PP Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Home Oxygen Services and Ventilation - VA Central California Healthcare System (VACCHCS)
- Solicitation number
- 36C26126Q0444
About this file
This is a Past Performance Information Questionnaire template used by the Department of Veterans Affairs to evaluate contractor performance for a Home Oxygen Services and Ventilation contract with VA Central California Healthcare System (VACCHCS), Solicitation Number 36C26126Q0444. Offerors must submit completed questionnaires to david.alvarez4@va.gov no later than April 17, 2026, and include copies with their proposal submission. The questionnaire must be completed by evaluators (individuals with direct knowledge of the contractor's performance) and returned directly to the evaluation email address by the specified deadline.
The form assesses past performance using a standardized five-point rating scale: Outstanding (O), Above Average (A), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), and Unacceptable (U). Evaluators rate 19 criteria covering contract compliance, timeliness, labor and safety standards, management effectiveness, staff integrity, personnel practices, quality control, training compliance, flexibility, reliability, technical responsiveness, invoicing accuracy, professionalism, and responsiveness to requests. The questionnaire also includes yes/no questions regarding cure notices, contract award likelihood, customer satisfaction, and problem notification. Evaluators must provide additional remarks if ratings are Marginal or Unacceptable, and the evaluator's identity is protected under Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.301-1, with responses considered source selection sensitive information.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26126Q0444 0002 CANX.pdf | ||
| 36C26126Q0444 Questions and Responses.pdf | ||
| 36C26126Q0444 CLINS Price Per Unit.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan 4-3-2026.pdf | ||
| 36C26126Q0444 0001.pdf | ||
| PP Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan - VA Fresno.pdf | ||
| 36C26126Q0444.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Information
OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate record must be completed for each Past Performance Information and Survey; Offeror must directly send to the evaluator, requesting they complete and return as indicated on the attached Past Performance Survey, no later than, April 17, 2026 to david.alvarez4@va.gov . Further, Offeror must include a copy of each requested Past Performance Information page with proposal submission.
Name of Offeror being evaluated:
Address of Offeror:
Contract Details (i.e. Contract #/ Delivery or Task Order #, Title, Location, etc)
Evaluator’s Full Name:
Evaluator’s Position held or function in relation to project:
Evaluator’s Company/Organization Name, Address and Phone number:
Evaluator’s email address:
Please complete and return to: david.alvarez4@va.gov No Later Than: April 17, 2026
Past Performance Survey
Reference Instructions: The Department of Veterans Affairs is considering the Offeror listed above for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) 15.301-1 prohibits the release of the names of the individuals providing reference information about the Offeror’s past performance. Survey should be completed by the evaluator and returned to david.alvarez4@va.gov, no later than the above date.
Please evaluate the Past Performance using only the following ratings without variation. If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
O = Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded contract requirements
A = Above Average = Performance exceeded contract requirements
S = Satisfactory = Performance met contract requirements
M = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
U = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements
NOTE: Do not use a color marking pen to circle the response. Best to use a ball point pen (Black or Blue) to circle your response.
Describe exactly what type of temporary staffing or similar service(s) were provided to your company/organization?
Length of the Service (Provide dates):
| Rate the following questions if the company provided temporary medical staffing or similar services. Provide information/comments in the Remarks Section below. |
| Circle One |
Q1. To what extent did the contractor comply with contract requirements?
O A S M U
Q2. How timely was the contractor’s performance?
O A S M U
Q3. How well did the contractor comply with the labor and safety standards?
O A S M U
Q4. Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s management of the contract?
O A S M U
Q5. Rate the contractor’s handling of staff integrity issues.
O A S M U
Q6. Rate the contractor’s personnel management practices.
O A S M U
Q7. Quality Control: Rate the overall quality of contractor’s work.
O A S M U
Q8. How well did the contractor comply with the training requirements with respect to its employees?
O A S M U
Q9. What extent was contractor flexible in responding to changing needs?
O A S M U
Q10. To what extent was the contractor reliable?
O A S M U
Q11. To what extent was the Contractor responsive to technical directions?
O A S M U
Q12. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, explain on the following page.
Yes No
Q13. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, explain on the following page.
Yes No
Q14. Was the customer satisfied with the service provided? If no, explain on the following page.
Yes No
Q15. To what extent did contractor notify you of problems of potential issues?
O A S M U
| Q16. Did the Contractor submit accurate invoices during the performance period? |
| Yes No |
| Q17. Was the contractor professional and courteous in its interaction with you? |
| Yes No |
| Q18. Did the contractor respond promptly to requests? |
| Yes No |
| Q19. Did the contractor meet all expectations under the contract? |
| Yes No |
Past Performance Survey – Remarks Section
Evaluator’s Additional Remarks regarding services:
Signature of Evaluator: Date of Evaluation:
Print Name of Evaluator:
Please email scanned copy directly to david.alvarez4@va.gov Do NOT return survey to the company you are evaluating
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .