PID N65236-26-RFPREQ-LSUBP00080-0002 Market Survey.pdf
PDF 216 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N65236-26-RFPREQ-LSUBP00080-0002
About this file
This is a Market Survey (MS) issued by the Naval Information Warfare Center, Atlantic (NIWC Atlantic) to assess marketplace capabilities for Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Test, Evaluation, Training, and Range Services supporting C6ISR Systems.
The procurement seeks contractors to provide E3 test, evaluation, training, and range services at NIWC Atlantic with potential travel to CONUS and OCONUS locations. The estimated effort is approximately 15 Full-Time Equivalents per year (28,800 hours annually). The Government anticipates a firm-fixed price contract with pre-priced contract line items for labor and calibration, and cost-reimbursement CLINs for material and travel, structured as a five-year ordering period with possible indefinite delivery indefinite quantity single-award contract consideration. This is a follow-on to predecessor support contract services. The estimated dollar range is >$10 million to $50 million. The applicable NAICS code is 541330 (Engineering Services) with a $41 million size standard under the Military and Aerospace Equipment and Military Weapons exception. Contractors must achieve and maintain CMMC Level 2 (Self) certification for all information systems processing, storing, or transmitting Federal Contract Information or Controlled Unclassified Information. Secret clearances are required for the majority of personnel, with all other personnel requiring a minimum Secret clearance. Responses are due by November 4, 2026, at 12:00 PM Eastern, with questions due by October 30, 2026, at 12:00 PM Eastern. Responses must include corporate description, corporate capabilities, completed capability assessment tables, and 1–4 citations of current and relevant contract experience demonstrating past performance and management infrastructure. The Government reserves the right to consider a set-aside for small businesses or small business preference groups.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PID N65236-26-RFPREQ-LSUBP00080-0002 Draft PWS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Market Survey (MS) for Services Procurements Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3), Test, Evaluation, Training, and Range
Services Support of Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C6ISR) Systems
REFERENCE NUMBER: PID#N65236-26-RFPREQ-LSUBP00080-0002
1. This MS is issued for the purpose of assessing large and small business capabilities.
Business firms having the capabilities to perform the tasking described in this MS are encouraged to respond. It should be noted that any resultant set aside contract will include the applicable limitations on subcontracting clause. If responding using similarly situated entities (SSEs), as defined in FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, the small business prime will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance to subcontractors that are not SSEs. See FAR Clauses: 52.219-27 - Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set- Aside 52.219-3 - Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole Source Award); 52.219-29 – Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Economically Disadvantaged Women- Owned Small Business Concerns; 52.219-30 – Notice of Set-Aside for, or Sole Source Award to, Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program. Note: The respondent (prime) proposing an SSE arrangement will need to have the infrastructure and resources in place to manage the entire contract and task order(s).
2. The contractor will be tasked to accomplish the work as specified in the draft Performance Work Statement (PWS) posted on the Governmentwide Point of Entry
(GPE).
A. The Naval Information Warfare Center, Atlantic (NIWC Atlantic) is issuing this MS for determining marketplace capabilities and is soliciting information from potential sources to provide E3 Test, Evaluation, Training, and Range Services support of C6ISR Systems at NIWC Atlantic, with potential travel to several CONUS and OCONUS locations identified in the draft PWS.
B. The Government anticipates this effort to be a firm-fixed price (FFP) type contract with pre-priced contract line-item numbers (CLINs) for labor and calibration, and cost-reimbursement only CLINs for material and travel for a five
(5) year ordering period. In addition, an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity single award contract is being considered for this requirement. This is a follow-on contract with services currently being performed under the predecessor support contract for Program Management, Engineering, Technical Documentation, and Integrated Logistics Support Services for the Test and Evaluation Efforts of E3 of C6ISR Systems at NIWC Atlantic.
C. The Government’s estimated level of effort for this procurement, based upon Full
Time Equivalents (FTE’s) will be approximately 15 per year. Each FTE is estimated to be 1,920 hours per year.
http://www.sam.gov/ http://www.sam.gov/
D. The Government’s estimated dollar range for this effort is: >$10M - $50M
E. The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is
541330 with a size standard of $41 million under the Military and Aerospace Equipment and Military Weapons exception with no maximum number of employee definition.
F. The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) status the contractor must have or exceed at time of contract award and maintain for the duration of the effort is CMMC Level 2 (Self) for all information systems that will be used in performance of this effort to process, store or transmit Federal Contract Infornation (FCI) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
3. Responses shall be prepared so that, when printed, they meet the following requirements: 8.5x11 inch paper, single-spaced typed lines, 1 inch margins, 12 point Times New Roman font. Tables may use 10-point font. Graphics or pictures are not allowed. Illustrations such as tables, flowcharts, organizational charts, process charts or other similar type informational charts may be used, and they will be counted against the page count limitations. Text entered into the Relevant Contract Experience Matrix, Attachment 1 shall be single spaced Times New Roman 10-point font. Respondents are responsible for ensuring the legibility of all tables, charts, and all documentation, and should assume that when their response is printed or copied, it will be done in black and white. When submitted, the format of Table 1 shall not be changed from how it appears in this document.
4. Responses shall include a Corporate Description section and a Corporate Experience section as described below (including SSE and Joint Venture (JV) if proposed).
Section 1: Corporate Description. Capability Responses must include all of the following information:
(1) Name of firm (prime)
(2) State the respondent’s size status and whether the respondent is registered in the applicable NAICS code listed in paragraph 2E above (for SSE(s) list the NAICS Code and size status for the NAICS code the prime contractor assigned to the effort the subcontractor will perform).
(3) Ownership (include SSE(s) or JV if applicable), including whether: Small, Small Disadvantaged, 8(a), Women-Owned, HUBZone, Veteran Owned or Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Business or both;
(4) Two points of contact, including: Name, title, phone, and e-mail address
(5) Commercial and Government Entity Code and Unique Entity Identifier (include
SSE(s) or JV if applicable)
(6) Affiliate information, including parent corporation, SSE(s), JV partners, potential teaming partners, or subcontractors.
(7) A completed Table 1. Table 1 is a listing of the percentage of work a respondent can perform with respect to the stated requirements based on the respondent’s capabilities. This is an assessment and analysis of a respondent’s independent abilities as to what they can or cannot perform – exclusive of any potential subcontractor and team member information. Do not include any documentation or percentages for any company other than your own. For respondents planning to propose an SSE arrangement that complies with the requirements set forth in 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting, or JV, Table 1 must be completed for each of the SSE(s) or JV members. In this case, additional Table 1 listings may be submitted on additional pages. If the prime contractor is planning to propose an SSE(s) or JV arrangement, the prime will also provide a summary table representing the combined percentage of the task that the prime and SSE(s) or JV members can perform (this value cannot exceed 100%). Respondents shall fill in Columns B and C of Table 1.
a. The percentages listed in Column A represent the Government’s estimated percentage of effort in each technical area that will be required relative to the overall effort of the contract.
b. Entries in Column B reflect the percentage work in each technical area that a respondent can accomplish as described above. The values in each of the rows of this column will be between 0 and 100%.
c. Values in Column C represent the percentages of the overall contract that the respondent can accomplish in each task area. For each task area, this is determined by multiplying the percentage listed in Column A with the percentage entered in Column B. The sum of the values in Column C represents the percentage of the overall contract that the respondent can accomplish. This value cannot exceed 100%.
Functional Area
Tasking Description (with
PWS/SOW/SOO
Paragraph Reference)
Column A Percentage of
Functional Area Effort in the Overall Task
(Gov Est)
Column B Respondent’s
Projected Level of Effort in each
Functional Area
Column C Respondent’s
Projected Level of Overall Task Effort
(Col A) x (Col B)
A Program Management Support (Para 3.2)
5%
B Engineering Support (Para 3.3)]
75%
C Training Support (Para 3.3.6) 15%
D Technical Support (Para 3.3.7, 3.4) 5%
Totals * 100% *The Sum of the values in Column C represent the percentage of the task that the respondent can perform as the prime or SSE.
TABLE 1 – Respondent’s Level of Effort Capability
(8) Respondents (including SSE(s) or JV members) shall submit at least one, and no more than four (prime and SSE(s) or JV combined), citations of current and relevant work performed (see Attachment 1). The purpose for the prime respondent is to demonstrate the prime’s management infrastructure, capacity to procure, and ability to execute and manage an effort that corresponds to the technical tasking. The purpose for SSE(s) and JV members is to provide relevant experience and past performance for the technical tasking. This information is not part of the description of the corporate capabilities for technical requirements listed in the Draft PWS.
a. Current work is defined as work performed within the 3 years before the posting date of this MS.
b. Common aspects of relevancy include similarity of services and support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract and teaming.
Experienced Department of Defense Program Management and Technical support is required. Specialized subject matter engineering experience is required for work in the Electromagnetic Environmental Effects field. Secret clearances will be required for the majority of personnel performing work stated in the PWS. All other personnel, at a minimum, must posses a Secret clearance to support this contract.
c. Information for each customer shall be provided by completing the Relevant Contract Experience Matrix provided in Attachment 1.
(9) Provide facility clearance level of the prime.
(10) Provide CMMC status type and current status for CMMC unique identifier(s) that would be used in performance of this effort to process, store or transmit FCI or CUI.
Section 2: Corporate Capabilities. To demonstrate the capability to perform percentages stated in Table 1 respondents shall summarize the work their company, employees or partnership has performed relevant to this planned requirement by demonstrating their experience and capabilities as described in the attached Draft PWS.
The definitions of current and relevant as listed in section 1 paragraph 4(8) above apply to the experience and capabilities cited in the response to this section. Respondents planning to propose an SSE arrangement that complies with the requirements set forth in 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting or JV arrangement shall submit each company’s experience and capabilities that are part of that SSE(s) or JV arrangement.
5. This notice is for planning purposes only and is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government. This is not a solicitation announcement. No reimbursement will be made for costs associated with providing information in response to this announcement.
The Government reserves the right to consider a set-aside for small businesses or one of the small business preference groups (e.g., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB, etc.).
6. Questions and responses to this MS shall be submitted to NIWC Atlantic via e-mail to Bryce Wasser at Bryce.w.wasser.civ@us.navy.mil and Blair Walker at blair.m.walker3.civ@us.navy.mil using reference No. PID#N65236-26-RFPREQ-mailto:Bryce.w.wasser.civ@us.navy.mil mailto:blair.m.walker3.civ@us.navy.mil
LSUBP00080-0002. Responses that do not conform to the MS instructions may not be considered by the Government. Questions submitted after the specified date may not receive responses.
a. The closing date for this MS is: 04 November 2026
b. The closing time for this MS is: 12:00PM Eastern
c. The deadline for submission of questions is 30 October 2026 12:00 PM Eastern.
7. Within a reasonable time after evaluation of responses, NIWC Atlantic will post the acquisition strategy decision on the GPE.
8. Contractor support will not be utilized in support of the review and evaluation of MS responses.
Attachment 1: Relevant Contract Experience Matrix Respondents Company Name: Responding as Prime, SSE or JV:
1. Customer Point of Contact (POC) (Name;
Government agency, commercial firm, or other organization) Name:
Agency:
2. Customer POC Phone Number / Email (This information is required to verify offeror’s performance) Phone:
Email:
3. Contract Number or other control number Xx
4. Period of Performance From: To:
5. Contract Type (CPFF, FFP etc.)
Xx
6. Prime or Sub
7. Contract Value / Obligated Amount
$XX / $XX
8. Provide brief summary of the work performed.
Xx
9. Describe how the work demonstrates capability to perform percentages stated in Table 1 (For primes (only), describe management infrastructure, capacity to procure, and ability to execute and manage the effort).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .