SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK/PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Work under this performance-based contract will be performed in accordance with the following description/ specifications/ statement of work (SOW) which herein will be referred to as Performance Work Statement (PWS):

SHORT TITLE: Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3), Test, Evaluation, and Range Services Support of C6ISR Systems

1.0 PURPOSE

1.1 SCOPE

This PWS will support Test and Evaluation efforts of Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) of C6ISR systems vital to the integration, and support to the warfighter. Performance of this work requires strong technical understanding and application of engineering principles regarding the effects of electromagnetic (EM) radiation and EM spectrum.

Additional engineering testing will include Test and Evaluation efforts supporting the TEMPEST Program and Protected Distribution Systems (PDS) Inspections and Certifications; Environmental Test and Evaluation efforts will include shock/vibration, altitude, salt fog, and temperature/humidity testing.

Test and Evaluation (T&E) requires site surveys at physical locations as well as modeling and simulation of sites and equipment sets. Testing that is within the scope of this effort necessitates the application of extensive knowledge of many types of specialized test equipment. Additionally, intimate understanding of data reduction equipment and the use of intensive analytical skills are staples in the efforts to develop reports that provide recommendations to protect systems and equipment from degraded performance due to electromagnetic source emissions.

This PWS will support Goal 4 objectives of the “The Navy’s Information Dominance Roadmap for Electromagnetic Spectrum Usage” (EMSU), and the Electromagnetic Environmental Effect (E3) and Spectrum Management (SM) Navy Training System Plan (NTSP) efforts in providing vital Shipboard Electromagnetic Compatibility Improvement Program (SEMCIP) support to the warfighter. This PWS will also support the Secretary of Defense’s Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy Goal 3: “Pursue Total Force EMS Readiness.”

1.1.1 Multiple Funding

This contract will allow multiple appropriation on a single task order; funding requirements will be specified at task order level.

1.2 BACKGROUND

Naval Information Warfare Center (NIWC) Atlantic has been tasked to provide program management, engineering, technical documentation, and integrated logistics support services relating to electromagnetic environmental effect (E3). The technical services provided under this requirement will support overall analytical and technical products to include engineering and technical analysis for Command, Control, Communications , Computers, Cyber-defense, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C6ISR) E3 programs and systems.

2.0 PLACE(S) OF PERFORMANCE

2.1 GOVERNMENT FACILITIES

Government facilities (i.e., office space or lab space) are provided to those contractor personnel that would otherwise adversely affect the work performance if they were not available on Government site. Labor categories with supplied Government facilities shall be located at NIWC Atlantic in Charleston, SC. Contractor personnel assigned space within Government facilities shall provide support in accordance with the following requirements.

2.1.1 Access to Government facilities

NIWC Atlantic and other Government installations have restricted access. Contractors are limited to access during certain days and times as specified in the workweek requirements of this PWS. If access to the assigned Government facility is restricted due to safety/security exercise, an Executive Order, or an administrative leave determination applying to the local activity (e.g., inclement weather), the contractor, in agreement with the COR, shall make alternative work arrangements. The contractor shall adjust work schedule or work at an alternate location. If alternate work arrangements cannot be accommodated, the contractor shall notify the COR of the inability to access the assigned facility prior to charging their time to the contract as direct cost provided such charges are consistent with the contractor’s accounting practices. The ability to work at an alternate location that is not a Government or contractor facility site is dependent on the contractor having an alternative work site agreement with the employee. The ability to work at an alternate location may not be an option for certain support services.

2.1.2 Training Requirements and Exercise Support

Contractor personnel working full-time or partially at a Government facility shall complete all applicable training requirements as specified under Mandatory Training, PWS Para 8.0. Contractor personnel may also be required to participate in safety, security (e.g., Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (AT/FP)), and operational training exercises (possibly two per year). Applicable contractor personnel shall support and participate in the training exercise which may include role-playing and reacting to exercise injects based on the situation or exercise objectives.

2.1.3 Alternate work locations from Government facilities

The ability to provide support from an alternate location (includes working from an employee’s residence or other contractor facility) versus from a Government facility is dependent on the type of support provided, the contractor employee’s ability and trustworthiness, and the company’s employment policy. The ability to work at an alternate location is not an option for all positions and personnel. The ultimate decision to allow work performed at an alternate work location will be determined by the COR at the task order level. If alternate work locations are allowed, a contractor employee can work at an alternate location if their company has defined minimum criteria consisting of secure connectivity access and an established signed agreement between the company and employee.

Contractor employees requesting an alternate location shall submit a request to the COR that includes the time and date the work will be accomplished; the nature of the work with the referenced support PWS task paragraph; the reason the work must be accomplished at an alternate location; and include a copy of their company agreement for the contract files. The Government reserves the right to disallow any billable hours by contractor employees working at an alternative work location without obtaining Government approval and the Government reserves the right to discontinue the ability to work from an alternate location at any time without cause.

2.1.4 Emergency Management at Government Installations

During emergency situations including health (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic) and weather-related circumstances, contractor personnel with scheduled access to a Government installation shall coordinate with the COR prior to reporting to their Government worksite. Access will be in accordance with the latest Government installation requirements and restrictions. The contractor shall identify with the COR if certain personnel are designated mission essential and determine the work expectations during the emergency period of performance. Depending on the type of support, working from an alternative worksite may or may not be allowed. To the extent possible, contractor personnel shall follow the same requirements and restrictions as Government civilian personnel at the same facility/installation in order to continue work or return to the Government workplace; requirements include, but not limited to, quarantining, completing/submitting questionnaire, and medical screening/testing prior to entering a Government facilities.

2.2 CONTRACTOR FACILITIES

The contractor shall have a facility (i.e., office space, laboratory space, staging, and storage areas, with or without classified storage) in order to accomplish task order objectives. Depending on the type of support required at the task order level, contractor shall be required to possess or establish facilities at specific locations. Any necessary contractor facilities requirements will be identified at the task order level.

3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

The following paragraphs list non-personal services tasks that will be required throughout the contract. The contractor shall provide necessary resources with knowledge and experience as cited in the personal qualification requirement to support the listed tasks. The contractor shall perform requirements in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and/or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) that do not include performance of inherently Government functions. The contractor shall complete all required tasks while controlling and tracking performance and goals in terms of costs, schedules, and resources.

3.1. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

The contractor shall have demonstrated experience in conducting Electromagnetic Interference/Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI/EMC) test and evaluations, TEMPEST testing and surveys, PDS inspections, theoretical analysis to determine RADHAZ (Radiation Hazards) effects as well as site surveys that provide measurement data, proficient in MATLAB and ANSYS (EMIT 5.x) software modeling and simulation tools, and Environmental tests.

The Contractor shall develop EMI/EMC training for the Department of the Navy. The performance requirements are listed in sections 3.2 through 3.3 of the PWS and will provide a more detailed list of tasks that are required.

3.1.1 Systems and Equipment

The contactor shall provide functional and technical expertise supporting Testing and Evaluation of a wide range of Department of the Navy (DoN) and Department of Defense (DoD) systems as the tests relate to E3 subject matter expert (SME) knowledge areas. Systems will include communication/transceivers, radar platforms, and information technology gateways. E3 SME knowledge areas of testing are defined in section 3.3.

3.2. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The contractor shall provide the project management necessary to direct the timely and efficient performance of requirements of this contract as specified in individual task orders written under this basic contract.

3.2.1 Program Support

The contractor shall work closely with the government project manager supporting the needs of the program at the sponsor level. As specified in individual task orders, developing agenda items, attending at high-level meetings, generating minutes, and tracking action items may be required as per paragraph 3.3.6.4. Program support will require significant coordination and interface with various DOD and non-DOD activities located in and out of

CONUS.

3.2.2 Program Support Documentation

The contractor shall develop and draft various program management (PM) documents (CDRL A001). The following documents are typical PM deliverables that the Contractor shall have knowledge writing:

• Statement of Work or Performance Work Statement

• Cost Estimation

• Meeting Agenda and Minutes

• Plans of Action and Milestone

• Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

• Various Program Acquisition related documents: Mission Needs Statement (MNS), Capability Production

Documentation (CPD), Operational Requirements Document (ORD), Trip reports (TR) etc.

3.3. TEST, EVALUATION, AND RANGE SERVICES

3.3.1 Radio Frequency Test Facility

The contractor shall work closely with the government project manager supporting the needs of the program at the sponsor level. As specified in individual task orders, coordination of meetings, preparing budget drills, developing agenda items, attending high-level meetings, generating minutes, and tracking action items may be required. Other support may require a contractor to recommend policies, doctrine, tactics, and procedures at the Federal, State, and

Local level given their past expert opinion or using analysis of actual outcomes. Program support may require significant coordination and interface with various DOD and non-DOD activities.

3.3.1.1 2-D/3-D Testing

3.3.1.1.1 2D Antenna The contractor shall perform an instrumented test at the Radio Frequency Test Facility using the approved test plan for this test in accordance with (IAW) IEEE 149 Standard Test Procedures for Antennas. The purpose of 2D antenna pattern and gain testing is to fully document the receiving and transmit capability of the antenna(s) under test around the entire 360-degree azimuth, 0 degrees elevation of the test vehicle or the antenna in a standalone configuration. Testing is performed for vertical polarizations at a specified receive antenna height and distance.

Antenna pattern testing identifies coverage dropouts due to the antenna installation, vehicle related scattering and coupling between co-located antennas.

The contractor shall be responsible for the following:

• Determine the size and weight of Antenna under Test (AUT).

• Determine number of AUTs.

• Determine the frequency band for each AUT.

• Determine the degree azimuth, (every 5◦, 10◦, etc.) of data collection.

• Determine the installation platform(s) of each AUT. (Vehicle Mounted or Standalone Test)

• Incorporate the 2D antenna testing data into a Formal Test Report.

• The contractor shall perform the associated routine maintenance listed in the Maintenance Schedule and

Planned Maintenance, Attachment 2A and 2B prior to the scheduled test event. Completed maintenance will be documented on the schedule.

3.3.1.1.2 3D Antenna The contractor shall perform an instrumented test at the activity using the approved test plan for this test IAW IEEE 149 Standard Test Procedures for Antennas. The purpose of 3D Antenna testing is for the collection and analysis of spherical near field data. The antenna test range consists of a 20 ft. diameter vehicle turntable with a composite gantry arm. In antenna measurement terms, this range configuration is referred to as a gantry over turntable (azimuth) collection system. During data collection, the turntable rotates the antenna/vehicle under test (AUT) from 0 to 360 degrees, while a dual polarized probe mounted on the gantry arm is used to measure the amplitude and phase of the AUT for two orthogonal polarizations. The gantry arm moves the dual polarized probe from 0 to 90 degrees at a fixed radius with respect to the center of the turntable. Using this collection system, a hemispherical radiation pattern of the AUT will be collected.

The contractor will be responsible for the following:

• Determine the size and weight of Antenna under Test (AUT).

• Determine number of AUTs.

• Determine the frequency band for each AUT.

• Determine the sampling interval of data collection.

• Determine the installation platform(s) of each AUT. (Vehicle Mounted or Standalone Test)

• Incorporate the 3D antenna testing data into a Formal Test Report.

• The contractor shall perform the associated routine maintenance listed in the Maintenance Schedule and

3.3.1.2 Communications Testing

The contractor shall perform an instrumented test at the activity using the approved test plan for this test IAW MILSTD-188C Military Communications System Technical Standards. The objective of this test is to characterize the degradation in reception range for vehicle-mounted radios in the presences of other transmitted radio signals.

The contractor will be responsible for the following:

• Determine the radio configuration for the vehicle under test.

• Ensure required trained personnel are available to operate the equipment.

• Determine number of radios.

• Determine the frequency band for each radio to be tested.

• Determine the sampling interval of data collection.

• Incorporate the Commutations testing data into a Formal Test Report.

• The contractor shall perform the associated routine maintenance listed in the Maintenance Schedule and

3.3.1.3 Co-Site Testing

The contractor shall perform an instrumented test at the activity using the approved test plan for this test IAW IEEE 149 Standard Test Procedures for Antennas. Co-Site testing identifies the Radio Frequency (RF) isolation between installed systems. Based on the measurements made assessments can be made on adverse impacts to equipment.

Strong RF signals can potentially damage sensitive receiver front ends/ amplifiers and/or degrade receiver performance. The impact to system performance is dependent on the transmitter output power, transmitter frequency range, antenna isolation and the receiver characteristics.

The contractor will be responsible for the following:

• Determine number of Antennas under Test (AUTs).

• Determine the frequency band for each AUT.

• Determine the installation platform(s) of each AUT.

• Determine equipment the antennas are connected to.

• Determine Pass/Fail criteria.

• Incorporate the Co-Site antenna testing data into a Formal Test Report.

• The contractor shall perform the associated routine maintenance listed in the Maintenance Schedule and

3.3.1.4 EMC Testing

The contractor shall perform an instrumented test at the activity using the approved test plan for this test IAW MIL- STD-464 / MIL-STD-461. The purpose of this test is to evaluate potential receive degradation of receivers on a platform due to the use of equipment co-located on the same platform. The measurements will be made using installed C4I antennas and cables (if available). If not available then a calibrated reference antenna and cables, the same length and material of the installed cable will be used. The measurements made are a direct reading of the level of radiated EMI from a specific source to a specific C4I system installed on the vehicle.

The contractor will be responsible for the following:

• Determine what equipment is installed in the Vehicle under Test (VUT).

• Determine number of Antennas under Test (AUTs).

• Determine the frequency band for each AUT.

• Determine the power on sequence for the VUT installed equipment.

• Incorporate the EMC testing data into a Formal Test Report.

• The contractor shall perform the associated routine maintenance listed in the Maintenance Schedule and

3.3.1.5 Instrumented RADHAZ Testing

The contractor shall perform an instrumented survey IAW NAVSEA OP 3565/NAVAIR 16-1-529 Volume 1/2 at the activity using the approved test plan. All measurements shall be recorded with the conditions under which they were made (e.g., emitter output power, test point location, antenna correction factor, cable loss, etc.). For each emitter, the actual RADHAZ safe separation distances shall be determined and any potential problem identified.

3.3.1.6 Site Maintenance

3.3.1.6.1 The contractor shall monitor all equipment for proper operation and maintain all elements of the RF Test Facility and Vehicle Test Facility to include Preventive maintenance for the Vehicle Turn Table (VTT), Antenna Turn Table (ATT), Composite Antenna Turn Table (CATT), power distribution, RF distribution, power pads, site security camera systems, antennas, site lighting, habitability, and storage structures.

The contractor shall establish and maintain a routine maintenance schedule for all of the items listed in the Maintenance Schedule and Planned Maintenance, Attachment 2A and 2B and perform the maintenance prior to the scheduled test event. Completed maintenance will be documented on the schedule.

3.3.1.6.2 The contractor shall provide corrective, emergent maintenance and equipment replacement for all elements of the RF Test Facility and Vehicle Test Facility to include Vehicle Turn Table (VTT), Antenna Turn Table (ATT), Composite Antenna Turn Table (CATT), power distribution, RF distribution, power pads, site security camera systems, antennas, site lighting, habitability and storage structures.

The contractor shall monitor track equipment failures and document failed parts. Any equipment failure will be documented and the documentation delivered to the COR with recommendations for improving site performance.

The contractor shall provide on-site repair /replacement of failed equipment to include equipment for the Vehicle Turn Table, Antenna Turn Table, Composite Turn Table, power distribution, RF distribution, power pads, site security camera systems, antennas, test equipment, site lighting, habitability, storage structures, RF/video/fiber optic cabling and equipment between the test enclosures and any test equipment located outside of the test enclosures.

The contractor is not responsible for testing any RF cabling originating from the test enclosures that is not being repaired / replaced by the contractor. All cabling installed by the contractor will be tested IAW NIWC Atlantic approved drawings.

Contract Acquired Property (CAP), Attachment 3 provides a list (which is not all-inclusive) of the estimated materials required for preventative maintenance and emergent maintenance/equipment replacement for the RF Test Facility and Vehicle Test Facility. Also, the list has material requirements listed for emergent maintenance material for the Electromagnetic Interference Lab (EMI), Environmental Lab (ENV) and Tempest Test Chamber.

3.3.2 E3 Analysis

3.3.2.1 EMI Desktop Analysis

The contractor shall apply a standardized, rigorous, structured methodology to create and validate a physical, mathematical, or otherwise logical representation of a system entity, phenomenon, or process. The contractor shall be able to use models, including emulators, prototypes, simulators, and stimulators, either statically or overtime, to develop data as a basis for making managerial, technical, strategic, or tactical decisions.

The contractor shall use SPECTRUM XXI (Revision as required) to perform interference analysis by utilizing local Government/Civil spectrum use information, perform analysis of potential impact to and from local RF transmitters and receivers for a specific geographic location to evaluate the potential interference.

3.3.2.2 EMI Testing

The contractor shall perform an instrumented survey at a United States Navy (USN)/United States Marine Corp (USMC) activity using the approved test plan. All measurements shall be recorded with the conditions under which they were made (e.g., emitter output power, test point location, antenna correction factor, cable loss, etc.). For each EMI issue, the actual resolution shall be determined and any potential problem identified. The Electromagnetic Interference/Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMI/EMC) testing supports engineering development and EMI/EMC measurements and provides EMI/EMC evaluation and certification testing of various communication suites.

3.3.2.3 EMI Site Approvals

The contractor shall use the ANSYS Electromagnetic Interference Toolkit (EMIT) to predict radio frequency interference (RFI) in complex environments containing multiple RF systems that must operate simultaneously. In using the software, the contractor will evaluate if co site and coexistence radio frequency interference effects exists and provide mitigating solutions/recommendations.

3.3.2.4 HERP/HERF/HERO Testing

The contractor shall perform an instrumented survey IAW OPNAVINST 5100.23G (Revision as required) at the USN/USMC activity using the approved test plan. All measurements shall be recorded with the conditions under which they were made (e.g., emitter output power, test point location, antenna correction factor, cable loss, etc.). For each emitter, the actual RADHAZ safe separation distances shall be determined and any potential problem identified.

3.3.2.5 SPECTRUM MONITORING

The contractor shall conduct spectrum monitoring at the USN/USMC activity through the use of automated spectrum collection hardware and spectrum occupancy software to determine spectrum availability, characterize emissions, analyze transmission patterns, continually ensure that critical frequency bands are clear, detect illicit transmissions, and manage assigned spectrum.

3.3.3 Environmental

3.3.3.1 Shock Testing

The contractor shall perform shock testing IAW MIL-STD-810 (Revision as required) Method 516 and MIL-S- 901(Revision as required). Shock tests are performed to provide a degree of confidence that materiel can physically and functionally withstand the relatively infrequent, non-repetitive shocks encountered in handling, transportation, and service environments. This may include an assessment of the overall materiel system integrity for safety purposes in any one or all of the handling, transportation, and service environments; determine the materiel's fragility level, in order that packaging may be designed to protect the materiel's physical and functional integrity;

and test the strength of devices that attach materiel to platforms that can crash.

3.3.3.1.1 Perform shock testing in the vertical, longitudinal, and transverse axes for one shock pulse level/type.

3.3.3.1.2 Perform shock testing in the vertical, longitudinal, and transverse axes for two shock pulse levels/types.

3.3.3.1.3 Perform shock testing in the vertical, longitudinal, and transverse axes for three shock pulse levels/types.

3.3.3.2 Vibration Testing

The contractor shall perform vibration testing IAW MIL-STD-810 (Revision as required) Method 514 in order to verify that materiel will function in and withstand the vibration exposures of a life cycle.

3.3.3.2.1 Perform vibration testing in the vertical, longitudinal, and transverse axes for one installation platform.

3.3.3.2.2 Perform vibration testing in the vertical, longitudinal, and transverse axes for two installation platforms.

3.3.3.2.3 Perform vibration testing in the vertical, longitudinal, and transverse axes for three installation platforms.

3.3.3.3 Salt Fog Testing

The contractor shall perform salt fog testing IAW MIL-STD-810 (Revision as required) Method 509. The salt fog method is performed to determine the effectiveness of protective coatings and finishes on materials. It may also be applied to determine the effects of salt deposits on the physical and electrical aspects of materiel. This method is used for screening purposes only to evaluate the effectiveness and quality of protective coatings and finishes on materiel and material coupons, and to locate potential problem areas, quality control deficiencies, design flaws.

3.3.3.3.1 Two (2) salt fog cycles and two (2) drying cycles are required.

3.3.3.4 Temperature Testing

The contractor shall perform temperature testing IAW MIL-STD-810 (Revision as required by customer) Methods 501 and 502.to evaluate the effects of high and low temperature conditions on materiel safety, integrity, and performance during storage, operation, and manipulation.

3.3.3.4.1 Perform one (1) temperature cycle.

3.3.3.4.2 Perform three (3) temperature cycles.

3.3.3.4.3 Perform seven (7) temperature cycles.

3.3.3.5 Humidity Testing

The contractor shall perform humidity testing IAW MIL-STD-810 (Revision as required by customer) Method 507.The purpose of this method is to determine the resistance of materiel to the effects of a warm, humid atmosphere.

3.3.3.5.1 Perform one (1) humidity cycle.

3.3.3.5.2 Perform three (3) humidity cycles.

3.3.3.5.3 Perform ten (10) humidity cycles.

3.3.3.6 Altitude Testing

The contractor shall perform altitude testing IAW MIL-STD-810 (Revision as required) Method 500 to determine if materiel can withstand and/or operate in a low-pressure environment and/or withstand rapid pressure changes.

3.3.4 EMI/EMC

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity to profile the emissions, susceptibility, and power characteristics of electronic and electrical equipment and subsystems designed for use by the DoD. The purpose of this testing is to verify requirements for controlling electromagnetic interference (EMI) and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) for DoD platforms. The contractor shall provide test documentation to include a MIL-STD- 461 test plan with procedures that include the information IAW DI-EMCS-80201C and resulting test data that includes required information as per DI-EMCS-80200C, as well as a MIL-STD-1399 test plan with procedures that include the information IAW DI-EMCS-80201and resulting test data that includes required information as per DI-

EMCS80200C.

3.3.4.1 Radiated Susceptibility

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity according to the requirements and procedures for the relevant revision of MIL-STD-461 radiated susceptibility tests.

3.3.4.1.1 Test RS101, radiated susceptibility, magnetic field, 30 Hz to 100 kHz The contractor shall perform magnetic field radiated susceptibility testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.1.1.1 Perform test RS101 for level 1 effort (EUT ≤ 4,500 cm2).

3.3.4.1.1.2 Perform test RS101 for level 2 effort (4,500 cm2 < EUT ≤ 36,000 cm2).

3.3.4.1.1.3 Perform test RS101 for level 3 effort (36,000 cm2 < EUT ≤ 72,000 cm2).

3.3.4.1.2 Test RS103, radiated susceptibility, electric field, 2 MHz to 40 GHz.

The contractor shall perform electric field radiated susceptibility testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.1.2.1 Perform test RS103 for level 1 effort (EUT ≤ 4,500 cm2).

3.3.4.1.2.2 Perform test RS103 for level 2 effort (4,500 cm2 < EUT ≤ 36,000 cm2).

3.3.4.1.2.3 Perform test RS103 for level 3 effort (36,000 cm2 < EUT ≤ 72,000 cm2).

3.3.4.2 Radiated Emissions

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity according to the requirements and procedures for the relevant revision of MIL-STD-461 radiated emissions tests.

3.3.4.2.1 Test RE101, radiated emissions, magnetic field, 30 Hz to 100 kHz The contractor shall perform magnetic field radiated emissions testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.2.1.1 Perform test RE101 for level 1 effort (EUT ≤ 4,500 cm2).

3.3.4.2.1.2 Perform test RE101 for level 2 effort (4,500 cm2 < EUT ≤ 36,000 cm2).

3.3.4.2.1.3 Perform test RE101 for level 3 effort (36,000 cm2 < EUT ≤ 72,000 cm2).

3.3.4.2.2 Test RE102, radiated emissions, electric field, 10 kHz to 18 GHz The contractor shall perform electric field radiated emissions testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.2.2.1 Perform test RE102 for level 1 effort (EUT ≤ 4,500 cm2).

3.3.4.2.2.2 Perform test RE102 for level 2 effort (4,500 cm2 < EUT ≤ 36,000 cm2).

3.3.4.2.2.3 Perform test RE102 for level 3 effort (36,000 cm2 < EUT ≤ 72,000 cm2).

3.3.4.3 Conducted Susceptibility

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity according to the requirements and procedures for the relevant revision of MIL-STD-461 conducted susceptibility tests.

3.3.4.3.1 Test CS101, conducted susceptibility, power leads, 30 Hz to 150 kHz The contractor shall perform conducted susceptibility testing on power leads IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.1.1 Perform test CS101 for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.1.2 Perform test CS101 for level 2 effort (4 < power cables ≤ 8).

3.3.4.3.1.3 Perform test CS101 for level 3 effort (8 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.3.2 Test CS103, conducted susceptibility, antenna port, intermodulation, 15 kHz to 10 GHz The contractor shall perform conducted susceptibility testing on antenna ports IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.2.1 Perform test CS103 for level 1 effort (antenna ports ≤ 2).

3.3.4.3.2.2 Perform test CS103 for level 2 effort (2 < antenna ports ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.2.3 Perform test CS103 for level 3 effort (4 < antenna ports ≤ 6).

3.3.4.3.3 Test CS104, conducted susceptibility, antenna port, rejection of undesired signals, 30 Hz to 20 GHz The contractor shall perform conducted susceptibility testing on antenna ports IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.3.1 Perform test CS104 for level 1 effort (antenna ports ≤ 2).

3.3.4.3.3.2 Perform test CS104 for level 2 effort (2 < antenna ports ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.3.3 Perform test CS104 for level 3 effort (4 < antenna ports ≤ 6).

3.3.4.3.4 Test CS105, conducted susceptibility, antenna port, cross modulation, 30 Hz to 20 GHz The contractor shall perform conducted susceptibility testing on antenna ports IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.4.1 Perform test CS105 for level 1 effort (antenna ports ≤ 2).

3.3.4.3.4.2 Perform test CS105 for level 2 effort (2 < antenna ports ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.4.3 Perform test CS105 for level 3 effort (4 < antenna ports ≤ 6).

3.3.4.3.5 Test CS106, conducted susceptibility, transients, power leads The contractor shall perform conducted susceptibility testing on power leads IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.5.1 Perform test CS106 for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.5.2 Perform test CS106 for level 2 effort (4 < power cables ≤ 8).

3.3.4.3.5.3 Perform test CS106 for level 3 effort (8 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.3.6 Test CS114, conducted susceptibility, bulk cable injection, 10 kHz to 200 MHz The contractor shall perform bulk cable injection conducted susceptibility testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.6.1 Perform test CS114 for level 1 effort (power cables or cable interfaces ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.6.2 Perform test CS114 for level 2 effort (4 < power cables or cable interfaces ≤ 8).

3.3.4.3.6.3 Perform test CS114 for level 3 effort (8 < power cables or cable interfaces ≤ 12).

3.3.4.3.7 Test CS115, Conducted susceptibility, bulk cable injection, impulse excitation The contractor shall perform bulk cable injection conducted susceptibility testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.7.1 Perform test CS115 for level 1 effort (cables ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.7.2 Perform test CS115 for level 2 effort (4 < cables ≤ 8).

3.3.4.3.7.3 Perform test CS115 for level 3 effort (8 < cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.3.8 Test CS116, conducted susceptibility, damped sinusoidal transients, cables and power leads, 10 kHz to 100 MHz.

The contractor shall perform damped sinusoidal transient conducted susceptibility testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.3.8.1 Perform test CS116 for level 1 effort (cables ≤ 4).

3.3.4.3.8.2 Perform test CS116 for level 2 effort (4 < cables ≤ 8).

3.3.4.3.8.3 Perform test CS116 for level 3 effort (8 < cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.3.9 Test CS118, personnel borne electrostatic discharge The contractor shall perform personnel borne electrostatic discharge conducted susceptibility testing IAW MILSTD- 461.

3.3.4.3.9.1 Perform test CS118 for level 1 effort (test points ≤ 30).

3.3.4.3.9.2 Perform test CS118 for level 2 effort (30 < test points ≤ 60).

3.3.4.3.9.3 Perform test CS118 for level 3 effort (60 < test points ≤ 120).

3.3.4.4 Conducted Emissions

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity according to the requirements and procedures for the relevant revision of MIL-STD-461 conducted emissions tests.

3.3.4.4.1 Test CE101, conducted emissions, power leads, 30 Hz to 10 kHz The contractor shall perform power lead conducted emissions testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.4.1.1 Perform test CE101 for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 10).

3.3.4.4.1.2 Perform test CE101 for level 2 effort (10 < power cables ≤ 20).

3.3.4.4.1.3 Perform test CE101 for level 3 effort (20 < power cables ≤ 30).

3.3.4.4.2 Test CE102, conducted emissions, power leads, 10 kHz to 10 MHz The contractor shall perform power lead conducted emissions testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.4.2.1 Perform test CE102 for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 10).

3.3.4.4.2.2 Perform test CE102 for level 2 effort (10 < power cables ≤ 20).

3.3.4.4.2.3 Perform test CE102 for level 3 effort (20 < power cables ≤ 30).

3.3.4.4.3 Test CE106, conducted emissions, antenna terminal, 10 kHz to 40 GHz The contractor shall perform power antenna terminal conducted emissions testing IAW MIL-STD-461.

3.3.4.4.3.1 Perform test CE106 for level 1 effort (scans ≤ 3, receive or transmit).

3.3.4.4.3.2 Perform test CE106 for level 2 effort (3 < scans ≤ 6, receive or transmit).

3.3.4.4.3.3 Perform test CE106 for level 3 effort (6 < scans ≤ 9, receive or transmit).

3.3.4.5 DC Magnetic Field

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity according to the requirements and procedures for the relevant revision of DOD-STD-1399, Section 070, Part 1. The purpose of this testing is to characterize the ability of the EUT to withstand DC magnetic fields.

3.3.4.5.1 Test DC Magnetic Field

The contractor shall perform DC Magnetic Field tests on all three axes IAW DOD-STD-1399, Section 070, Part 1.

3.3.4.5.1.1 Perform test DC Magnetic Field for level 1 effort (1 m3 dimensional EUTs ≤ 6).

3.3.4.5.1.2 Perform test DC Magnetic Field for level 2 effort (6 < 1 m3 dimensional EUTs ≤ 12).

3.3.4.5.1.3 Perform test DC Magnetic Field for level 3 effort (12 < 1 m3 dimensional EUTs ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6 AC Power Testing

The contractor shall perform instrumented testing at the activity according to the requirements and procedures for the relevant revision of MIL-STD-1399, Section 300. The purpose of this testing is to characterize the electrical interface(s) of the EUT for shipboard use.

3.3.4.6.1 Voltage and Frequency Tolerance Test

The contractor shall perform the Voltage and Frequency Tolerance Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.1.1 Perform Voltage and Frequency Tolerance Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.1.2 Perform Voltage and Frequency Tolerance Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.1.3 Perform Voltage and Frequency Tolerance Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.2 Voltage and Frequency Transient Tolerance and Recovery Test The contractor shall perform the Voltage and Frequency Transient Tolerance and Recovery Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.2.1 Perform Voltage and Frequency Transient Tolerance and Recovery Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.2.2 Perform Voltage and Frequency Transient Tolerance and Recovery Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.2.3 Perform Voltage and Frequency Transient Tolerance and Recovery Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.3 Voltage and Spike Test

The contractor shall perform the Voltage Spike Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.3.1 Perform Voltage Spike Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.3.2 Perform Voltage Spike Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.3.3 Perform Voltage Spike Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.4 Emergency Condition Test

3.3.4.6.4.1 70 msec Power Interruption Test

3.3.4.6.4.2 2-Minute Power Interruption Test

3.3.4.6.4.3 Power Source Decay Test

3.3.4.6.4.4 Positive Excursion Test

The contractor shall perform the Emergency Condition Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.4.5 Perform Emergency Condition Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.4.6 Perform Emergency Condition Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.4.7 Perform Emergency Condition Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.5 Grounding Test

The contractor shall perform the Grounding Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.5.1 Perform Grounding Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.5.2 Perform Grounding Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.5.3 Perform Grounding Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.6 User Equipment Power Profile Test

The contractor shall perform the User Equipment Power Profile Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.6.1 Perform User Equipment Power Profile Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.6.2 Perform User Equipment Power Profile Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.6.3 Perform User Equipment Power Profile Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.7 Current Waveform Test

The contractor shall perform the Current Waveform Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.7.1 Perform Current Waveform Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.7.2 Perform Current Waveform Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.7.3 Perform Current Waveform Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.8 Voltage and Frequency Modulation Test

The contractor shall perform the Voltage and Frequency Modulation Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.8.1 Perform Voltage and Frequency Modulation Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.8.2 Perform Voltage and Frequency Modulation Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.8.3 Perform Voltage and Frequency Modulation Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.4.6.9 Simulated Human Body Leakage Current Tests for Personnel Safety The contractor shall perform the Simulated Human Body Leakage Current Test on all EUTs IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.9.1 Perform Simulated Human Body Leakage Current Test for level 1 effort (EUTs ≤ 4).

3.3.4.6.9.2 Perform Simulated Human Body Leakage Current Test for level 2 effort (4 < EUTs ≤ 8).

3.3.4.6.9.3 Perform Simulated Human Body Leakage Current Test for level 3 effort (8 < EUTs ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.10 Equipment Insulation Resistance Test

The contractor shall perform the Equipment Insulation Resistance Test (Insulation Resistance Test/Active Ground Detector (AGD) Test on all power leads IAW MIL-STD-1399, Section 300.

3.3.4.6.10.1 Perform Equipment Insulation Resistance Test for level 1 effort (power cables ≤ 6).

3.3.4.6.10.2 Perform Equipment Insulation Resistance Test for level 2 effort (6 < power cables ≤ 12).

3.3.4.6.10.3 Perform Equipment Insulation Resistance Test for level 3 effort (12 < power cables ≤ 18).

3.3.5 TEMPEST

3.3.5.1 PDS Inspections

The contractor shall perform the Protected Distribution System (PDS) inspection and demonstrate knowledge of both the Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) 7003 of Sep 2015 and CNO/USMC IA PUB 5239-22. PDS inspections will allow for validation of corrections to discovered deficiencies while still on site.

Basic knowledge of tools will be needed for use of ladders, shims, flashlight, and mirrors. The contractor may need to access tight areas or great heights and should be prepared to do so following all applicable safety precautions.

After the inspection a report will be drafted and submitted to the Certified TEMPEST Technical Authority (CTTA) for review and concurrence. Travel will be required for PDS inspections.

3.3.5.2 PDS Design Reviews

The contractor shall perform the Protected Distribution System (PDS) design review with the understanding of both the CNSSI 7003 of Sep 2015 and CNO/USMC IA PUB 5239-22 of Sep 2008. The design review will require documentation review, application of policy knowledge, customer coordination, design input, and Government lead coordination. The contractor shall communicate all design discrepancies with the customer and ensure that government lead agrees with design changes before proceeding with a final recommendation. After the design review is complete, a report will be drafted and submitted to the CTTA for review and concurrence. Travel will NOT be required for PDS design reviews.

3.3.5.3 TRQ Reviews

The contractor shall perform the TEMPEST Requirements Questionnaire (TRQ) review with required advanced knowledge of National and Navy TEMPEST documents. Reviews are required to be conducted underneath a Certified TEMPEST Technical Authority (CTTA). When performing the review, National and Navy policy will be applied to determine TEMPEST requirements subject to the CTTAs approval. This will require communication with customer to ascertain specifics of the TRQ. After the review a report will be drafted and submitted to the CTTA for review and concurrence. Travel will NOT be required.

3.3.5.4 TEMPEST Testing

The contractor shall perform TEMPEST testing and demonstrate knowledge and experience in operating EMI/TEMPEST receivers, antenna suites, amplifiers, data collection/reporting devices, and TEMPEST test policy.

The contractor shall be required to attend National TEMPEST Testing House for TEMPEST course completion.

The contractor shall also support with equipment calibration and maintenance (para 3.3.7 and 3.3.1.6) and general test preparations. Travel will be required for TEMPEST testing.

3.3.6 E3 Training

NIWC Atlantic Technical Training Services support development and the alignment of manpower, personnel, training, and education (MPT&E) resources with mission, system, and human performance requirements in support of the Shipboard Electromagnetic Compatibility Improvement Program (SEMCIP) Program and the E3/SM Navy Training System Plan (NTSP). The contractor shall provide the following:

3.3.6.1 (SEMCIP) Training Requirements The contractor shall provide the following:

3.3.6.1.1 Annual Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) Analysis. This analysis provides assessment of SEMCIP Program training requirements and defines NMETL standards and criteria in support of mandatory Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS) Key Performance Parameters and Key System Attributes.

3.3.6.1.2 Annual review/update of Navy Tactical Tasks (NTAs). This includes the review of SEMCIP Program requirements linked to Navy Mission-Essential Task List (NMETL). These NMETLs provide Navy leadership and warfighters with clear tasks, conditions, and standards (i.e., measures and criteria) that support operational and maintenance requirements/certification of fleet units and tactical watch teams. NIWC Atlantic coordinates integration of EM-related career-training pipelines, and provide fleet personnel with the necessary SEMCIP Program information, practices, and resources to manage/maintain Mission Critical Systems (MCS).

3.3.6.1.3 Job Duty Task Analysis (JDTA) development and maintenance. JDTA includes tasks required to support SEMCIP Program critical item design, testing, maintenance, and repairs; inclusion of JDTA data in Human Performance Requirements Reviews (HPPRs).

3.3.6.1.4 Front End and Business Case/Cost Analysis. The Front End Analysis will include processes by which the Program manager (PM) evaluates the new or modified tactical or non-tactical equipment, system, subsystem, or capabilities to determine what manpower, knowledge, skills and abilities will be required to safely operate and maintain these systems, equipment, or capabilities. The Business Case/Cost Analysis will take the proposed training systems from the FEA and assigns a cost to each. The BCA also will capture any risk associated with each option.

3.3.6.1.5 Updating E3/SM NTSP [N2N6-NTSP-S-70-8003]. Per OPNAV Instruction 1500.76, update, and coordinate E3/SM NTSP with SEMCIP program knowledge and skill requirements; and billets for Joint, Fleet, Engineering, and Acquisition workforces to provide system-specific knowledge and skills; general EM information;

and training delivered in blended training solutions using Collaborative, On-The-Job Training (OJT), Formal, and Distance learning (Navy Knowledge Online (NKO) and Defense Acquisition University (DAU) tools.

3.3.6.1.6 Develop and update fleet certifications, repetitive exercises, and readiness assessments. Fleet certifications implement metrics, standards, and measures to ensure task units, strike groups, and organizations senior leaders possess required SEMCIP Program KSAs.

3.3.6.1.7 Establish a Navy Electromagnetic Discipline. Development of SEMCIP Program formal education and training accreditation and Industry certifications.

3.3.6.1.8 Subject Matter Expertise (SME). Provide SME support for SEMCIP Program knowledge and skill requirements WRT general EM, SM, and EMSO.

3.3.6.1.9 Instructor Support. Provide EM, SM, and EMSO instructor support for SEMCIP Formal Course Training Train the Trainer (T3); provide instructor support to meet identified NTSP training solutions.

3.3.6.2 EMC Community of Practice (CoP)

The contractor shall provide the following:

3.3.6.2.1 Maintaining NKO EMC Community of Practice (CoP). This includes the revision of the EMC/SM CoPs requirements to increase SEMCIP Program awareness, conferences, publications, and articles.

3.3.6.2.2 Update of the EMC Fleet E3/EMC Certification SOE

3.3.6.3 E3 Training Fielding

The contractor shall provide the following:

3.3.6.3.1 Developing Navy eLearning (NeL) training. Fielding of specialized training for Navy’s Electromagnetic acquisition, engineering, technical, and operational specialty occupations such as Ship, Electronics, System integration inspectors, and test personnel.

3.3.6.3.2 Developing Navy Formal training. Fielding of Navy’s Electromagnetic integrity, hardening, and survivability of mission critical components, systems, and platforms to support fleet operations and sustainment tasks.

3.3.6.3.3 Developing specialized training. Fielding of electronic instructional job aids, case studies, and personal computer (PC)-based simulations to support learning styles in the widely used Fleming Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic/Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing Preference, and Kinesthetic model.

3.3.6.3.4 Developing Industrial, Acquisition, Outreach, and Indoctrination training. This includes briefings and training to support key aspect of engineering design, operational readiness, and survivability in support of mission critical systems (MCS).

3.3.6.3.5 Development of Fleet Personnel Qualification Standards (PQS). Support Fleet and Engineering Skill Groups training in Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) requirements.

3.3.6.4 NAVSEA ISEA

The contractor shall provide the following:

3.3.6.4.1 Development of NAVSEA monthly Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and biweekly reports.

-Development of input to NIWC Atlantic Weekly Activity Reports (WAR).

-Generation of monthly and weekly FLTMPS reports

-Participation in the USN/USMC E3 IPT Meetings (TRISYSCOM) -Attend the E3 and Spectrum Program Reviews and conferences as directed

3.3.7 Calibration

The contractor shall research and document all existing equipment at the RF Test Facility, EMI Facility, E3 Analysis and the TEMPEST Facility that requires periodic calibration IAW the Calibration List, Attachment 4, establish a calibration schedule, provide calibration services IAW ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and ensure that equipment is delivered to and from the calibration facility IAW with the schedule. The contractor shall maintain a calibration record for each piece of equipment identifying the dates of calibration, any equipment repairs, configuration, and/or failure trends.

3.4 EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL SUPPORT

3.4.1 Procurement Support

The contractor shall research and procure specified equipment and material as contractor-acquired property (CAP).

To ensure fair and reasonable pricing under this cost reimbursable contract line items, the…