Questionnaire Design-Builder in Word Format.doc
DOC document 85 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RECOVERY Solicitation GS-08P-09-JA-C-0089: Department of State Facility at the Denver Federal Center
- Solicitation number
- RECOVERY-GS-08P-10-JA-C-XXXX-DB
About this file
Design-Builder Questionnaire in Word Format
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Name Brand Justification fedbizopps.pdf | ||
| A0005.pdf | ||
| DB Amendment 0005.pdf | ||
| A0004.pdf | ||
| A0003.pdf | ||
| Questionnaire Team Member in Word Format.doc | DOC document | |
| A0002 SF30.pdf | ||
| DB Questionnaire 10-01-09.pdf | ||
| A0001.pdf | ||
| RFQ DB Data Center.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Part III Past Performance Questionnaire
Note: Completed questionnaires shall be considered confidential information and may not be seen or reviewed by the contractor/Offeror. Mail or email completed questionnaires directly to:
Attention: Beverly Carey, Contracting Officer
General Services Administration
Design and Construction Division (8PC)
Building 41, Denver Federal Center
Lakewood, CO 80225
Beverly.Carey@gsa.gov
Name:
Company:
Role/position during construction:
Current Telephone No.:
(Use this cover sheet for each past performance questionnaire submitted)
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE DESIGN-BUILDER
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104 u.s. General Services administration
Public BuildingS service
Rocky MOUNTAIN REGION
OVERVIEW
The Offeror shown below is submitting qualifications for Design/Build services on the Tier III Data Center New Construction project at Denver Federal Center in Lakewood, Colorado, and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluation process requires information on the Offeror’s past performance. Your participation is important to us and responses are required by October 29, 2009 , 2:00 PM (Mountain Time) for inclusion in our evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
SECTION 1: Contract Identification
To be completed by the Offeror and provided to the customer referenced Name of Offeror being evaluated: _______________________________________
Project Number/Title: _________________________________________________
Project Location:_____________________________________________________
Project Description: ___________________________________________________
Project Award Amount: $_______________________________________________
Project Final Dollar Amount: $___________________________________________
Year Completed: _________ Project Manager: _________________________
SECTION 2: Respondent Identification
Name of Evaluator: ________________________________________________
Relation to Contract/Project: ___________________________________________
Company Name: ____________________________________________________
Phone Number (Commercial/DSN): ____________________________________
Email Address: ____________________________________________________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE DESIGN-BUILDER
SECTION 3: Rating of Offeror
To be completed by the customer:
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
Score Performance Level
EXCELLENT - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
ACCEPTABLE – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appears, or were, satisfactory.
MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNACCEPTABLE – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Management
Professional conduct
Cooperation/responsiveness –timely, solicits feedback, suggests alternatives
Offeror is easy to work with, friendly, courteous
Oversight of project management/superintendents
Quickly/professionally resolves issues/disputes
Review/resolution of subcontractors issues
Clear line of supervision on construction site, effective
Followed and maintained project budget
Implementation of Subcontracting Plan (applicable to large businesses)
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE DESIGN-BUILDER
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Construction
Compliance with laws and regulations
Coordination\control of subcontractors – ensures adherence to work schedule
Resource Management – maintains good construction pace/work environment
Site Management (i.e. materials properly staged/stored, job site cleanliness)
Adequacy & adherence of initial progress schedule/submission of revisions
Resolution of Delays
Timely completion of punch-list items
Adequacy and implementation of Safety Plan
Use of specified/equal materials
Identification/correction of deficient work in a timely manner
Quality of workmanship
Adequacy of QC Testing – provides all tests as required
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Closeout/Warranty
Submission of required documentation
Timeliness of submissions
Adequacy of As-Builts - maintains accurate red line drawings on site per specs
Format of closeout documentation
Warranty response
Correction of noted deficiencies
SECTION 4: Narrative Summary
Please indicate in writing any additional comments you have of the Offeror and suggestions you may have concerning the following categories:
Strengths of performance: ____________________________________________________________________
Weaknesses of performance: __________________________________________________________________
Additional Thoughts: ________________________________________________________________________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE DESIGN-BUILDER
SECTION 5: Submission
Thank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire. As stated above, when filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 3.104. When completed please mail, hand-deliver, or email directly to:
U.S. General Services Administration
Public Buildings Services
P.O. Box 25546
Denver, Colorado 80225-0546 PHONE: (303) 236-8000, Ext. 5257 ATTN: Beverly Carey (8PSD) EMAIL: beverly.carey@gsa.gov Respondent Signature: _________________________________________ Date: ______________________ �Provide Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .