Persons with HIV-AIDS RR Tool.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waivers
- Solicitation number
- 24-478HFS-DIREC-B-39324
- Issued by
- St. Clair County, Illinois
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Review Tool for the Persons with HIV/AIDS Waiver program operated by the Illinois Division of Rehabilitation Services. The tool outlines the sub-assurances and data sources the state uses to evaluate the level of care determinations, service plans, and health and welfare monitoring for waiver participants. Key details include assessments of level of care determinations, annual service plan updates, monthly participant contacts, and documentation of choice between waiver services and providers. The state demonstrates it has designed and implemented an effective system for reviewing the adequacy of service plans and assuring participant health and welfare.
The related state and local contract opportunity is for the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services to release a Request for Quote Proposal seeking a vendor to conduct Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Waiver quality assurance reviews. The contract will cover quality assurance activities for HCBS waivers in the state of Illinois.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-38-002 - RFQ HCBS Waiver Services 9-22-23.docx | DOCX document | |
| Question and Answers on RFQ Klein.docx | DOCX document | |
| Question and Answers on RFQ-2.docx | DOCX document | |
| ELD Record Review Tool.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Review Tool – On-site Records Review
Case Management Agency Record Review Tool
Persons with HIV/AIDS Waiver Operating Agency: Division of Rehabilitation Services
Record #: _____________________ RIN: __________________________________________
Customer Name: ___________________________________ Phone: _____________________
Guardian Name: ___________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Level of Care (Appendix B)
Level of Care Assurance: The State demonstrates that it implements the processes and instrument(s) specified in its approved waiver for evaluating/reevaluating an applicant’s/waiver participant’s level of care consistent with care provided in a hospital, NF, or ICF/ID-DD.
Sub-Assurance B: The levels of care of enrolled participants are reevaluated at least annually or as specified in the approved waiver.
16B: The waiver participant is reassessed through the redetermination process of waiver eligibility every 12 months.
• Data Source: WebCM / Hard Chart
• Date of most recent LOC assessment:
• Date of previous LOC assessment:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
• Comments:
Yes No
Sub-Assurance C: The processes and instruments described in the approved waiver are applied appropriately and according to the approved description to determine participant level of care.
17B: The waiver participant’s documentation supports LOC determination (minimum total DON score of 29).
• Data Source: DON / HSP Needs Assessment
• DON score:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
Service Plan (Appendix D)
Service Plan Assurance: The State demonstrates it has designed and implemented an effective system for reviewing the adequacy of service plans for waiver participants.
Sub-Assurance A: Service plans address all participants’ assessed needs (including health and safety risk factors) and personal goals, either by the provision of waiver services or through other means.
29D: The waiver participant’s service plan addresses all personal goals identified by the assessment.
• Data Source(s): Service Plan, Assessment
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
30D: The waiver participant’s service plan addresses all of the participant’s needs identified by the assessment.
• Data Source(s): Service Plan, Assessment
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
• Comments:
31D: The waiver participant’s service plan addresses all health and safety risk factors identified in the assessment.
• Data Source(s): Service Plan, Assessment
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
Sub-Assurance B: The State monitors service plan development in accordance with its policies and procedures.
33D: The waiver participant’s service plan is signed and dated by the participant (or legally authorized representative) and the case manager (counselor).
• Data Source(s): Service Plan
• Participant or Representative Signature present?
• Date of Participant or Representative Signature:
• Case Manager (Counselor) Signature present?
• Date of Case Manager (Counselor) Signature:
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
Yes No
34D: The waiver participant received monthly contacts, with one face-to-face contact every other month (bi-monthly), by his/her case manager in an effort to monitor service provision and to address potential gaps in service delivery.
• Data Source(s): WebCM
• Month(s) missing face-to-face contact:
• Month(s) missing telephone contact:
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
Sub-Assurance C: Service plans are updated/revised at least annually or when warranted by changes in the waiver participant’s needs.
35D: The waiver participant has his/her service plan updated every 12 months.
• Data Source(s): Recent Assessment, Service Plan
• Date the current year service plan was updated/revised:
• Date the previous year service plan was updated/revised:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
Sub-Assurance D: Services are delivered in accordance with the service plan, including the type, scope, amount, duration and frequency specified in the service plan.
37D: Were services delivered to the participant in the type, scope, amount, duration, and frequency as specified in the service plan?
• Data Source(s): Service Plan, Case Management notes, WebCM
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
Sub-Assurance E: Participants are afforded choice between/among waiver services and providers.
39D: The waiver participant’s records with a signed plan of care indicates participant had choice between waiver services and institutional care;
and between/among services and providers.
• Data Source(s): HSP Application and Eligibility Form, Consent Packet
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
Health and Welfare (Appendix G)
Health and Welfare Assurance: The State demonstrates it has designed and implemented an effective system for assuring waiver participant health and welfare.
Sub-Assurance A: The state demonstrates on an ongoing basis that it identifies, addresses and seeks to prevent instances of abuse, neglect, exploitation and unexplained death (A/N/E).
40G: The waiver participant received information about how and to whom to report A/N/E at the time of assessment/reassessment.
• Data Source(s): Consent Packet
• Date of assessment/reassessment:
• Date participant received A/N/E information:
• Explanation, if noncompliant:
• Recommendations for Remediation (if noncompliant):
| Pages from Binder2.pdf |
| Binder2.pdf |
| DRS Persons with Disabilities RR Tool_1 |
| DRS One page |
| DRS Perons with Disabilities RR Tool_Final.pdf |
| Level of Care (Appendix B) |
| Service Plan (Appendix D) |
| Health and Welfare (Appendix G) |
| 01D. Elderly Care Coordinators Review Tool |
| Qualified Providers (Appendix C) |
| Record: |
| RIN: |
| Participant Name: |
| Phone: |
| Guardian Name: |
| Phone_2: |
| Group1: Off |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| R1: |
| C1: Re-determination is completed every 365 days. |
| R2: |
| C2: DON score must be 29 or above |
| Group2: Off |
| Text4: |
| R3: |
| C3: Can be found in WebCM or hard chart by looking at needs assessment and service plan. Can also be found in case notes. |
| Group3: Off |
| E3: |
| R4: |
| C4: Can be found in WebCM or hard chart by looking at needs assessment and service plan |
| E4: |
| E5: |
| Group4: Off |
| Group5: Off |
| R5: |
| C5: Can be found in WebCM and chart by looking at needs assessment and service plan |
| E6: |
| Group6: Off |
| Group7: Off |
| Group8: Off |
| Text8: |
| Text9: |
| R6: |
| R7: |
| C6: Both the case manager and participant has to sign and date the most recent service plan. Must see the hard copy in the chart to verify |
| E7: |
| Group10: Off |
| R8: |
| C8: Service plan must be completed every 365 days. |
| C7: Monthly contacts. Bi-monthly home visits. Contacts must be successful and focus on the well being of participant. Contacts talking about timesheets would not be acceptable. |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
| Group50: Off |
| R10: |
| C10: The service plan should reflect the type/scope (homemaker vs. PA) and the amount/duration/frequency of the services (i.e. How many days per month, hours per month, hours per day etc.) |
| E10: |
| E11: |
| E12: |
| E13: |
| E14: |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Group12: Off |
| R11: |
| C11: Form stating that participant had a choice between waiver services and institutional care. (This form is usually 2 pages with initials and then signed and dated by participant/poa). |
| E15: |
| Group13: Off |
| R12: |
| C12: From Nurse Q & A: If there is any documentation/written correspondence that ANE information was provided, then yes, that is in compliance. |
| E16: |
| Group14: Off |
| Text13: |
| Text14: |
| Text10: |
| Text999: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .