PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK FORM.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Fabrication Services and Installation of Security Grilles and Solid Core Doors at Diplomatic Residences
Solicitation number
19RP3825Q0085
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Reference Check Form used to evaluate a contractor's previous performance across five key areas: quality of services, compliance with contract terms, management effectiveness, cooperation, and business integrity. The form allows a reference to rate each area as either "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" and requires specific examples to support the ratings, with additional questions about major problems encountered and willingness to do business with the company again.

The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Quotation (RFQ) 19RP3825Q0085 issued by the Department of State for fabrication services and installation of security grilles and solid core doors at diplomatic residences in Manila, Philippines. A mandatory site inspection is scheduled for June 23, 2025, and quotations are due by July 7, 2025, at 4:00 pm local time. The U.S. Government intends to award the contract to the responsible company submitting the lowest-priced acceptable offer, with electronic submissions required through ManilaContracting@state.gov. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and submit several required documents, including SF-1442, pricing details, and representations and certifications.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK

Offeror Name:

Person(s) performing reference check
Date
Client/Company/Office name
Person contacted
Phone number

Questions and Responses:

1. Describe the services provided under your contract.

2. How would you rate the Contractor's performance in the areas listed below using the following rating guidelines:

Acceptable - Performance met or exceeded minimum requirements/standards

Unacceptable - Performance was poor (less than acceptable; did not meet contract requirements)

a.Quality of services provided under the contract.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
b.Compliance with contract terms and conditions.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
c.Effectiveness of management.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:

d. Willingness to cooperate with, and assist, the customer in routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties.

|_| Acceptable |_| Unacceptable

Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
e.Business integrity/business conduct.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:

3. Describe any major problems that occurred and whether/how they were resolved.

4. Would you do business with this company again?

|_| YES |_| NO

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .