Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 193 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P5424R0019
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to Solicitation Number 140P5424R0019 for Emergency Repairs to the Engineering Officer's Quarters at Dry Tortugas National Park. The National Park Service is seeking contractor performance information from the recipient of this questionnaire, who is listed as a reference for the contractor. The questionnaire requests the recipient to rate the contractor's performance on factors such as meeting requirements, timeliness, quality of work, and overall performance. The questionnaire must be completed and returned to the Contracting Officer, William Vazquez, by 1:00 PM EST on July 08, 2024. The related federal contract opportunity is for the Rehabilitation of the Fort Jefferson Engineering Officer's Quarters at Dry Tortugas National Park, and is being issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Answers_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5424R0019_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5424R0019_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| 140P5424R0019_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5424R0019_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5424R0019.pdf | ||
| SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5424R0019
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Con Ops East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5424R0019 to Emergency Repairs to Engineering Officer’s Quarters at Dry Tortugas National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 PM EST on July 08, 2024. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
5BEXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
0BVERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
1BSATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
2BMARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
3BUNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
4BNOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.
Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 6BN/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 7BN/A
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Issues
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .