Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation No. 140P5424R0014

Please Complete this Questionnaire and Email to Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

We are currently preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Contracting Operations East, Solicitation Number: 140P5424R0014 for replacing the windows and doors at the Elliott Key Visitor Center located within Biscayne National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous or ongoing contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

This Questionnaire is due to Christian Sanabria no later than 04:00 PM EST on May 27, 2024. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

If you will be unavailable on May 27, 2024, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting Officer to contact.

Thank you.

POC / Alternate POC:

POC / Alternate POC Phone Number:

POC / Alternate POC Email Address:

NAME OF OFFEROR:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT REFERENCED

Contract or Identifying Number:

Contract Value:

Period of Performance:

Brief Description:

Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency / Company:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

EVALUATION

Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Evaluation Definitions: The following definitions should be used in assessing Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE

(N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.

Unable to provide assessment.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products timely?

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of Shipments

QUESTION 5: OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: