The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
VETS 2
SOLICITATION QTA0016AWA0001
J.P-8 Past Performance Rating Form
ATTACHMENT J.P-8
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM
This attachment is in support of solicitation QTA0016AWA0001.
Reference solicitation section L.5.3 for further information.
NOTE: If PPIRS information is available for any selected past performance relevant experience project, the PPIRS information must be used for the Past Performance evaluation and Attachment J.P-8 shall not be submitted. (See L.5.3) PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):
| CONTRACTOR NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| ORDER NUMBER (if applicable): |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS: MM/YYYY - MM/YYYY or MM/YYYY - Present |
| Click here to enter text. |
| RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT: (Choose One) |
| Choose Project Identifier from drop-down list. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| E-MAIL |
| Click here to enter text. |
| SIGNATURE OF RATER: (Rating must be provided by a Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative or Corporate Officer with cognizance over the project for the ordering activity) |
For each of the five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose one (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. For any rating that is checked Not Applicable, please explain why it does not apply.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| Rating |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| |_| |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was |
accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| |_| |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
| Rating |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| |_| |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was |
accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| |_| |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
| Rating |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| |_| |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was |
accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| |_| |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| Rating |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| |_| |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was |
accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| |_| |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| Rating |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
| |_| |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was |
accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| |_| |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| |_| |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| |_| |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| |_| |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Click here to enter text.
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104