Phase I - 20210201 - PPQ for Architect.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation Design/Build (DB) Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Upgrade project (Q&A Updated 3/1) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
BLDG53_DB_SOL
Issued by
General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 8

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for architect-engineer services and a related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by offerors and references for the Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Backfill Project, with responses due by March 5, 2021. It defines a similar project and requires descriptions of work performed, ratings of performance categories, and remarks from references. The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the General Services Administration for the design-build project for the Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Backfill Project located at the Denver Federal Center in Lakewood, Colorado. Responses to the solicitation are due by March 5, 2021 at 4:00 Local time.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Solicitation Design/Build (DB) Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Upgrade project (Q&A Updated 3/1), newest first.
File Type Posted
Q_A DB Building 53 Project 3_1_2021.pdf PDF
Q_A DB Building 53 Project 2_19_2021.pdf PDF
Q and A_ DB Building 53 Project.pdf PDF
SF1442-14b.pdf PDF
GC Reps and Certs Nov 2020 508.docx DOCX document
1 - VOL I STATEMENT OF WORK 20210201.pdf PDF
SBU Form.pdf PDF
Phase I - 20210201 - PPQ - General Contractor.docx DOCX document
B53 Solicitation Phase 1_2021.02.01 .pdf PDF
Phase I - 20210201 - DRAFT Agreement.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER

INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaires for each Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist not later than 4:00 PM MOUNTAIN TIME, FRIDAY, MARCH 5, 2021.

Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:

Len Wilson, Contracting Officer at len.wilson@gsa.gov Joseph Dorsey, Contract Specialist at joseph.dorsey@gsa.gov

Email subject lines should reference “Building 53 Limited Scope & Tenant Backfill Project”.

A SIMILAR PROJECT is defined as follows:

· Construction was substantially completed within eight years prior to the submission deadline for Phase 1 proposals;

· The SP was contracted using the design-build delivery method;

· Renovation of an existing building for use as an office;

· Project area (office space) was not less than 100,000 gross square feet; and

· Contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $20 million.

Additional favorable consideration may be given to the extent any of the following are demonstrated:

· The proposed General Contractor and the proposed A/E worked on the same SP.

· Two or more SPs are received for the A/E.

· Awards were received for superior design and/or project delivery.

SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR

Name of Offeror/Firm:____________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Number: ______________________________________________________________________________________

Was the Offeror the Prime Contractor?: _____________________________________________________________________

Contract Type : ________________________________________________________________________________________

Place of Performance:____________________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance (include start and substantial completion dates):_____________________________________________

Was the delivery method Design-Build or IPD?:________________________________________________________________

Did the proposed A/E and proposed General Contractor work on this project together?:_________________________________

Gross Square Footage of Facility Construction: _______________________________________________________________

Gross Square Footage of Office Space Construction: ___________________________________________________________

Construction Value at initial award: $________________________________________________________________________

Total Construction Value (including modifications): $____________________________________________________________

Did the project require a pre-alteration asbestos survey?: _______________________________________________________

List any awards that were received for superior project design and/or project delivery: _________________________________

Briefly describe all work performed under this contract: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Continued on next page SECTION 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last eight (8) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Name of Respondent/Title: _____________________________________________

Firm Name: _________________________________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________________

Phone:_____________________________________________________________

Fax:_______________________________________________________________

Email:______________________________________________________________

Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below. Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.

KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.

Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.

Acceptable – A Satisfactory rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.

Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.

Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.

PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
Poor
Marginal
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent
N/A

Quality of Design and Construction Documents

Achieving Project Design Goals Within the Allowable Budget

Creativity of Solutions to Design Issues

Timeliness of Required Documentation

Communicating and Interfacing with Government/Company Personnel

Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance

Continued on next page

1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES ________ NO __________

2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES ________ NO __________

Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary): ______________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .