Past Performance Questionnaire Tres Piedras Janitorial.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tres Piedras Janitorial Services
- Solicitation number
- 127EAV25Q0022
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a janitorial services contract for the USDA Tres Piedras Ranger District in New Mexico. The solicitation (127EAV25Q0022) requires a contractor to provide comprehensive janitorial services, including management, tools, equipment, and labor to maintain facility cleanliness and a professional appearance. Specific responsibilities include performing cleaning tasks and replenishing soap and paper products in all restrooms, including vault toilets.
The questionnaire is designed to evaluate the contractor's past performance across key areas such as customer satisfaction, quality of services, and timeliness. The evaluation uses a rating scale from Unsatisfactory to Excellent, with the recipient requested to complete and return the confidential assessment to ernest.hernandez@usda.gov by a specified date in 2025. The form seeks detailed feedback on the contractor's performance, including adherence to contract specifications, workforce management, relationship with agency personnel, and overall project execution.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 127EAV25Q0022 Final.pdf | ||
| TP Floor Plan.pdf | ||
| Tres Piedras SOW.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5443.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
JANITORIAL SERVICES
Contractor Past Performance Inquiry
INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Customer:
Our firm has submitted a quote to the USDA Tres Piedras Ranger District NM. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your firm has been listed as a reference for work previously performed.
Your candid response to the attached survey will assist the evaluation team in this process and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed survey as thoroughly as possible. General information regarding the responses may be released to the quoter; the FAR prohibits the release of names providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained.
Please email the completed form NO LATER THAN x/xx/2025.
DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO OUR COMPANY, PLEASE RETURN TO: ernest.hernandez@usda.gov
Contractor Name:
Address:
Contract or Order No:
Total Value of Contract:
Liquidated Damages Assessed:
Contract Award Date:
Final Completion Date:
Name of person completing this form:
Phone Number:
Name of Company or Government Agency:
Description of work this company performed:
127EAV25Q0022 Tres Piedras NF
RATINGS - Summarize contractor performance and check the number that corresponds to the rating for each category.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| E = Excellent |
| Performance exceeded what was required by the contract |
| VG = Very Good |
| Performance met all the requirements of the contract |
| S = Satisfactory |
| Contractor met most (essentially all) of the requirements of the contract |
| M = Marginal |
| Contractor met some of the requirements of the contract however changes to the contractor’s processes were necessary to |
achieve contract requirements
| U = Unsatisfactory |
| Contractor failed to meet requirements of the contract |
| N/A = Not Applicable |
| Question did not apply to the contract performed for your firm. |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Was the project completed in accordance with the contract specifications?
How well did the contractor identify and correct deficient work?
Were submittals, testing, certifications, and final drawings (as-builts) completed accurately and timely?
Was work performed as scheduled?
Were delays resolved quickly and to both parties satisfaction?
Comments:
QUALITY OF SERVICES
Did the contractor provide adequate oversight to sub-contractors, suppliers, employees?
Did the contractor maintain a good relationship with the owner, contracting agency, and management personnel?
If there were change orders, was the contractor reasonable in defining scope of change and controlling cost?
Did the contractor provide adequate work force (number and skills) for work being performed?
How well did the contractor manage the quality of work?
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
127EAV25Q0022 Tres Piedras Janitorial
TIMELINESS
Did the contractor complete the project on time?
If there were problems, were they addressed and resolved?
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Would you recommend the selection of this contractor again?
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .