Presolicitation Notice 36C26024R0074_Attachment_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 112 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26024R0074
About this file
This document is a Presolicitation Notice for a federal contract opportunity. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Regional Procurement Office West (RPOW) Network Contracting Office 20 (NCO20) is seeking sources and intends to award a firm fixed price design contract for Architect-Engineering (A-E) services to perform investigative surveys and develop construction documents for the replacement of a reverse osmosis unit filtration system in Building 100, 5 West clinical unit at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System in Seattle, Washington. The A-E Services contract will be a 100% set-aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs). The anticipated contract award is in late August 2024 with a 273-calendar day period of performance for design completion. Interested SDVOSBs must submit a Standard Form 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications by May 24, 2024. The solicitation will be issued to the highest rated firm as a Request for Fee Proposal, and site visits will be authorized during the negotiation process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Presolicitation Notice 36C26024R0074_Attachment_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C26024R0074.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
VHA NETWORK CONTRACTING OFFICE 20 ● 1601 E. FOURTH PLAIN BLVD BLDG. 17, SUITE B428 ● VANCOUVER, WA
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
*All PPQs are not included in the 20 page limit for SF330 submissions.
SECTION 1
CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3
1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.
IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.
2. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Title: 663-24-102 Replace Reverse Osmosis Unit for Renal Dialysis – Seattle 5 West
CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT TYPE: Other if other: A-E Services
CONTRACT LOCATION: VA Puget Sound Health Care System (VAPSHCS), Seattle, Washington 98108-1532
AWARD DATE: 8/30/2024
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.
FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Regional Procurement Office West (RPOW) Network Contracting Office 20 (NCO20) is seeking sources and intends to award a firm fixed price design contract for Architect-Engineering (A-E) services to perform investigative surveys to verify as-built conditions required in order to fully develop construction documents for the site preparation, demolition, new construction, and renovation to clinical unit 5 West of Building 100 which reflect removal of the old water treatment systems and designing, upgrading, and adapting the existing layout and utilities within the current water treatment and acid distribution rooms in order to bring them into line with the specifications required to house a new reverse-osmosis unit filtration unit. AE shall meet VA internal integrated project team to aid in the selection of a new reverse-osmosis unit from approved national contracts at the initial phase of the design, Seattle VA has the final authority to approve or disapprove the selection of a new reverse-osmosis unit, approximately 375 square feet of renovation to the aforementioned water treatment space, and an additional limited renovation to approximately 325 square feet of patient space, predominately for cutting holes in the wall to facilitate the removal of old and instillation of new water distribution piping and hardware as well as subsequently patching the walls back up to current VA Interior Design standards.
HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.
SECTION 2
EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror identified above for award of the Replace Reverse Osmosis Unit for Renal Dialysis – Seattle 5 West – 36C26024R0074.
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation. Please verify the accuracy of the information in Section 1 and complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. VHA-PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.
Please return your completed questionnaire to the Offeror to be incorporated into the SF330 submission. PPQs should NOT be submitted directly to VHA NCO 20 by the client. Refer to the solicitation for SF330 submission due date.
EVALUATOR INFORMATION
NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.
POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.
EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.
DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:
1. QUALITY
| Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
3. COMMUNICATION
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes and responsiveness to client requests) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR
| Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project) |
| Choose an item. |
| Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT
| Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Ability to manage subcontracting effort, including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance
Choose an item.
Comments:
7. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below. |
| Choose an item. |
| Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| Choose an item. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
| EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: |
| DATE: |
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
*THIS PAGE WILL BE REMOVED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE SF330 PAGE COUNT – IT IS FOR PPQ COMPLETION PURPOSES ONLY*
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Outstanding |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective. |
| Above Average |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were satisfactory. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the Offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
image1.tiff
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .