Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation# 140P5424R0008

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov

Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Con Ops East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5424R0008 to Repair Collapsed Storm Drain at Castillo de San Marcos National Monument. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov

Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 p.m. EST on July 24, 2024. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

NAME OF CONTRACTOR:

Phone: Fax:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________

2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________

3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________

4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Company: __________________________________________________________

Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________

E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.

5BEXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

0BVERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

1BSATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

2BMARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

3BUNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

4BNOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.

Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 6BN/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 7BN/A

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Issues

Question 4. Quality of Work

The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of Shipments

Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: