Past Performance Questionnaire- Road MAintenence 2022 GWJ NF.doc
DOC document 45 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12445122Q0021
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Evaluation Survey
Instructions: Offeror shall send this survey to a minimum of three references. Offeror shall complete Sections A, B, and C before sending.
A. FROM:
Company:
Contact Person:
B. TO:
Company:
Address:
C. Reference Contract:
Contract number:
Date of award:
Dollar value:
Completion date:
Description of work:
Dear (LIST THE FIRM, AGENCY, OTHER) Our firm/company is preparing a quote for the U.S. Forest Service {PROJECT NAME}. Please provide a reference for our work under the contract identified above. If you have any questions, you may contact the Contracting Officer, Kelvin Jackson at kelvin.jackson1@usda.gov.
Have this in email format to Kelvin Jackson no later than 7/8/22, 13:00pm EST.
1) What role did you play (Contracting Officer/COR/Inspector/Other), and for how long?
2) Please provide a more complete description of the work.
3) How well did the contractor’s crew(s) perform?
4) Was the contractor cooperative in resolving issues? Please offer an example.
5) Did the contractor provide sufficient tools, equipment, and vehicles to perform the work?
6) Did the contractor devote sufficient effort to performing the work? If not, please describe.
7) If the Contracting Officer may need to contact you with further questions, please provide the contact information here:
How was contractor’s performance in terms of:
a) Quality of Service Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
b) Customer Satisfaction:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
c) Business Relations/Responsiveness (ex: RFI responses, negotiations on change orders) Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
d) Timeliness (i.e., how well met project schedule) Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .