About this file

This document outlines a quality assurance surveillance plan (QASP) and related federal contract opportunity for temporary staffing services. The Department of Veterans Affairs seeks quotes from service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses to provide journeyman plumbers, electricians, carpenters, painters, and AC mechanics at the James J. Peters VA Medical Center and Margaret Cochran Corbin VA Medical Center in New York. The performance-based contract valued at $34 million will have a base period of 120 business days and one optional 120-day period. Quotes are due by March 21, 2024 and must be emailed to Andres.cepeda@va.gov. The QASP defines monitoring methods and acceptable performance standards for timely completion of tasks, on-time arrivals, and job site cleanliness. Performance will be assessed weekly through observation, timesheets, and customer feedback.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24224Q0447 Questions.docx DOCX document
36C24224Q0447 0001.pdf PDF
36C24224Q0447 0001_1.docx DOCX document
36C24224Q0447.pdf PDF
36C24224Q0447_1.docx DOCX document
Wage Determination.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

• What will be monitored? Temporary Manpower Services Contract

• How monitoring will take place.

• Who will conduct the monitoring?

• How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

A. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO: Andres Ceoeda (Andres.cepeda@va.gov) Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, RPO East, VISN 2

B. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Avin Kannadan, Chief of Engineering Organization or Agency: James J Peters VA Medical Center – Department of Veterans Affairs

VISN 2

C. Other Key Government Personnel: Amer Rohmen, Manhattan VA Medical Center

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.

A. Program Manager: To Be Determined upon vendor selection

B. Dispatcher: To Be Determined

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.

The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix, paragraph (N/A) in the Statement of work (SOW), includes performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).

Contractor agrees to maintain an on-going Quality Management/Assurance Program which include the following activities Quality Assurance: The contractor will be evaluated throughout the contract period in regard to their compliance with all VA quality performance measures and monitors as it pertains to Ambulance Services; proper documentation, adherence to performance measures, timely access, excessive waits/delays, pickup and delivery of special mode.

Additionally patient safety and patient complaints will be researched and addressed as necessary.

Task ID Indicator Standard Acceptable

Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Incentive/Penalty

Task/Job Completion 1

Inspection

Contractor shall perform all tasks assigned to them in a safe and timely manner. The contractor will be provided with proper guidance to complete all tasks assigned.

Once a task is complete, the contractor shall report to the COR for another task.

99% Daily Inspection

Subject to a negative review.

Task ID Indicator Standard Acceptable

Quality Level

Method of Surveillance

Incentive/Penalty

On Time Arrival 2

Timecard arrive on time and report to the COR for tasking. If the contractor is late, they shall contact the

COR

immediately.

Not to Exceed twice a month.

Daily Review of timesheet.

Subject to

Any additional expenses from delays will be owned by the contractor.

Job Cleanliness

Observation ensure job site is cleaned after task is completed. No leftover materials, tools, or equipment shall be on the job site.

Not to exceed 2 complaints per month.

Daily observation by the COR.

Subject to

Subject to cure notice and ultimately termination of the task order if not being followed.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

A. DIRECT OBSERVATION.

6. RATINGS

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used for measurement will be: meets standards/does not meet standards

7. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

A. Acceptable Performance

The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.

B. Unacceptable Performance

When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.

8. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT

A. Frequency of Measurement – Weekly

During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.

B. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings – Weekly between the contractor and the COR.

The COR shall meet with the contractor weekly to assess performance, discuss concerns, and troubleshoot existing problems.

9. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP

SIGNED:

COR NAME/TITLE DATE

SIGNED:

CONTRACTOR NAME/TITLE DATE

CONTRACT DISCREPANCY REPORT

1. CONTRACT NUMBER 2. REPORT NUMBER FOR THIS DISCREPANCY

3. TO: (Contracting Officer) 4. FROM: (Name of COR)

5. DATES

a. CDR PREPARED

b. RETURNED BY

CONTRACTOR:

c. ACTION COMPLETE

6. DISCREPANCY OR PROBLEM (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

7. SIGNATURE OF COR Date:

8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER Date:

9a. TO (Contracting Officer) 9a. FROM (Contractor)

10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE, CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT

RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE Date:

12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION. (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS (Acceptance, partial acceptance, reflection. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

14. CLOSE OUT

NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

CONTRACTOR

NOTIFIED

COR

CONTRACTING

OFFICER

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .