ranking of proposals.

Each Offeror will be responsible for all costs it incurs as a result of negotiations, including any travel and per diem expenses. Contract negotiations will be conducted primarily by email, conference calls, or internet-based conference. Any on-site negotiation, if needed, will be held in Bismarck, North Dakota.

The STATE may terminate negotiations, reject a proposal as nonresponsive, and continue or commence negotiations with other Offerors reasonably susceptible for award, if the Offeror:

· Fails to provide necessary information for negotiations in a timely manner

· Fails to negotiate in good faith

· Is unable to successfully negotiate contract terms that are acceptable to the STATE

· Indicates that it cannot perform the contract within the budgeted funds In accordance with N.D.C.C. § 54-44.4-13.1, the STATE and contractor may negotiate payment terms for all commodities and services procured. If a date for payment is not specified in this contract, payment must be made pursuant to section N.D.A.C § 13-01.1-01.

5.11 NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD

After proposals have been evaluated and the successful Offeror selected, a notice of intent to award will be promptly issued to all Offerors that submitted proposals. Upon issuance of this notice, the procurement file becomes an open record. The successful Offeror named in the notice of intent to Award is advised not to begin work, purchase materials, or enter into subcontracts until the successful Offeror and the STATE sign the contract.

5.12 CONTRACT APPROVAL

This RFP does not, by itself, obligate the STATE. The STATE's obligation shall commence when the STATE signs the contract. Upon written notice to the contractor, the STATE may set a different starting date for the contract. The STATE shall not be responsible for any work done by the contractor, even work done in good faith, if it occurs prior to the contract start date set by the STATE.

5.13 EVALUATION DEBRIEFING

After the notice of intent to award is issued, Offerors may contact the Procurement Officer to schedule an evaluation debrief. The debrief will provide information about the evaluation process and proposal scores.

SECTION SIX – CONTRACT INFORMATION

6.1 NORTH DAKOTA CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS – BACKGROUND

As a public institution and government entity of the State of North Dakota (the STATE), there are a number of statutes, rules, and policies (Requirements) that may restrict or prevent the STATE from entering into certain types of contracts or certain contractual terms and conditions, some of these Requirements are non-negotiable.

While these Requirements occasionally make the process of negotiating a contract with the STATE more challenging than negotiating with a private industry business, these are not unique to any one agency of the State of North Dakota. These Requirements apply to all public institutions and government entities of the State of North Dakota. Although some are unique to North Dakota, the majority of these Requirements are common to public institutions and government entities throughout the United States.

6.2 STATE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS – OFFEROR’S PROPOSED CHANGES

North Dakota procurement statutes, rules, and policies allow some negotiation of the terms and conditions. No changes to the terms and conditions will be permitted without prior written approval from the STATE.

Pursuant to N.D.A.C. § 4-12-11-06, proposals subject to conditions imposed by the Offeror may be rejected as nonresponsive, as determined by the STATE. Proposed terms and conditions that conflict with those contained in the attached contract or that diminish the STATE’s rights under the contract shall be considered null and void. The terms and conditions in the attached contract shall prevail in the event a conflict arises between a term or condition in the proposal and a term or condition in the attached contract.

Part or all of this RFP and Offeror’s proposal may be incorporated into the contract. The STATE may deem any failure to object to a contract provision as the Offeror’s acceptance of that provision.

1. Contract Changes – Unanticipated Amendments During the course of the contract entered as a result of this solicitation, the contractor may be required to perform additional work due to a legitimate unforeseen circumstance. That work will be within the general scope of the initial contract. When additional work is required, the STATE shall provide the contractor with a written description of the additional work and request that the contractor submit proposal for accomplishing the scope of work. Contractor will not commence additional work until all parties agree in writing.

6.3 CONTRACTUAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS – NO MATERIAL CHANGES

A. Indemnification and Insurance N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-17 requires that the OMB establish guidelines for indemnification and insurance provisions in state contracts. The indemnification and insurance requirements contained in the attached contract are pursuant to those guidelines. The STATE shall not be deemed to have accepted any alteration of these provisions without prior written approval to Offeror from the STATE acting in consultation with the North Dakota Risk Management Division.

B. Indemnification Indemnification is a contractual clause by which one party to a contract asks the other party to defend it against any claims of third parties who might be injured as a result of something that occurs while the parties are performing their duties and obligations under the contract. Without specific authority to do so, the STATE agencies cannot enter into agreements indemnifying contractors, or any other entity, against third party claims.

Any clause that has the intent of seeking indemnification from the STATE, whether the clause contains the words “indemnity” or “indemnify,” are not clauses to which the STATE may agree.

The STATE will also not agree to clauses to indemnify a contractor “to the extent permitted by law”. This is because the STATE knows that the extent to which the law permits it to indemnify contractors is no extent whatsoever, and as a result would be disingenuous for the STATE to imply in a contract that there might be some set of circumstances under which the STATE would defend the contractor against a third party claim(s). Simply put, the STATE is not going to agree to something it knows it cannot do. In this circumstance an “extent” clause is merely an invitation to litigate the matter in the event a third party claim(s) arises, and the STATE does not enter into agreements that invite litigation. Do not ask the STATE to indemnify you against third party claims because it is a contractual obligation to which the STATE cannot agree.

While the STATE may limit the liability of a contractor in claims between the STATE and the contractor, the STATE does not have authority to limit a contractor’s liability for claims brought by a third party. In the event a contract contains a limitation of liability clause, the contract’s Indemnification clause and obligation of the contractor cannot be subject to that limitation of liability clause. See 6.4(D) for Limitation of Liability.

C. Insurance Upon receipt of the notice of intent to award, the successful Offeror must obtain the required insurance coverage and provide the Procurement Officer with proof of coverage prior to contract approval. The coverage must be satisfactory to the STATE, in consultation with the North Dakota Risk Management Division. The successful Offeror’s failure to provide evidence of insurance coverage is a material breach and grounds for withdrawal of the award or termination of the contract.

D. Limitation of Liability The STATE may negotiate Limitation of Liability pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-15 “Contracts limiting liability to the STATE”.

Notwithstanding any provision in N.D.C.C. ch. 32-12.2 to the contrary, an agency may agree to limit the liability of a contractor to the STATE if:

1. the agency determines such services or products cannot be effectively obtained without such limitation; and

2. the limitation does not pose any significant risk of loss to the STATE; and

3. the limitation is in the best interests of the STATE.

The agency, in consultation with OMB and the Attorney General's Office, shall prepare written documentation before agreeing to any liability limitation.

An agency's authority to agree to a limitation of liability is limited to contracts for the purchase or lease of, or services related to, software, communication, electronic equipment, and economic forecasting.

1. An agency may limit its ability to recover indirect consequential damages.

2. If the extent of potential direct loss is unknown, an agency may agree to limit direct damages to a reasonably estimated amount commensurate with the foreseeable risk of loss to the STATE. The amount must be equal to twice the total value of the contract unless all parties to the contract agree to an alternative amount. Any agreed upon amount that is less than twice the value of the contract must be approved by the director of OMB. The liquidated damages and retainage provisions for delay, missed deadlines, and other breaches are not subject to a general limitation on direct or indirect damages authorized under N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-15.

3. A contract under N.D.C.C. § 32-12.2-15 may not limit any loss to the STATE resulting from fraud or other intentional or willful misconduct, breach of confidentiality obligations, or loss resulting from tangible property damage or personal injury.

E. Waivers of Jurisdiction and Venue; Alternative Dispute Resolution The North Dakota Attorney General is the STATE’s attorney for all purposes, including management of litigation and claims against the STATE. The STATE may not usurp the Attorney General’s authority by agreeing in advance to control the way litigation may be managed in the event of a dispute. The STATE cannot, without specific authority, agree to the jurisdiction or the laws of another state or federal courts, nor can it contractually agree to participate in any form of alternative dispute resolution.

Although the STATE cannot contractually agree to such terms, this does not mean that in the event of a dispute, the STATE would not agree to participate in alternative dispute resolution. It simply means that this is a decision that must be made by the Attorney General and is a decision that is made at the time a dispute arises.

F. Confidentiality All state agencies of North Dakota are subject to North Dakota public records laws. The STATE cannot agree to contractual terms that attempt to prevent it from having to disclose records that are declared public records under applicable statutes. Although some confidentiality and exemptions are allowed under the public records laws, the STATE may not agree to more restrictive obligations concerning its records. Under North Dakota public records laws, contracts are records that are open to the public and may be reviewed at the request of the public.

G. Unliquidated Expenses (i.e., attorney’s fees, add-ons, cost increases) Because the STATE may only obligate those funds that have been appropriated to it by the Legislative Assembly and may only obligate those funds for the purposes for which the funds were appropriated, the STATE may not agree to clauses which may obligate it to pay for claims that might exceed its current funding appropriation. Certainly, this is one of numerous reasons why the STATE cannot indemnify a contractor against third party claims, but it may also be said for clauses that purport to obligate the STATE to pay a contractor’s attorneys’ fees, unknown cost increases during the life of the contract, add-ons that were not contemplated or priced in the contract.

6.4 SCOPE OF WORK

The Scope of Work agreed upon by the parties will be incorporated into the contract.

6.5 CONTRACT TERM

The contract term will be set forth in the contract, including any options for extension, renewal, and renegotiation.

6.6 RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS

At reasonable times, the STATE may inspect those areas of the contractor's place of business that are related to the performance of a contract. If the STATE performs an inspection, the contractor must provide reasonable assistance.

ATTACHMENT 1

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET

Bismarck State College Technical Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

Offeror Name: ___________________________________________________

RFP Title/Number: _____________________________________________

Evaluator Name: __________________________ Date of Review: ____________________

Evaluator Certification. I have reviewed the Request for Proposal Evaluators Guide, and I certify that neither I nor my immediate family members have a conflict of interest with regard to this offeror, in accordance with N.D.C.C. $4-12-04-04.

Evaluator Signature: ____________________________ Date: _______________________

THE TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS USED TO SCORE THIS PROPOSAL IS 100

70 POINTS – Technical Proposal

· 40 Points – Experience and Qualifications

· Experience of the Offeror performing similar work

· Experience and qualifications of the project team

· Ability to meet deliverables

· References

· 30 Points – Experience with higher education on prior work

· Ability to meet deliverables

· Turnaround schedule and availability

· Response to Contract Terms and Conditions

30 POINTS – Cost Proposal

· 30 Points – Cost Proposal

· Cost proposal for scope of work

· Cost proposals are scored by the Procurement Officer or selected evaluators, and cost proposals are given to the Evaluation Committee after technical proposals have been evaluated.

IMPORTANT. Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below. Do not assign points to individual questions, instead, award a total score for each evaluation criterion. Evaluators must provide comments to support scoring.

EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS RATING SCALE (40 Points Maximum)

Point Value
Explanation
0 – 8
Poor. Not addressed or response of no value
9 – 16
Fair. Limited applicability
17 – 24
Good. Some applicability
25 – 32
Very Good. Substantial applicability
33 – 40
Excellent. Total applicability

MINIMUM EXPERIENCE OR QUALIFICATIONS

How well has the Offeror followed the proposal preparation instructions? Does the proposal contain all the requested information?

EVALUATOR NOTES

If the RFP requires a minimum amount of experience or qualifications, has the offeror provided information to demonstrate meeting these requirements? Does the offeror exceed the minimum experience or qualifications?

EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM

How extensive is the firm’s experience in this type of work? How well does the information about similar projects demonstrate the firm’s experience work related to this RFP?

If the offeror provided letters of reference or the Evaluation Committee contacted the customer contacts, what information did the offeror’s customers provide related to the offeror’s past performance?

Did references identify any areas of concern?

INITIAL EVALUATION SCORE FOR EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS: __________

Additional/overall comments related to the offeror’s experience and qualifications.

EVALUATOR NOTES

EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS RATING SCALE (40 Points Maximum)

Point Value
Explanation
0 – 8
Poor. Not addressed or response of no value
9 – 16
Fair. Limited applicability
17 – 24
Good. Some applicability
25 – 32
Very Good. Substantial applicability
33 – 40
Excellent. Total applicability

How much prior experience has the firm had with higher education work? How much of this work was done directly for North Dakota higher education? What types of work did the firm perform for institutions in the past?

In prior experience with higher education, what has been the firm’s track record with understanding scope of work and meeting deliverables?

In prior experience with higher education, what has been the firm’s availability, communication methods, and other customer service practices?

In prior experience with higher education, has the firm been responsive to contract terms and conditions? Has prior work been completed per scope of work and within contract timelines?

INITIAL EVALUATION SCORE FOR EXPERIENCE WITH HIGHER EDUCATION ON PRIOR WORK: ________

Additional/overall comments related to the offeror’s experience with higher education on prior work.

image1.emf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .