PPQ - Minor Design IP Pharmacy Columbia.docx

DOCX document 104 KB Posted

Attached to
C1DA--523-432 Construct New Inpatient Pharmacy Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C77624R0004
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Technology Acquisition Center Austin

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire (PPQ) template for a federal contractor to evaluate past work completed for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Technology Acquisition Center Austin. The VA is considering awarding the contractor the Electronic Health Record Modernization Infrastructure Upgrades Design Project at the Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System in New Orleans. The PPQ requests information on a previous contract to assess the contractor's ability to perform the new project, which involves design work. It prompts the evaluator to provide adjectival ratings and comments on factors such as quality, schedule, communication, management, cost control, and subcontract oversight from the past project. The evaluator is also asked if they would hire or work with the contractor again in the future.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to C1DA--523-432 Construct New Inpatient Pharmacy, newest first.
File Type Posted
SOW Attachment 06 - AE Submission Instructions.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 04 - Sensitive Infrastructure.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 10 - Underground Utilities Map.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 08 - WR Campus Map.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 07 - Legionella Sensitive Infrastructure.pdf PDF
SOW Attachment 05 - CPM Schedule.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 03 - General Design Comments.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 01 - Req Div 01 Specs Section.docx DOCX document
36C77624R0004_1.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 11 - Electrical Background and Noise Study.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 02 - PG 18-12 Pharmacy Service.pdf PDF
SOW Construct New Inpatient Pharmacy.docx DOCX document
SOW Attachment 09 - SHPO Notification Guide.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

VA PROGRAM CONTRACTING ACTIVITY CENTRAL ● 6150 OAK TREE BLVD SUITE 300 ● INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

*All PPQs are included in the page count for SF 330 submissions.

SECTION 1

CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3

1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.

ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.

PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.

IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.

2. CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT TITLE: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTRACT TYPE: Choose an item.

if other:

CONTRACT LOCATION: Click or tap here to enter text.

AWARD DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.

ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.

ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.

EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.

ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATION PRICE: Click or tap here to enter text.

ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.

FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.

EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.

HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.

SECTION 2

EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror identified above for award of the Electronic Health Record Modernization Infrastructure Upgrades Design Project at the SLVHCS in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation. Please verify the accuracy of the information in Section 1 and complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. VHA-PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.

Please return your completed questionnaire to the Offeror to be incorporated into the SF 330 submission. PPQs should not be submitted directly to VHA PCAC by the client. Refer to the solicitation for SF 330 submission due date.

EVALUATOR INFORMATION

NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.

POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.

ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.

EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.

DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.

*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:

1. QUALITY

Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance
Choose an item.
Comments:

2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.)
Choose an item.
Comments:

3. COMMUNICATION

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes and responsiveness to client requests)
Choose an item.
Comments:

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR

Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project)
Choose an item.
Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract)
Choose an item.
Comments:

5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT

Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price
Choose an item.
Comments:

6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

Ability to manage subcontracting effort, including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance

Choose an item.

Comments:

7. SUMMARY

Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below.
Choose an item.
Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
Choose an item.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:
DATE:

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

*THIS PAGE WILL BE REMOVED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE SF 330 PAGE COUNT – IT IS FOR PPQ COMPLETION PURPOSES ONLY*

Rating
Definition
Outstanding
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective.
Above Average
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective.
Satisfactory
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the Offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract.

image1.tiff

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .