QASP.doc
DOC document 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Agricultural Research Plots Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12505B22Q0086
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Cass County SCA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| 12505B22Q0086.pdf | ||
| Washington County SCA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Hamilton County SCA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Benton County SCA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Story County SCA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Carroll County SCA Wage Determination.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
FOR
Agricultural Research Plots
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC) standards included in this contract and in subsequent task orders issued there under. The intent is to ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with performance metrics set forth in the contract documents, that the Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract and that the Government only pays for the acceptable level of services received.
The QASP has been developed by the requiring activity. It is designed to provide direction to personnel performing contract surveillance activities. Personnel surveying the contract terms and conditions and SOW requirements will periodically review the QASP throughout the life of the contract.
The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) will monitor the land provided for conducting agricultural research plots at the designated sites to ensure all meet the specified requirements. Sites provided in Benton, Cass, Carroll, Hamilton, Story, and Washington counties in Iowa must meet area, access, and management specifications.
2. SCOPE
The QASP is put in place to provide Government surveillance oversight of the Contractor’s quality control efforts to ensure the products/results specified in the PR&C or task order are delivered on time and meet the requirements of the PR&C or task order. The QASP is not intended to duplicate the Contractor’s Management Plan.
3. GOVERNMENT RESOURCES
The following definitions for Government resources are applicable to this plan:
Contracting Officer - A person duly appointed with the authority to enter into, administer, or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the Government.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - An individual designated in writing by the Contracting Officer to act as his authorized representative to assist in administering a contract. The source and authority for a COR is the Contracting Officer. COR limitations are contained in the written letter of appointment.
4. RESPONSIBILITIES:
The Government resources shall have responsibilities for the implementation of this QASP as follows:
Contracting Officer – The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that ensures the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the project and ensures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. Any changes that the Contractor deems may affect contract, price, terms, or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action.
5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
The below listed methods of surveillance shall be used in the administration of this QASP.
100% Inspection – The method used to evaluate the contractor when required by the contract Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) as noted in Technical Exhibit 1. Using this method of inspection, all the parts of the service or requirement are monitored for evaluation. Such performance requirements cover equipment and practices deemed critical for crane lift support. Failure to properly service these items would certainly have an adverse effect on research plot data quality.
6. LEVELS AND STANDARDS OF SERVICE
The standards of services are held to and comply with the standards specified in the PR&C, commercial/industry, and military/government standards.
7. IDENTIFIED QA SURVEILLANCE ITEMS
Performance Requirements
| Required Services |
| Performance Objective |
| Performance Requirement |
| Soil Type |
| Homogeneous soil type, high yield potential, good drainage, and less than 3% slope. |
| No part of plot having highly erodible, non-tillable areas, small areas of poor-quality soils such as high sand or gravel content, or prone to surface water accumulation. |
| Previous and Current Year Management |
| Uniform fertility, minimized compaction, and adjacent crop management. |
| Entire are planted to soybeans in previous year, surface and/or solid manure application avoided, and surrounding area in corn production for current season. |
| Plot Area |
| Single field of size and dimensions as noted accessible throughout growing season. |
| Area at field ends for turning equipment during planting, cultivating, and harvest. Land area located near field access road that allows easy access throughout the growing season. |
| Field Marking |
| Designated plot area boundaries marked by provider prior to planting. |
| Plot boundaries to be marked 5 days prior to planting. Provider to notify ARS when site is ready for planting. |
| Field Management |
| Tillage, fertilization, and chemical weed control managed to optimize corn production. |
| Tillage, fertilization, and chemical weed control conducted with uniformity to obtain optimal planting seedbed, plant grown, and minimize weed competition. Additional agronomic interventions (herbicide, fungicide, etc.) as needed to ensure optimal crop production condition. |
| Harvest |
| Ease of access during harvest operations and transport of resulting grain. |
| ARS to be notified when research plot is accessible for harvest. Provider will arrange for transport for resulting harvested grain. ARS will grant possession of grain harvested to the research provider. |
8. DOCUMENTATION
The COR shall, in addition to providing documentation to the Contracting Officer, maintain a complete Quality Assurance file. All such records will be retained for the life of this contract.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .