QUESTIONS _ ANSWERS RFP 2024 025 04222024.pdf
PDF 93 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2024-025 Road Assessment Services
- Solicitation number
- PE-72600-NONST-2024-000000012
- Issued by
- Talbot County, Georgia
About this file
This document is a set of Questions and Answers related to an RFP (Request for Proposals) issued by the Spalding County Board of Commissioners for Road Assessment Services 2024-025. The RFP seeks proposals for a pavement inspection and management solution to collect pavement condition data, perform sign inventory, and provide web-based GIS application and geospatial database tools to manage the county's ongoing roadway maintenance program. The RFP covers approximately 470 center lane miles of pavement, 6 miles of chip and seal, and 75 miles of gravel roads. The county is interested in solutions that can provide pavement management system (PMS) capabilities, including budgetary analysis and funding scenario generation, as well as robust reporting functionalities. The RFP does not require LiDAR, but does require geotagged pavement distresses, and the county is open to proposals for managing additional assets such as guardrails.
Regarding pricing, the county is seeking bids to determine the cost of a web-based asset management software license, and the RFP indicates the county has no specific restrictions or preferences on the licensing model. The county is also interested in options and associated costs for the proposed data collection and asset management methods.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Pavement Management Program RFP template Curr.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
April 27, 2024
SPALDING COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR RPF ROAD ASSESSMENT SERVICES 2024 025
1. Based on the Reporting paragraph in page 5: Is the County looking for one software that is web based with both Pavement Management System (PMS) (e.g., generate budgetary analysis, funding scenarios) and reporting capabilities? We would prefer but not limited too.
2. Does the County have any restrictions or preferences (e.g., subscription cost) on the license for the web-based asset management software? We are seeking bids to determine that cost.
3. What is the County’s pavement surface (e.g., concrete vs. asphalt) distribution? Asphalt and Gravel
4. How many total lane miles does the County have? Approximately 470 center miles pavement, 6 miles chip and seal 75 miles gravel
5. Does the County have a physical address for hand delivery? 119 East Solomon St, Griffin Ga 30223
6. Can the County supply the centerline mileage broken down by functional classification (i.e.
arterials, collectors, residential)? We do not have a break down. It will be a majority 2 lane rural with residential subdivision as secondary.
7. Is LiDAR required? We are confident that we can get all the data required for a robust pavement management plan without LiDAR, using AI and physical evaluations All technology and techniques shall be equal or greater to specified.
8. Is IRI required? All technology and techniques shall be equal or greater to specified.
9. Are the geotagged pavement distresses a requirement? Or is the road segment with geotagged PCI value sufficient? Geotagged pavement distresses will be required.
10. What other assets are you interested in apart from road signs and manholes? (e.g., guardrails?) A listing of options and associated costs available to the proposed methods should be included.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .