Professional_SDM-TAP_Grant_Scoring_Criteria.pdf
PDF 83 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Supported Decision Making Technical Assistance Program (SDM-TAP) Grant- Professional Implementation
- Solicitation number
- 0000031627
- Issued by
- California
About this file
This document is the SDM-TAP PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROFESSIONAL IMPLEMENTATION SCORING CRITERIA from the State Council on Developmental Disabilities (SCDD) in California. It outlines the scoring criteria for evaluating proposals submitted for the Supported Decision Making Technical Assistance Program (SDM-TAP) grant focused on professional implementation. The grant opportunity has a total of $430,000 available to fund project(s) that encourage and honor the implementation of supported decision making (SDM) within one or more professional focus areas, including the aging community, individuals with mental health issues, and individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. The scoring criteria evaluate proposals on elements such as the organization's qualifications, collaborative partners, project description, design, implementation plan, target population, diversity and disparities, work plan, deliverables, outcomes, impact, and evaluation.
The proposed budget is required to be reasonable and provide clear details on how it will adequately fund all elements of the proposal. The intended outcome of the grant is to effect systemic change that will increase professionals' awareness of and ability to honor SDM, allowing for successful implementation statewide, especially in underserved communities.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SDM-TAP PROPOSAL EVALUATION
PROFESSIONAL IMPLEMENTATION
SCORING CRITERIA
POINTS
Organization’s qualifications: The proposer has demonstrated experience, knowledge, and potential to accomplish all elements of the proposal, including SME qualifications.
Collaborative Partners: The proposal identifies at least 1 collaborative partner. 5
Project Description: The proposal meets the intent and need(s) identified in the proposed project description (i.e., the proposal thoroughly addresses the issue) related to SDM in the proposed professional implementation area(s).
New/Innovative Project: The proposal effectively utilizes existing SDM materials, applies research-based practices (i.e., best or promising practices) in the design and implementation, builds on evidence-based practices, and can be expanded.
Project Design: The proposal clearly identifies the design of the proposed project with a focus on replicability, including all types of activities planned and details on each activity type.
Implementation Plan: The proposal clearly identifies method(s) to achieve intended outcomes. 15
Target population: The proposal clearly/appropriately identifies its target population(s). 5
Diversity/Disparities: The proposal identifies how it will address/impact historically under-served and/or other underrepresented, marginalized, disadvantaged, and diverse communities for use of SDM in professional settings (i.e., ethnically, racially, culturally, linguistically, economically, etc.).
Region/Counties: The proposal identifies the targeted counties and rationale for serving those areas. 5
Work Plan and Timeline: The proposal clearly outlines the project plan across the proposed project period. 10
Deliverable(s)/Output(s): The proposal describes specific deliverables (i.e., curriculum, materials, resources, etc.). 10
Projected Number of People to be Reached: The proposal identifies the total number of people in professional settings to be served within groups listed in application table.
Outcomes: The proposal’s outcomes are designed to clearly identify, measure, and explain how it will meet the intent of the proposed project with a focus on systemic change.
Impact: The proposal clearly describes how it is designed to expand implementation of SDM and how it will impact the target professional implementation area(s).
Evaluation & Reporting: The proposal provides a clear and sound evaluation plan (includes data collection, program assessment and outcome analysis, and recommendations) as part of its bi-monthly and final reporting process.
Personnel Information: The proposal includes required supporting documentation for staff employed or anticipated to be employed by the project.
Budget: The proposed budget is reasonable, meets the stated requirements of the RFP, and provides clear details as to how it will adequately fund all elements of the proposal. 10
TOTAL SCORE: 160
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .