Request for Proposal - 374129 Lease.pdf

July 29, 2024

Dear Prospective Offeror, Request for Lease Proposal NO: 374129 - Information Management Field Support Services Replacement Facility

Hanford Mission Integration Solutions, LLC. (HMIS) requests for lease proposals for Information Management Field Support Services Replacement Facility The requested work is in support of Hanford Mission Essential Services Contract (HMESC) Prime Contract 89303320DEM000031 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Office.

Information regarding the submission of a proposal is contained in the attached Solicitation. Proposals are to be prepared in accordance with the instructions and conditions set forth herein. PST.

Questions | Comments (including technical) regarding the Solicitation | RFP are due by: 08/13/2024; 3:00 PM or sooner.

Proposals are to be received by 08/26/2024 3:00 PM. or sooner.

Proposal submission will include proposed costs for Period of Performance schedules below for evaluation:

o Base Year: 10 years

Please return ALL completed RFP Exhibits and Attachments (if applicable) with proposal submission.

Companies must be registered in Hanford Vendor Registration at https://vendreg.hanford.gov/ with NAICS 531120

(Lessors of Nonresidential Buildings (except Mini warehouses)).

Ensure company is registered to the specified NAICS in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov).

All questions are to be directed to the Procurement Specialist. All proposals are subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Any exceptions, deviations, or omissions may be grounds for rejection of proposals submitted.

HMIS looks forward to your response.

Thank you, Procurement Specialist

Kristina Hamby,

(509) 367-3011 Kristina_G_Hamby@rl.gov

NOTE: Communications with any HMIS personnel except the above-named Procurement Specialist concerning any aspect of this Solicitation may be grounds for disqualifying an Offeror from being considered for award.

https://vendreg.hanford.gov/ https://sam.gov/workspace/profile/

REQUEST FOR LEASE PROPOSAL NO: 374129

Table of Contents

SOLICITATION/AWARD

A.0 Introduction

A.1 Buyer Not Obligated- Irregularities and Notifications

A.2 Request for Lease Proposal Addendums

A.3 Proposal Submittal

A.4 Late Proposals

A.5 Proposal Changes

A.6 Withdrawal

A.7 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code and Size Standard

A.8 Questions/Comments Regarding the Solicitation

B.0 Basis for Award

B.1 Basis of Award- Tradeoff Selection Process

C.0 Proposal Instructions

C.1 Proposal Preparation

C.2 Proposal Content

C.2.1 Volume I Technical Proposal Requirements

C.2.2 Volume II Required Price Support Information

C.3 Request for Schedule of Cost and Rates

C.4 Evaluation of Options

C.5 Representations and Certifications

C.6 Anti-kickback Certifications

C.7 Employment Eligibility Verification (E-Verify)

C.8 Additional Information

C.9 Acceptance of Terms and Conditions and Technical Requirements

C.10 Proposal Validity Period

D.0 Notices

D.1 Financial Capability Determination Information

D.10 Proprietary Data Submittals

Exhibits

Exhibit 001 – Lease Proposal Worksheet

Exhibit 002 – Proposed Lower-Tier Subcontractors

Exhibit 003 – Past Performance

Exhibit 004 – Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Representation

Exhibit 005 – Representation and Certification

Exhibit 006 – Agreement, Exceptions, and Assumptions

Exhibit 007 – Organizational Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement

Exhibit 008 – Executive Compensation

Exhibit 009 – FAR 52.203-11 Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Sept 2007)

Exhibit 010 –Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension

Exhibit 011 – Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (August 2020)

E.0 Award – EXAMPLE/DRAFT

SOLICITATION/AWARD

A.0 Introduction Hanford Mission Integration Solutions, LLC. (hereby HMIS, “Contractor” or “Buyer”) acting under its contract with the U.S. Department of Energy – Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) located in Richland, WA, requests Offeror to submit a lease proposal for a Firm Fixed Price type of subcontract to provide Information Management Field Support Services Replacement Facility.

A.1 Buyer Not Obligated- Irregularities and Notifications Buyer is not obligated to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of Offeror’s proposal, nor required to enter into a subcontract or any other arrangement with Offeror.

A.2 Request for Lease Proposal Addendums The Procurement Specialist may issue one or more addendums to the Request for Lease Proposal to make changes or to resolve any problems regarding the solicitation. The Procurement Specialist will issue the amendment in time for prospective Offerors to incorporate any changes into their proposals. If this Request for Lease Proposal is amended, then all terms and conditions that are not amended will remain unchanged. FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE RECEIPT OF THE ADDENDUM AT THE DESIGNATED LOCATION BY THE SPECIFIED DATE AND TIME MAY RESULT

IN REJECTION OF THE OFFER.

A.3 Proposal Submittal The proposal is due by 8/26/2024 3:00 PM.

The proposal shall be submitted via e-mail provided that it includes appropriate signatures where required.

NOTE: Communications with any HMIS personnel except the above-named Procurement Specialist concerning any aspect of this Solicitation may be grounds for disqualifying an Offeror from being considered for award.

A.4 Late Proposals A proposal is considered late if it is received after the exact time and date specified for receipt and will not be considered unless:

a. It was sent by telephone or fax, if authorized by the Procurement Specialist, and it is determined that the late receipt was due solely to mishandling upon receipt; or

b. It is the only proposal received.

A.5 Proposal Changes Any modification of a proposal, including the Procurement Specialist’s request for “Best and Final Offer,” is subject to the same conditions as in the “Late Proposals” section above.

A.6 Withdrawal Offeror may withdraw its proposal by written or electronic notice received at any time prior to award.

A.7 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code and Size Standard The Procurement Specialist has determined that North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) Code 531120

– Lessor of Nonresidential Building (except Mini-warehouses) applies to this acquisition. Therefore, the size standard for determining whether an Offeror is a small business in regard to this acquisition is $34 Million.

If this solicitation is designated as a small business set-aside, by submitting a proposal or an offer to this solicitation, the Offeror certifies that they are a small business qualifying for the NAICS code and meeting the size standard noted above.

By submitting a proposal for this solicitation, Offeror agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Buyer for any and all liability, loss, damages, penalties, claims, costs, and expenses, including attorney fees and costs of legal action, litigation, or settlement, arising from, or relating to Offeror’s misrepresentation of its business size or status, regardless of whether Offeror’s misrepresentation was willful, intentional, or knowing.

A.8 Questions/Comments Regarding the Solicitation The Offeror must submit any comments or questions regarding the solicitation to the Procurement Specialist no later than 8/13/2024 3:00 PM. The Procurement Specialist will answer all questions in writing for the benefit of all prospective Offerors.

B.0 Basis for Award HMIS may award one or more subcontracts as a result of this solicitation. Award will be made to the Offeror who is considered to be the overall Best Value to the government. This solicitation provides the basis for HMIS evaluation. Offerors are also advised that HMIS reserves the right to award a subcontract based upon initial offers and without further discussions with Offerors. Offeror should provide their best price and technical offers initially.

B.1 Basis of Award- Tradeoff Selection Process Award may be made to the Offeror submitting the best proposal in which both cost/price and other specifically defined factors will be the basis of award. Proposals will be evaluated to determine the response that provides the best value to Buyer and the Government, considering cost/price and technical criteria; with technical rated higher than cost/price.

Best Value Evaluation Criteria is based on the following:

1) Building Location and Neighborhood

a. Location near Hanford site

b. Access to facility

c. Class of facility

2) Desired Building Features

a. HLAN capabilities

b. LEED certification “Silver” or higher

c. Distance from Data Center or potential to add Data center

3) Building Quality and Amenities

a. Building visual appeal interior and exterior

b. Rentable Square Feet in relation to requested min-max

4) Space Layout Flexibility and Efficiency

a. Shipping and Receiving Area

b. Modifications needed or build to suite

c. Laydown Yard

d. Wired for internet and intranet or availability of fiber optics

5) Key Leasing Terms

a. Vacate notification timeline

b. Restoration obligations

c. Timeline for occupancy

C.0 Proposal Instructions Follow the described proposal instructions.

C.1 Proposal Preparation Prepare the proposal simply and economically and provide a straightforward and concise presentation of the information requested in the Request for Lease Proposal. Emphasize completeness and clarity. Do not submit elaborate brochures or other presentations that are neither required nor desired by the HMIS.

If the Offeror submits any data which it considers proprietary data as part of its proposal, the document transmitting the data or which contains the data, shall be boldly marked indicating that the data included is considered proprietary.

C.2 Proposal Content Proposals shall include the following elements and be organized in the manner listed below. Each volume of the proposal should be separate and complete. Omit all cost or pricing details from the technical proposal.

C.2.1 Volume I Technical Proposal Requirements HMIS will evaluate Offeror’s technical capabilities/qualifications, as well as its pricing for the requirements as specified in the Performance Work Statement and Draft Lease Agreement. Offeror’s proposal must address the following:

• Offeror’s proposal must contain a brief discussion of its technical qualifications, capabilities, and resources for completing the requirements, taking care to address the solicitation evaluation factors listed above.

• An acknowledgement that the Draft Lease Agreement and Performance Work Statement is fully understood, and that Offeror can meet all technical requirements and has or will have resources qualified to perform the work.

• Work Plan/schedule for tenant improvements, if needed, availability for HLAN and security installations.

• Describe organization structure that identifies the relationships between HMIS, the Offeror, and any teaming partners or lower-tier subcontractors.

• The term of the Lease Agreement is for 10 years.

• Executive summary of building. Including:

o Description of proposed space, highlighting specific areas that may meet Energy Star and LEED certification.

o Provide the location on a map, demonstrating the building or land lies within the delineated area.

o Detailed floor plan(s) showing the floor(s) and room dimensions to support Rentable Square Feet

(RSF) of proposed space.

o A description of all services to be provided under the full-service by the Lessor with a schedule of planned activities. Must include cost of utilities and taxes as the responsibility of the lessor under the lease.

• Draft Lease Agreement with Janitorial Services – See section E.0 for example. Draft lease example is provided for informational purposes unless Offeror chooses to utilize it. HMIS request that each Offeror provide a proposed changes to the draft lease with proposal or confirmation that draft lease contained in RFP is acceptable. If exceptions are taken to the draft lease agreement, please note on Exhibit 006 Agreements, Exceptions and Assumptions and provide a red-line copy with proposal or alternate lease language noted.

• Confirmation that your company is registered or is willing to register in the Hanford Vendor Portal

C.2.2 Volume II Required Price Support Information The Offeror is required to submit information sufficient to determine that the prices or costs being charged are fair and reasonable. Such information may include pricing, sales, or cost information that is pertinent to establishing the pricing or costs being charged.

Offeror proposal must provide the following:

• All data necessary to determine the pricing for Rentable square Feet (RSF) per year.

• Pricing must be provided for all years included in lease; unpriced options will not be considered.

• Evidence that the lease term does not exceed 75 percent of the estimated economic life of the asset along with backup documentation. Provide economic life of facility.

• Evidence of the present value of the minimum contractually required payments over the life of the lease does not exceed 90 percent of the fair market value of the asset at the beginning of the lease term along with backup documentation. Provide fair market value of facility.

The Offeror grants the Buyer or its authorized representative(s) the right to examine, at any time before award, books, records, documents, or other directly pertinent records to verify the reasonableness of the price. For items priced using catalog or market prices, or law and regulation, access does not extend to cost or profit information or other data relevant solely to the Offeror’s determination of the prices to be offered in the catalog or marketplace.

Any Subcontract that results from this Request for Lease Proposal will be determined by the price the Offeror pays for material (without profit applied) plus fully burdened hourly labor rates, multiplied times the number of hours worked. Upon mutual agreement, this schedule of costs and rates will be the basis for pricing on any resulting Subcontract.

C.3 Request for Schedule of Cost and Rates This is not a request for cost or pricing data, but notification to all Offerors that this information may be required prior to award unless the Subcontract is determined by the Buyer to be exempt from the requirements of 10 USC 2306(a).

C.4 Evaluation of Options Except when it is determined not to be in HMIS’ best interest, HMIS evaluates offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirements. Evaluation of options will not obligate HMIS to exercise the option(s).

HMIS analyzes bids to determine whether prices are unbalanced and may reject a proposal offer as nonresponsive if it determines that the proposal is materially unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more-line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques.

C.5 Representations and Certifications HMIS relies upon Offeror’s current representations and certifications within a Federal web-based system, the System for Award Management (SAM), that centralizes and standardizes the collection, storage and viewing of many of the representations and certifications required by the Federal Acquisition Regulations.

By submitting a proposal to HMIS in response to this solicitation, the Offeror is certifying that:

The representation and certification information in SAM is accurate and complete as of the date of the offer.

All statements and explanatory documentation submitted are current and accurate.

Offeror complies with all requirements of State of Washington statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, codes, and orders related to equal employment opportunity and operation of non-segregated facilities.

All Offeror employees who may work on HMIS premises or on the Hanford Site are not under the influence of controlled substances, drugs, or alcohol. Offeror agrees to the testing of assigned employees under HMIS program for controlled substances.

Offeror’s information in the Buyer registration system is current, accurate and complete and is no greater than 12 months old.

Offeror will update its information in SAM on at least an annual basis.

In addition, the Offeror must be registered with HMIS through the Hanford Site Vendor Portal at https://vendreg.hanford.gov/ and have obtained a vendor identification number and form number (password). If assistance is required, please contact VendorRegSupport@rl.gov.

C.6 Anti-kickback Certifications By submitting a proposal response to this solicitation, the Offeror certifies that it has not:

Provided, attempted to provide, or offered to provide, any kickback.

Has not solicited, accepted, or attempted to accept any kickback.

Included, directly or indirectly, the amount of any kickback, in the Subcontract price proposed by the Offeror to the Buyer. (For definition of the term kickback, see 41 U.S.C. § 8701(2), Title 41 U.S.C. Chapter 87, Sections 701 and 8702).

By submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation, Offeror agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Buyer for any and all liability, loss, damages, penalties, claims, costs, and expenses, including attorney fees and costs of legal action, litigation, or settlement, arising from or relating to Offeror’s failure to certify or false certification of compliance with any requirements of this Section, regardless of whether the failure or false certification was willful, intentional, or knowing.

C.7 Employment Eligibility Verification (E-Verify) HMIS anticipates that this award will be subject to the Employment Eligibility Verification requirements established in Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) clause 52.222-54, which requires the successful Offeror to enroll and utilize the E-Verify program. Enrollment is completed via the Internet at the Department of Homeland Security Web site at http://www.dhs.gov/E-Verify. This requirement is applicable to awards with a value greater than $3,500 and considered commercial or noncommercial Services (except for commercial Services that are part of the purchase of a Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) item (or an item that would be a COTS item, but for minor modifications) performed by the COTS provider and are normally provided for that COTS item) or Construction. Subcontractors who are only suppliers are not subject to E-Verify.

Buyer reserves the right, prior to award, to require Offeror to submit information which Buyer will use to make a determination whether Offeror has successfully enrolled in the E-Verify program. Such information may include a copy of the last three (3) pages of the enrollment form (i.e., pages 11, 12, and 13) and any other information that may be required to make the appropriate determination. Offeror agrees to promptly provide such information upon request and prior to award.

If Buyer requests such information, award shall be conditioned on Offeror’s submission of information Buyer deems acceptable.

By submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation, Offeror agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Buyer for any and all liability, loss, damages, penalties, claims, costs, and expenses, including attorney fees and costs of legal action, litigation, or settlement, arising from or relating to Offeror’s failure to certify or false certification of compliance with any requirements of this Section, regardless of whether the failure or false certification was willful, intentional, or knowing.

http://www.dhs.gov/E-Verify

C.8 Additional Information In order for HMIS to adequately evaluate the proposal, some additional information is required. Please complete and return all forms and documents listed in Exhibits of this Request for Lease Proposal.

The draft lease agreement is provided for informational purposes. HMIS requests that Offeror provides a proposed draft lease with proposal or confirmation that Model Lease Agreement contained in RFP is acceptable. In case of doubt, Offeror should request clarification from the Procurement Specialist. If any exceptions are taken to the requirements of the Solicitation, the pricing shall be based on the requirements of the Solicitation and the exception(s) priced as alternates. If the proposal is based only on the proposed exceptions, HMIS may determine the proposal to be non-responsive. The Offeror should review the completed Lease for accuracy and consistency with his or her proposal. If exceptions are taken to the draft lease agreement, please note on Exhibit 006 Agreements, Exceptions and Assumptions and provide a red-line copy with proposal or alternate lease language noted.

C.9 Acceptance of Terms and Conditions and Technical Requirements The subcontract resulting from this Request for Lease Proposal will be substantially the same as the draft Subcontract.

Offeror must describe any exceptions (on the Agreement Exceptions Exhibit form) to the terms and conditions and technical requirements. HMIS considers compliance with the terms and conditions and technical requirements of the Subcontract to be essential. In case of doubt, Offeror should request clarification from the Procurement Specialist. If any exceptions are taken to the terms and conditions and/or technical requirements of the Solicitation, the pricing shall be based on the requirements of the Solicitation and the exception(s) priced as alternates. If the proposal is based only on the proposed exceptions, HMIS may determine the proposal to be non-responsive.

Unless otherwise noted in the proposal, Offeror’s submission of a proposal signifies unqualified acceptance of all of the terms and conditions and technical requirements of the Subcontract that are contained in or referenced in this Solicitation.

C.10 Proposal Validity Period Offeror’s proposal shall remain firm for 120 days after the proposal due date.

D.0 Notices In order for HMIS to adequately evaluate the proposal, some additional information is required. Please complete and return all forms and documents listed in Notices of this solicitation.

D.1 Financial Capability Determination Information HMIS reserves the right, prior to award, to require Offeror to submit information which HMIS will use to make a determination whether Offeror has the financial capability to perform the contemplated subcontract. Such information may include, but not be limited to: annual reports; lines of credit with financial institutions and suppliers; and any other information that may be required to make the appropriate determination.

D.10 Proprietary Data Submittals If Offeror submits any data which is considered to be “Proprietary Data,” the document transmitting the data, or which contains the data, shall be boldly marked indicating that the data is considered proprietary.

Offerors who include in their proposals any data that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose or used by Buyer or the Government except for evaluation purposes shall mark the title page of their proposal with the following legends: USE AND DISCLOSURE OF DATA: “This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside Buyer or the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed – in whole or in part – for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a Subcontract is awarded to this Offeror as a result of – or in connection with – the submission of this data, Buyer and the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting Subcontract. This restriction does not limit Buyer’s or the Government’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets” and “Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.”

Exhibits The list of Exhibits as outlined in the table below are required as a part of your response to the identified Request for Lease Proposal. Failure to provide and disclose any information requested below may be grounds for disqualification if identified prior to award or termination, if identified after award.

Note: Additional attachments may be outlined within the Request for Lease Proposal.

It is recommended that you refer back to the Request for Lease Proposal document to ensure all attachments have been identified and included in your proposal response.

Exhibit No. Title GO TO

001 Lease Proposal Worksheet Exhibit 001

002 Proposed Lower-Tier Subcontractors Exhibit 002

003 Past Performance Exhibit 003

004 Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Representation Exhibit 004

005 Representation and Certification Exhibit 005

006 Agreement, Exceptions, and Assumptions Exhibit 006

007 Organizational Conflict of Interest Disclosure Exhibit 007

008 Executive Compensation Exhibit 008

FAR 52.203-11 Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal

Transactions (Sept 2007) Exhibit 009

010 Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension Exhibit 010

Prohibited Telecommunications Equipment Lease

Addendum & Lessor’s Representation Exhibit 011

NOTE: IF EXHIBITS ARE DETERMINED NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) PLEASE MARK N/A, PROVIDE

REASON(S), SIGN, AND DATE ACCORDINGLY.

Exhibit 001 – Lease Proposal Worksheet

Please find Exhibit 001– Lease Proposal Worksheet included with this Solicitation as an Adobe PDF file.

Partial picture of the Lease Proposal Worksheet

Exhibit 002 – Proposed Lower-Tier Subcontractors

Please type or print the names and contact information for all of the lower-tier Subcontractors. Use additional sheets if necessary.

LOWER-TIER SUBCONTRACTOR/SUPPLIER

CONTACT NAME:

TELEPHONE NO.:

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

TO BE PROVIDED:

**APPROXIMATE

AWARD AMOUNT:

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR: NAME OF SIGNER (Print):

TITLE OF SIGNER (Print):

OFFEROR: (Signature of person authorized to sign)

DATE:

** APPROXIMATELY _____% OF TOTAL SUBCONTRACTED AMOUNT TO BE PERFORMED BY LOWER-TIER SUBCONTRACTOR. PERCENTAGE OF LOWER-TIER SUBCONTRACTED WORK SHALL NOT EXCEED 50% FOR SMALL BUSINESS OR 70% FOR A LARGE BUSINESS (FOR SERVICES) OR 85% (FOR CONSTRUCTION) OF TOTAL SUBCONTRACT AMOUNT. SUBCONTRACTOR’S ARE REQUIRED TO NOTIFY PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST WHENEVER _____ % OF LOWER-TIER WORK IS ANTICIPATED OR REACHES 70% (FOR SERVICES) OR 85% (FOR

CONSTRUCTION).

Exhibit 003 – Past Performance Please type or print at least two (2) and as many as five (5) references to recently completed or substantially complete contracts with requirements similar to those described within this solicitation.

CLIENT NAME

CONTACT NAME

TELEPHONE NO.

CONTRACT NO.

CONTRACT DATE

START DATE/

END DATE

CONTRACT

VALUE

CONTRACT

TERMINATED?

(Y/N) Explain in attachment

NAME AND ADDRESS OF SUBCONTRACTOR NAME OF SIGNER (Print):

SUBCONTRACTOR (Signature of person authorized to sign)

DATE

Exhibit 004 – Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Representation It is Hanford Mission Integration Solutions, LLC (HMIS) policy to avoid situations which place a Subcontractor or Subcontractor’s employees in a position in which it may not be able to participate or perform on an equal basis for Buyer-controlled work with other qualified contractors due to impermissible Conflicts of Interest. See, FAR 3.1101. To address this matter, the Subcontractor is to consider the relevant circumstances surrounding this effort to determine if there are any past, present or future interests (financial, contractual, organizational or personal) that could be viewed as a conflict of interest. In addition, the Subcontractor is to consider potential conflicts of interest of all personnel working in a staff augmentation or direct services role for familial relationships at Hanford in answering the following.

A conflict of interest occurs when one's personal or financial interest could interfere with the ability to make object business decisions of behalf of the Company. Employees must avoid, at all times, situations that give rise to such bias or even the appearance of such bias.

It is required that conflicts are identified, declared, and if required, mitigated.

DEFINITIONS:

• Company - Includes your responsible company and company affiliates.

• Conflict of Interest(s) - When one's personal or financial interest may interfere with the ability to make business decisions on behalf of the company.

• Perceived Conflict of Interest - Situation that could give rise to the perception that a conflict exists and may interfere with the ability to make business decisions on behalf of the Company.

• Members of Household/Family Members - Employee’s spouse, child parent, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, sister-in-law, brother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, roommates, significant others, cousins, aunts, uncles, dating partners, or any other person where the relationship could lend itself to an actual or perceived Conflict of Interest.

Government agencies affiliated with Hanford, for purposes of this COI Disclosure includes -

• Department of Energy

• U.S. Environmental Protection agency

• U.S. Department of Interior

• Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

• Washington State Department of Ecology

• Washington State Department of Health

• Richland Fire Department

• Benton County Sheriff Office

Subcontractor hereby certifies that ☐ there is not or ☐there is a potential conflict of interest by the company or company personnel, to include individuals that will be working under any possible subcontract. If the answer is affirmative, the details associated with the real or potential concerns are disclosed and highlighted in the Subcontractor’s proposal. Any such disclosure may result in the need for additional discussions relative to the Subcontractor’s continued participation in this effort. Failure to disclose any real or potential concerns may be grounds for disqualification if identified prior to award or termination if identified after award.

https://www.acquisition.gov/far/3.1101

Exhibit 005 – Representation and Certification

Offeror hereby certifies their socioeconomic size status as ☐ SMALL or ☐LARGE based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) _____________ (input NAICS identified in the subject Request for Lease Proposal).

Offeror also identifies as: (list additional socioeconomic status applicable, i.e., Woman Owned, HubZone, Veteran owned, etc.) ________________________________.

Offeror certifies that the disclosure of size status as listed above corresponds to the size status as identified in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) in reference to identified NAICS for the subject Request for Lease Proposal. Any such disclosure may result in the need for additional discussions relative to the Offeror’s continued participation in this effort.

Failure to disclose any real or potential concerns may be grounds for disqualification if identified prior to award or termination if identified after award.

Please complete section below if your company is a Joint Venture. Offeror certifies that they ☐ Do or ☐ Do Not have an active Joint Venture agreement. If Offeror does have an active joint venture, please identify the following: Joint Venture Name: __________________________

Please list companies that make up the Joint Venture and the socioeconomic status of each:

Company: ________________________________________ hereby certifies their socioeconomic size status as

☐ SMALL or ☐LARGE based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) _____________ (input NAICS identified in the subject Request for Lease Proposal). Offeror also identifies as:

☐Woman Owned, ☐HUBZone, ☐ Service-Disabled Veteran Owned, ☐Veteran Owned, ☐ Small Disadvantage Business, ☐Other (list all that apply) ________________________________.

Company: ________________________________________ hereby certifies their socioeconomic size status as

☐ SMALL or ☐LARGE based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) _____________ (input NAICS identified in the subject Request for Lease Proposal). Offeror also identifies as:

☐Woman Owned, ☐HUBZone, ☐ Service-Disabled Veteran Owned, ☐Veteran Owned, ☐ Small Disadvantage Business, ☐Other (list all that apply) ________________________________.

If you are submitting as a Joint Venture, please provide the date of 1st award and the number of contracts awarded under the agreement to date. ________________________

**Offeror must provide a copy of the SBA Joint Venture Agreement as a part of the proposal package**

Please complete section below if your company has an SBA Mentor/Protégé Agreement.

Offeror certifies that they ☐ Do or ☐ Do Not have an active SBA Mentor Protégé agreement. If Offeror does have an active SBA Mentor/Protégé agreement, please identify the following:

Mentor or Protégé Name: __________________________

Date the Mentor/Protégé was approved under the Small Business Administration: ______________________

**Offeror must provide a copy of the SBA Mentor/Protégé Agreement and SBA Program Mentor/Protégé Letter as a part of the proposal package**

Exhibit 006 – Agreement, Exceptions, and Assumptions

Any agreement, exceptions, and/or assumptions to the proposed subcontract terms and conditions, Request for Lease Proposal and/or Performance Work Statement must be indicated below. Hanford Mission Integration Solutions, LLC (HMIS or Buyer), however, reserves the right to disqualify offers which deviate from the Solicitation. If the Offeror has no exceptions or assumptions, please write “None” below.

Exhibit 007 – Organizational Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement It is Hanford Mission Integration Solutions, LLC (HMIS or Buyer) policy to avoid situations, which place an Offeror in a position wherein it may not be able to compete on an equal basis for Buyer’s-controlled work with other qualified Offerors.

This representation, and the information disclosed thereby, will serve to advise Buyer whether or not an Offeror's judgment may be biased because of any past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, the Offeror may have or appear to have which relates to the work to be performed under a subcontract which may result from this solicitation, thus providing the Offeror an unfair competitive advantage over others. The term "Offeror" herein means the proposing entity or any of its affiliates or proposed consultants or Subcontractors of any tier. Therefore:

Offeror shall provide Buyer a statement which describes in a concise manner, all relevant facts concerning any past, present, or currently planned interest (financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) relating to the work described in the Performance Work Statement of this solicitation. Offeror may also provide relevant facts that show how its organizational structure and/or management systems limit its knowledge of affiliates or other divisions or sections of the proposing entity and how that structure or system would avoid or mitigate an organizational conflict of interest.

Offeror shall assure that any consultants and/or Subcontractors identified in its proposal which will perform part or all of any resulting subcontract submit the same information as required above, either as part of the Offeror’s proposal or directly to Buyer, prior to the time and date set forth for the receipt of proposals, including identification of the solicitation number and the (Offeror's) proposal to which it relates.

Offeror shall assure that each of its chief officers or directors, if any, who will be directly involved in the actual performance of the subcontract, submit such information.

Offeror shall promptly provide to Buyer information concerning any changes, including additions, in its relevant facts reported, that occur between the time of submission of its proposal and the award of a subcontract or the time the Offeror is notified that it is no longer being considered for an award.

Buyer will review the information submitted and may require additional relevant information or certifications from the Offeror.

All such information, and any other relevant information known to Buyer , will be used to determine whether an award to the Offeror may create an organizational conflict of interest with respect to the Offeror's (1) bias caused by financial, contractual, organizational, or other interests which relate to the work to be performed under the subcontract, resulting in Offeror being unable to render impartial, technically sound, and objective assistance or advice, or (2)obtaining an unfair competitive advantage over other parties. If Buyer determines a conflict exists which would require some action to mitigate an actual or potential conflict of interest that would otherwise represent an unacceptable risk to Buyer, it may, at its sole discretion: (1) impose appropriate terms or conditions necessary to avoid or mitigate the conflict, (2) disqualify the offer, or (3) proceed with an award despite the conflict.

Offeror refusal to submit the representation and/or to provide the disclosure or any additional information requested by Buyer may result in disqualification of the Offeror for an award. Misrepresentation of material facts or other reported information may also result in disqualification. If any such misrepresentation is discovered following award, Buyer may terminate the contract for default or seek other remedies including actions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001.

Depending on the nature of the subcontract activities, Offeror may, because of the existence of possible organizational conflicts of interest, propose to exclude specific kinds of work from the Performance Work Statement contained in the original solicitation, unless the solicitation specifically prohibits such exclusion. Any proposed exclusion may be considered by Buyer in the evaluation of proposals but may ultimately determine the proposal to be unacceptable.

No work shall be performed, and Buyer will not authorize work to begin, until representations and disclosure information has been evaluated. Buyer may also, at its option, permit missing representations or disclosure information to be provided by an Offeror at any time during the pre-award process.

In lieu of or in addition to the above and/or when requested by Buyer, Offeror shall provide a certification similar to the following, altered only to reflect the relevant facts:

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, no facts exist relevant to any past, present, or currently planned interest or activity (financial, contractual, personal, organizational, or otherwise) that relate to the proposed work; and bear on whether the Buyer and the Offeror have a possible conflict of interest with respect to being able to render impartial, technically sound, and objective assistance or advice, or being given unfair competitive advantage.

Exhibit 008 – Executive Compensation HMIS First-Tier Subcontractor Transparency Act Reporting Form

Name of Subcontractor

Subcontractor’s Physical Address:

Street

City, State & Nine-Digit Zip Code Country Congressional District

Subcontractor’s Fiscal Year

Street City, State & Nine-Digit Zip Code Country Congressional District

Performing Entity

Parent Company

a) During the previous tax year was the Subcontractor’s gross income from all sources under $300,000?

b) During preceding fiscal year was 80% or more of Subcontractor’s annual gross revenues from Federal contracts (and subcontracts), loans, grants (and subgrants) and cooperative agreements?

c) During preceding fiscal year did Subcontractor have $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal contracts (and subcontracts), loans, grants (and subgrants) and cooperative agreements?

d) Does the public have access to information about the compensation of Subcontractor’s executives through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 USC 78m(a), 780(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

e) Subcontractor’s Top Five Most Highly Compensated Officers

Yes – skip to signature block No – answer 4(b)Yes – answer 4(c) No – skip to signature block

Yes – answer 4(d) No – skip to signature block

Yes – skip to signature block No – complete 4(e)

Officer Name Total Compensation for Preceding Fiscal Year

Print Name & Title of Representative Completing Form

Signature of Authorized Representative Date

4. Subcontractor’s Top Five Most Highly Compensated Officers Reporting

1. Subcontractor Information

2. Place of Performance

3. Subcontractor’s Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number

HMIS First-Tier Subcontractor Transparency Act Reporting Form Guidance FAR 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Oct 2016)

Subcontractor's Compensation Reporting Guidelines

Upon award of any Subcontractor award of $30,000 or more, and annually thereafter, HMIS as the prime contractor must report the total compensation and names of the Subcontractor’s top five most highly compensated executives if:

(a) In the Subcontractor’s preceding fiscal year, the Subcontractor received:

(i) 80% or more of its annual gross revenues from Federal contracts (and subcontracts), loans, grants (and subgrants) and cooperative agreements, and other forms of Federal financial assistance; and

(ii) $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal contracts (and subcontracts), loans, grants

(and subgrants) and cooperative agreements, and other forms of Federal financial assistance; and

(b) The public does not have access to information about the compensation of the executives through period reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 USC 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

If a Subcontractor in the previous tax year had gross income from all sources under $300,000, the prime contractor does not need to report awards for that subcontractor.

This information will be reported through the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System. The public may view first-tier subcontract award data at http://usaspending.gov.

Definitions

As used in FAR 52.204-10:

Executive means officers, managing partners, or any other employees in management positions.

First-tier subcontract means a subcontract awarded directly by the Contractor for the purpose of acquiring supplies or services (including construction) for performance of a prime contract. It does not include the Contractor's supplier agreements with vendors, such as long-term arrangements for materials or supplies that would benefit multiple contracts and/or the costs of which are normally applied to a Contractor’s general and administrative expenses or indirect cost.

Total compensation means the cash and noncash dollar value earned by the executive during the Contractor's preceding fiscal year and includes the following (for more information see 17 CFR 229.402(c)(2)):

(1) Salary and bonus.

(2) Awards of stock, stock options, and stock appreciation rights. Use the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 718, Compensation- Stock Compensation.

(3) Earnings for services under non-equity incentive plans. This does not include group life, health, hospitalization or medical reimbursement plans that do not discriminate in favor of executives and are available generally to all salaried employees.

(4) Change in pension value. This is the change in present value of defined benefit and actuarial pension plans.

(5) Above-market earnings on deferred compensation which is not tax-qualified.

(6) Other compensation, if the aggregate value of all such other compensation (e.g., severance, termination payments, value of life insurance paid on behalf of the employee, perquisites, or property) for the executive exceeds $10,000.

Further information about the Transparency Act is available at: www.USAspending.gov & www.whitehouse.gov/omb/open http://usaspending.gov/ https://www.usaspending.gov/ http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/open

Exhibit 009 – FAR 52.203-11 Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Sept 2007) In accordance with FAR 52.203-12, Limitations on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Oct 2010) contained in the General Provisions attached to this solicitation, Offerors who are submitting a proposal for a subcontract expected to exceed $150,000.00 are required to submit a declaration, including certification and disclosure in paragraphs (c) and (d) of the provision at FAR 52.203-11 as shown below.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision-"Lobbying contact" has the meaning provided at 2 U.S.C. 1602(8).

The terms "agency," "influencing or attempting to influence," "officer or employee of an agency," "person," "reasonable compensation," and "regularly employed" are defined in the FAR clause of this solicitation entitled "Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions"(52.203-12).

(b) Prohibition. The prohibition and exceptions contained in the FAR clause of this solicitation entitled "Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions" (52.203-12) are hereby incorporated by reference in this provision.

(c) Certification. The offeror, by signing its offer, hereby certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that no Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress on its behalf in connection with the awarding of this contract.

(d) Disclosure. If any registrants under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 have made a lobbying contact on behalf of the offeror with respect to this contract, the offeror shall complete and submit, with its offer, OMB Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, to provide the name of the registrants. The offeror need not report regularly employed officers or employees of the offeror to whom payments of reasonable compensation were made.

(e) Penalty. Submission of this certification and disclosure is a prerequisite for making or entering into this contract imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited under this provision or who fails to file or amend the disclosure required to be filed or amended by this provision, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000, and not more than $100,000, for each such failure.

SIGNATURE/CERTIFICATION:

By signing below, the bidder/offeror certifies, under penalty of law, that the above certification is accurate, current, and complete. By signing the below, the Offeror further agrees to include the language of this certification in all subcontract awards at any tier and require that all recipients of subcontract awards in excess of $150,000 shall certify and disclose accordingly as required in FAR 52.203-12.

COMPANY NAME:

NAME OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

(Type/Print):

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TITLE

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

SIGNATURE:

Exhibit 010 –Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension In accordance with FAR 52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting With Contractor Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment (Oct 2015) (c) contained in the General Provisions attached to this solicitation, Offerors who are submitting a proposal for a subcontract expected to exceed $35,000.00 for other than commercially available off the shelf items are required to submit to HMIS, in writing, whether as of the time of award of the subcontract, the subcontractor, or its principals, is or is not debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment by the Federal Government.

The Offeror certifies that the Offeror and/or any of its Principals—

☐ Are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment by the Federal Government.

☐ Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment by the Federal Government.

SIGNATURE/CERTIFICATION:

By signing below, the bidder/offeror certifies, under penalty of law, that the above certification is accurate, current, and complete.

Exhibit 011 – Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (August 2020) NOTE: The "Offeror," as used on this form, is the owner of the property offered, not an individual or agent representing the owner.

52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (Aug 2020)

The Offeror shall not complete the representation at paragraph (d)(1) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it “does not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services as a part of its offered products or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument” in the provision at 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services—Representation, or in paragraph (v) of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision—

Backhaul, covered telecommunications equipment or services, critical technology, interconnection arrangements, reasonable inquiry, roaming, and substantial or essential component have the meanings provided in the clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

(b) Prohibition.

(1) Section 889(a)(1)(A) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2019, from procuring or obtaining, or extending or renewing a contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of…