Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 485 KB Posted

Attached to
148TH Janitorial Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W50S6S-20-Q-0031
Issued by
Department of the Army Arizona Army National Guard

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 148TH Janitorial Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
W50S6S-20-Q-0031- Amendment 1.pdf PDF
W50S6S-20-Q-0031 Q-A - final.docx DOCX document
W50S6S-20-Q-0031- Combined Synopsis final.pdf PDF
WD 20155473 Rv10.docx DOCX document
148 PWS_BLDG 34 Janitorial Services.doc DOC document
CERT of 52.204-2425 26.pdf PDF
Reference_List.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information

A. Contractor’s name and address: __ _________________________________________

B. Point of Contact: _____________________________

C. Phone Number (with area code): _________ __________

D. Contract number: ________________________________________

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project: ___ _______________________________

F. ContractType:
Firm‐Fixed‐PriceIndefinite‐Delivery/IndefiniteQuantityTaskOrderCost‐Reimbursement

G. Contract Award Date: Scheduled Completion Date: _____________________________

H. Contract Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount: ____________________

I. Contractorbeingevaluatedperformedasthe:
PrimeContractorSubcontractorSupplieronthiscontract/order.

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

_________________________________ Organization:____________________________________
(TypedorPrintedName)

______________________ Address: _______________________________ (Title)

(EmailAddress)
PhoneNumber:_______________________________

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing the reference information shall not be disclosed.

Source Selection Sensitive

PERFORMANCERATINGQUESTIONNAIRE
(Contractortoforwardtotheirreferencesforcompletion)
(ThisQuestionnaire,whencompleted,shallbetreatedasSourceSelectionSensitiveinaccordance
withFAR3.104‐3andshallnotbedisclosedtoanyoneoutsidetheGovernment)
TheRATINGdefinitionsareasfollows:
EEXCEPTIONAL–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirementsandexceeded/exceedmany
requirementstotheorganization’sbenefit.Nocontractualperformanceproblemsfortheelementbeing
assessedhaveoccurredorifanyminorproblemsoccurredthecorrectiveactionstakenbythecontractor
werehighlyeffective.
VVERYGOOD–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirementsandexceeded/exceedssome
requirementstotheorganization’sbenefit.Thecontractualperformanceoftheelementbeingassessedwas
accomplishedwithsomeminorproblemsforwhichcorrectiveactionstakenbythecontractorwereeffective.
SSATISFACTORY–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirements.Thecontractualperformanceof
theelementbeingassessedwasaccomplishedwithsomeminorproblemsforwhichcorrectiveactionstaken
bythecontractorweresatisfactory.
MMARGINAL–Performancedidnot/doesnotmeetsomecontractualrequirements.Thecontractual
performanceoftheelementbeingassessedreflectsaseriousproblemforwhichthecontractorhasnotyet
identifiedcorrectiveactions,orthecontractor’sproposedactionsappearonlymarginallyeffective,orwere
notfullyimplemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY–Performancedidnot/doesnotmeetmostcontractualrequirementsandrecovery
isnotlikelyinatimelymanner.Thecontractualperformanceoftheelementbeingassessedcontainsserious
problem(s)forwhichthecontractor’scorrectiveactionswereineffectiveorwerenotimplementedtimely.

N NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable.

PERFORMANCERATINGQUESTIONNAIRE
(Contractortoforwardtotheirreferencesforcompletion)
(ThisQuestionnaire,whencompleted,shallbetreatedasSourceSelectionSensitiveinaccordance
withFAR3.104‐3andshallnotbedisclosedtoanyoneoutsidetheGovernment)

The contractor:

1 How efficient was the contractor in abiding by all Rules, Regulations, Laws, and Safety Standards?

2 Were you satisfied with the quality of service performed or items supplied?

3 How effective were the contractor’s quality control and/or inspection procedures?

4 How well did the contractor perform in a respect to timeliness and schedule?

5 How well did the contractor resolve Issues/

Problems/Customer Complaints?

6 How flexible, cooperative, reasonable was the contractor, particularly when faced with short‐notice mission changes or requirements changes?

7 How well was the contractorabletomaintaina
good relationship withagencycontractingand
technical/projectmanagementpersonnel?

8 How likely are you to award another contract to this contractor?

9 Wasthecontractoreverissuedacure or show cause
noticeunderthereferencedcontract?Ifyesexplain
outcomein‘remarks’ sectionbelow.

ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

**Please forward this questionnaire directly to the 162D Wing Contracting Office **

E‐MAIL: 162.WG.MSG.MSC@us.af.mil Subject: W50S6S-20-Q-0031 PPQ

Text8:
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Text16:
Text17:
Text18:
Text19:
Text20:
Check Box25: Off
Text26:
Text27:
Text28:
Text29:
Text30:
Text31:
Text32:
Text33:
Check Box1: Off
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
Text7:
Dropdown1: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown3: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown4: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown5: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown6: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown7: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown8: [Not Applicable]
Dropdown9: [Not At All Likely]
Dropdown10: [No]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .