PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM.pdf

PDF 138 KB Posted

Attached to
Alaska Municipal Bond Bank Authority- RFP 2025-0400-0395- Financial Advisory Service
Solicitation number
2025-0400-0395
Issued by
Anchorage Municipality, Alaska

About this file

The document is a Proposal Evaluation Form for RFP Number 2025-0400-0395, designed to assess proposals for a financial advisory services contract with a Bond Bank. The evaluation form outlines a comprehensive scoring methodology across four key sections: Understanding of the Project (10%), Methodology Used for the Project (10%), Management Plan for the Project (10%), and Experience and Qualifications (20%), totaling 100 points. The evaluation process involves detailed scrutiny of the offeror's proposal, focusing on their comprehension of Bond Bank programs, methodology for delivering financial advisory services, project management approach, and the qualifications of personnel assigned to the project.

The evaluation criteria are structured to assess multiple dimensions of the proposal, including the offeror's experience with pooled conduit financing of municipal debt, ability to complete similar projects on time and within budget, personnel backgrounds, and overall feasibility of the proposed approach. Evaluators will examine the proposal's depth of understanding, logical methodology, clear lines of authority and communication, potential problem identification, and the firm's historical performance. The form provides space for detailed notes across each evaluation criterion, allowing for a thorough and nuanced assessment of each proposal's strengths and potential limitations.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM

All proposals will be reviewed for responsiveness and then evaluated using the criteria set out herein.

Offeror Name:

Evaluator Name:

Date of Review:

RFP Number: 2025-0400-0395

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SCORING

THE TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS USED TO SCORE THIS PROPOSAL IS 100

5.01 Understanding of the Project—10 Percent

Maximum Point Value for this Section - 10 Points

100 Points x 10 Percent = 10 Points

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below.

1) How well has the offeror demonstrated a thorough understanding of the Bond Bank programs and the financial advisor’s role to the Bond Bank?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

2) How well has the offeror identified pertinent issues and potential problems related to the assignment?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

3) Has the offeror demonstrated an understanding of the deliverables the Bond Bank expects it to provide?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

4) Has the offeror demonstrated an understanding of the Bond Bank's time schedule and can meet it?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

5) Are all potential conflicts disclosed and discussed?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR'S POINT TOTAL FOR 5.01: _________________

5.02 Methodology Used for the Project—10 Percent

Maximum Point Value for this Section - 10 Points

100 Points x 10 Percent = 10 Points

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below.

1) How comprehensive is the methodology and does it depict a logical approach to fulfilling the continued operation of the Bond Bank’s existing programs?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

2) How realistically and well does the methodology initiate, maintain, and continually deliver on the assignments set out in the RFP?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

3) For the specific examples requested in 4.04 is the response complete and inclusive in describing the financial advisor’s role?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

4) How well does the methodology interface with the time schedule in the proposal?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR'S POINT TOTAL FOR 5.02: _________________

5.03 Management Plan for the Project—10 Percent

Maximum Point Value for this Section - 10 Points

100 Points x 10 Percent = 10 Points

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below.

1) How well does the management plan support all of the project requirements and logically lead to the deliverables required in the RFP?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

2) How well is accountability completely and clearly defined?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

3) Is the organization of the project team clear?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

4) How well does the management plan illustrate the lines of authority and communication?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

5) To what extent does the offeror already have the hardware, software, equipment, and licenses necessary to perform the contract?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

6) Does it appear that offeror can meet the schedule set out in the RFP?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

7) Has the contractor gone beyond the minimum tasks necessary to meet the objectives of the

RFP?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

8) To what degree is the proposal practical and feasible?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

9) To what extent has the offeror identified potential problems?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR'S POINT TOTAL FOR 5.03: _________________

5.04 Experience and Qualifications—20 Percent

Maximum Point Value for this Section - 20 Points

100 Points x 20 Percent = 20 Points

Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below.

1) Questions regarding the personnel.

a) Do the individuals assigned to the project have experience on pooled conduit financing of municipal debt?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

b) Are resumes complete and do they demonstrate backgrounds that would be desirable for individuals engaged in the work the project requires?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

c) How extensive is the applicable education and experience of the personnel designated to work on the project?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

d) Has the primary designee participated in financings as described in 4.06?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

2) Questions regarding the firm.

a) How well has the firm demonstrated experience in completing similar projects on time and within budget?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

b) How successful is the general history of the firm regarding timely and successful completion of projects?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

c) Has the firm provided letters of reference from previous clients?

NOTES:_______________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR'S POINT TOTAL FOR 5.04: _________________

EVALUATOR'S COMBINED POINT TOTAL FOR ALL EVALUATED SECTIONS: _________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .