Redacted SSJ.pdf

PDF 383 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS ROBERT E. PEARY Renk Coolers Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N3220525Q2214
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

This is a Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC) for the acquisition of propulsion motor bearing coolers from RENK CORP under the simplified acquisition threshold. The document justifies sole-source procurement based on RENK CORP's proprietary rights to the technical drawings and their position as the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) with no authorized distributors.

The procurement is for the USNS ROBERT E. PEARY with a required delivery date of June 1, 2025. Multiple justifications are cited, including that RENK CORP owns the proprietary rights, the equipment is critical ship equipment that poses safety risks if it fails (per SMS Procedure N0700-106.00-T-AKE Revision 4), and standardization requirements for T-AKE class vessels (Make/Model: RENK CORP/200747950). The Military Sealift Command (MSC) notes they lack the manufacturing and technical information required to evaluate non-OEM components, making RENK CORP the only viable source for maintaining and replacing these critical components.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS ROBERT E. PEARY Renk Coolers, newest first.
File Type Posted
Revised_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_25Q2214.docx DOCX document
Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_25Q2214.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1 Ver 2.0 (01 June 2018)

Date: 1/22/2025

MEMORANDUM

Subj: USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION FOR AN ACQUISITION UNDER

THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD

Ref: (a) PR Number(s): REQ # N2319550284052, ERP# 1301224705

I. BACKGROUND:

1. In considering the references, FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) states for purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, Contacting Officers may solicit from one source if the Contracting Officer determines that, under the circumstances of the contract action, only one source is reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing, brand-name, or industrial mobilization).

2. As required by FAR 13.106-3(b)(3)(i), this memorandum explains the absence of competition for this acquisition because only one source will be solicited for this requirement (or for a portion of the requirement) and the requirement is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

II. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM OR SERVICE:

1. Provide a description of the item or service required, to include

a) the name of the required source or brand name

RENK CORP

b) the required delivery date/period of performance and

RDD: 6/01/2025

c) its intended use.

Propulsion motor Bearing Coolers

2. List the source(s) or known vendor(s) who are able to provide the above described item or service.

III. THE DETERMINATION FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION IS BASED

ON THE FOLLOWING (select all that apply):

A. _ X Only one responsible source (select all that apply):

1. X RESTRICTIVE RIGHTS: the source has established proprietary rights, limited rights in data, patent rights, copyrights, or secret processes in the item or service.

a. Explain what is subject to the restrictive rights.

RENK CORP OWNS THE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS TO THE DRAWINGS OF THE

MATERIAL.

2 Ver 2.0 (01 June 2018) b.

2. X EXCLUSIVE LICENSING AGREEMENTS: The item or service is only available from the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), or there is ONLY ONE authorized distributor or technical representative for the OEM.

a. Identify the OEM and explain the circumstances surrounding why the item or service is only available from the OEM.

RENK CORP ONLY SELLS DIRECT AND HAS NO AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTORS

b. Identify the distributor / authorized technical representative for the item or service.

Provide evidence of the exclusive licensing agreement as an attachment to this document.

(NOTE: If there is more than one distributor / authorized technical representative, then use Part B Brand Name.)

3. ___X__ OTHER REASON:

a. _ X CRITICAL SHIP EQUIPMENT: The required item is critical ship equipment, the failure of which poses a hazard to the ship, the crew or the environment.

i. SMS Procedure Number: N0700-106.00-T-AKE Revision 4.

b. __X STANDARDIZATION / BRAND NAME: Per MSCs standardization initiative, only the specified make/model of the additional units or replacement items.

i. Identify Make / Model Number(s): RENK CORP/ 200747950

ii. Identify other vessels with this Make / Model:

T-AKE CLASS

c. FORM, FIT, AND FUNCTION: Item is direct replacement parts / components for existing equipment and must be compatible in terms of form, fit, and function with existing equipment / configurations.

i. Identify Make / Model of existing equipment:

ii. Describe how the equipment must be compatible with the existing configuration.

3 Ver 2.0 (01 June 2018)

d. __X__ OTHER:

MSC does not have manufacturing and technical information required to evaluate and determine whether non-OEM components and replacement parts offered are equivalent to the OEM components and replacement parts. The Responsible Source has access to equipment, parts, provide service and technical data / drawings as required to properly repair, replace and maintain the equip

4. _ UNUSUAL AND COMPELLING URGENCY: The supplies or services are of such unusual and compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured unless the agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits. Urgent requirements are supplies or services that will result in work stoppage, or are mission critical and the routine processing time would injure the Government. The determination that the procurement for the above is an urgent and compelling requirement is based on the following:

a. Date on which the requirement was identified:

b. Required delivery date / Period of Performance: ___________

c. If the difference between a. and b. is more than one week, explain the delay in submitting the requirement.

d. Estimated production lead time: ___________

e. Explanation of why delivery / commencement of services by the date required is needed: (explain the impact to the mission, any special circumstances or conditions, etc.)

f. CASREP Number:

IV. ANTICIPATED DOLLAR VALUE OF PROCUREMENT:

4 Ver 2.0 (01 June 2018)

V. CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVALS:

Technical / Requirement Certification: I certify that the facts and representation under my cognizance which are included in this justification are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .