Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 178 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q301--Reference Laboratory Services - Detroit
- Solicitation number
- 36C25026Q0126
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Reference Laboratory Testing Services, issued as part of an RFQ process. The form is designed to capture detailed performance feedback from previous customers, with rating categories including transmission/connectivity to IT systems, IT support quality, startup time, test menus, turn-around times, specimen evaluation, critical result metrics, specimen pick-up time, and continuing education materials. The questionnaire uses a four-tier rating system (Superior, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, and Neutral) to evaluate vendor performance, and includes sections for identifying contract details, assessing strengths and weaknesses, and determining whether the customer would award another contract to the vendor. The form is intended to provide comprehensive insight into a vendor's past performance to support future contract award decisions in reference laboratory testing services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25026Q0126 0001_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| REVISED Price Cost Schedule - Detroit.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Purchase Card Procedures for VA and Contractor.pdf | ||
| QASP - Detroit Reference Lab.pdf | ||
| Service Contract Act WD 2015-4839 REV 29 EFF 12.03.2025 Wayne.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination Information - Detroit Reference Lab.pdf | ||
| Declining Balance Spreadsheet - Reference Labs - Detroit.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Certificate of Confidentiality.pdf | ||
| Non-Disclosure Agreement.pdf | ||
| 36C25026Q0126_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Price Cost Schedule - Detroit.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Reference Laboratory Testing Services
RFQ# ___________________________
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on reference laboratory testing services solicitation. Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to the vendor by promptly so the vendor can provide in their solicitation package.
If you have any questions about this request, please contact: Morgan.Stein@va.gov.
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. OFFEROR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: _____________________________________
2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________
CUSTOMER POINT OF CONTACT/EVALUATOR:
NAME: ___________________________________
TITLE: ___________________________________
PHONE NO: ___________________________________
3. Contract Number: ___________________________________
4. Contract Value: ___________________________________
5. Period of Performance: ___________________________________
6. Contract Type: ___________________________________
7. Complexity of Work:
____DIFFICULT ____ROUTINE
8. Brief Description of Your Contract Requirements:
mailto:Morgan.Stein@va.gov
PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATINGS
On the following pages, please summarize the offeror’s performance in each rating factors. Each factor has a set pf sub-factors with four possible confidence ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents experience with this offeror and indicate assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading.
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
RATING DEFINTION
Superior Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is highly likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
Satisfactory Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unsatisfactory Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is not likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the offeror, key personnel, or subcontractors. This is neither a negative nor positive assessment.
Superior Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Neutral
Transmission/Connectivity to your IT systems
Quality of IT Support
Startup Time from contract award to contract start date
Test Menus
Turn Around Times
Notification of Specimen Evaluation Viability
Metrics for Critical Results
Specimen Pick-Up Time
Continuing Education Materials (PACE, CME, and
CE)
1. Has this contract been partially terminated for default or convenience?
___ YES ___ Default ___Convenience
___ NO
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules – also include contract number, name, and phone number of Termination Contracting
Officer – TCO)
2. What was the Contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3. What was the Contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4. Would you award another contract to this contractor?
____ YES ___NO
COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the information in this form is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
SIGNED: ___________________________________________
TITLE: ___________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .