Phase I - 20210201 - PPQ for Architect.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation Design/Build (DB) Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Upgrade project (Q&A Updated 3/1) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- BLDG53_DB_SOL
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for architect-engineer services and a related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by offerors and references for the Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Backfill Project, with responses due by March 5, 2021. It defines a similar project and requires descriptions of work performed, ratings of performance categories, and remarks from references. The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the General Services Administration for the design-build project for the Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Backfill Project located at the Denver Federal Center in Lakewood, Colorado. Responses to the solicitation are due by March 5, 2021 at 4:00 Local time.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_A DB Building 53 Project 3_1_2021.pdf | ||
| Q_A DB Building 53 Project 2_19_2021.pdf | ||
| Q and A_ DB Building 53 Project.pdf | ||
| SF1442-14b.pdf | ||
| GC Reps and Certs Nov 2020 508.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1 - VOL I STATEMENT OF WORK 20210201.pdf | ||
| SBU Form.pdf | ||
| Phase I - 20210201 - PPQ - General Contractor.docx | DOCX document | |
| B53 Solicitation Phase 1_2021.02.01 .pdf | ||
| Phase I - 20210201 - DRAFT Agreement.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaires for each Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist not later than 4:00 PM MOUNTAIN TIME, FRIDAY, MARCH 5, 2021.
Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:
Len Wilson, Contracting Officer at len.wilson@gsa.gov Joseph Dorsey, Contract Specialist at joseph.dorsey@gsa.gov
Email subject lines should reference “Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Backfill Project”.
A SIMILAR PROJECT is defined as follows:
· Construction was substantially completed within eight years prior to the submission deadline for Phase 1 proposals;
· The SP was contracted using the design-build delivery method;
· Renovation of an existing building for use as an office;
· Project area (office space) was not less than 100,000 gross square feet; and
· Contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $20 million.
Additional favorable consideration may be given to the extent any of the following are demonstrated:
· The proposed General Contractor and the proposed A/E worked on the same SP.
· Two or more SPs are received for the A/E.
· Awards were received for superior design and/or project delivery.
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Offeror/Firm:____________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number: ______________________________________________________________________________________
Was the Offeror the Prime Contractor?: _____________________________________________________________________
Contract Type : ________________________________________________________________________________________
Place of Performance:____________________________________________________________________________________
Period of Performance (include start and substantial completion dates):_____________________________________________
Was the delivery method Design-Build or IPD?:________________________________________________________________
Did the proposed A/E and proposed General Contractor work on this project together?:_________________________________
Gross Square Footage of Facility Construction: _______________________________________________________________
Gross Square Footage of Office Space Construction: ___________________________________________________________
Construction Value at initial award: $________________________________________________________________________
Total Construction Value (including modifications): $____________________________________________________________
Did the project require a pre-alteration asbestos survey?: _______________________________________________________
List any awards that were received for superior project design and/or project delivery: _________________________________
Briefly describe all work performed under this contract: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Continued on next page SECTION 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last eight (8) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Name of Respondent/Title: _____________________________________________
Firm Name: _________________________________________________________
Address:____________________________________________________________
Phone:_____________________________________________________________
Fax:_______________________________________________________________
Email:______________________________________________________________
Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.
KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.
Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.
Acceptable – A Satisfactory rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.
Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.
Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.
| PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY |
| Poor |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| N/A |
Quality of Design and Construction Documents
Achieving Project Design Goals Within the Allowable Budget
Creativity of Solutions to Design Issues
Timeliness of Required Documentation
Communicating and Interfacing with Government/Company Personnel
Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance
Continued on next page
1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________
2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________
Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary): ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .