Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 163 KB Posted

Attached to
REPLENISH PIER REVETMENT LANDING RIP-RAP AT FORT C
Solicitation number
140P5426R0005
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for National Park Service solicitation 140P5426R0005 regarding the replenishment of pier revetment landing rip-rap at Fort Caroline National Memorial Site under ConOps East, South MABO. The questionnaire is to be completed by references who have worked with a contractor on similar services and submitted directly to Contracting Officer William Vazquez at william_vazquez@nps.gov no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on March 25, 2026. Responses must originate from corporate or government email accounts.

The questionnaire requests contract reference information including the contract number, value, period of performance, and brief description of items provided, along with contact details for the person completing the form. Evaluators must rate contractor performance across four primary assessment areas using a standardized five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable): overall ability to meet requirements; timeliness and ability to resolve issues; quality of work and task requirements fulfillment; and overall performance considering requirements, schedule, and price. Detailed evaluation definitions are provided for each rating level, with explanatory narratives requested for as many responses as possible to support the ratings. Additional pages may be attached if needed for expanded commentary.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_140P5426R0005_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Pier_USACOE_20230918-Permit_NWP-13.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Photos__Blueprints__and_Drawings.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0005.pdf PDF
Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation# 140P5426R0005

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov

Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, ConOps East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5426R0005 to Replenish Pier Revetment Landing Rip-Rap at Fort Caroline National Memorial Site. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov

Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on March 25, 2026. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

NAME OF CONTRACTOR:

Phone:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________

3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________

4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Company: __________________________________________________________

Title: __________________________________ Phone: _________________________________

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation:

Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Timeliness and Ability to Resolve Issues

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Issues

Quality of Work

The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.

Quality of Shipments

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
N/A
N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .