PWS.pdf
PDF 603 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IHS1523484
About this file
This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for Medical Physicist Radiological Services at the Rosebud IHS Service Unit in South Dakota.
The contractor shall provide comprehensive medical physics services ensuring compliance with federal regulations, accreditation requirements, radiation safety standards, and quality assurance programs for diagnostic imaging equipment and procedures. Key service objectives include: conducting appropriateness criteria audits and optimizing patient dose through review and recommendations of radiology program policies covering 21 minimum topics (imaging referral justification, staff qualifications, continuing education, equipment maintenance, personnel monitoring, ALARA implementation, patient dose documentation, fetal protection, quality assurance, patient incident reporting, and infection control); evaluating patient dose and entrance skin exposure against FDA NEXT diagnostic reference levels; verifying clinical decision support implementation; and establishing facility quality assurance programs. The contractor must also perform device performance and quality control testing according to AAPM Report 74 and applicable standards (ACR, NCRP, MQSA/FDA) for modalities including CT, fluoroscopy, general radiography, portable units, mammography, dental equipment (portable, handheld, and panoramic), and ultrasound. Services include acceptance testing for new equipment, annual performance monitoring, testing after major component repairs, and radiation shielding surveys when directed via change order. The contractor must provide detailed documentation including appropriateness audit results, facility risk profiles, decision support system information, exam evaluation numbers, dose comparisons to reference levels, equipment identification, test results, corrective action plans if deficiencies are found, and staff sign-off.
The Qualified Medical Physicist performing services must hold a Master's or Doctoral degree in physics or related discipline and possess current certification from the American Board of Radiology, American Board of Medical Physics, or Canadian College of Physicists in Medicine. The contractor shall provide all supplies, kits, test equipment, tools, and parts required. Services are performed at Rosebud IHS Service Unit, PO Box 550, 800 Hospital Drive, Rosebud, SD 57555, during business hours (8:00 AM to 5:30 PM) with scheduling required 30 days and two weeks in advance respectively. The period of performance is one year from award date. Invoices must be submitted through the Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) in accordance with HHSAR 352.232-71. A Contracting Officer's Representative (TBD) will monitor technical progress and performance. The Rosebud IHS Service Unit equipment inventory includes a Siemens CT scanner, GE fluoroscopy and radiography systems, portable x-ray units, ultrasound machines, Hologic mammography unit, and multiple dental x-ray systems (8 Progeny bitewing units, 1 handheld Aribex unit, and 1 Sirona panoramic unit).
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
MEDICAL PHYSICIST RADIOLOGICAL SERVICES
ROSEBUD IHS SERVICE UNIT
I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
This is a non-personal services contract to provide Medical Physics services for the Rosebud IHS Service Unit.
Services shall ensure compliance with applicable federal regulations, accreditation requirements, radiation safety standards, and quality assurance programs for diagnostic imaging equipment and procedures.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. The contractor shall conduct the “Optimizing Patient Dose” and “Staff Exposures” activities listed in Table 2, including but not limited to:
1) Review, recommend improvements, provide examples if needed, and evaluate compliance with each radiology program’s policies, procedures, and protocols to ensure the program has policies in place consistent with their scope of work that are sufficient to protect staff and patients and minimize patient dose and are reviewed annually. Policies on the following minimum topics should be in place and implemented:
a) Imaging referral justification and verification
b) Pre-procedure screening and patient condition assessment
c) Safe use of sedation and anesthesia (if in use)
d) Staff qualifications
e) Continuing education (radiology staff, and medical providers)
f) Equipment maintenance process and documentation
g) Personnel monitoring and means to prevent/reduce exposure
h) Appropriateness and ALARA in imaging; Decision Support Systems (if in use)
i) Patient dose estimation, documentation, and reporting
j) Protection of pregnant patients and workers; fetal protection and dose calculation
k) Equipment Performance Monitoring
l) Protective equipment inspection
m) Quality Assurance/ Performance improvement
n) Patient rights, education, and consent; and medical over-ride
o) Annual imaging program evaluation
p) Management of imaging records
q) Equipment planning
r) Infection control (including housekeeping, standard and Transmission-based precautions)
s) Chemical hygiene and hazardous material/waste handling
t) Radiation Safety Officer appointment and scope of responsibilities
u) Patient incident and over-exposure reporting and analysis.
2) Contactor shall provide consultation to assure an optimized balance between image quality and patient dose by ensuring the optimum technique factors are utilized by the facility
3) Contractor shall evaluate patient dose/Entrance Skin Exposure with comparison to FDA NEXT or equivalent diagnostic reference levels via patient dose estimates using appropriate phantoms.
4) Verify optimization process (whether they have a Clinical Decision Support mechanism/software in place, and if so, how well it was being implemented to limit patient dose) and dose documentation in the medical records while conducting the Appropriateness Criteria Audit (Section A above).
B. Contractor shall conduct “Device Performance” and “Quality Control Measures” activities listed in table 2 and according to AAPM Report 74 (http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_74.PDF) and consistent with the below cited references and will assist in establishing a facility radiology quality assurance program.
C. The contractor will provide details to the local site contact on any equipment that is not in proper working condition, or any environmental condition negatively impacting patient safety/privacy or program operations.
D. The contractor will provide acceptance testing for new x-ray devices installed during the contract period when directed by a properly executed supplement agreement/change order.
E. The contractor shall include additional equipment and Radiation Shielding Surveys under this contract when directed by a properly executed supplement agreement/change order.
F. The contractor shall consult with the Radiology Supervisor concerning patient and fetal dose determinations under this contract when needed. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.
III. SPECIFICATIONS
A. Medical Physicist Certification Requirements: The Services shall be performed by a Qualified Medical
Physicist (QMP) meeting the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) definition. In cases where an eligible a s s i s t a n t / t e c h n i c i a n p e r f o r m s t h e m e a s u r e m e n t s , t h e Q M P i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e w o r k p e r f o r m e d . A Q u a l i f i e d M e d i c a l P h y s i c i s t i s a p e r s o n w h o i s c e r t i f i e d , o r b o a r d e l i g i b l e , b y t h e A m e r i c a n B o a r d o f R a d i o l o g y , A m e r i c a n B o a r d o f M e d i c a l P h y s i c s , o r t h e C a n a d i a n C o l l e g e o f P h y s i c i s t s i n M e d i c i n e . T h e c o n t r a c t o r m u s t s u b m i t e v i d e n c e o f b o a r d c e r t i f i c a t i o n w i t h t h e i r q u o t e . AAPM defines a qualified medical physicist as, “an individual with the following credentials:
1. Masters or Doctoral degree in physics, medical physics, biophysics, radiological physics, medical health physics, or equivalent disciplines from an accredited college or university; and
2. Certification in the specific subfield(s) of medical physics with its associated medical health physics aspects by an appropriate national certifying body and abides by the certifying body's requirements for continuing education. (AAPM, 2012)
a. These certification requirements are consistent with the national practice guidelines referenced in
Rosebud IHS Equipment List
Radiology X-ray Units:
CT: Siemens SOMATOM go.top 128 slice RF Room: GE Discovery RF 180 General Rad Room: GE Definium VR 656 Shimadzu/ Mobile Dart Portables (2) Canon Aplio i700 Ultrasound machine Canon Aplio MX Ultrasound machine Hologic Selenia Dimensions 500 Mammography Unit Lead garments (aprons) (30-50)
Dental:
Progeny Dental Bitewing Preva (8) Aribex Nomad Pro 2 hand held bitewing (1) Sirona Orthophos S (1)
Table 1. Medical physicist performance monitoring reports shall include verification of professional certification. For the subfield of Diagnostic Medical Physics, AAPM recommends certification by the American Board of Radiology; or the American Board of Medical Physics; or the Canadian College of Physicists in Medicine. (AAPM, 2012).
B. Radiation Safety Surveys - Performance Monitoring and Testing of Medical and Dental Imaging Equipment:
Services to meet the most recent nationally recognized standards of practice regarding x-ray equipment performance monitoring and testing according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) Technical Standards. Contractor shall provide all supplies, kits, test equipment, tools and parts required to perform monitoring and testing services. All required services as noted below will be conducted.
1. Radiation Safety Surveys will be conducted according to ACR, MQSA/FDA and NCRP standards and equipment manufacturers’ recommendations.
2. Performance Monitoring Tests and Services will be conducted according to the schedule noted in the table below, verify that new equipment meets manufacturer specifications and regulatory requirements, as well as identify any corrective maintenance or modifications to process or procedures that need to be addressed.
3. Contractor shall schedule visits with the Lead Radiologist or Radiology Supervisor for medical x-rays and
Dental Director for dental x-ray tubes at least two weeks in advance of the proposed site visit.
4. With thorough testing and measurements, the contractor shall verify that any new radiology equipment meets manufacturer specifications and regulatory requirements, as well as identify any problem areas that need to be addressed.
Table 1 – Medical Physicist Performance Monitoring Services
Modality Reference Physicist Services
Radiology – CT American College of Radiology (ACR) Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Computed Tomography (CT) Equipment (ACR, 2012)
-Acceptance testing upon installation and before clinic use.
-Annual device performance monitoring.
-Performance check after replacement or repair of major components.
-Annual assessment of patient radiology dose. Review and, when necessary, recommend improvements to radiology program’s policies, procedures, and protocols to minimize patient dose.
-Assist in establishing a facility quality radiology assurance program.
Radiology -above table, portable x-ray
ACR-AAPM Technical Standard For Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring Of Radiographic Equipment, 2016.
-Acceptance testing upon installation and before clinic use.
-Annual device performance monitoring.
-Performance check after replacement or repair of major components.
-Annual assessment of patient dose.
-Review and, when necessary, recommend improvements to radiology program’s policies, procedures, and protocols to minimize patient dose.
-Establish and monitor performance of a facility quality assurance program.
Fluoroscopy – under-table, and C-Arm
ACR-AAPM Technical Standard For Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring Of Fluoroscopic Equipment, 2016.
-Acceptance testing upon installation and before clinic use.
-Annual device performance monitoring.
-Performance check after replacement or repair of major components.
-Annual assessment of patient dose.
-Review and, when necessary, recommend improvements to radiology program’s policies, procedures, and protocols to minimize patient dose.
-Establish and monitor performance of a facility quality assurance program.
Mammography
Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) Regulations – 21 CFR Part 900 – Mammography
(FDA, 2009)
-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Mammography Facility Surveys, Mammography Equipment Evaluations, and Medical Physicist Qualification Requirements under
MQSA (FDA, 2005)
-Acceptance testing upon installation and before clinic use.
-Annual device performance monitoring which includes a summary of the evaluation of the facility quality control testing with any recommendations for necessary improvements and/or corrective actions, as needed.
-Performance check after replacement or repair of major components (including image processors).
Dental (includes portable, hand-held, and panoramic devices)
NCRP Report Number 145:
Radiation Protection in Dentistry
(NCRP, 2003)
-All new dental x-ray installations and existing installations not previously surveyed shall have a radiation protection survey.
-Resurveys shall be performed; resurvey interval should not exceed 4 years.
-A resurvey shall be made after any change in the installation, workload, or operating conditions that might significantly increase occupational or public exposure (including x-ray machine service or repair that could affect the x-ray machine output or performance).
Ultrasound-US Inspection of ultrasound equipment shall conform to the ACR/AIUM performance tests for ultrasound.
-Acceptance testing upon installation and before clinic use.
-Annual device performance monitoring -Performance check after replacement or repair of major components.
-Performance check after replacement or repair of major components (including image processors).
-Oversee the quality and appropriateness of ultrasound operations of the practice -Ensure diagnostic equipment operates safely and accurately.
- Physics testing verifies spatial resolution, contrast resolution, image uniformity, dead zone, and geometric accuracy
Table 2 – Standard Physicist Performance Monitoring Tests
Standard Physicist Performance Monitoring
Medical Fluoroscopy Dental Mammography CT Ultrasound
Optimizing Patient Dose Policies are in place and followed regarding protection of pregnant patients, credentialing and competencies verification of operators, who can prescribe, apron testing and frequency, etc.
X X X X As recommended by the ACR
2012 Computed Tomography
Quality Control Manual
Tests include:
A. Review of Clinical Protocols B. Image
Uniformity C. Scout
Prescription and Alignment Light Accuracy
C. Image Thickness – Axial Mode
D. Table Travel Accuracy
E. Radiation Beam Width
F. High/Low- Contrast
Performance G. Spatial Resolution
H. CT Number Accuracy I. Artifact Evaluation
J. CT Number Uniformity
K. Dosimetry L. Gray Level
Performance of CT Acquisition
Display Monitors
As recommended by ACR, AIUM and IAC annual ultrasound physics testing is performed to ensure diagnostic equipment operates safely and accurately.
Tests should verify spatial resolution, contrast resolution, image uniformity, dead zone, and geometric accuracy.
Appropriateness of technique factors
X X X X X
Patient Dose/Entrance Skin Exposure Evaluation with comparison to FDA NEXT or equivalent reference value via CDRH phantoms – Provide recommendations for reducing exposure if beyond expected 3rd quartile.
Adult Chest, Abdomen, & Spine
Maximum exposure rate
Intraoral Adult
Bitewing
MQSA required medical physicist tests for certification.
21 CFR 900.12(e)(9)
- Surveys
Fluoroscopic entrance exposure rates.
X
Patient dose monitoring system calibration
X
Review or establishing technique charts
X X X
Recommended fastest screen-film system available, as needed
X X
Monitoring
Medical Fluoroscopy Dental Mammography CT Ultrasound
Staff Exposures Policies are in place and followed regarding protection of staff, including pregnant staff, personnel monitoring, etc.
X X X X X
Appropriately donning radiation dosimeters, providing summary reports to staff, and maintaining exposure records
X X X X X
Device Performance Integrity of unit assembly.
X X X MQSA required medical physicist tests for certification.
21 CFR 900.12(e)(9)
- Surveys
As recommended by the ACR 2012
Computed Tomography
Quality Control Manual
Tests include:
A. Review of
Clinical Protocols B. Scout
Prescription and Alignment Light
Accuracy C. Image
Thickness – Axial Mode
D. Table Travel Accuracy
E. Radiation Beam Width
F. Low-Contrast
Automatic exposure control system performance kVp accuracy and reproducibility
Linearity of exposure versus mA or mAs
Exposure reproducibility
Timer accuracy X X
Beam quality assessment (half-value layer)
Equipment radiation safety functions.
Digital image receptor performance
If Digital X If Digital MQSA required medical physicist tests for certification.
21 CFR 900.12(e)(9)
- Surveys
Performance G. Spatial Resolution
H. CT Number Accuracy I. Artifact Evaluation
J. CT Number Uniformity
K. Dosimetry L. Gray Level
Performance of CT Acquisition Display Monitors
Tube Head Stability X
Collimation Acceptance Test (AT)
X AT
Center and Bucky Alignment
AT
Source to Imaging Receptor Distance
AT AT
Other performance tests recommended by the manufacturer or physicist
AT AT AT MQSA required medical physicist tests for certification.
21 CFR
900.12(e)(10) – Mammography
Equipment Evaluations
Monitoring
Medical Fluoroscopy Dental Mammography CT Ultrasound
Verification of preventive maintenance of devices.
X X X X As recommended by ACR, AIUM and IAC annual ultrasound physics testing is performed to ensure diagnostic equipment operates safely and accurately.
Tests should verify spatial resolution, contrast resolution, image uniformity, dead zone, and geometric accuracy.
Fluoroscopic system resolution
X
Fluoroscopic automatic brightness control performance (high-dose-rate, pulsed modes, field-of-view [FOV] variation
X
Fluoroscopic phantom image quality
X
Quality Control Review Repeat analysis X X X
See Above
Artifact Review X X X
XX
Diagnostic Workstation
- View boxes, image monitors, and viewing conditions
X X X X
Darkroom and screen cleanliness, darkroom fog, analysis of fixer retention, screen-film contact analysis
If Film/Screen Processing
If Film/Screen Processing
If Film/Screen Processing
Processor quality control (time, temperature, chemical, reference film for daily comparisons and manufacturer recommendations as needed.
If Film/Screen
If Film/Screen
If Film/Screen Processing
Computed Radiography and Digital Radiography (CR&DR) system performance – Uniformity. noise, contrast/sharpness, erasure
If CR&DR If CR&DR If CR&DR
Video and digital monitor performance
X X
Laser film printer quality control
As needed. As needed. As needed. As needed.
Exposure Indicator Analysis
If CR&DR If CR&DR If CR&DR
Integrity Test of Protective Clothing and other devices
Quality assurance log with record of observable quality variance and corrective action taken.
Completion of Service and Documentation:
On completion of all performance monitoring and testing services, the contractor’s representative shall brief the Radiology Supervisor for medical x-rays and Dental Director for dental x-ray tubes and provide documentation of all services that were performed; in addition a copy of the report is to be provided to the Radiology Supervisor, Bio-med, Clinical Director and the Division of Environmental Health Services (DEHS) Director of the Great Plains Area Office.
The documentation shall be a prepared form that provides at a minimum the following information:
A. Documents of the services performed for each item or system.
Results on Appropriateness Use Criteria audit:
1. Facility risk profile/stratification
2. Decision support system name/process type if available,
3. Exam prioritization selection,
4. Data sources available and reviewed,
5. Number of exams/data evaluated,
6. Number of exams lacking data needed for review,
7. Number of exams consistent, inconsistent, and undefined with appropriateness criteria,
8. Notable findings or facility comments,
9. Potential trends or areas for further facility QAPI/Medical Committee review,
10. Exams for which dose is/not reported, comparison of reported doses to diagnostic reference levels shall be in an easily readable format.
11. Shall be of ink or print type that can be photocopied on a standard copy machine.
B. Documentation shall include:
1. Facility Location
2. Names of key staff contacted, interviewed, and/or briefed while on site
3. Equipment Model Number
4. Equipment Manufacturer’s Serial Number
5. Location of Equipment
6. Date of Service
7. Type of service performed
8. Identification of methods and instrumentation and supplies used
9. Results of any tests or inspections performed
a. Automatic Exposure Level Standards based on latest Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD).
10. Provide for a check off or sign off to indicate “unit fully operational as specified by original manufacturer”.
11. If deficiencies in equipment or operation are found, corrective action plan is provided to Radiation Program Manager at each Service Unit and to the Director, DEHS.
12. Method of identifying Contractor’s service personnel
13. Block for local IHS Personnel to sign and date when service is complete.
5. Manner and Time of Conducting Work:
A. Contact the Service Unit Radiology Supervisor 30 days prior to service date for a brief consult and review of site conditions.
B. Contractor shall schedule visits with the Radiology Supervisor for medical x-rays and Dental Director for dental x-ray at least two weeks in advance of the proposed site visit.
C. Upon arrival at and before departing from the facility, the contractor’s representative shall physically check in with the Radiology Supervisor for medical x-rays and Dental Director for dental x-ray tubes.
6. Quality Assurance: The government procedures to verify that services being performed by Contractor are performed according to acceptable standards.
Quality Control: All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to ensure that the quality of and end Product or service shall meet contract requirements.
Place of Performance:
Rosebud IHS Service Unit PO Box 550 800 Hospital Drive Rosebud, SD 57555
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Designation/Point of Contact
The COR is responsible for monitoring the Contractor’s technical progress; interpreting the performance work statement; technical evaluations, inspections and acceptance required by this contract. Will assist the contractor in the resolution of technical problems encountered during performance of this contract.
The designated COR for this contract is:
TBD
Point of Contact:
TBD
Period of Performance: 1 year from the date of Award
Hours of Operation:
All work shall be performed during business hours of 8:00 am to 5:30 PM. Hours can differ if the facility is open for business 24/7 or if mutually agreed between the facility and contractor representative for the benefit of the surveyor. If a service has begun during regular business hours and it must be completed before any patients can be imaged according to the American College of Radiology (ACR), The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC), or the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), then the physicist must complete the service.
Invoice Submission:
Invoices submitted under any award resulting from this solicitation will be required to utilize the Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) in accordance with HHSAR 352.232-71, Electronic Submission and Processing of Payment Requests.
The IPP website address is: https://ww.ipp.gov. IPP Helpdesk: (866) 973-3131 (M-F 8AM to 6PM ET) Email:
IPPCustomerSupport@fiscal.treasury.gov
Contracting Authority
The Contracting Officer (CO) is the only person authorized to approve changes or modify any of the requirements of this contract.
The Contractor shall communicate with the CO on all matters pertaining to contract administration. Only the CO is authorized to make commitments or issue any modification to include (but not limited to) terms affecting price, quantity or quality performance of this contract. No person other than the Contracting Officer has authority to bind the Government with respect to this contract. No action or omission of any government employee or representative other than the Contracting Officer shall increase or decrease the scope of this contract or shall otherwise modify the terms and conditions of this contract. In no event shall any of the following be effective or binding on the Government or imputed to the Contracting Officer with respect to this contract: An understanding or agreement between the Contractor and anyone other than the Contracting Officer; A purported modification or change order issued by anyone other than the Contracting Officer; A promise by anyone other than the Contracting Officer to provide additional funding or make payments; or An order, direction, consent, or permission from anyone other than the Contracting Officer to: Incur costs in excess of a specified estimated cost, allotment of funds, or other ceiling; or expend hours in excess of a specified level of effort.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .