Past Performance Questionnaire .docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETATION LANGUAGE SERVICES
Solicitation number
HT001425R0032
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation HT0014-25-R-0032, issued by the Defense Health Agency's Healthcare Contracting Division Northeast (HCD-NE) for Translation and Interpretation Language Services. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide language services at Walter National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) and Augusta T. Alexander Military Medical Center (ATAMMC), with quotes due by July 15, 2025. The evaluation will focus on past performance across three key areas: quality of services, timeliness of performance, and business relations, using an adjectival rating system ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional.

The procurement is structured as a commercial item acquisition under NAICS Code 541930 for Translation and Interpretation Services, targeting companies registered in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov). Potential offerors must be self-certified under the specified NAICS code and have a valid Unique Entity ID. The government will award the contract based on best value, considering price and other factors, with an emphasis on the contractor's ability to provide high-quality, timely, and professionally managed language translation and interpretation services for military medical facilities.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE HT0014-25-R-0032

To the Offeror’s Reference:

The Defense Health Agency's Contracting Activity (DHACA) , Healthcare Contracting Division Northeast (HCD-NE) is procuring Translation and Interpretation Language Services for various clinics at Walter National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) and Augusta T. Alexander Military Medical Center (ATAMMC). Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist this office’s evaluation of the Offeror’s past performance. A typed (preferred) or handwritten response is sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages.

Please provide an adjectival rating for the evaluation questions below and provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating.

Please complete this form no later than July 14, 2025, by 10:00 AM (EDT) and return it to the company that provided it to you for their submission to this DHA Contracting Office.

Thank you for your assistance in this source selection.

A. EVALUATED CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION:

Company/Organization Name being evaluated:

Cage Code:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email address:

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Title/Description:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number (if Applicable):

Status (i.e. On-going, complete):

Annual Contract Value

Total Contract Amount: (Total amount of base period of performance plus any option period(s) exercised to date)

Type of Contract (e.g. FFP, Cost, etc.):

Performance Period being evaluated:

Place of Performance:

Total Number of Full Time Employees employed:

Title of Position(s) provided by the Offeror

Was work with a:
Commercial_____ Fed Gov’t_____ Local/State Gov’t_____ entity.

C. CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE INFORMATION:

COR’s Name:

Telephone Number:

Email:

Evaluated Contractor Performed as:
Prime Contractor _______ or Sub Contractor ________

D. RATING INFORMATION:

RATING
DEFINITION
Exceptional (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Satisfactory (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (U)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A
Not applicable to the subject contract or requirement

E. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONS:

Quality of Services

Performance Rating

(1) The Contractor provided quality services that adhered to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of professional conduct.

(2) The Contractor provided quality personnel that met or exceeded the required qualifications.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort.

(4) The Contractor maintained an effective on-going Quality Control Plan to provide for monitoring, analyzing, and improving quality contract performance.

Please provide a rationale for your Quality of Services Rating (required for other than satisfactory rating): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Timeliness of Performance/Services

Performance Rating

(1) The Contractor successfully achieved fill-rates established by the contract.

(2) The labor turnover in personnel and other labor categories (to include contracted interpreters and translators) was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor Performance.

(3) The Contractor consistently demonstrated an ability to quickly recruit Interpreters on time to meet the Government’s needs.

(4) The Contractor demonstrated the ability to retain contractors to support contract/task order requirements so that work schedules would not be disrupted.

(5) The Contractor demonstrated the ability to plan for and provide replacement candidates to include pre-planned absences, unplanned illnesses, or an extended leave of absence.

Please provide a rationale for your Timeliness of Performance/Services Rating (required for other than satisfactory rating): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Business Relations

Performance Rating

(1) The Contractor had the ability to respond effectively to contract performance issues.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) was apprised of technical and cost issues.

(3) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective solutions to critical contract issues.

(4) The Contractor provided proactive and effective management of its subcontractors.

(5) The Contractor was able to resolve customer complaints quickly and effectively.

Please provide a rationale for your Business Relations Rating (required for other than satisfactory rating): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

F. OTHER:

(1) Was a cure notice_____; show cause notice_____; suspension of progress payments, and/or______ termination for default issued to this firm during performance of this contract? If you answered “Yes”, provide an explanation. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(2) Based upon the information you provided and using the definitions provided in the evaluation criteria above, please provide your Overall Rating:

Exceptional ______ Very Good ______ Satisfactory ______ Marginal ______ Unsatisfactory ______

COMMENTS: (ALL Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Very Good, or Exceptional Ratings require comments to support the same. Failure to provide comments may render the questionnaire void and may result in it in not being evaluated by the Government): _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: _________________________________________

Title: _______________________________________________

Telephone: __________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .