Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Drain Maintenance Services.pdf
PDF 151 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25621Q1327
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) 36C25621Q1327
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) For: Drain Maintenance Services, G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216
Contract Number: To Be Determined
Contract Description: Drain Maintenance Services
Contractor’s name: To Be Determined
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
• What will be monitored?
• How monitoring will take place.
• Who will conduct the monitoring.
• How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
A. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: C.Robert Oravetz Assigned CS: C. Robert Oravetz Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, NCO 16, Division I, Services Team C
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Joe Yawn, Program Manager, Environmental Management Service (EMS), (601)-362-4471 ext.
53936 (office) / (601)-383-2563 (Mobile) Organization or Agency: G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, Environmental Management Service (EMS), 1500 E. Woodrow Wilson Drive, Jackson, MS 39216
B. Other Key Government Personnel: Edward Batton, Chief EMS
Organization or Agency: G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, Environmental Management Service (EMS), 1500 E. Woodrow Wilson Drive, Jackson, MS 39216
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
A. Program Manager: To Be Determined
B. Other Personnel (If Needed): To Be Determined
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix, paragraph (N/A) in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), includes performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).
The contractor will be evaluated throughout the contract period for their performance for Drain Maintenance Services. Contractor must perform all work, execute all services, and complete all tasks/deliverables as stipulated in the final contract
Deliverable Number Frequency Task
Acceptable Quality Level
Method of Surveillance
Incentive/
Disincentive
1 Weekly
WEEKLY SERVICES-
•Inspection of each drain and pump unit to ensure pumps are primed to the correct flow •Change out the 5-gallon containers as needed •Ensure all tubes are free from obstructions •Replace pump units as needed •Monitor any and all drain flow problems
100% (Frequency) /
>98% (Compliance with standard)
Periodic Inspection, Direct Observation
Positive past performance / Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
2 Weekly
TREATMENT-Treat all drains with Devour (super concentrated, bio-engineered complex of bacteria) or its equivalent per the manufacturer recommendations
100% (Frequency) /
>98% (Compliance with standard)
Periodic Inspection, Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
3 When Required
DISPOSAL-Contractor is responsible for disposal of any liquid or by-products that occur as a result of contractor performance on this contract. Contractor trucks shall not dispose of (or drain) any liquid accumulation on VA grounds. Any and all waste products must be disposed of off-site.
100% (Compliance with standard)
Periodic Inspection, Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
4 24/7/365
SCHEDULE-During all performance periods of the contract the Contractor shall develop and utilize a service schedule which allows for completion of contract requirements without adversely impacting or interfering with operation of the medical facility or execution of staff duties.
>98% (Compliance with standard with minor flexibility)
Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
Deliverable Number Frequency Task
Acceptable Quality Level
Method of Surveillance
Incentive/
Disincentive
When performing services
CHECK IN AND CHECK
OUT PROCEDURES-
Contractor is required to check in with facility representatives and/or the COR when arriving at the facility to perform work. Upon completion of work the contractor is required to check out with facility
>98% (Compliance with standard)
Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
After completion of services
REPORTING-Following the performance of work, execution of services, and/or completion of tasks/deliverables the contractor shall provide a written report and/or service log which summarizes the effort completed by the contractor while on site.
>98% (Compliance with standard)
Periodic Inspection, Direct Observation
Positive past performance / Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
7 If event occurs
EMERGENCY
SERVICE (CLOGGED
DRAINS)
In the event that treated drains become clogged with organic material (grease, fats, hair, or any other organic material) the Contractor shall respond and rectify the problem on the same day if such problem occurs during normal business hours.
If a drain becomes clogged during non-business hours the contractor shall contact the facility within four (4) hours in order to address/rectify such issues at the earliest time available.
>98% (Compliance with standard)
Direct Observation
Positive past performance / Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
During all performance periods
PROJECT MANAGER
OR EQUIVALENT
A project manager or equivalent is designated for this contract who is reachable and accessible when contacted
>98% (Compliance with standard)
Direct Observation (i.e. when attempted contact is made and/or when technical guidance is sought)
Positive past performance / Negative past performance in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Option renewal, Non- Renewal of Option
5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
A. DIRECT OBSERVATION. (Can be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance.)
Performance standard(s) IDs: 1-5
B. PERIODIC INSPECTION. (Evaluates outcomes on a periodic basis. Inspections may be scheduled
[Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, or annually] or unscheduled, as required.)
C. 100% INSPECTION. (Evaluates all outcomes.)
6. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used for measurement will be: meets standards, exceeds standards, significantly exceeds standards, or does not meet standards
7. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
A. Acceptable Performance
The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
B. Unacceptable Performance
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
8. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
A. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
B. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR shall meet with the contractor monthly to assess performance, discuss concerns, and troubleshoot existing problems.
Contractor
Joe Yawn, COR
| Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP. |
| Performance standard(s) IDs: 1-5 |
| Performance standard(s) IDs: 1-5 |
| Performance standard(s) IDs: 1-5 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .