ratings sheet - attachment A.docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
EYEGLASS PROGRAM - LAWTON INDIAN HOSPITAL, LAWTON OK
Solicitation number
246-21-Q-0009
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
246-21-Q-0009 Questions 01272021.docx DOCX document
Pricing Worksheet for Lawton Eyeglass.docx DOCX document
SOW - Lawton Eyeglass Program.docx DOCX document
Pt 12 solicitation clauses.doc.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT A – RATINGS SHEET

Ratings Methods Ratings Descriptors

Excellent Proposal demonstrates superior understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards and contains at least one exceptional enhancing feature that benefits the Government. Any weakness is minor. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Proposal demonstrates an exhaustive understanding of the requirements and a thorough approach that meets performance or capability standards. There may be strengths and weaknesses, though they offset one another. Has one or more enhancing features that will benefit the Government. Weakness do not significantly detract from the Quoter’s response. Any weaknesses appear to be correctable and will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk is low.

Satisfactory Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards. Acceptable solutions are identified. No major enhancing features will benefit the Government are identified. There is some risk.

Unsatisfactory Proposal fails to meet performance or capability standards and requirements of the Solicitation. Proposal is not awardable. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Past Performance Ratings

Rating Method
Rating Descriptors
Excellent
The contractor has performed successfully and greatly exceeded expectations under the contract.
Good
The contractor has performed successfully under the contract.
Neutral
No record of performance or performance is inconclusive.
Marginal
The contractor has some unsuccessful performance under the contract.
Poor
The contractor has performed unsuccessfully under the contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .