Past Performance Survey on 697DCK-23-R-00269.pdf
PDF 144 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-23-R-00269
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for a federal solicitation to replace heat pumps and air handling units at Lindberg Field Air Traffic Control Tower in San Diego, California. The solicitation number is 697DCK-23-R-00269 issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region. The work includes demolishing and replacing two existing heat pumps, two air handling units, refrigerant lines, controls, and associated wiring. Additional work involves installing disconnects, replacing thermostats and sensors, demolishing and replacing dampers and actuators, adding or reusing ducts per SMACNA standards. The survey collects information on contractors' past performance on factors such as resources, responsiveness, commitments, management visibility, user requirements, administration, correspondence, statement of work adherence, satisfaction with staff and reports, compliance, experience, cure notices, cost savings, recommendations, investigations, and terminations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| SAN Specification.Rev 12.19.2022.pdf | ||
| SAN ATCT Cab HVAC and Electrical set.pdf | ||
| DB.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-23-R-00269 (4).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
697DCK-23-R-00269: San Diego ATCT Heat Pumps
Return the required number of signed and dated Past Performance Surveys with your proposal.
POC: Darren Odegard Solicitation: 697DCK-23-R-00269
1. Contractor Name:
2. Contract Number:
3. Contractor Address:
4. Contract Type:
___ Firm Fixed Price ___ Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Please Specify)
5. Your Agency Name:
6. Your Agency POC/email:
7. Completion Date:
8. Dollar Amount of Award:
Total Value with Mods:
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Type of Work:
Construction __ Service Support__ Service__ Supply__ Other______
NOTE: 1-Unsatisfactory 2- Marginal 3-Satisfactory 4-Good 5-Outstanding
If Not Applicable, just write in N/A
***Please provide additional comments below for ratings of 4 and below.
1. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?
1 2 3 4 5
2. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.?
1 2 3 4 5
3. How reliably did the contractor follow through on commitments?
1 2 3 4 5
4. To what extent did the contractor’s management system provide visibility into problems and risks?
1 2 3 4 5
5. How responsive do you think the contractor was to information requests, issues, or problems during the course of the contract?
1 2 3 4 5
6. How effective has the contractor been in identifying user requirements?
1 2 3 4 5
7. To what extent did the contractor have the ability to administer and manage the contract?
1 2 3 4 5
8. To what extent did the contractor issue professional correspondence?
1 2 3 4 5
9. How well did the contractor adhere to the Statement of Work?
1 2 3 4 5
10. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s management and support staff?
1 2 3 4 5
11. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s Supervisor(s)?
1 2 3 4 5
12. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
1 2 3 4 5
13. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
14. To what extent was the contractor’s maintenance and problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate and of appropriate content?
1 2 3 4 5
15. To what extent did the contractor comply with safety requirements?
1 2 3 4 5
16. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s overall quality of service?
1 2 3 4 5
17. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government staff?
1 2 3 4 5
18. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction?
1 2 3 4 5
19. To what extent were the contractor’s employees experienced and qualified?
Respond: Yes or No.
20. Were there any cure notices issued? Yes: ____ No: ____
21. Was contractor pro-active? Yes: ____ No: ____
22. Did contractor suggest cost-saving changes? Yes: ____ No: ___
23. Would you recommend this contractor? Yes: ____ No: ____
If No, please provide reason in Comments.
For Federal contracts:
24. Were there any Labor Department Investigations? Yes:____ No: ____
24a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
25. Were there any safety investigations? Yes: ___ No: ____
25a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
26. Were there any security investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
26a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
27. Was there a partial or complete termination for default or convenience?
Yes: ____ No: ____
27a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
28. Are there any pending terminations? Yes: ____ No: ____
29. What is/was the duration of the contract? ___________
30. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work? If yes, please describe.
Comments: (Comments required for any rating of 4 or less)
Signature: ______________________
Date: ____________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .