QASP.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Autoclave Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911S625QA034
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for Special Programs (SPD) Autoclave/Sterilization Maintenance and Repair at Dugway Proving Grounds, dated May 19, 2025. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price type, with the primary objective of providing annual preventative maintenance checks and services (PMCS) and repair for autoclave equipment. The contractor is required to perform comprehensive maintenance tasks including inspecting chamber and jacket traps, safety valves, door components, filters, gaskets, calibration, boiler operations, and running test cycles to ensure proper equipment functionality.
The QASP outlines detailed government surveillance methods, including 100% inspection of contractor reports, customer feedback tracking, and a multi-level non-conformance reporting system. Key performance requirements include completing maintenance within 72 hours of notice, providing detailed service reports within 72 hours, and maintaining a maximum 5% failure rate during power outages. The government will monitor contractor performance through monthly status reports, surveillance checklists, and potential Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDRs) for performance issues. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) will have primary responsibility for technical oversight, with the Contracting Officer retaining ultimate contractual authority.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation W911S625QA034.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - W911S625QA034.pdf | ||
| Performance work statement.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
For
Special Programs (SPD) Autoclave/Sterilization Maintenance and Repair
May 19, 2025
Insert Contracting Officer Info Insert COR Info, e.g., Mr. Paul Frailey Mr. Allen Wilson Contracting Officer Contracting Officer’s Representative Mission & Installation Contracting Command West Desert Test Center Dugway Proving Grounds Dugway Proving Grounds
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subject Page Number
1. Overview
2. Description of Services
3. Roles and Responsibilities
4. Contract Quality Requirements
5. Government Surveillance
6. Non-Conforming Performance
7. Deduct Plan
8. Data Analysis
9. Acceptance of Services
10. COR Status Report
11. Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA)
12. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)
13. Combating Trafficking In Persons
14. COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance Files
15. QASP Changes
1. Overview.
1.1. Purpose. The purpose of this Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is to identify the methods and procedures the Government will use to ensure it receives the services under this contract as identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
1.2. Intent. The intent of this QASP is to: 1) ensure Contractor performance meets or exceeds contract terms, conditions and specifications; 2) hold the Contractor accountable for quality control; and 3) encourage the Contractor to take appropriate steps to control and improve quality.
Accordingly, the Government will perform surveillance on the contract in accordance with this QASP, but reserves the right to monitor the contract in any manner necessary, at any times necessary, and at all places necessary to ensure that the rendered services conform to contract requirements. The Government also reserves the right to perform quality assurance at the Subcontractor level and perform quality assurance at the contractor's place of business, if applicable. Resolution of non-conforming services discovered at the Subcontractor level will be addressed with the prime Contractor
2. Description of Services.
2.1. Scope of Work. Services include:
Check with operator about past performance. Make note of any problems reported by the operator.
Check test logs for Bowie & Dick type test and/or live biological test results.
Check chamber and jacket traps – Remove trap elements and inspect – Replace if necessary.
Check safety valves for proper operation.
Check door for loose, broken, or missing parts
- Inspect door safety pressure lock for proper operation
- Lubricate as necessary
Check Ambient Air-In Filter. Replace if necessary.
Check Compressed Air Filter (With Air-Over-Pressure Option). Replace if necessary.
Check door gasket. Replace if gasket is hard, flattened, or has been damaged.
Check calibration. Crosscheck chamber temperature with the chamber pressure gauge.
Check all gauges and indicators. Make sure that the timers are operating correctly.
Check for loose, broken, missing, or improperly installed parts.
Check that all piping and connections are secure and there is no evidence of leaks.
Check all solenoids and valves for proper operation.
Check Boiler for proper operation.
- Inspect heating elements for evidence of leaks – Remove element & inspect.
- Check high voltage connections for arching – Clean and tighten if necessary.
- Inspect liquid level control for proper operation.
- Inspect sight glass components and replace if necessary.
- Check and record amperage draw.
Run a test cycle and verify that the sterilizer is operating properly.
Reset the PM Due Date and/or make entry into the Equipment Maintenance Log.
All services performed on these items shall be accompanied by a detailed report of the work performed, results of all analytical tests performed on individual equipment systems, and recommendations (including pricing) for any additional work that is not covered under the regularly scheduled maintenance portion of this contract. The contractor shall accomplish these tasks ensuring at the most a 5% failure rate during power outages.
2.2. Type of Contract. The government will award a Firm Fixed Price contract
3. Roles and Responsibilities. The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, transportation, tools, supervision, and other items (including non-personnel services) to perform annual preventative maintenance checks and services (PCMS) and repair. The government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.
3.1. Government.
3.1.1. Contracting Officer (KO). The KO is the only person with the authority to enter into, administer, and or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the Government. Note: The only individual who can legally bind the Government.
3.1.2. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The (COR) will be identified by separate letter. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract: perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance: maintain written and oral communications with the Contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract: issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications: monitor Contractor's performance and notifies both the Contracting Officer and Contractor of any deficiencies;
coordinate availability of Government furnished property, and provide site entry of Contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the Contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.
3.1.3. Contract Administrator.
3.1.4. Property Administrator.
3.2. Contractor.
3.2.1. Contract Manager.
3.2.2. Project Manager.
3.2.3. Quality Manager.
4. Contract Quality Requirements.
4.1. Contractor’s Quality Control Program. The Contractor’s quality control program is the means by which he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract.
The Contractor shall ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The Contractor shall identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services.
4.2. Government Quality Assurance. The Government shall evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with this QASP. This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the Contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance and minimum acceptable defect rate(s).
5. Government Surveillance.
5.1. Methods of Surveillance. The following Methods of Surveillance will be utilized in monitoring the Contractors’ performance:
5.1.1. 100% Inspection. 100% review of all contractor reports will be performed.
5.1.2. Customer Feedback. The DA Form 5477, Customer Complaint Record, Attachment 2, will be used to document/record all complaints. The following procedures will be followed when a complaint is received.
• The COR will investigate and determine the validity of the complaint.
• If the complaint is determined to be invalid, the COR will inform the person who submitted the complaint of the reason(s) as soon as practical.
• For validated complaints that are true contractual non-conformances, the procedures in paragraph 6 below will be followed.
5.2. Surveillance Schedule. A Surveillance Schedule will be created each year utilizing the DA 5475, COR Surveillance Schedule, Attachment 3. The schedule is “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY” and is not releasable to anyone other than authorized Government personnel. A copy of the Surveillance Schedule will be filed in the Virtual Contracting Enterprise (VCE), COR Management Tool, https://cor.army.mil/, (Either as an Attachment to the Monthly COR Status Reports or uploaded separately in the Miscellaneous Documents Section of the CORs’ Online File.).
5.3. Surveillance Instructions/Checklists. Surveillance Checklists, Attachment 4, will be utilized and completed when surveillances are conducted.
5.4. Surveillance Documentation. The applicable Surveillance Checklist(s) will be completed when/as Surveillances are conducted. Completed Surveillance Checklist(s) will be filed in the Virtual Contracting Enterprise (VCE), COR Management Tool, https://cor.army.mil/, (Either as an Attachment to Monthly COR Status Reports or uploaded separately in the Miscellaneous Documents Section of the CORs’ Online File.).
6. Non-Conforming Performance. Non-conformance occurs when a Contractor fails to meet Contract or Task Order terms, conditions and/or specifications. All instances of non-conformance will be documented and the Contractor will be notified. Resolution of non-conformance discovered at the Subcontractor level will be addressed with the prime Contractor.
Non-conformance is classified as either: Level I (Minor); Level II (Major); or Level III (Critical).
6.1. Level I (Minor). Level I non-conformance is not likely to materially reduce the usability of services for their intended purpose or is a departure from established standards having little bearing on completing the contract requirement. Minor non-conformances can usually be corrected on the spot and can be issued to the Contractor through either a verbal or written Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). However, the Government is still required to document verbal Level I CDRs. The COR may issue verbal Level I CDRs directly to the appropriate level of Contractor management. The COR will notify the KO as soon as practical when a verbal Level I CDR is issued and document them in their Monthly Reports. If the non-conformance cannot be corrected on the spot, the Contractor shall be given a suspense date to correct the deficiency. The KO will issue and sign written Level I CDRs, Attachment 5.
6.2. Level II (Major). Level II non-conformance is likely to result in failure of the services to meet contract requirements. Also, repeated discrepancies, a large number of documented Level I CDRs and trends indicating failure of the Contractor’s quality control program can be classified as Level II CDRs. The KO issues all Level II CDRs in writing, Attachment 5. The COR will notify the KO as soon as practical when a major non-conformance is identified.
6.3. Level III (Critical). Level III non-conformances result in hazardous or unsafe conditions due to the manner in which the services are performed; prevent or impact a vital agency mission as a result of performance; or are for repeated or uncorrected Level II CDRs. The Contracting Office Director or Deputy Director issues written Level III CDRs. The COR is responsible for notifying the KO immediately upon discovery of a critical non-conformance.
6.4. Documenting CDRs. Documentation, as a minimum, will include: the Contract or Task Order number; reference to the specific contract requirement; the specific discrepancy to the requirement; where it was discovered; the date and time it was discovered; Contractor representative who was notified; and the suspense date for Contractor response/corrective action.
6.5. Tracking and Resolving CDRs. All CDRs, verbal and written, regardless of issuer will be included in the COR’s Monthly Report. The COR and KO shall track CDRs to ensure the Contractor indentifies and takes appropriate corrective action to the root cause and the specific non-conformance is corrected within the required timeline. The KO will make a final written determination of the Government’s remedies if the non-conformance is not corrected by the Contractor after receiving notice and a reasonable opportunity to correct the work.
7. Deduct Plan. This acquisition does not include a Deduct Plan.
8. Data Analysis. Data Analysis will be performed to identify trends in cost, schedule and/or performance risks. The results of Data Analysis will be documented in COR Status Reports and may be used to make adjustments to surveillance schedules, increase or decrease surveillance, if deemed appropriate. Negative trends noted using Government data/observations could result in issuing the Contractor a Contract Discrepancy Report. Trends noted using Contractor data will not result in a CDR unless the Contractor is not addressing the negative trend.
9. Acceptance of Services. When all services have been deemed acceptable and there is documented objective quality evidence to support acceptable performance the COR will accept the services provided and authorize payment of the Contractor. This is accomplished by approving the Contractor’s Receiving Reports in Wide Area Workflow at https://wawf.eb.mil/.
10. COR Status Report. COR Status Reports will be submitted on a Monthly basis to the Contracting Officer via the COR Management Tool. COR Status Reports will provide a synopsis of the Contractors performance for the inclusive dates of the report. The synopsis will contain a summary of: surveillances performed; Customer Feedback, if any; CDRs, if any; an analysis of the Contractors performance; recommended adjustments to surveillance schedules;
and any other pertinent contract information. Completed Surveillance Checklists and CDRs, if any, will be included as attachments to COR Status Reports or uploaded separately in the Miscellaneous Documents Section of the CORs’ Online file.
11. Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA). In accordance with Office of the Secretary of Defense Memorandum, Enterprise-wide Contractor Manpower Reporting Application, dated 28 Nov 2012, the Contractor must report contractor manpower to the Contractor Manpower Reporting website at https://cmra.army.mil. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year.
The COR shall verify that the Contactor has complied with the required contractor manpower reporting annually and document the results in the VCE, COR Module, CORs’ Online File, CMRA section.
12. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Documented surveillance data (COR Status Reports, Completed Surveillance Checklists, Customer Feedback and CDRs, if any) will be used to support CPARS ratings. CPARS will be completed in accordance with AFARS, Subpart 5142.15 – Contractor Performance Information.
13. Combating Trafficking In Persons (CTIP). In accordance with PGI 222.17 and FAR 52.222-50, the KO will be notified immediately of any information from any source that alleges a Contractor employee, subcontractor and/or subcontractor employee has engaged in conduct that violates the United States Government “zero” tolerance policy regarding trafficking in persons.
14. COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance Files. The official COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance File will be maintained in the on-line COR Management Tool per Army Contracting Command Pamphlet, 70-1.
15. QASP Changes. This QASP is a living document and, as such, may be changed as needed based on Data Analysis (trends), contract modifications, etc. The COR will send any recommended changes to the Contracting Officer for approval and the Contracting Officer must approve all changes.
COR’S Signature Block
Contracting Officer’s Signature Block
Attachments:
1. Performance Requirements Summary (PRS)
2. Customer Complaint Record, DA Form 5477
3. Surveillance Schedule, DA Form 5475
4. Surveillance Checklist(s)
5. Contract Discrepancy Report, DA Form 5479
Attachment 1
Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) The contractor service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.
Performance Objective
(The Service required—usually a shall statement)
Standard Performance Threshold (This is the maximum error rate. It could possibly be “Zero deviation from standard”)
Method of Surveillance
PRS # 1.
The contractor shall provide annual PMCS and repair by performing tasks outlined in this PWS paragraph 5.2.
A. The contractor shall provide annual PMCS and repair as required to bring Autoclave unit up to operating status.
B. Complete this requirement within 72 hours from the Government’s notice to proceed.
C. The contractor shall provide a report of the PMCS and repairs performed as outlined in paragraph
5.2 within 72 hours of service.
D. The contractor shall provide results of any tests performed on the equipment listed in paragraph 1.3 within 72 hours of service.
No Deviation from standard.
100 % review of contractor report
Attachment 2
Customer Complaint Record, DA Form 5477
DA FORM 5477
Attachment 3
Surveillance Schedule, DA Form 5475
DA FORM 5479
Attachment 4
Surveillance Checklist(s)
COR Inspection Checklist & Data Report (Fixed Firm Price Contract)
Meeting Contract Requirements
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Service Provided:
COR Name:
Date: YES No N/A
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments summary, to include, positive trends, negative trends, concerns, customer comments, and any additional COR comments:
Attachment 5
Contract Discrepancy Report, DA Form 5479
DA FORM 5475
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .