Past Performance Report Form..docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MOC/BMD/TYCOM Support Services - Only Seeking RFP Responses from current Seaport NxG Contract Holders Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0018926R3101
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Report Form issued by NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) to collect detailed performance feedback about a contractor. The form is to be completed and returned by 1:00 PM ET on February 10, 2026, and seeks comprehensive evaluation of a contractor's performance across four key areas: quality/meeting contract requirements, timeliness, responsiveness, and overall contractor performance. The form requires detailed assessments from the evaluating agency/company, including specific questions about customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, problem resolution, cost control, and recommendations for future contract awards. The form is directly related to a Naval Information Forces (NAVIFOR) solicitation (N0018926R3101) seeking contractor support services for Maritime Operations Center, Ballistic Missile Defense, and Type Command functions, with performance to be conducted on-site at NAVIFOR in Suffolk, VA, and is specifically limited to current Seaport NxG Contract Holders.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Past Performance Information Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 2015-5689 Rev. 27 Pearl Harbor, HI 12.03.2025.pdf | ||
| Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| RFP N0018926R3101_MOC BMD.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4281 Rev. 35 Washington, DC 12.03.2025.pdf | ||
| Draft DD 254.pdf | ||
| Contract Discrepancy Report.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5635 Rev. 29 San Diego, CA 12.03.2025.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-4341 Rev. 32 Suffolk, VA 12.03.2025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT FORM
Complete and return NLT 1:00 PM ET on 10 February 2026 to:
NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Contracting Department, Attn: Elizabeth Phelps, Code 214 Phone: 564-230-2749 Email: elizabeth.a.phelps14.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of (Requester Information):
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the U.S. Naval Supply System (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by : ____________________________
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Describe the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?
b. Describe the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· The number and severity of problems
· The effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .